9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v.

PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

Home Law Firm Law Library Laws Jurisprudence

May 1965 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1965 > May 1965 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v.
RAMON LOPEZ:

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-18766. May 20, 1965.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAMON LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

Solicitor General, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mauro B. Cresencia, for Defendant-Appellee.

SYLLABUS

1. CRIMINAL LAW; ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS; ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS. — The crime of illegal possession of picklocks or similar
tools has two elements: (1) possession of picklocks or similar tools specially adapted to the commission of the crime of robbery; (2) such
possession is without lawful cause.

2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; SUFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION; DESCRIPTION OF PICKLOCK AS SPECIALLY ADAPTED TO ROBBERY

UNNECESSARY. — Since picking of locks is one way to gain entrance to commit robbery, a picklock is per se specially adapted to the
commission of robbery. The description in the information of a picklock as "specially adapted to the commission of robbery" is therefore
unnecessary for its sufficiency.

3. ID.; ID.; TERM "FALSE KEYS" SUFFICIENTLY DESCRIBES SUCH TOOLS AS ADAPTED TO COMMISSION OF ROBBERY. — The Revised Penal
Code, in Article 305, defines "false keys" to include "the tools mentioned in the next preceding article." Article 304, "the next preceding
article", mentions "picklocks or similar tools specially adapted to the commission of the crime of robbery." It follows that the term "false keys"
appealing in the information sufficiently describes such tools.

DECISION

BENGZON, J.P., J.:

At 10:00 A.M. of December 21, 1960, the Chief of Police of Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, apprehended three suspicious-looking strangers who were
loitering in Pagao, a sitio of Bacuag. A bag which they were carrying was confiscated with the following contents: three carbines, caliber .30 M1; one
revolver, caliber .22; three flashlights with batteries; two carbine ammunition magazines, fully loaded; twelve rounds of carbine ammunition; one
balisong; a screw driver; seven false keys, one of which was a master key; trousers; shirts; and a pair of shoes.

After an investigation the aforesaid persons — Ramon Lopez, Manuel Buico and Arturo Caniete — were charged in the Justice of the Peace Court of
Bacuag with the crime of illegal possession of firearms and, in a separate complaint, the crime of illegal possession of false keys. They pleaded guilty to
illegal possession of firearms, not guilty to illegal possession of false keys.

Following the transmittal of the record of the case on illegal possession of false keys to the Court of First Instance of Surigao del Norte, an information
was filed therein against the three accused, thus:

jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The undersigned Assistant Provincial Fiscal accuses MANUEL BUICO, RAMON LOPEZ and ARTURO CANIETE of the crime of ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF
FALSE KEYS committed as follows:

jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the 21st day of December, 1960 in the municipality of Bacuag, Province of Surigao del Norte, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of
this Honorable Court, the said accused with deliberate and criminal intent and without lawful cause did then and there willfully, unlawfully and
feloniously have in their possession, custody and control seven (7) false keys, one of which is a picklock or master key.

"CONTRARY TO LAW. (Article 304 in relation to Article 305, both of the Revised Penal Code), with the aggravating circumstance that the offenders have
been previously punished for an offense to which the law attaches an equal or greater penalty, that is, same three accused were on 24 December 1960
convicted of Illegal Possession of Firearms by the Justice of the Peace Court of Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, and thereby sentenced `to suffer
imprisonment of three (3) years each and fine of P2,000.00 each’ in Criminal Case No. 374."

cralaw virtua1aw library

This time, however, Buico and Caniete pleaded guilty. Lopez, pleading not guilty, stood trial. After the prosecution presented one witness, said accused
moved to dismiss the case on the ground that the facts charged in the information do not constitute an offense. It was argued that an essential element
of illegal possession of false keys was not alleged, namely, that the picklock or false keys in the possession of the accused were "specially adapted to
the commission of the crime of robbery." Thereupon, the trial court dismissed the case. The prosecution, with commendable sense of duty, appealed.

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 1/6
9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

Article 304 of the Revised Penal Code provides:

jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"ART. 304. Possession of picklocks or similar tools. — Any person who shall without lawful cause have in his possession picklocks or similar tools
specially adapted to the commission of the crime of robbery, shall be punished by arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision correccional in its
minimum period."

cralaw virtua1aw library

Such crime of illegal possession of picklocks or similar tools has, accordingly, two elements: (1) possession of picklocks or similar tools specially
adapted to the commission of the crime of robbery; (2) such possession is without lawful cause.

The information alleged that the accused possessed, "without lawful cause . . . seven (7) false keys, one of which is a picklock or master key."
(Emphasis supplied.)

A picklock—a tool used in picking locks—is in itself specially adapted to the commission of robbery of the kind provided for in Articles 299(a) 3 and 302,
par. 3 of the Revised Penal Code:

jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"ART. 299. Robbery in an inhabited house or public building or Office devoted to worship.—Any armed person who shall commit robbery in an inhabited
house or public building or edifice devoted to religious worship, shall be punished by reclusion temporal, if the value of the property taken shall exceed
250 pesos, and if —

"(a) The malefactors shall enter the house or building in which the robbery was committed, by any of the following means:

chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

x       x       x

"3. By using false keys, picklocks or similar tools." (Emphasis supplied.)

ART. 302. Robbery in an uninhabited place or in a private building.— Any robbery committed in an uninhabited place or in a building other than those
mentioned in the first paragraph of article 299, if the value of the property taken exceeds 250 pesos, shall be punished by prision correccional in its
medium and maximum periods provided that any of the following circumstances is present:

chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

x       x       x

"3. If the entrance has been effected through the use of false keys, picklocks or other similar tools." (Emphasis supplied.)

Since picking of locks is one way to gain entrance to commit robbery, a picklock is per se specially adapted to the commission of robbery. The
description in the information of a picklock as "specially adapted to the commission of robbery" is therefore unnecessary for its sufficiency.
Notwithstanding the omission of such superfluous description, therefore, the charge of the offense of illegal possession of a picklock is valid. We find
both elements of the crime clearly alleged in the information in question.

Furthermore, the information alleged illegal possession of "seven (7) false keys." The Revised Penal Code, in Article 305, defines "false keys" to include
"the tools mentioned in the next preceding article." Article 304 — "the next preceding article" — mentions "picklocks or similar tools specially adapted
to the commission of the crime of robbery." It follows that the term "false keys" appearing in the information sufficiently describes such tools.

WHEREFORE, the order quashing the information is hereby set aside and the case is remanded for further trial, without costs. It is so ordered.

Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.

Bengzon, C.J., took no part.

Back to Home | Back to Main

Brittany
Beautiful Luxury Properties
We Change the Industry of Conventional Real Estate Development and Championing Excellence.

brittany.com.ph OPEN

Search

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 2/6
9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 3/6
9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 4/6
9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

May-1965 Jurisprudence                 

G.R. No. L-16784 May 19, 1965 - IN RE: LIANE C.

GOMEZ v. AUGUSTO G. SYJUCO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-19997 May 19, 1965 - VISAYAN BICYCLE

MANUFACTURING CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION, ET
AL

G.R. No. L-20139 May 19, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. SEGUNDO MARQUEZ Y CASTRO, ET AL

G.R. No. L-20282 May 19, 1965 - FORTUNATO F.

HALILI v. EUSEBIO DAPLAS

G.R. No. L-20791 May 19, 1965 - MANUEL F.

AQUINO, ET AL v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ET AL

G.R. No. L-20815 May 19, 1965 - SANTIAGO

MANZANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-19537 May 20, 1965 - LINO GUTIERREZ,

ET AL v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ

G.R. No. L-19537 May 20, 1965 - LINO GUTIERREZ,

ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

G.R. No. L-19727 May 20, 1965 - COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

G.R. No. L-20430 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. EDUVIGES SAN ANTONIO

A.C. No. 611 May 25, 1965 - BONIFACIO GARCIA, ET

AL v. ATTY. ABELARDO MILLA

G.R. No. L-20448 May 25, 1965 - NAPOLEON

MAGALIT, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS,
ET AL.

G.R. No. L-20618 May 25, 1965 - HERMENEGILDO R.

ROSALES v. FLAVIANO YENKO

G.R. No. L-14532 & L-14533 May 26, 1965 - JOSE

LEON GONZALES v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-13469 May 27, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. PABLO EGUAL, ET AL

G.R. No. L-15706 May 27, 1965 - ILDEFONSO D. YAP,

ET AL v. MANUEL L. CARREON

G.R. No. L-18804 May 27, 1965 - COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE v. WESTERN PACIFIC
CORPORATION

G.R. No. L-19450 May 27, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. SIMPLICIO VILLANUEVA

G.R. No. L-21997 May 27, 1965 - JOSE C. ZULUETA

v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

G.R. No. L-13816 May 31, 1965 - SEVERO ROMERO,

ET AL. v. ISABELO DE LOS REYES, JR.

G.R. No. L-17132 May 31, 1965 - JUAN BENEMERITO,

ET AL v. PETRONILA COSTANILLA, ET AL

G.R. No. L-17320 May 31, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO PAZ, ET AL

G.R. No. L-17712 May 31, 1965 - BASILIO UNSAY, ET

AL v. CECILIA MUÑOZ PALMA, ET AL

G.R. No. L-18038 May 31, 1965 - ROSA GUSTILO v.

AUGUSTO GUSTILO, ET AL

G.R. No. L-18348 May 31, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. CAMILO CALACALA

G.R. No. L-18443 May 31, 1965 - ENRIQUE SISON,

ET AL v. JUAN PAJO, ET AL

G.R. No. L-18452 May 31, 1965 - AUGUSTO COSIO,

ET AL v. CHERIE PALILEO

G.R. No. L-18497 May 31, 1965 - DAGUPAN TRADING

COMPANY v. RUSTICO MACAM

G.R. No. L-19346 May 31, 1965 - SOLEDAD L.

LACSON, ET AL. v. ABELARDO G. DIAZ

G.R. No. L-19587 May 31, 1965 - RAFAEL JALOTJOT

v. MARINDUQUE IRON MINES AGENTS, INC., ET AL

G.R. No. L-19646 May 31, 1965 - IN RE: ESPIRITU

NG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

G.R. No. L-19659 May 31, 1965 - DR. POLICARPIO C.

ALISOSO v. TARCELA LASTIMOSO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-19967 May 31, 1965 - ARSENIO REYES v.

SINAI C. HAMADA, ET AL

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 5/6
9/14/21, 1:41 PM G.R. No. L-18766 May 20, 1965 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON LOPEZ : May 1965 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions

G.R. No. L-20202 May 31, 1965 - CIRIACO

HERNANDEZ v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION
COMMISSION, ET AL

G.R. No. L-20227 May 31, 1965 - IN RE: GO KEM LIM

v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

G.R. Nos. L-20275-79 May 31, 1965 - VIRGINIA B.

UICHANCO, ET AL v. FIDEL GUTIERREZ, ET AL

G.R. No. L-20394 May 31, 1965 - STEPHEN W.

MARTIN v. CELESTINO GOMEZ

G.R. No. L-20472 May 31, 1965 - MARIO F. OUANO,

ET AL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-20577 May 31, 1965 - VISAYAN PACKING

CORP. v. REPARATIONS COMMISSION

G.R. No. L-20617 May 31, 1965 - BRUNO GARCIA v.

DALMACIO ANAS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-20737 May 31, 1965 - ROQUE ESCAÑO v.

RODRIGO C. LIM

G.R. No. L-20792 May 31, 1965 - ELIZALDE & CO.,

INC. v. ALLIED WORKERS ASSO. OF THE PHIL., ET AL

G.R. No. L-20950 May 31, 1965 - REPUBLIC OF THE

PHIL. v. AYALA Y CIA, ET AL

G.R. No. L-21235 May 31, 1965 - RODOLFO TIRONA

v. M. CUDIAMAT

G.R. No. L-21653 May 31, 1965 - VICENTE DE LARA,

JR., ET AL v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL, ET AL

G.R. No. L-21764 May 31, 1965 - VICENTE

CABILING, ET AL. v. EUSEBIO PABULAAN, ET AL.

Copyright © 1995 - 2021 REDiaz

https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965maydecisions.php?id=152 6/6