Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dan Glimne Motor Tuning 2 - MC Jan-70
Dan Glimne Motor Tuning 2 - MC Jan-70
Dan Glimne Motor Tuning 2 - MC Jan-70
Cars 2
MOTOR
TUNING
the complete story
PRESENTED FREE
WITH THE JANUARY 1970 ISSUE OF MODEL CARS
2
CH AM PIO N
OF EUROPE
X
w
GO APE
FOR
CHAMPION!
B .I.C .O ., 2 L a n c a s te r R oad, W.11
T e le p h o n e N o. 0 1 - 2 2 9 1601
European D istrib u to rs for the p ro d u c ts o f
C ham pion o f Cham blee
3
s e lf flu x in g w ire
FOR ALL MODEL CARS
AND TRAINS, Etc.
on i oz. Reels
28-36 swg, 26-33 B/S
Reels 2/6d. each.
Packing and postage 6d.,
three or more 2/- post free.
Also High Temperature Wire.
4/6d. per reel.
N. J. E L E C T R IC , 1587 LO N D O N RO AD,
L E IG H -O N -S E A . Telephone: Southend 73694
1 1 m a I C ? 373 H IG H ST . N O R T H . M A N O R P A R K
W a l l M o d e l s L O N D O N E.12 01-472 2508
DON'T FORGET!
Binders for this series of handbooks, in handsomo grocn card with
gold lettering and uniquo clip systom, aro still available, price
2/6d. inc. postage.
4
ELTHAM MODELS
Ian & Ray Skilling
6
Model Cars
MOTOR
TUNING
• 1969/70 Contents
Prepared by 6. THE B A S IC S OF REW IN D IN G 8
Dan Glimne 7. CO N N ECTIO N T YPES 11
for Mode! Cars
readers 8. M ULTIPLE W IN D S 12
9. THE M ET A L S T A C K 15
10. TIM IN G 20
11. LIM IT A T IO N S 21
12. SETTING UP A M O TO R 24
13. M A T E R IA L A N D P A R T S 26
14. A R M A T U R E PREPARATIO N 31
HIGH-G S T R E S S 36
Part Two of a three-part series
Publishers of
Aeromodcller. Model Boats. Model Cars, Model Engineer, Model
Railway Nows. Meccano Magazine, Radio Control Models & Electronics,
Scale Models, Plans, Technical Books, etc.
7
F o lk s , ste p righ t up an d take a look - the w in d they have been k id d in g about
lor ye ars - ye s. o n e tu rn of coat h an g e r w ire. T h e w ire, cut from an actual coat
hanger, i s steel o f 2.5 m m . (or abou t n u m be r 10 A W G ) in diam eter. In su la tio n
is b y a co at of e p o xy d ire ctly o n the w ire, and a bit o f deft b e n d in g and filing
w a s req uired to fit the sin g le turn. N o. it w o n 't ru n - there are n o m a g n e ts
stro n g e n o u g h - bu t it w ill m elt e n db e ll and c o m in les s tim e than it tak es to
read th is line. T h is arm is o ne in the lin e of ‘c ir c u s ' w in d s w e h a v e m a d e over
the y ears. P erh a p s they w o u ld m a k e for an intere stin g article.
6 the basics of
rewinding
Behind every great car, there is a bit of philosophy. During a recent
race, I had the opportunity of watching a driver 'slugging it out' with
his car, powered by a 24-gauge Cukras Mura. Now this is a good
motor - but not for the 1/32nd Ford Escort it w as installed in . Per
formance w as really magnificent, the car w as an absolute blur down
the main straight. But, oh, for the cornering . . . the slightest move
ment on the controller produced violent reactions, totally unsuitable
for the poor little Escort. After a few minutes of fascinated watching
on my part, the car finally crashed.
The moral of this is to suit your performance to the circumstances.
The object of motor tuning is not just producing the hottest motor
possible, but rather the best for a particular car and track. You might
want a motor with the power band spread wide for a track with both
fast and slow sections . . . or a real good bottom end 'punch' for
getting out of those tight corners. The treatment of the armature will
offer you just these possibilities of 'customizing' your performance, if
you know how. During the following chapters, I will try to explain
most of the variables in the equation of armature performance -
though the editor will wince at the number of pages used for this. I
will also briefly cover the delicate interplay between armature and
magnets.
This should prove of special value to all you EC R A racers: most of
the high-quality motors emanating from the U.S. are more suited for
1/24 commercial racing than 1/32 club racing, with the result that the
'home-brew' motors will often be winners in the latter case. For the
1/24 commercial, it can often be a toss-up whether to use a home-
wound or a factory armature. The magnets and case should always
be individually treated, how ever!
8
F ig u re 11: W ir e table D iam ete r siz e s are g iv en in d e c im al in c h e s A ll figure s
refer to u n in s u la ted w ire . N o te that the three-step rule for d o u b le w in d s refe rs
to A W G only.
Num ber AW G. SW G N u m b er AW G. SW G
w ir e d ia . w ire dia. w ire dia. w ire dia.
20 0.0319 0.0360 28 126 148
21 285 320 29 112 136
22 253 280 30 100 124
23 225 240 31 089 116
24 201 220 32 079 106
25 179 200 33 071 100
26 160 180 34 063 092
27 142 164 35 056 064
And now for the armature. W e differ between two main areas for
modifications:
(1) the wind: wire, size, turns, connection types;
(2) the metal sta ck : diameter, plates, skewing, timing, treatment.
First, the wind. Before we take the plunge I want to point out that
we, because of the strong American influence, are using two system s
for measuring the wire thickness, A W G (American Wire Gauge) and
S W G (British Standard Wire Gauge). I have included a table for
comparison, with the wire numbers and their thickness (diameter) in
inches. I hope you will forgive me if I, from now on, stick to AW G,
but the table should help you if you prefer to work with SW G. Abbre
viation: 35 of 26 will mean 35 turns of number 26 (A W G ) wire, and
so on.
When considering what wind to use, we must take into account all
the circumstances: car weight, gearing, size of track, power source,
etc. There is no 'best wind', because then we would all wind like that
and the fun would be gone, right?
A few rules e x ist:
(1) Increasing the number of turns (using the same wire size)
will give more torque, better brakes, less heat and less
R PM 's, while decreasing the number of turns will give the
opposite results.
(2) Increasing the wire size (using the same number of turns)
will give more torque, horsepower and R P M 's, but more
heat and slower brakes.
Now. these rules are not always valid, only within the limits that
automatically exist in any motor, due to design and materials. Read
that line over again, to make sure.
Example 1: you have Mabuchi 16D , stock with the exception of the
armature, which you have wound with 15 of 23 (of course unusable
and dangerous here, but only used for enlightening example). If you
change the wind to 15 of 22 (we are on rule 2), you will find that you
will actually have less torque and horsepower (though more R P M 's).
but more - a lot more - heat and slower brakes. This is because the
armature material and design in conjunction with the weak stock
magnets can no longer cope with these gauge winds. At the end of
the chapter on armatures I will return to these design limitations.
Thus, part of rule 2 does not always ap p ly: at some point on the
gauge scale - I should imagine it lies around number 25 A W G for the
aforementioned Mabuchi - we reach the limit, and torque and horse
power figures start to go down again. At some other point further
down the line, we will also reach the RPM limit, and RPM will also
start to go down. I have not tested this, but the RPM limit should
on the Mabuchi lie around 17 or 19 AW G , this on a quick estimation.
9
The other part of rule 2 will still hold, though: increasing the wire
thickness will always give increased heat and decreased brakes.
For those of you who still have chapter 2 fresh in mind and are
wondering how R P M 's can increase when both torque and horse
power go down, the explanation is that these diagram curves are
altering their distribution, so that the torque and horsepower have
gone down on the middle and bottom of the new range (where it
should be useful with more of it instead) but increased slightly on
the top end (which w e seldom have any use for).
M ore on rule 1: when we start to decrease the number of turns
(using the same wire size), torque will go down and R P M 's rise, as I
said. This, too, has a limit. If the number of turns becomes too small,
the R P M 's will also start to drop - rather sharply. If we get back and
instead start to increase the number of turns, R P M 's will go down
and torque will increase - also to a certain point. If we now put on
more turns, torque will go down.
Efficiency - maximum available horsepower - will come at a number
of turns somewhere between the two others. Thus, for a very small
number of turns, we will have maximum R P M 's. Put on a few more
turns, and the motor will develop more horsepower for more speed.
Put on even more turns, and we will get maximum torque for ripping
off the starting line.
Example 2: note that motor characteristics will drastically alter with
the number of turns. W e will assume that w e have another Mabuchi
16D, this time winding it with 28 A W G wire. Now if we only put on,
say, 10 turns of this wire and put the motor in a car, we will find that
it will be slow off the line and have a long, slow, even acceleration up
to its top speed, which won't be very much. If we instead put on 50
turns of the 28 wire, the car will be much quicker in the start and
have a better top speed, but acceleration will start getting noticeably
quicker in the bottom and middle range than the top. Finally, if we go
all out and cram on 75 turns of the 28 A W G (yes, it actually is
possible on a 16D armature), our motor will be the 'touch and g o '
type, with fantastic punch off the line and out of slow corners, but
top speed will have gone down, and acceleration out of a fast corner
will actually be slow, no pun intended.
Summing this up. Using more turns will make for a more and more
uneven acceleration distribution, with the motor getting rather jerky
in the bottom end. The intelligent reader will at once realize that the
faster the track is, the less the number of turns - up to a point, of
course. However, there are many more w ays than this of setting up
the motor for a fast track!
Here as for rule 2. though, the latter part will remain the sa m e : in
creasing the number of turns will always give less heat and more
brakes. (Yes. torque and brakes are often connected, and an increase
in one is often accompanied by an increase in the other.) Applying
this on example 2, our 10 of 28 will become awfully hot in running
and brakes will be as bad as the acceleration. At the other end of the
scale, our 75 of 28 will run cool and have instant braking in addition
to its jump out of slow turns, just right for the tight, short-straight
track - if you can drive the thing, it will be rather of the on/off
variety. The 50 of 28 will be 'softer' with a more widespread power
band, making it more suited for faster tracks and easier to drive.
Getting the hang of it now?
There is yet another rule that deserves mentioning :
(3) an armature wound with thinner wire will rev up and shut
off quicker than one wound with thicker wire.
10
P rin c ip a l c o n n e c tio n of a cro ss w in d . N ote s h o rt-c irc u itin g r isk w he re w ire s
c ro ss.
★ ★ ★ ★
7 connection types
So far, we have only discussed the wind itself, but not how the
wires should be connected to the commutator.
All common slot racing motors are delta connected, which can be
performed in one of two w a y s : cross-winding, the kind nearly all
commercial motors use, and twist-winding. (These names are transla
tions of the names commonly used here in Sweden for denominating
11
SHORT CIRCUIT Figu re 12: S c h e m a tic c o n n e c tio n d ia gra m for
RISK HERE a c r o s s w in d in g .
the different types). The names are directly derived from the arma
ture construction, since in a cross-winding, the wires are crossed
before being connected to the commutator, and in a twist-winding,
the wire ends are twisted together before they are joined to the com.
Study photos and figures.
W e will return to these types when actually winding the armature,
so let it here suffice to say that twist-winding is more suitable for
handwinding, while for a machine, the cross-winding is easier to do.
Performance-wise, there is no difference.
There is yet another type, star winding. See figure. In this, only one
wire end goes to each commutator 'ear', the other end will hang
loose, and when all the poles have been wound, the loose ends are
joined and soldered together. Due to this obviously different connec
tion, the armature will have altered characteristics compared to a
delta connected one, even with the same wire and number of turns.
Generally speaking, you can get away with a wilder wind (fewer
turns and thicker wire) when using star winding. However, it will
only be used in special circumstances.
★ ★ ★ ★
8 multiple winds
First double winds. All winds we have discussed so far have been
single winds, i.e. on each pole there has only been one single length
of wire, wound around the pole. A s an example, we will take a 50 of
28, so that each pole has been wound with 50 turns of number 28
wire. Now, if we instead put on 25 turns of 28, and then yet another
25 turns of 28, we will radically have altered the performance, despite
there still being a total of 50 turns on each pole. Instead of one single
length of wire, we now have two separate ones. W e have a double
wind.
Fig. 14 Fig. 13
12
P rin cip le co n n e ctio n o f a star w in d . N o te o n ly o ne w ire end to each co m lu g ,
the other e n d s b e in g joined together o n the far sid e o f the arm.
The intelligent reader will already have calculated the right answer,
the total resistance in our double wind is now only a fourth of the
resistance of our previous single wind. However, the number of
effective turns will be that of each coil. For the example above, we
will assume that 50 of 28 single draws 1 amp (not true but easy for
calculation). This will give the ampere-turn product as 50 (number of
turns) multiplied by 1 (amount of amps) = 50 amp-turns. However,
for the double wind, it will be 25 (number of effective turns=turns
in each coil) multiplied by 4 (amps, since the resistance w as only a
fourth) = 100 amp-turns. This amp-turn product is twice as big for the
double wind as for the single, and it really means a difference: torque,
horsepower and R P M 's will be almost doubled (only almost, because
of non-linear friction losses), but so will the generated heat! Brakes
will also have taken a turn for the worse.
W e could have done even better and made a triple wind, by wind
ing three coils of each 17 turns of 28 on each pole. You mathematic
ally interested readers can easily compute the resistance to a ninth
and the amp-turn product to three times the product of the original
wind. Results will be drastic, too, with torque, horsepower and heat
about three times increased. This wind of 17 of triple 28 is actually
on the limit for today's magnets and armatures, and would require a
very long track and mucho batteries to be useful. Try that one on
Tottenham, if you've got a light car and gears around 5.5:1.
There is a connection between multiple and single winds. If you
take a look at the table, you will see that going down three numbers
(from 29 to 26, or 28 to 25. etc), will double the cross area of the
wire, meaning that twice the current will flow through it, meaning
that the amp-turn product will be doubled for the same number of
turns. Thus, a wind of 25 of double 28 will correspond to 25 of 25,
13
38 of double 29 will be the same as 38 of 26, and so on. Making a
double wind is like increasing the wire size three steps.
Will, then, two motors, one with 25 of double 28 and the other
with 25 of 25, behave exactly alike?
The answer is no. Theoretically, they should, but in all probability
(other factors being equal), the one with 25 of double 28 will run
cooler, have more torque and higher R P M 's - but the difference will
be small.
The answer lies in the practical properties of the thinner wire: it
can be 'packed in' tighter and closer to the pole, so that a slightly
shorter length of wire will be needed, meaning less weight and more
current, and also a slightly stronger field from the smaller radius of
the coil. Chances are that the thinner wire will also be wound more
evenly, meaning less removal of magnetic mass (i.e., smaller holes)
when balancing.
There are drawbacks, though, mostly in reliability: the increased
number of wire connections will mean more of a safety risk, and the
thinner wire will also burn more easily should the armature overheat.
All in all, however, we can with fair certainty say that double winding
is like increasing the wire size three steps. Using the same number of
(effective) turns, of course, and A W G wire.
Triple w inds can be 'translated' to single winds by instead increas
ing the wire size 4 1/2 steps. Thus, that 17 of triple 28 will be like a
wind with 17 of 23) (wire thickness between 23 and 24), which is
pretty hot even for Tottenham.
Some time ago, I read with interest R. Sloper's article on double
winds in Model Cars magazine, but I'm sorry that I will have to disagree
with him on several points. First, I do not recommend experimenting
wildly with different wire sizes and number of turns in the coils on
the same pole, and I will explain why.
M ost people are aware that the motor principle - running current
through a coil and generating a field - can be reversed - inducing a
field in a coil and generating current. The latter is the principle for
the generator. The connection between current and field is dependent
on number of turns in the coil, as well as the coil’s size, and here
our trouble starts. If we double wind with equally thick wire but
different number of turns in the two coils on the pole, the coils will
not generate equal back emf's, and this will induce a 'parasite'
current that can overheat the arm. If we employ the same number of
turns but use wire of different thicknesses, the amp-turn product will
not be the same, meaning that the two coils will not generate equally
strong fields, and again 'parasite currents' will be induced, robbing
the motor of power. And should you wish to use both different
number of turns and different thicknesses, you will risk really being
in trouble.
(The reason deep down behind all this is that the coils are not
generating equal emf' s. for those of you who wish to research the
subject. I must point out that it is extremely difficult to balance' an
armature electrically, so that one of the coils will not act as a
generator - electrical brake - and increase the current in the other
coil enough to destroy the motor through excessive heat. The subject
of this is very complicated and far beyond the scope of this article,
so I will not trouble your nights' sleep by enlarging on it).
So, unless you really know what you are doing. I recommend
winding with the same size wire and same number of turns in your
multiple winds. Furthermore - and this is important - the coils should
be wound simultaneously. If you wind the pole with first one coil
14
The tw o c o m b a ta n ts and the b e st b la n k a rm s available on the m arket, the
M u r a 007 (left) and the C h am pio n .
and then the other, the coils will not generate equally strong fields,
due to the difference in resistance and coil size, and then you will
again be plagued by the problems above.
(I hope you readers are not getting tired of all these facts and
figures, but in this enormous complex known as motor tuning, I will
not just say wind so-and-so because it usually works on this or
that track. I believe you will benefit much more from really knowing
'what happens', as outlined here, than from any number of articles
with hearty advice to use Rikochet magnets and this-or-that winding.
This principle, as you will discover, is true in all teaching.)
At the end of the chapters on armatures. I will describe the
practical 'setting up' of them.
★ ★ ★ ★
will cause extra heat. Because of this, the stack is instead built up
from many thin plates, insulated from each other by a thin phosphate
coating. W e will, of course, have eddy currents in each one of these
plates, but their total will be smaller than had the stack been made
out of one single piece. Thus, more power and less heat.
This reasoning can be carried further: the thinner the plates, the
less the total of our power-robbing eddy currents. B U T - and here is
the so-called catch to th is - this will mean less metal, and therefore
less strength of the field.
Look at it like this: Each one of the plates has to be insulated by
that coating, or there would be no point at all in using plates. But
this insulation has to have some thickness, which cannot be over
looked. The thinner the plates, the more of them we must use, and
this means that there will be more coats of this phosphate, meaning
that a larger percentage of the stack's length will be not-so-magnetic
phosphate. Thus, the law of diminishing returns: the thinner the
plates, the less metal in the stack. There is. of course, an optimum,
which depends on the metal quality and the thickness of the coating.
NOTE: the amount of metal is called the stacking factor. For
example, a stacking factor of 95 (or 9 5 % ) means that 95 % of the
stack's length consists of metal. For example, a standard Mabuchi
arm has a stacking factor of approx. 98 but suffers from great core
losses (losses due to eddy currents and hysteresis effects). The new
Champion .013 plate arm has a stacking factor of 96, very reasonable
despite thinner plates. The Mura .007 has a factor of 94 but makes
up for this in extremely low core losses, due to the very thin plates.
W e can change the characteristics of the motor by changing the
number of plates. Rule: more plates will mean more torque, better
brakes, less heat and less R PM 's. A 'short-stack' armature (few
plates) will be smooth and have better power at high R P M 's - suit
able for fast tracks - but more heat, unfortunately. A 'long-stack' arm
16
(many plates) will have instant wind-up and shut-down, similar to
putting on many turns of wire, but this set-up can be useful when the
track has extremely slow turns and you want to come out and gain
speed quickly.
For fast tracks, a standard 25-plate stack will usually have three or
four plates removed for good high speed power, though I have
actually seen 15-plate jobs run fine in light cars. On the other hand,
I have run a 26-plate armature on one of Sw eden's faster tracks, with
a fair amount of success, due to its magnificent brakes. It all depends
on what attitude you take.
Next, the armature diameter: this is very critical for torque, even a
few thousandths difference will make itself felt. For this reason, an
armature should never be polished. M any people will polish the
armature to get a shiny surface, which is better for magnetic field
conduction. However, the dull surface from the phosphate coating
will only affect torque by a few tenths of a per cent, but you sand
off a few thousandths in dia. for that shiny look and you are going to
lose torque, like now! Not being protected by the coating, the pole
surface will also quickly acquire a coating of rust, which is not
going to help torque any.
(W hen I first wrote this article for the Sw edish magazine, I sug
gested putting a 26D armature in a 16D can with suitable treated
magnets and shims, this for added torque, since the 26D arm is
considerably bigger in dia. than a 16D. Som e time ago the Mura
company also came out with exactly this combination, though I doubt
that there w as any connection - it w as simply a logical step that w as
going to be tried sooner or later.)
Another point on metal stack design is the angular area, that is. the
angle the pole faces will cover out of the total 360 degrees we have
around the armature circle. See figure. The greater this angular area
S h o rt an d to n g -sta c k arm s. I a p o lo g is e for the latter, but a s I d id not at the
tim e have an y 'r e a l' lo n g -s ta c k arm h a n d y. I h ad to ju st tack o n a fe w extra
p la te s o n a n o rm a l arm . . . n o t v e ry g o o d -lo o k in g .
17
Fig ure 15: Illu stra tin g the co n c e p t o f an g u la r area. A rm ature A o n left h a s sm a ll
an g u la r are a an d to rq u e a c co rd in gly . A rm atu re B o n right h a s great angular
are a and w ill b e m u ch better su ite d fo r slo t ra c in g m o to rs
F ig u re 16: In c a s e y o u are u n su re , h ere is w h at the term s 'w e b ' and 'c r o w n '
de no te . ( H ey. that’s a g r eat nam e fo r a p u b for u s slo t racers: the 'W e b &
C r o w n ' . . .).
is, the more torque and horsepower (as well as braking) we will
have. A comparison between the early Mabuchis and the latest high-
quality blank armatures from Mura and Champion will show that the
angular area has greatly increased over the years.
A few years ago, when rewinding w as becoming the rage, Hemi
armatures were much in demand. This w as because of their greater
angular area and lower core loss steel, as well as being about .008 in.
larger in diameter, which gave them a decided advantage over the
Mabuchi armatures. Even today Hemi arm rewinds are often seen on
the club level, where the heavy competition from Muras and
Champions has not made them extinct.
If you are really looking for torque, I advise you to go to five-pole
configuration. Their great angular area (see photo) and different
electro-mechanical characteristics give them quite an edge in torque
and horsepower over three-pole jobs, but drawbacks are a heavier
armature and slower brakes, as well as lower R P M ’s. M akes me
wonder w hy so few people try experimenting . . .
An important point is the web thickness, and again we have
different factors fighting each other. If the web is thin, we can pack
in more turns and the coil will be slightly smaller in diameter, while
the current can be increased slightly due to a shorter length of wire
being needed, all this making for more torque. How ever. with a thin
web we run into the problem of oversaturation. since the small
amount of metal in the thin web cannot carry too much magnetism.
Therefore, the web cannot be too thin, in which case the armature
A 5-pole arm . here rep resented b y a V e rsit ec S S 101. N o te the great total angular
are a - o n ly a sm a ll slit se p a ra te s the p o les.
18
will draw more current and start to overheat because of oversatura
tion, and it cannot be too thick, in which case we will start to lose
torque for the reasons given above.
An interesting comparison is between the Mura and Champion
armatures. The Champion has a thicker web, but to compensate for
this and provide more winding space, the underside of the crown
(see figure) has been ground out. This, however, also means slightly
less material for field conduction. The Mura arm has a thinner web
and will suffer from a slight oversaturation with the hotter winds,
but this is compensated by the fact that more turns can be added
with a smaller coil diameter. Geometrically. I would say that they
come out approximately alike.
Looking at diameters, though, we find that the Champion arm
measures .520 in. and the Mura .514 in., which gives the Champion a
slight edge in torque. The Champion also has a shade longer winding
stack, which gives it more low-end punch. Drawbacks for the Cham
pion, though, are slightly more weight and the bigger measurements,
which will limit R P M 's and give it slightly less high speed torque than
the Mura. So there you are, take your pick. M y personal preferences
I will keep to myself.
Notes on other armatures: I would refrain from using the latest
Mabuchi armatures, since these have too thin a web to prevent over
saturation and thus will draw more current (overheating). Though
for 'softer' w inds, 28 or 29 single for club tracks, they will usually
work well.
Hemi armatures are good, if you can still get them.
Older Mabuchi armatures are not very good because of their small
angular area, also the steel material has high core losses. They are
not recommended.
Hitachi armatures have the same disadvantages as Mabuchis, bad
steel, with high core losses, and thin webs. M ost people on the club
level will usually keep to Hitachis and Mabuchi arms, so again it puts
them on equal footing.
For those of you who wish to use a better arm without going all
the way to purchase a Champion .013 or a Mura .007, I recommend
the Mura M -8 silicon steel armature. This has plates about the thick
ness of Mabuchi's but is made of much better steel with very low
core losses. The only disadvantage is the short stack, but this could
be compensated by more turns when winding, if you are not willing
to buy an extra arm to pirate plates from.
Also, both Titan and M R R C have come out with new blank arma
tures. They both feature drill blank shafts and low core loss steel, so
they are highly recommended.
One last note on the metal stack design: a few years ago, 'skew ing'
or 'slanting' the plates w as sometimes done, mostly by the less
Fig ure 17: Illu stra tin g th ick and thin w e b s. A rm A o n left i s , of co u rse , the
th in -w e b o ne here. It is o ften a rule, that the thinner the w eb. the m ore the
t u rn s of wire.
Fig ure 18: A ' zero e d ' arm ature for a ca n -typ e m o to r (N O T v a lid for Pittm an
6001). N o te p o s itio n of co m slo ts, righ t in front of the w e b s of the poles.
The n ew M a b u c h i '6 8 arm and the C h a m p io n o n e . N o te real difference in w eb
th ic k n e ss! The M a b w ill suffer b a d ly from o ve rh e atin g du e to o ve rsaturatio n.
10 timing
The timing, i.e. how the commutator is set compared to the metal
stack, is another important factor. In figure 18 you can see a 'zeroed'
armature, meaning that the degree of commutator advance is 0°.
If we now turn the com in the direction of rotation, there will be an
increase in horsepower and R PM 's, but, unfortunately, less torque and
more heat. Brakes will also get worse (since an advanced' armature
is a bad generator). The farther we advance the commutator, the
more pronounced these characteristics will be. W e cannot advance
too far, however, about 25° mechanical (30° electrical) is the absolute
maximum
Note how the com should be timed: clockwise for a twistwound
motor and anticlockwise for a crosswound motor, this when looking
at the armature from the commutator side. Don't advance the com in
the wrong direction, or you will be wondering whatever went wrong
when you run the m otor!
The question of timing or no timing can be difficult - sometimes the
gain in horsepower and R P M 's will be balanced by the loss in brakes.
Usually though, a general, and I stress general, rule is that the faster
the track, the greater the advance. Advances of 15° or more are rare,
however. The special characteristics of the Dyna-Rewind motors, high
20
The M u ra s ilic o n - s teel arm is ve ry g o o d and c o m e s co m p le te w ith co m and
in su la to rs, a s sh o w n .
11 limitations
A s the final chapters on armature theory are drawing to a close,
perhaps some of you racers and readers out there are wondering why
we cannot wind with 20 or 15 A W G or whatever we want.
The direct reason for this is heat, as any long-distance racer will
testify. Our team recently participated in a 24-hour enduro where
we set a new Swedish record by being forced to change 15 arma
tures in 24 hours from overheating. And when I say overheating, I
mean that these armatures had turned blue, with cracked epoxy and
wire insulation burned through, so I've had my share of experience,
thank you.
S o , usually, the way to get power out of your motor is to treat and
wind it as hot as possible without having it ‘cough’ on you in the
race. A s even slight excessive heat will slow down a motor, there
should be a margin, but this is up to your gambling nerve. This
chapter will delve a bit deeper into motor theory, so those of you
21
who feel like it can always skip it and
go on.
One source of heat is the wire itself,
which will heat up because of the current
running through it (joule losses). There is
really nothing to do about it right now , so
we will have to pay for increased amperes
with increased heat. Note that the heat
S k ew in g the arm ature, not recom m end ed. S h o u ld
y o u w is h to s k e w (or so m e reaso n , th ou gh , re
m e m be r to e p o xy the p late s in po sitio n .
A tw ist-w o u n d arm w ith the co m turned c lo c k
w ise .
will also increase electrical resistance, meaning that ampere draw will
go down when the motor gets hot.
Another not-so-commonly-known fact is that the presence of
magnetic fields (i.e. those from the magnets and the armature) will
decrease current draw and thus performance, by disturbing the flow
of electricity in the wire.
The other main source of heat is in the metal stack, generated by
the core losses (hysteresis losses and eddy currents). These losses
can be diminished in two ways, by using better stack materials or
stronger magnets.
Exactly w hy stronger magnets will reduce core losses is a matter
of nasty formulas and complicated reasoning, so I will not evoke the
editor's rage by starting out on it here. Eh. Alec? But you will notice
that as magnets have become stronger the winds have become more
and more daring. On the old Mabuchis, the absolute limit w as about
30 AW G, but then came Arcos and we all went down to number
27. Then 'the boom" started, with better armature steel and mucho
gauss magnets, and now the hottest racers are running 24-gauge arms
Figure 19: O n a t w ist-w o u n d arm ature, the com s h o u ld bo ad va n ce d c lo c k w is e
a s sh o w n . N o te that the tim in g is de cid e d b y the p o s itio n of the co m s lo t s ,
not the c o m ears.
Figure 20: O n a c r o s s - w o u n d arm ature, the co m sh o u ld in ste ad b e a d v a n c ed a n ti
c lo c k w ise . T h is is a lso the d ire ctio n in w h ic h the m otor w ill run best. (A
tw ist-w o u n d m otor, e sp e c ia lly w h e n ad va n ce d, w ill run be st c lo c k w ise , se en
f rom the co m ).
Fig 19 Fig. 20
on the fast tracks. Makes me wonder what it will be like if somebody
ever comes out with real magnets . . . who will be the first to run a
19-gauge wind ?
So, in practise, the limiting factors are the magnets and the arma
ture steel. Super shimming will, of course, make for a stronger
magnetic field, but until the next revolution (which may have occurred
when this is printed) we dare not venture beyond the realms of 23’s.
A s long as we are speculating, it is possible that something really
revolutionary is around the corner - supra conductive wire. For the
benefit of those who don't know, supra conduction is when electricity
can flow without resistance or heat generation. So far, we can only
induce this state by cooling metals down to some 260 centigrades
below zero.
However, there is theoretical proof that organic materials, supra
conductive at room temperatures and above, can be manufactured.
When - and if - this happens, we will have the biggest change in slot
racing since the anglewinder. No longer will it be necessary to use
large wire to run high amperes, we could instead use as thin a wire
as we want and wind on any amount of turns, since we no longer
have any electrical resistance! Unfortunately, core losses will still
exist in the stack and put a limit to field strengths, but before that,
lap records will be cut by seconds and not tenths. But I doubt that it
will happen in the next decade. Theories, fantasies, dreams.
Returning to reality and heat, I must point out that excessive shim
ming will actually increase heat. Normal shimming will reduce heat
due to the stronger effective field (lower core losses), but if we shim
the magnets too close, the cooling air will have difficulty circulating
and then the temperature will rise again.
One last point is on the torque and RPM limits of the motor.
In the chapter on multiple winds, I stated that the motor and
generator principles were reversible. Few people know, though, that
these phenomena can happen at the same time. W e are putting in
current and the armature starts to run. but when it is running in the
field from the magnets, there will be a current induced in the winds.
Unfortunately, this current is running opposite the current we put in.
and thus it will act as a brake.
The voltage of this current is dependent on three things, (a) the
strength of the field from the magnet, (b) the speed of the armature,
and (c) the number of turns (or more correctly the total wire length)
on the pole.
Thus, when we are pouring in 12 volts from the track and the
armature is motionless, as in the starting moment, there is no back
current or emf induced (armature speed zero, see (b) above). In this
moment, therefore, w e have the full 12 volts generating the field, and
since the field now is its strongest, the torque is the greatest.
When the car has been accelerating for a short time, the armature
will be rotating and the emf will now be induced, reducing the actual
voltage and therefore reducing the field strength and torque. Let's
assume that we are giving the motor 12 volts and that the arm has
reached 20.000 RPM and is reducing 4 volts emf. Therefore, the
actual voltage in the coil will be 12 - 4 = 8 volts, and with only 8 volts
in the coil you can understand that torque has gone down.
The faster the armature rotates the greater the induced voltage,
right up until the actual coil voltage has dropped to 1 volt or less.
Note that we are still pumping in 12 volts, but the armature is rotat
ing so fast that it is inducing nearly the same amount of voltage
pointing the other way. At this point the armature will have reached
23
the top speed, since the actual voltage in the coil is now so small
that the field can barely keep the speed.
Note that wire thickness has nothing to do with the emf. If we
have two armatures, one with a smaller amount of turns than the
other - as it usually is with thicker gauge wire - and spin the arma
tures at the same speed, the arm with less turns will generate less
back voltage. Therefore, an armature with a smaller number of turns
will have higher RPM 's. At the speed where the armature with many
turns has reached its rev limit, the other armature is inducing less
back voltage and still has a few actual volts 'to go'. I hope this will
have cleared up a few w h y's and ho w 's' on armatures.
★ ★ ★ ★
12 setting up a motor
For those of you who are still awake. I have included a quickie
diagram where you can see how a specification change will affect
characteristics. And now. and I bet you've been waiting for this, we
will go into practical cases of setting up a motor. If you have digested
the previous 11 chapters, you should now be an expert.
When confronted with a short track with low power supplies, we
must concentrate on making the motor as effective as possible. Since
track speeds are low but good acceleration and brakes necessary, I
would suggest winding some 80 turns of 30 AW G. leave the timing
at 0° and shim the magnets very close, all this to reduce the core
losses and prevent overheating. If the current is really bad, I might
also add a plate to the arm (I am talking about a 25-plate stack).
Please note that this is only a guess. If you want to have the
perfect combination for a track, it will take a lot of experimenting.
Perhaps this track above is faster than I thought at first, so I experi
ment with 60 to 80 turns of 29 instead and perhaps a slight advance
like 5°. The treatment suggestions given here are only to give you an
idea of the thinking that lies behind a motor combination.
Please note also that the winds 'and treatments I suggest are for
super' magnets. Using stock magnets there really is no difference
between winding a Mabuchi with 26 instead of 2 7, except possibly
that the armature would cough in 5 laps instead of 10. Should you
use 'interim' magnets like Dyna 9 's or Rikochets. however, keep in
mind that they need milder winds. Thinner wire, less advance and
more plates will help prevent coughing your motor.
than copper but about 40 per cent less weight. By using one or two
sizes larger wire (electrical resistance is dependent on wire size:
bigger wire will let through more current) we will end up with an
armature that draws the same amount of current but is lighter than a
similar copper-wound armature. This combination of silver and other
metals is called silver-core. Drawback with this method is that with
the larger wire, you cannot pack in as many turns as you would some
times wish.
Mura has tried another combination with silver and magnesium.
which is even lighter than alum but has higher resistivity. Also here
you should wind one or two sizes larger than you would have done
with copper.
NOTE : Due to the great differences in atom sizes, silver and mag/
alum will not mix in any quantity you would wish. Also, silver core
wire will usually show the common treat with all metallic solutions,
porosity and brittleness. Care must be taken with the Mura mag-wire,
it can only be wound o n c e : if you must ’back off' a few turns and
start again, the Mura mag-wire will usually crack and short-circuit
the armature. Note, too, that resistivity is not linear with solution
percentage, a small quantity of the strange metal will make resistivity
shoot way up.
There is one more type, silver-plated copper wire, used by Mura.
French and Cobra. This wire will often wrongfully be advertised as
silver wire, though it is really copper wire with a thin coating of
silver. Mura claims 7 per cent less resistivity, but drawback is more
weight.
So pure silver wire is not (as far as I know) available for winding
purposes, since it would be expensive and somewhat impractical.
Remains silver-core and silver plating, of which the former should be
28
C o m m u tato rs. O n the left, for co m p a riso n , is the sta n d a rd Pittm an 196 com .
The lo n g o n e next is a Fre n ch (T ra d e sh ip ) com . w h ic h ca n be had w ith v a rio u s
tim in g and c o lo u r s o f pla stic . Next, w ith e a rs a s cro o k e d a s a rand o m in c id e n c e
curve, is the n e w K irk w o o d 'fib r e g la s s ' com . and o n far right the o ld K irk w o o d .
29
R em o v e plate s b y s t ic k in g in a sh a rp X -a c to blade and w ig g le the arm a little.
14 armature preparation
First, decide how many plates you wish to use on your armature,
and add or remove as the case is. When removing plates, it is best to
stick in the sharp edge of an X-acto knife and roll a little back and
forth until the plates loosen up. Then, pull them off while twisting
back and forth. If adding plates, it is just a matter of pressing on -
careful or you might bend them.
Whether you wish to use the fibre plates or not is up to you. They
represent more weight and a longer coil, but added safety. Personally,
I usually have them on. except in special cases.
Here you can also decide whether to change the armature to a B
(pinion on case end) or A (pinion on endbell side) type. This can be
accomplished by having the blank armature stand upright on a piece
of hard wood, threading a piece of tubing over the shaft until it rests
on the plates, and then giving it a few taps with a hammer until the
plates are in their right position. Care, though, or you will bend the
shaft.
If you are using Mabuchi, Hemi or Hitachi armatures or similar, the
shaft should be exchanged for a drill blank. The drill blank is a piece
of specially treated steel, very hard and absolutely straight. They can
be purchased from Model Car Centre for 2/6 each, which is very
reasonable. The only slight disadvantage is that these drill blanks are
slightly undersize - hey, Howard, how about getting out a drill blank
of .0790 in. instead?
If y o u w is h to m o v e the p o s itio n of the p late s, slip a p iece of tub ing o ve r the
sh a ft an d h a m m e r o n t h i s - gently. W h e n c h a n g in g to a drill blank, p u t the arm
o n a vice w ith the old shaft h a n g in g d o w n , then k n o c k it o u t u s in g the drill
b la n k a s a pu n c h . E p o x y plates.
31
For k e e p in g e po xie d p la te s in place, th is trick ca n be u sed. A tight-fitting T a ylo r
10-tooth p in io n (the lo n g es t , for m ore stab ility) next to the s ta c k o n either sid e ,
and then lo ck w ith 1/8 In. p ic k u p c o lla rs - real tight. T a ke care not to get the
p in io n s e po xie d a s w ell.
32
A few sid e is s u e s : the b ru s h track o n a co m is ve ry revealing. Ideally, the b ru sh
track s h o u ld be o n e u n b ro ke n , e ven b a n d of ca rb o n d e p o sit aro u n d the co m
A n y u n e v e n n e s s in the c o m , and it w ill im m e dia te ly s h o w up in the b ru s h track
a s cro o k e d e d g e s an d s p o t s not co ve re d b y the ca rb on . If th is latter is the ca se ,
the co m m u st be trued (tu rn e d ) for m a x im u m pe rfo rm ance . W h e n e v e r ta k in g a
m otor apart, a lw a y s c h e c k b r u s h track.
Insert this assembly - making sure that no washer falls off - into our
finished case with magnets and screw the endbell on. This 'trial fit' is
to insure that the finished arm really will sit right in the motor. Again
experience sp e a k s: one of my most beautifully finished armatures,
unfortunately, proved to be too long to fit inside, so benefiting from
this mistake I now always check everything out in time.
At this trial fit, three things must be checked:
(1) with the motor screwed together, the endplay should be
about .010 in.;
(2) the metal stack must be centered between the magnets;
(3) the shaft must run the entire length of the bearing holes.
That endplay needs special attention. Ideally, the endplay should be
zero (but armature running free), but since the armature will enlarge
slightly when hot. there must be a margin of about .010 in. on a
'cold' motor. Endplay should not be too big. though, or we will
encounter what is called brush rattle'.
A so re s ig h t to a r a c e r 's eyes: the feared B lo w n C om .
33
W h e n e p o x y in g the tu be s, try to get a little s m e ared aro u n d the base, next to
the fibre p la te . T h is w ill m a k e for les s c h a n c e of s c ra tc h in g the w ire in su la tio n .
•k ★ ★ ★
35
36
Synopsis for
MOTOR TUNING
Book 3
Winding
Pointers
Epoxying
Balancing (static)
Balancing (dynamic)
Endbell
Brushes and Springs
Assembly
Service
37
ai W ANT: 1
c
| slot car 'bits'. 2
00
30
fast mail order (free O
| service) racing, (w e
believe the best in the
5 country) and 'statics'
>
or home raceway sets V)
</>
YOUNEED o
o
>
H
m
O
MINI-WINDER
THE MINIATURE ARMATURE WINDING TOOL
39
Printad by Graphic Art Sarvicaa (Brighton) Ltd.. Burgaat Hill. Suaaai