Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Najdorf VS Gligoric - Bled-1961
Najdorf VS Gligoric - Bled-1961
Najdorf – Gligorić
9 round, Bled International Tournament, 15th September 1961
th
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 0–0 5.Nf3 d6 6.0–0 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.Nc3 Nc7 9.a4
If immediately 9.Bf4, then also deserving attention is a pawn sacrifice: 9...b5 10.cxb5 Rb8 11.a4
a6 12.bxa6 Bxa6 (Najdorf-Gligorić, Mar del Plata 1965); or 11.Qd2 Nxb5 with good play
(Szabó-Gligorić, Leipzig 1960).
13.b3
This is stronger than 13.Ra2, as Korchnoi played against Khasin in one of the USSR
Championships, and against Gligorić in Buenos Aires in 1960. White’s plan is Ra3 and Na2
followed by b2–b4 with strong pressure on Black’s position. Therefore Black should undertake
energetic measures in the centre.
13...e5
13...e6 would have been too slow on account of 14.Na4.
XIIIIIIIIY
8-+lwq-trk+0
7+-sn-+pvlp0
6ptr-zp-snp+0
5+-zpPzp-+-0
4-+P+-vL-+0
3+PsN-+NzP-0
2-+-+PzPLzP0
1tR-+Q+RmK-0
xabcdefghy
14.dxe6
Another serious attempt to demonstrate the shortcomings of Black’s tactics could have been the
move 14.Bd2, not opening the position in the centre, after which Black’s knight on the queen’s
flank is activated. (Translator’s note: Interestingly, Najdorf later preferred this alternative against
Pietsch at the 1962 Capablanca Memorial tournament in Havana.)
14...Nxe6 15.Be3
15.Bd2 is seemingly more natural, but after this White feared the move 15...d5 with the
interesting continuation 16.Nxd5 Nxd5 17.Ba5!?, against which Black has several reliable replies.
(Translator’s note: Subsequently, the alternative 15.Na4!? was tried here. Thus: 15...Nxf4
16.Nxb6 and now: 16...Qxb6 17.gxf4 Nh5 18.Ra2 Nxf4 (Donner-Matanović, Utrecht 1961) or
16...Nxe2+ 17.Qxe2 Qxb6 (Marović-Janošević, Skopje 1970).)
17.Na4
The attack 17.Rd2 is repulsed by a counter-attack on the b3–pawn with the move 17...Qb6.
25...Bh6!
Strongest of all, since it maintains the better chances for Black. The white queen has to leave
the diagonal f4–b8, but in return White trades the displaced knight for the strong bishop.
26.Qxh6
Worse would have been 26.Qxf7+ Kh8 27.Qf6+ Bg7 28.Qf4 on account of 28...Rf8 and the
knight is lost. (Translator’s note: In fact, after 29.Nxc5 the knight is saved; whereas after the correct
28...Rc8! (29.Qg4 Rg8! 30.Nxc5 Qxe3+) the knight is indeed lost.)
29...Rc6 30.Ra5 Qc8 31.Qd5 h5 32.Ra1 Re6 33.e4 Kg7 34.Ra5 Qe8 35.Rxc5 Rxe4 36.Rc8!
Forcing the exchange of rooks and eliminating the danger that was threatening the white king.
40.Kg1 a4 41.c5
Agreed drawn. For instance: 41...Kf8 42.Qc3 Ke7 43.Qd4 etc.