Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of Virology 1991 Benmansour 4198.full
Journal of Virology 1991 Benmansour 4198.full
8
0022-538X/91/084198-06$02.00/0
Copyright © 1991, American Society for Microbiology
Although the number of antigenic sites on the rabies virus glycoprotein that have been described regularly
increases with time, no attempt has been made to carefully evaluate the relative importance of each of these
sites. Here we provide a more precise description of the antigenicity of the protein in mice of the H-2d
haplotype; we developed this description by using 264 newly isolated monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and a
The glycoprotein of rabies virus is believed to form glycoprotein. For instance, sites I and IV have up to now
polymeric structures that project from the surface of the been defined by a single MAb. More recently, a new epitope
virus particle. These surface spikes are responsible for has been described for ERA and CVS strains. This epitope
induction and binding of virus-neutralizing antibodies (7, 23), has been considered unique in that it was defined by a
determination of virulence (5, 6, 8), and stimulation of neutralizing MAb binding to the denatured glycoprotein (1).
lymphocytes (3, 4). An escape mutant to this MAb was shown to have an amino
Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) raised in acid substitution at position 264 of the glycoprotein (10).
BALB/c mice immunized with rabies virus were shown to Two neutralizing MAbs of human origin have also recently
delineate numerous epitopes on the viral glycoprotein (11, been isolated (9, 16). Both failed to neutralize the same
24). Their pattern of cross-reactivity with MAb-resistant escape mutant (RV 2-22C5) selected with the murine MAb
(MAR) mutants selected with some of these MAbs was used 2.22C5. One bound to the denatured glycoprotein, while the
to define three groups of epitopes on the challenge virus other did not. Whether the two human MAbs would recog-
standard (CVS) glycoprotein and five on the ERA glycopro- nize the same region of the glycoprotein as did MAb 2-22C5
tein (14, 15). Some groups contained a single epitope recog- was not investigated.
nized by a unique MAb, while others contained many Regions of the glycoprotein which are recognized by
epitopes defined by a collection of MAbs isolated from MAbs of new specificity have often been termed antigenic
several laboratories. sites. As a result, as many as six or seven antigenic sites on
Several overlapping epitopes certainly define an antigenic the rabies virus glycoprotein have been described, which
site. This is the case for antigenic sites II and III of the rabies does not reflect the actual antigenic properties of the protein.
virus glycoprotein. Antigenic mutants selected for resistance Using 266 neutralizing MAbs derived from the fusion of
to MAbs delineating site II were found to have one amino spleen cells from BALB/c mice immunized with beta propi-
acid substitution located between positions 34 and 42 or 198 olactone-inactivated CVS virus and our collection of MAR
and 200 of the glycoprotein, with the exception of two mutants, we have made a more accurate evaluation of the
mutants which each had a mutation in an intermediate relative importance of the different regions of the rabies
position (19). If most of those mutations are within the region virus glycoprotein in the stimulation of the B-cell response.
where MAbs bind to the protein, as postulated for the In addition, this large number of neutralizing MAbs allowed
majority of MAR mutants, then site II is a discontinuous, us to delineate and map new regions of the glycoprotein
conformational antigenic site. In contrast, mutants resistant which could also be antigenic.
to MAbs delineating site III were found to have amino acid
substitutions that were clustered in a short linear stretch MATERIALS AND METHODS
between positions 330 and 338, except for one mutant with
an amino acid substitution in position 357 (22, 26). Several Cells and viruses. CER and BSR clones of BHK21 cells
isolated epitopes were also identified on the rabies virus were grown in Eagle minimal essential medium supple-
mented with 8% calf serum. The myeloma cell line Sp2/0 was
grown in Dulbecco modified minimal essential medium sup-
*
Corresponding author. plemented with 15% foal serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10
4198
VOL. 65, 1991 ANTIGENICITY OF RABIES VIRUS GLYCOPROTEIN 4199
mM sodium pyruvate. Hybridomas were grown in the same AGAGACCTA, (iii) GATTACACCATTTGGAT, (iv) AC
medium with 0.1 mM hypoxanthine, 0.4 M aminopterin, and CAAATGGTGCTCTCC, and (v) GTCCCAGGGTTTGGA
16 mM thymidine. AA. They were purchased from Appligene, except primer 5,
The CVS strain of rabies virus and its antigenic mutants which was kindly donated by D. H. L. Bishop.
were grown and purified by previously described procedures Reverse transcription, amplification, and sequencing. RNA
(19). extracted from purified viral particles was engaged in first-
MAb production and characterization. BALB/c mice (pur- strand cDNA synthesis by the general method described by
chased from IFFA-Mdrieux) were immunized at a 6-week Sambrook et al. (21). Briefly, RNA in Tris-HCl, pH 8.3-50
interval with two intraperitoneal injections of 100 ,g of mM KCl-5 mM MgCl2-1 mM each deoxynucleotide triphos-
purified, beta propiolactone-inactivated CVS. An intrave- phate (dNTP)-25 U of RNAsine (Promega)-7.5 U of avian
nous booster injection was given 4 days before fusion. myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Amersham)-50
Spleen cells from immunized mice were fused with Sp2/0 pmol of messenger sense primer (primer 1), in 20 ,ul (final
myeloma cells, according to standard procedures (12). volume), was incubated for 45 min at 37°C.
Hybridomas secreting anti-rabies virus antibodies were First-strand cDNA-RNA heteroduplexes were denatured
first characterized by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent as- for 5 min at 95°C, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was
say (ELISA) against the whole virus (20) and then against performed with 5 ,ul of the cDNA synthesis mixture in 100 ,ul
lev
OD
IV
at
IV Nq 14
C4
r1
i
UZ -w 91 C4
N IV Un In
(class 4, 5, or 6 in Fig. 1) were also resistant to MAbs specific
1 12 0 000 00000 000 000 0 0 to site II, indicating that these mutants were affected within
12 00000 0 000 00 o ( 00 00 antigenic site II. MAbs 46D2 and 52A4 should thus be
7 00 00 0 * 0 C0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 considered site II specific. The mutant selected with 46D2
2 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 also failed to be neutralized by 49C2. This indicates that
3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 49C2 is also directed against site II. The 40 mutants were
4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O0 O @ 0 * 00 neutralized by 52C4 and 7D2. The specificities of the two
5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 C) O * *0 00 MAbs which neutralized all categories of MAR mutants
6 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 @ 0 0 0 0
remain to be determined.
MAb reactivity with SDS-treated glycoprotein. The reactiv-
FIG. 2. Binding of 39 representative neutralizing MAbs to the viral glycoprotein in Western blots. (a) Summary table; (b) representative
immunoblots showing binding in the presence (lanes 1) or absence (lanes 2) of 2-p-mercaptoethanol: binding in both condtions (A), binding
only in the absence of the reducing agent (B), or no binding (C). The positions of the five viral proteins were identified by staining the blot
with Ponceau red. The dye was washed out before treatment with antibodies.
VOL. 65, 1991 ANTIGENICITY OF RABIES VIRUS GLYCOPROTEIN 4201
A B C
A B
1023 bp-
w _ "
766 bp.-
GM 2
FIG. 4. Electrophoretic mobilities of the proteins of CVS (B) and
mutant AD8 (A). The destruction of the first putative glycosylation
FIG. 3. PCR amplification of two segments of the glycoprotein site by the substitution of an asparagine in position 37 does not
gene. Lanes Aand B, amplification products; lane C, markers. change the electrophoretic mobility of the glycoprotein (Gl, G2).
4202 BENMANSOUR ET AL. J. VIROL.
Bunschoten, L. Otvos, Jr., W. H. Wunner, H. C. J. Ertl, D. Logan, and D. Stuart. 1990. Structural and serological
A. D. M. E. Osterhaus, and H. Koprowski. 1990. Structural and evidence for a novel mechanism of antigenic variation in foot-
immunological characterization of a linear virus-neutralizing and-mouth disease virus. Nature (London) 347:569-572.
epitope of the rabies virus glycoprotein and its possible use in a 19. Prehaud, C., P. Coulon, A. Diallo, C. Martinet-Edelist, and A.
synthetic vaccine. J. Virol. 64:3804-3809. Flamand. 1989. Characterization of a new temperature-sensitive
10. Dietzschold, B., W. H. Wunner, T. J. Wiktor, A. D. Lopes, M. and avirulent mutant of the rabies virus. J. Gen. Virol. 70:133-
Lafon, C. L. Smith, and H. Koprowski. 1983. Characterization 143.
of an antigenic determinant of the glycoprotein that correlates 20. Prehaud, C., P. Coulon, F. Lafay, C. Thiers, and A. Flamand.
with pathogenicity of rabies virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988. Antigenic site II of the rabies virus glycoprotein: structure
80:70-74. and role in viral virulence. J. Virol. 62:1-7.
11. Flamand, A., T. J. Wiktor, and H. Koprowski. 1980. Use of 21. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular
hybridoma monoclonal antibodies in the detection of antigenic cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,
differences between rabies and rabies-related virus proteins. II. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
The glycoprotein. J. Gen. Virol. 48:105-109.
12. Kohler, G., and C. Milstein. 1975. Continuous cultures of fused 22. Seif, I., P. Coulon, P. E. Rollin, and A. Flamand. 1985. Rabies
cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature (Lon- virulence: effect on pathogenicity and sequence characteriza-
don) 256:495-497. tion of rabies virus mutations affecting antigenic site III of the
13. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the glycoprotein. J. Virol. 53:926-934.