Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2083134X - Materials Science-Poland
(2083134X - Materials Science-Poland
(2083134X - Materials Science-Poland
427-434
http://www.materialsscience.pwr.wroc.pl/
DOI: 10.1515/msp-2018-0037
1 Laboratoire des Composants Actifs et Matériaux (LCAM), Université Larbi Ben M’Hidi, Oum el Bouaghi 04000, Algieria
2 Laboratoire des Matériaux et Structures des Systèmes Electromécaniques et leur Fiabilité (LMSSEF),
Université Larbi Ben M’Hidi, Oum el Bouaghi 04000, Algieria
3 Laboratoire de Cristallographie, Université de Constantine 1, Constantine 25000, Algieria
Heavily In doped zinc oxide (IZO) thin films were deposited on glass substrates by dip-coating method with different
concentrations of indium. The effect of heavy In doping on the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of
ZnO was discussed on the basis of XRD, AFM, UV-Vis spectra and Hall effect measurements. The diffraction patterns of
all deposited films were indexed to the ZnO wurtzite structure. However, high In doping damaged the films crystallinity. The
highest optical transmittance observed in the visible region (>93 %) exceeded that of ITO: the absolute rival of the most
commercial TCOs. The grain size significantly decreased from 140 nm for undoped ZnO to 17.1 nm for IZO with the greatest
In ratio. The roughness decreased with increasing In atomic ratio, indicating an improvement in the surface quality. Among all
synthesized films, the sample obtained with 11 at.% indium showed the best TCO properties: the highest transmittance (93.5 %)
and the lowest resistivity (0.41 Ωcm) with a carrier concentration of 2.4 × 1017 cm−3 . These results could be a promising
solution for possible photonic and optoelectronic applications.
Keywords: ZnO:In; dip coating; resistivity; transparency; crystallinity
© 2018. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
428 S. B ENZITOUNI et al.
greater than 10 %, on the structural, morphologi- the samples were referenced ZO for undoped ZnO
cal, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide and IZO11, IZO16 and IZO33 respectively for the
thin films obtained by dip-coating sol-gel method. In doped ZnO.
The amount of consumed indium is after all very
low compared to those used to obtain indium tin 2.3. Analysis techniques
oxide (ITO). The structural characterization of the films
was performed using X-ray diffractometer (Bruker
2. Experimental AXS-8D) with a CuKα radiation (1.54056 Å), op-
erating at 45 kV and 40 mA. The surface morphol-
2.1. Materials ogy was studied using A100 atomic force micro-
scope of APE Research with Gwyddion 2.34 soft-
Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3 COO)2 ·2H2 O, ware. Optical properties were investigated using a
98 % purity), indium nitrate trihydrate spectrophotometer UV-Vis (Jasko V-630). Electri-
(In(NO3 )3 ·3H2 O, 99.9 % purity), absolute ethanol cal characterization of the films was realized using
(C2 H5 OH, 99.8 % purity), and monoethanolamine the Hall measurement system (HMS-3000).
(NH2 CH2 CH2 OH, 99 % purity) purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich, were used to prepare the highly
In-doped ZnO thin films. 3. Results and discussion
3.1. Structural properties
2.2. Preparation of In-doped ZnO thin
films The X-ray diffraction patterns of undoped ZnO
and IZO films deposited on glass substrates with
Highly In-doped ZnO (IZO) thin films were different indium atomic ratios are shown in Fig. 1.
prepared by sol-gel dip-coating method as reported XRD analysis results are reported in Table 1.
in previous works [33, 34] using zinc acetate di- The diffraction peaks of all the samples were in-
hydrate and indium nitrate trihydrate as starting dexed to hexagonal wurtzite ZnO, and no peak of
materials. These materials were dissolved in abso- other crystalline phase was detected despite the
lute ethanol to obtain a total molarity of 0.2. Mo- high concentration of indium introduced. The un-
noethanolamine (MEA) was added to the mixture doped ZnO films yield a sharp peak at 34.42°,
as a stabilizer. The molar ratio of MEA to zinc ac- which is attributed to (0 0 2) plane (JCPDS File
etate was maintained at 1. To obtain a clear and No. 36-1451) [35], indicating a c-axis preferred
homogeneous solution, the mixture was stirred at orientation due to self-texturing phenomenon fre-
60 °C for 2 h. The solution was usually prepared quently observed in ZnO films [16, 17, 27]. More-
one day before using. The glass substrates were over, the (0 0 2) diffraction peak intensities of
cleaned in an ultrasonic bath in acetone, ethanol doped ZnO films decreased rapidly with increas-
and distilled water successively. The layers were ing atomic ratio x and the amorphous background
deposited by immersing a substrate in the solution appeared. The mean crystallite size, calculated us-
for 2 min (Dip-coater KSVDCX2), and then dried ing Sherrer formula (equation 1), decreased with
at high temperature of 300 °C for 4 min in an elec- increasing In ratio (Table 1). All this indicates that
tric furnace (Nabertherm B-180). The procedure an excess in indium doping ratio deteriorates the
from immersing to drying was repeated 20 times, crystallinity of the films. Thambidurai et al. [36] re-
the films were then annealed at 500 °C for 2 h. To ported similar results in their work devoted to IZO
investigate the effect of high In doping concentra- thin films (with 10.48 % In) obtained by sol-gel
tion on the physical properties of ZnO, IZO thin technique. This behavior may be due to the differ-
films were fabricated at several In atomic ratios ence in ionic radius between zinc (Zn2+ = 0.74 Å)
(1/9, 1/6, and 1/3) corresponding, respectively, to and indium (In3+ = 0.80 Å) which reduces
11 at.%, 16 at.% and 33 at.% of indium. Therefore, the incorporation of indium into ZnO matrix
High transparency and conductivity of heavily In-doped ZnO thin films. . . 429
Table 1. XRD patterns analysis: position, intensity and FWHM of (0 0 2) peak as well as the d-spacing, the
hexagonal parameter c and the crystallites size D.
Samples 2θ002 [°] I002 [a.u] β002 [°] d002 [Å] c [Å] D [nm]
ZO 34.552 23780 0.360 2.593 5.187 23.1
IZO11 34.202 398 1.034 2.619 5.238 9.3
IZO16 33.982 102 1.887 2.642 5.285 5.1
IZO33 33.775 45 – 2.660 5.321 –
α = α0 exp(hυ/EU ) (4)
Urbach Roughness
Atomic ratio Optical band Film thickness Grain size
Samples energy RMS
x = In/Zn gap Eg [eV] d [nm] D [nm]
EU [meV] [nm]
ZO 0 3.26 349 488 3.1 140
IZO11 0.11 3.16 377 497 1.6 33.1
IZO16 0.16 3.12 386 523 1.2 20.6
IZO33 0.33 3.05 392 716 1.1 17.1
with increasing In atomic ratio, but it stayed al- atoms become electrically inactive, and hinder
most constant with increasing In atomic ratio from the mobility of electrons, increasing the resistiv-
0.11 to 0.33. This signifies that the solid solu- ity of IZO films [47]. When comparing the resis-
bility of indium in ZnO was reached. Contrary tivity reported here to similar works, it is lower
to electron concentration, the mobility decreased than 0.84 Ω·cm obtained by Benhaliliba et al. [48]
with increasing In atomic ratio, in agreement with however Lim et al. [29] measured a resistivity of
the growing disorder deduced from Urbach energy 0.06 Ω·cm along a nanowire of 1.03 µm length. The
analysis, the combination of these two effects in resistivity measured in our case is lateral therefore
Ohm law gave a minimum resistivity of 0.41 Ω·cm takes into account the effect of grain boundaries.
at 11 % In concentration. However, an increase in
In atomic ratio from 0.11 to 0.33 led to an increase
the resistivity.
4. Conclusions
In this work, heavily indium doped ZnO thin
films have been prepared by the sol-gel dip-coating
method using zinc acetate and indium nitrate as
precursors. The effect of high In doping on the
physical properties of ZnO was studied in details.
XRD results indicated that the crystallinity was
much deteriorated with increasing In atomic ratio
x. This stress was due to the difference between ion
radius of zinc and indium as well as the high level
of doping generating indium segregation at the
grain boundaries which hindered the lateral growth
of the crystallites. The AFM investigation indicated
that all IZO samples present capillary structures,
Fig. 5. Resistivity ρ, carrier concentration n and mobil- leading to improving the photons flow through the
ity µ of IZO thin films with different In atomic films, which explains the very high recorded trans-
ratio x. mittance. Among all synthesized samples, 11 % In
doped ZnO have the highest transmittance (93.5 %)
According to previous studies [45, 46], it is
and the lowest resistivity (0.41 Ω·cm) which results
commonly accepted that electrons are generated
in the best TCO properties.
by ionization of interstitial zinc atoms and oxy-
gen vacancies in undoped ZnO to which an ex-
Acknowledgements
cess of electrons is added by the trivalent dop-
Laboratoire des Composants Actifs et Matériaux
ing atoms substituting Zn [47]. Besides, similar (LCAM), Université Larbi Ben M’Hidi, Oum el Bouaghi
results [30, 31] show that the excess of indium 04000, Algieria, has supported this work. The au-
is segregated in grain boundaries, where these thors are grateful to the Algerian MESRS (Ministère
High transparency and conductivity of heavily In-doped ZnO thin films. . . 433
de L’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique) [20] L I F., D ING Y., G AO P., X IN X., WANG Z.L., Angew.
for the financial support. S. Benzitouni thanks particu- Chem. Int. Ed., 43 (2004), 5238.
larly M. Toubane (Research Unit of Materials, Processes [21] S HEN G.Z., BANDO Y., L IU B.D., G OLBERG D., L EE
and Environment, URMPE-Boumerdes-Algérie) for XRD C.J., Adv. Funct. Mater., 16 (2006), 410.
measurements. [22] F ENG X.Y., WANG Z., Z HANG C.W., WANG P.J.,
Physica E, 54 (2013), 144.
References [23] WAUGH M.R., H YETT G., PARKIN I.P., Chem. Vap.
[1] L IM J.H., K ANG C.K., K IM K.K., PARK I.K., Depos., 14 (2008), 366.
H WANG D.K., PARK S.J., Adv. Mater., 18 (2006), 2720. [24] U MAR A., K ARUNAGARAN B., S UH E.K., H AHN
[2] PARK Y.J., S ONG H., KO K.B., RYU B.D., C UONG Y.B., Nanotechnology, 17 (2006), 4072.
T.V., H ONG C.H., J. Nanomater., 2016 (2016), ID [25] PARK T.E., K IM D.C., KONG B.H., C HO H.K., J. Ko-
7947623 (6). rean Phys. Soc., 45 (2004), S0697.
[26] L EHRAKI N., A IDA M.S., A BED S., ATTAF N.,
[3] D JESSAS K., B OUCHAMA I., G AUFFIER J.L., B E -
P OULAIN M., Curr. Appl. Phys., 12 (2012), 1283.
NAYADI Z., Thin Solid Films, 555 (2014), 28.
[27] BAO D., G U H., K UANG A., Thin Solid Films, 312
[4] S YU Y.K., T INGARE Y., L IN S.Y., Y EH C.Y., W U
(1998), 37.
J.J., Molecules, 21 (2016), 1025.
[28] H AFDALLAH A., YANINEB F., A IDA M.S., ATTAF N.,
[5] D ILONARDO E., P ENZA M., A LVISI M.,
J. Alloy. Compd., 509 (2011), 7267.
D IFRANCO C., PALMISANO F., T ORSI L., C IOFFI N.,
[29] L IM S.Y., B RAHMA S., L IU C.P., WANG R.C.,
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 7 (2016), 22.
H UANG J.L., Thin Solid Films, 549 (2013), 165.
[6] S AIDANI T., Z AABAT M., A IDA M.S., B OUDINE B.,
[30] C HEN K.J., H UNG F.Y., C HANG S.J., H U Z.S., Appl.
Superlattice. Microst., 88 (2015), 315.
Surf. Sci., 255 (2009), 6308.
[7] D OBRUCKA R., D ŁUGASZEWSKA J., Saudi J. Biol. [31] C AGLAR M., I LICAN S., C AGLAR Y., Thin Solid Films,
Sci., 23 (2016), 517. 517 (2009), 5023.
[8] C ADAFAL CH., G AZQUEZ G., L EI S., G EORGE A., [32] L EE S.Y., PARK B.O., Thin Solid Films, 484 (2005),
G ULLAPALLI H., B OUKAMP B.A., A JAYAN P.M., 184.
T EN E LSHOF J.E., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 21 [33] S AIDANI T., Z AABAT M., A IDA M.S., BARILLE R.,
(2016), 13466. A LMOHAMED Y., J. Mater. Electron., 28 (2017), 9252.
[9] L IU J., F ERNANDEZ -S ERRA M.V., A LLEN P.A., Phys. [34] S AIDANI T., Z AABAT M., A IDA M.S., B ENABOUD A.,
Rev. B, 93 (2016), 081205(R). B ENZITOUNI S., B OUDINE A., Superlattice. Microst.,
[10] WANG Z.L., MRS Bull., 37 (2012), 814. 75 (2014), 47.
[11] B ORUAH B.D., M ISRA A., ACS Appl. Mater. Inter- [35] Powder Diffraction File Data Card 5-644, 3cPDS Inter-
faces, 8 (2016), 18182. national Center for Diffraction Data, Swartmore, PA.
[12] J IN Z., Z HOU Q., C HEN Y., M AO P., L I H., L IU H., [36] T HAMBIDURAI M., K IM J.Y., K ANG C.M.,
WANG J., Y ULIANG L., Adv. Mater., 28 (2016), 3697. M UTHUKUMARASAMY N., S ONG H.J., S ONG J.,
[13] L IU H., AVRUTIN V., I ZYUMSKAYA N., Ö ZGÜR Ü., KO Y, V ELAUTHAPILLAI D., L EE C., Renew. Energy,
M ORKOÇ H., Superlattice. Microst., 48 (2010), 458. 66 (2014), 433.
[14] J UN M.C., PARK S.U., KOH J.H., Nanoscale Res. [37] N OLAN M.G., H AMILTON J.A., B RIEN S.O,
Lett., 7 (2012), 639. B RUNO G., P EREIRAD L., F ORTUNATOD E., J.
[15] M INAMI T., S ATO H., NANTO H., TAKATA S., Jpn. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 219 (2011), 10.
Appl. Phys., 24 (1985), L781. [38] R AMAMOORTHY K., K UMAR K., C HANDRAMO -
[16] L IU C., M ASUDA Y., W U Y, TAKAI O., Thin Solid HAN R., S ANKARANARAYANANA K., S ARA -
Films, 503 (2006), 110. VANAN R., K ITYK I.V., R AMASAMY P., Opt.
[17] YANG J.H., Z HENG J.H., Z HAI H.J., YANG L.L., Commun., 262 (2006), 91.
L IU L., G AO M., Cryst. Res. Technol., 44 (2009), 619. [39] K AUR G., M ITRA A., YADAV K.L., Mater. Int., 25
[18] KOU H., J IA L., WANG C., Carbon, 50 (2012), 3522. (2015), 12.
[19] W U X., Q U F., Z HANG X., C AI W., S HEN G., J. Alloy. [40] H OGGAS K., N OUVEAU C., D JELLOUL A., B OUOUD -
Compd., 486 (2009), 13. INA M., Appl. Phys. A, 120 (2015), 745.
434 S. B ENZITOUNI et al.
[41] F OROUHI A.R., B LOOMER I., Phys. Rev. B, 34 (1986), [47] B ENOUIS C.E., B ENHALILIBA M., J UAREZ A.S.,
7018. A IDA M.S., C HAMID F., YAKUPHANOGLUE F., J. Al-
[42] PANKOVE J.I., Optical Processes in Semiconductors, loy. Compd., 490 (2010), 62.
Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1971. [48] B ENHALILIBA M., B ENOUIS C.E., M OUFFAK Z.,
[43] TAUC J., Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors, O CAK Y.S., T IBURCI O., S ILVER A., A IDA M.S.,
Plenum Press, New York, 1974. G ARCIA A.A., TAVIRA A., S ANCHEZ J UAREZ A., Su-
[44] O’L EARY S.K., Z UKOTYNSKI S., P ERZ J.M., J. Non- perlattice. Microst., 63 (2013), 228.
Cryst. Solids, 210 (1997), 249.
[45] PARK Y. R., K IM E. K., J UNG D., PARK T. S., K IM
Y.S., Appl. Surf. Sci., 254 (2008), 2250.
[46] C HEN K.J., FANG T.H., H UNG F.Y., J I L.W., C HANG
S.J., YOUNG S.J., H SIAO Y.J., Appl. Surf. Sci., 254 Received 2017-06-27
(2008), 5791. Accepted 2018-03-24