Personal video introduction rubric

name: _________________________________ ______________

Date: _______________
Criteria Needs Improvement (1) Satisfactory (2) Well Done (3) Score
Content: Does the video - Little to no information - Most (but not all) - All elements are
contain suitable personal about you is present (e.g. elements are present (e.g.
information to support name, personal present and effective name, personal
connections between the information, program and (e.g. name, personal information, program
teacher and learners? year of study, personal and information, program and year of study,
professional interests and and year of study, personal and
passions, goals for career personal and professional interests
and life, and/or relevant professional interests and passions, goals
pictures) and passions, goals for for career and life,
career and life, and/or and/or relevant
relevant pictures) pictures)
Organization: Does the video - Introduction and/or - Introduction and - Introduction and
have a clear structure? summary summary are summary are present
aren’t present in the video present in the video and very effective
- Progression of
information clear
Presentation Skills: Does the - Commentary, voice over - Commentary, voice - Commentary, voice
instructor articulate themselves and/or over and/or over and/or
well in the video? video is awkward or video is engaging for the video over is fun and
disorganized most part engaging
Interactivity/Engagement: - Pictures, graphics, audio, - Some visual and - Visual and auditory
Is there evidence of interactivity video, auditory elements elements clearly add
and engagement in the video? etc., not present and/or present (e.g. pictures, to the educational
mostly graphics, audio, video, quality of the learning
distracting etc.). object
- No elements are
distracting
Visual Design: - Use of colour and fonts is - Use of colour and fonts - Visual design looks
Is the design visually unprofessional or is highly
aesthetic? distracting professional and not professional, with
- Little to no evidence of distracting thought given to colour
thought given to visual - Evidence of thought and font schemes
design given to visual design
Audio: - Much of the audio is - Most audio - All audio commentary
Is the audio clear and audible? unclear and inaudible commentary is clear and is clear and audible
- Most volume levels are audible - Volume levels of
uneven - Most volume levels of commentary are even
commentary are even
Wow Factor: - Does not meet all criteria - Meets all criteria - Surpasses all criteria
Is it especially unique, creative and is
and professional, surpassing uniquely creative,
expectations and criteria professional
and/or pedagogical

Total Raw Score

Evaluated by:

________________________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name