Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Progress in Electromagnetics Research, PIER 52, 173-183, 2005
Progress in Electromagnetics Research, PIER 52, 173-183, 2005
K. W. Leung
Department of Electronic Engineering
City University of Hong Kong
Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
H. W. Yang
Department of Communication Engineering
Nanjing University of Science & Technology
Nanjing 210094, P. R. China
1 Introduction
2 Formulation
3 Numerical Results
4 Conclusions
Acknowledgment
References
174 Qian et al.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. FORMULATION
For this paper, we will use the cold plasma approximation and the
complex permittivity ε(ω) and susceptibility χ(ω) of plasma can be
described as
ωp2
ε(ω) = ε0 1+ = ε0 (1 + χ(ω)) (1)
ω(jvc − ω)
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 52, 2005 175
3. NUMERICAL RESULTS
-20
|R| (dB)
-30
-40
-50
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Frequency (GHz)
h3
h2
Plasma sheath
εr
h1
W
x z
g L
y d
Wf
ε r
line and the patch antenna [6]. The RT/Duroid 5870 substrate with
relative dielectric constant εr = 2.33, loss tangent tan δ = 0.0012
and thickness h1 = 0.787 mm is used. The computational parameters
used in the FDTD analysis are as follows: ∆x = 0.2625 mm, ∆y =
0.762 mm, ∆z = 0.4075 mm, ∆t = ∆x/(2c), L = 16.3 mm, W = 25.1
5 mm, Wf = 2.286 mm, d = 4.075 mm, and g = 0.762 mm. It should be
pointed out that the dominant mode of this antenna is T M001 x mode.
The return loss of the typical microstrip patch antenna (h2 =
0 mm) as a function of frequency with/without the plasma layer is
given in Figure 3. It can be found that the resonant frequency of
the uncovered antenna (h3 = 0 mm) is about 5.75 GHz. However, the
resonant frequency of the covered antenna is about 6.06 GHz with the
plasma layer h3 = 0.525 mm, fp = 12 GHz and vc = 10 Ghz. The
deviation of resonant frequency relative to the uncovered case is 5.4
percent. It can also be inferred that the higher the plasma frequency
fp , the stronger the influence of plasma layer on the resonant frequency
of the patch antenna. This can be reasonably explained as follows:
at relatively low frequencies, the plasma layer actually becomes a
metallic thin film, and at higher frequencies, it becomes transparent to
electromagnetic waves. The shift of resonant frequency may seriously
178 Qian et al.
0
-10
Return loss (dB)
-20
h 3 = 0mm
f p = 1GHz
-30 f p = 6GHz
f p = 12GHz
-40
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
Frequency (GHz)
200
h 3 = 0mm
50
0
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
Frequency (GHz)
(a)
200
h 3 = 0mm
150
Input reactance (Ohms)
f p = 1GHz
f p = 6GHz
100 f p = 12GHz
50
-50
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
Frequency (GHz)
(b)
-10
-5
Return loss (dB)
-10
-15
d = 4.075mm
-20 d = 3.26mm
-25 d = 2.445mm
-30
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
Frequency (GHz)
2π π
Prad = U (θ, φ) sin θdθdφ, (9)
0 0
Prad
η = . (10)
Pin
The effect of the plasma sheath on the microstrip patch antenna is
illustrated in Figure 7. It can be inferred that the plasma layer mainly
degrades the radiation efficiency and hardly changes the directivity.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 52, 2005 181
8
Gain (dB) 4
-4
h 2=0mm, h 3=0mm
h 2=0.787mm, h 3=0mm
-8
h 2=0mm, h 3=0.525mm, f p =12GHz, v c =10GHz
is
h 2=0.787mm, h 3=0.525mm, f p =12GHz, v c =10GHz
-12
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
Frequency (GHz)
Figure 7. The gain versus the frequency for plasma covered microstrip
patch antenna.
4. CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES