Professional Documents
Culture Documents
American University in Cairo Project Seminar Politics 5285 Fall Semester 2016 Waleed C147
American University in Cairo Project Seminar Politics 5285 Fall Semester 2016 Waleed C147
Project Seminar
Politics 5285
Fall Semester 2016
Waleed C147
This course will examine the process by which development programs and projects
are identified, designed and put into implementation. The emphasis of the course will
be at project level. This will involve examining the project cycle, through which
projects are identified, appraised, selected for finance, implemented and evaluated.
Critiques of this process will also be considered. Students will also be exposed to the
basic concepts and methodology of cost-benefit analysis.
By the end of the course students should have mastered the following skills:
The course will be in the form of a seminar. Readings drawn from academic texts and
program/project documentation will be set from week to week. Active class
discussion of the reading material will constitute the basis for the weekly classes. As
students become more familiar with the skills and procedures involved in producing
project documentation it is expected that meetings will become more and more
student led.
Evaluation
Grades will be determined on the basis of a substantial project design exercise, a mid-
term essay, and student participation. Each student will produce a draft project
proposal, this being the project design exercise. The completed student project will be
defended orally in class. The project will account for 60% of the student’s grade,
1
while one midterm essay (1500 words) will be worth 15%, one reaction paper (700
words) will be worth 10%, and participation will constitute the remaining 15% of the
grade.
Texts
The course readings will be drawn mostly from the following documents and
volumes:
A. Hira & T. Parfitt, Development Projects for a New Millennium, Praeger, 2004.
(Hard copy is available in the copy center)
B. European Union, Project Cycle Management Handbook (Hildastrasse,
Germany: 2002). (Soft copy available)
C. European Union, Aid Delivery Methods: Project Cycle Management
Guidelines, March 2004 (A soft copy is available).
D. EU: A project cycle manual and logical framework toolkit: A practical guide
for equal development partnership (Hard copy is available in the copy center).
E. UNDP, Regional Bureau for Africa and the Pacific, How to Write a Project
Document: A Manual for Designers of UNDP Projects, New York, 1991(Hard
copy is available in the copy center).
F. UNDP Programming Manual, New York, 1999 (Soft copy available).
G. UNEP Project Manual, New York, 2009.
H. ITTO, Manual for Project Formulation, #rd edition, ITTO (International
Tropical Timber Organization), 3rd edition, 2009, (Soft copy available)
I. Little, Mirlees, Project Appraisal and planning, (Basic Books, N.Y, 1974)
(Hard copy is available in the copy center).
J. Supportive reading: UNHCR, Practical Guid on the use of objectives, outputs,
and indicators, Division of Operations Support (A soft copy and a hard copy is
available).
K. Additional readings will be supplied in soft form.
Outline of the Course
2
• ITTO: pp.9-32.
• Little, Mirlees, Project Appraisal and planning; Chapter 6 and 7
• Parfitt and Hira: Chapter 2.
3
• Khandakar, Elahi and (2004): Danopoulos, Constatine Microcredit and the
Third World: Perspectives from moral and political philosophy, International
Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 643-654.
• Molla, Rafiqul Isalm et al (2008): Questioning Bangladesh’s Microcredit,
Challenge Vol. 51, pp. 113-121.
• Mahmud, Simeen (2003): Actually how Empowering is Microcredit?,
Development and Change, 34 (4), pp. 577-605.
• UNDP (2006): Review of UNDP Microfinance Portfolio, Revised January
2006.
• Rosenberg, Richard (2009): Measuring Results of Microfinance Institutions:
Minimum Indicators That Donors and Investors should track, A Technical
Guide, CGAP, June 2009.
• Guidelines for Designing Poverty-Focused Projects with Microfinance
Components, The World Bank, Social Protection Team, June 2002.
4
Adjusting project design to donors' proposal format
E.U Australi USAID Danish Japan Norway Sweden Arab OPEC U.K GTZ
an Fund
Instructor