XXX PROJECT

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT (HIRA)

0
REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED COMPANY
STATUS CODE : A= Issued For Comments, B= Issued For Approval, C= Approved For Construction, D= As Built,
INFO= For Information, ITB = Invitation To Bid
© This document is copyright.
No part may be reproduced or used without the written permission of Premier Oil

PREMIER OIL NATUNA SEA B.V.

Natuna Sea B.V.

Natuna Sea B.V.
DOCUMENT NO : REV STATUS

INFO
 ATTENDANCE LIST
Meeting Subject :

Date :
Chaired by :
Scribed by :
ATTENDANCE

No Name
1
ATTENDANCE LIST

ATTENDANCE

Designation
 SUMMARY HIRA ACTIONS

Rec no Action Action By Status Target Date

S

Remark
HAZARD ANALYSIS MEETING RECORD
No. Path
1 placement on deck
Pre-work
2 Shutdown Installation
3 Start up delay
Shutdown windows (19 - 24
October)
4 Support of DP Vessel
Installation Program by Conbit
5
methodology
6 Weather
7 Sequence of Flare Tip
Replacement-Installation
Associated work of Cable Tray
8 and Panel Junction Box
Installation
Associated Work of Piping
9
Modification
Concern
Installation equipment
Demolition of Angle Support
Hotwork
Not enough time
Unavailability of DP2 Vessel. Collision
Use of DP 1 Vessel in close
proximity of Platform
Rope access attachment
LRE Installation on Flare Tip
Access Platform
LRE Boom tied up (anchored) Equipment damage (Flare capable to handle 200 kg
to Flare Pipe Pipe), personnel injury Boom
Weather (severe wind
condition)
Weather (severe wave)
Old Flare Tip removal
- Lifting COG
- Lifting of new Flare Tip
- Lifting COG (incorrect
location)
No additional issue identified
No additional issue identified
Consequences /
Potential Hazard Safety Guarding System Rec. No Recommendation PIC Target No Tasks PIC for Task Remarks
1
Ensure structural check to be done prior to job in Conduct visual check
order to confirming the structural integrity of PLE at 18" piping and 2
auxiliaries other structural
member where the
Structural TA 12 September 2019 a PLE would attach Kusairi Use SI Inspector - Structural
Assurance will be validated by load test prior to
commencing the activity PM 19 October 2019
2
The angle support located on FTAP to be removed
prior to work commencement in order to remove
obstacle during flare tip replacement work
Conbit
No additional issue
identified
Start working at 6.0 on day-1. Conbit confirms they
6 days are considered only require 4 days to complete
sufficient
Agreed to use DP1 due to unavailability of DP2 Vessel.
Ensure the rope access deviceis attached properly
3 (integrity wise as well as equipment condition wise)
Personnel injury
The Flare Tip Access Platform
is designed to hande a total
load of 1 ton (weight of LRE
Equipment damage, 200 kg And 4 personnel)
personnel injury
Check and confirm the integrity of Flare Pipe prior to Achoring to structural member below grating is
Th 18" pipe is considered installation of LRE
4 considered 'would not be able to meet the shutdown
window duration'
Conbit to confirm whether 25 knots windspeed at Conbit
5 FTAP is acceptable (including RAT) General : 25 knots
Project delay
Project delay Hs: 1.5 m Significant wave: Hs 1.5 m
Dropped object - Horizontal orientation
- adjustable sling
- Lifting lugs etc.
To review lifting COG locations of the new Flare Tip Haris D.
Dropped object 6
4. HAZARD ANALYSIS MEETING RECORD
No. Path
1 prior to work commencement in order to remove
Pre-work
2 Shutdown Installation
3 Start up delay
Shutdown windows (19 - 24
October)
4 Support of DP Vessel
Installation Program by Conbit
5
methodology
6 Weather
7 Sequence of Flare Tip
Replacement-Installation
Associated work of Cable Tray
8 and Panel Junction Box
Installation
Associated Work of Piping
9
Modification
Concern
Installation equipment
placement on deck
Demolition of Angle Support
Hotwork
Not enough time
Unavailability of DP2 Vessel. Collision
Use of DP 1 Vessel in close
proximity of Platform
Rope access attachment
LRE Installation on Flare Tip
Access Platform
LRE Boom tied up (anchored) Equipment damage (Flare capable to handle 200 kg
to Flare Pipe Pipe), personnel injury Boom
Weather (severe wind
condition)
Weather (severe wave)
Old Flare Tip removal
- Lifting COG
- Lifting of new Flare Tip
- Lifting COG (incorrect
location)
No additional issue identified
No additional issue identified
Consequences /
Potential Hazard Safety Guarding System Rec. No Recommendation PIC Target No Tasks PIC for Task Target for Task Remarks
1
Ensure structural check to be done prior to job in Conduct visual inspection (plus NDT if
order to confirming the structural integrity of PLE required) at 18" piping and 2 other
auxiliaries structural member where the PLE would During shutdown
Structural TA 12 September 2019 a attach Kusairi day-1 Use SI Inspector - Structural
Assurance will be validated by load test prior to Conduct Static Load Test prior to using
commencing the activity PM 19 October 2019 a the PLE Conbit During shutdown Static Load Test procedure in place
2
The angle support located on FTAP to be removed
Conbit to do cold cutting on the Angle
obstacle during flare tip replacement work Support. Ensure respective tool is
Conbit a provided by Conbit Conbit During shutdown
b Prepare spare cold cutting tool on site Oki Prior to shutdown
No additional issue
identified
Start working at 6.0 on day-1. Conbit confirms they
6 days are considered only require 4 days to complete
sufficient
Agreed to use DP1 due to unavailability of DP2 Vessel.
Ensure the rope access deviceis attached properly
3 (integrity wise as well as equipment condition wise)
Personnel injury
The Flare Tip Access Platform
is designed to hande a total
load of 1 ton (weight of LRE
Equipment damage, 200 kg And 4 personnel)
personnel injury
Check and confirm the integrity of Flare Pipe prior to Achoring to structural member below grating is
Th 18" pipe is considered installation of LRE
4 considered 'would not be able to meet the shutdown
window duration'
Conbit to confirm whether 25 knots windspeed at Conbit a
Project delay
5 FTAP is acceptable (including RAT) TO ensure wind and wave criteria
included in the Procedure
CLOSED
Project delay Hs: 1.5 m Significant wave: Hs 1.5 m
Dropped object - Horizontal orientation
- adjustable sling
- Lifting lugs etc.
To review lifting COG locations of the new Flare Tip Haris D. a Haris D. Sep 6, 2019
Dropped object 6 Submit latest COG to Conbit
incorporating their previous comment
related with COG of new Flare Tip
4. HAZARD ANALYSIS MEETING RECORD
No. Path Concern
Readiness (additional medical test
required by Company (Threadmill)
1 already been complied with on UK and Norway Oil and Gas
Review of Personnel Readiness - Conbit Team
FTW
Review of Anoa Platform Structural Integrity Initial structural integrity
Pre-work Job prior to the Conbit Installation Temporary laydown of Conbit's
Methodology containers not within Cranes's limit
Conbit containers exceeding Crane Load
limitation
Limited space and deck capacity
3
Too big container
Load test Dynamic test (maximum load i.e 12
tonnes); 10 times up and down
4
Static test (8.3 tonnes)
5 Review of PLE Equipment Installation
A chance where RAT personnel may be
Simulatneous works between RAT and working in close proximity with
Conbit Lifting
suspended load which against Premier Conbit's special Golden Rules
Oil stipulation
6 RAT
Access blockage (back side of existing
LQ) may apply during assembly of PLE Personnel injury
and other critical liftings done by Conbit
Supply vessel by the Platform
7 Support of DP Vessel Weather (severe wind condition)
Weather (severe wave)
Deck Extension and Module Installation Works
Conbit Temporary Laydown (Lack of
laydown space)
8
Misalignment between brace and pin
Work interruption due to external
factor (e.g. emergency mustering
requirement from OIM)
Load swing towards Platform
Consequences /
Potential Hazard Safety Guarding System Rec. No Target Recommendation Actionee
Unaccepted MCU certificate
Consult with POI Doctor regarding additional MCU item
requirement (Treadmil), considering personnel MCU certificates
Associations
1 Sri Retna / Silvia
Collapse due the failure of existing POI Structural Integrity and Conbit
structural integrity
Conbit
Conbit to conduct second site visit to assure that current condition
still meet the previous structural study
2
Unable to locate Conbit's containers on Prepare lifting and laydown plan as to meet Crane and lifting radius
Main Deck 3 limitations
Conbit/Project
Unable to lift Conbit's containers onto Conbit's trolley
Main Deck
Unable to pull out equipment from
closed container (12.6 Ton loads) 4 Review and assess deck capacity during second site visit (trolley mo
Project
Lifting over the side of the existing LQ
area may impair the FW Monitor or
other equipment
Do the dynamic load testing gradually starting from 6.6 tonnes to
12.5 tonnes
No significant issue Procedure is in place 5
No significant issue Procedure is in place
When other means is not available, consult Premier Oil respective
Competent personnel authorities whether exception can be made to allow simultaneous
works between rope access work and PLE assembly/disassembly
Construction management
JRA
6
Discuss access restriction detail (when and where)during PLE
assembly/disassembly or associate liftings for the sake of personnel
7 safety Project/OIM
PTW
Project has to define Job Card for the work and discuss thoroughly
8 in JRA Project
Collision hazard DP 2 Vessel type
Escape strategy plan to be define if we miss to lift all stack the
modules.
9 Project
Project delay Max windspeed 25 knots
Project delay. Swaying of vessel affects Hs: 1 m for heavy lifts (> 10
establishment of lifting, whilst dynamic tonnes)
calculation was based on 1 m Hs Hs: 1.5 m for general lifts
Provide material management plan (options ) and rigging plan
during lifting by Conbit.
10
Project interruption due to difficulty to
store projjects material Develop logistic/ storage plan according to layouts of the deck and
vessel (incorporate layout of Vessel and lifting devices involved)
11
Verify the exact dimension/level of attachements points as
precision of brace length is essential. Failure to do so will lead to
project delay as in situ adjustment will take long time and
significant effort. Verification of dimensions to be done on site
Design using sophisticated Tool
Failure/difficulty to finalize brace
installation Shim plate is adjustable 12 Project
Dimension control
Quick hooking on chain block
Drop object leading to escalation
takes 10 minutes only
RAT personnel evacuation on Platform
mustering demand
Lifting arrangement prevents Verify lifting lug locations against PLE hook coordinates
Facility damage
load swing 13
4. HAZARD ANALYSIS MEETING RECORD
No. Path Concern
Readiness (additional medical test
required by Company (Threadmill)
1 (Treadmil), considering personnel MCU certificates already been complied
Review of Personnel Readiness - Conbit Team
FTW
Review of Anoa Platform Structural Integrity Initial structural integrity
Pre-work Job prior to the Conbit Installation Temporary laydown of Conbit's
Methodology containers not within Cranes's limit
Conbit containers exceeding Crane Load Unable to lift Conbit's containers onto
limitation
3 Limited space and deck capacity
Too big container
Load test Dynamic test (maximum load i.e 12
tonnes); 10 times up and down
4
Static test (8.3 tonnes)
5 Review of PLE Equipment Installation
Simulatneous works between RAT and working in close proximity with
Conbit Lifting
6 RAT
Access blockage (back side of existing
LQ) may apply during assembly of PLE Personnel injury
and other critical liftings done by Conbit
Supply vessel by the Platform
7 Support of DP Vessel Weather (severe wind condition)
Weather (severe wave)
Deck Extension and Module Installation Works
Conbit Temporary Laydown (Lack of
laydown space)
8
Misalignment between brace and pin
Work interruption due to external
factor (e.g. emergency mustering
requirement from OIM)
Load swing towards Platform
Consequences /
Potential Hazard
Unaccepted MCU certificate
Collapse due the failure of existing
structural integrity
Unable to locate Conbit's containers on
Main Deck
Conbit's trolley
Main Deck
Unable to pull out equipment from
closed container (12.6 Ton loads)
Lifting over the side of the existing LQ
area may impair the FW Monitor or
other equipment
No significant issue
No significant issue
Competent personnel
A chance where RAT personnel may be
Construction management
suspended load which against Premier
JRA
Conbit's special Golden Rules
Oil stipulation
Collision hazard
Project delay
Project delay. Swaying of vessel affects Hs: 1 m for heavy lifts (> 10
establishment of lifting, whilst dynamic tonnes)
calculation was based on 1 m Hs Hs: 1.5 m for general lifts
Project interruption due to difficulty to
store projjects material
Failure/difficulty to finalize brace
installation
Drop object leading to escalation
RAT personnel evacuation on Platform
mustering demand
Facility damage
Safety Guarding System
Procedure is in place
Procedure is in place
PTW
DP 2 Vessel type
Max windspeed 25 knots
Design
Shim plate is adjustable
Dimension control
Quick hooking on chain block
takes 10 minutes only
Lifting arrangement prevents
load swing
Rec. No Recommendation Actionee
Consult with POI Doctor regarding additional MCU item requirement
with on UK and Norway Oil and Gas Associations
1 Sri Retna / Silvia
POI Structural Integrity
and Conbit
Conbit
Conbit to conduct second site visit to assure that current condition still
meet the previous structural study
2
Prepare lifting and laydown plan as to meet Crane and lifting radius
3 limitations
Conbit/Project
4 Review and assess deck capacity during second site visit (trolley movement)
Project
Do the dynamic load testing gradually starting from 6.6 tonnes to 12.5
tonnes
5
When other means is not available, consult Premier Oil respective
authorities whether exception can be made to allow simultaneous works
between rope access work and PLE assembly/disassembly
6
Discuss access restriction detail (when and where)during PLE
assembly/disassembly or associate liftings for the sake of personnel safety
7 Project/OIM
Project has to define Job Card for the work and discuss thoroughly in JRA
8 Project
Escape strategy plan to be define if we miss to lift all stack the modules.
9 Project
Provide material management plan (options ) and rigging plan during
lifting by Conbit.
10
Develop logistic/ storage plan according to layouts of the deck and vessel
(incorporate layout of Vessel and lifting devices involved)
11
Verify the exact dimension/level of attachements points as precision of
brace length is essential. Failure to do so will lead to project delay as in situ
adjustment will take long time and significant effort. Verification of
12 dimensions to be done on site using sophisticated Tool Project
Verify lifting lug locations against PLE hook coordinates
13
 HIRA FOR XXX
Date :

Consequences / Safety Guarding

Rev. No. Concern Potential Hazard System Rec. No Recommendation Actionee Remark Status