Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Relations Final - Edited
International Relations Final - Edited
International Relations
Name of student
Institution affiliation
Course
Date
2
International Relations
Question 1
The Iran nuclear deal was reached between The Islamic Republic of Iran and several
worlds
Liberal internationalism is based on the execution of nonviolent world order in the universe.
From this perspective, every nation is considered in its interests through cooperation.
International cooperation incorporates the ideas of different countries. The countries do not have
to rely on one military wing but rather operate through collaboration. Achieving economic
power by politicians is dependent on the use of economic and social control. There may be the
building of an agreement to help secure a border. Organizations such as the United Nations have
Liberalism offers excellent insight into and a concise understanding of the Iran nuclear deal. The
nuclear deal proves how different countries assume different roles and how states and
Liberalism is best demonstrated by those who believe in the peaceful coexistence of deals. The
accumulation of Iran's uranium would secure the safety of individuals. In liberal terms, the
governments have the mandate to maintain the safety of the citizens. The Iran nuclear deal IS
AN example of governments and international organizations pulling efforts to ensure the well-
In agreement with the provisions laid down between Iran and many other countries, Iran has
Realism states that nations work to increase their influence and power. The structural constraints
determine major players' behaviors. By eliminating international sanctions, Iran has been brought
back to the world economy. In this case, Iran’s power has massively increased. Structural realism
does not lead to competition. The United States has a robust military force but still fears what
might war to break out. Through cooperation, such measures are mitigated. Iran has provided for
its defense after lifting the arms sanctions[ CITATION 12L19 \l 1033 ].
Question 2
The world is rapidly changing, and different technological measures are being adopted. With the
emergence of new technologies, different people's lives are changing rapidly. Technology has
dramatically influenced how different people perceive each other in the world. Innovations have
transportation. Global sourcing of different raw materials has been made possible. Another
On the other hand, advancements in technology prove destructive, especially in supporting vices
such as terrorism. Extremism has also been witnessed. This has enhanced disastrous international
effects. Through the creation of harmful software, connections in different parts of the world
have been slowed down. The malware has also caused computers to crash. This has caused
vulnerability to digital assets. Children's explosive drones have proved a threat to world security.
Technology and innovation are not desirable as the threats caused are very questionable. Highly
skilled and professional manpower is needed to execute these malicious acts, such as creating
4
harmful computer viruses. Bioweapons pose a threat to human existence. In many cases, the
weapons are not always successful and may even wipe the entire generation. An example is
given on the United States anthrax attacks [ CITATION Tow17 \l 1033 ] . Terrorists may use 3D guns
The internet has led to massive terror activities in different parts of the world. The coverage of
the terror activities inflicts fear among different masses. The terrorists may also use the internet
in finding recruits or even followers. In this case, disruptive innovation theory is put into
Question 3
Marx brings into context the materialistic nature of religion. The real relationship between men
and objects is put into context. According to Marx, man’s ability to act is influenced by nature.
Nature thus controls how man behaves, thus, understanding it either scientifically or rationally.
On the other hand, religion plays a role in projecting personal characteristics into nature.
Through the invention of Gods, religion believes that nature can be controlled. The gods are
appealed through rituals and sacrifices. According to Marx, religion helps to dull oppression,
thus preventing people from making anxieties for social change. Marx also believes that religion
acts as a tool for control. Marx also perceives religion as a mechanism for maintaining uneven
status. This is seen in the context where others have more influence and power than others. The
Marx argues that the less powerful continue to be appeased by the rich. The people believed in
the afterlife, and thus, religion provided solace. The people find joy in the faith. In justifying
5
oppression, religion seeks to control the less fortunate. The more a person suffers, the more the
Social solidarity in religion is enforced through religion. The mental states created during the
worship of a supernatural being dictates this. Marx emphasized that the social order is reinforced
through religion through sanctification. Marxists believe that faith will stand in their paths amidst
difficulties.
Constructivism is immensely associated with the end of the cold war. Several debates have been
held between different scholars in international relations theory. Constructivism is best
elaborated with the evolution of ideologies. Constructivists argue that the end of the cold war is
best explained in terms of concepts and agency. Mikhail Gorbachev's thinking (Glasnost and
Perestroika) had a significant impact. The world is perceived to be socially constructed according
to constructivists. Ontology and epistemology bring the reality of the world into practice.
Alexander’s thoughts on social construction show that the 500 British nuclear weapons less
threaten the United States. The new world order influenced by Gorbachev’s decisions indicates
the transformation of the various positions held[ CITATION Int19 \l 1033 ].
Traditional theories such as realism and liberalism have failed in different ways to explain the
end of the cold war; hence constructivism dives in. Constructivists have embedded their
ideologies ever since the early 1980s. In turn, constructivists have been realized, prompting the
end of the cold war and generational change. Constructivism has led to positive developments,
thus remaining true to the core. Changes to neorealism and neoliberalism have also been noted.
6
References
12. Liberalism, internationalism, and Iran today. (2019). Liberalism for a New Century, 193-208.
Elrashidy. (2016). The Iranian nuclear agreement from a legal perspective. Review of economics
and political science, 35-63.
Grayson. (2001). Liberals, international relations, and appeasement: The liberal party, 1919-
1939. Psychology Press.
Introduction: Forgetting the Cold War. (2019). How We Forgot the Cold War, 1-10.
Jackson, R. (2019). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford
University Press, USA.
Marx, K. (2002). Marx on religion. Temple University Press.
Powers, P. R. (2020). Karl Marx, Marxists, and Marxians: Religion, oppression, and revolution.
Religion and violence, 41-58.
Prospects for globalization and development. (202). Globalization of High Technology
Production, 163-177.
Townsend. (2017). Technology, the new frontier for crime and terror. The Dark Side of
Technology, 208-228.
7