An Analysis On Educational Supply Chain in India: Project Report

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 43

Project Report

An Analysis on Educational Supply Chain in India

(Subject: Business Research Methods)

Submitted by
Group No. 21

A Nirmal Kumar (2002001)


Ailani Deepak Ashan (2002012)
Sunil Kumar Behera (2002049)
Manoj Kumar Bulugundla (2002056)
Bhaskar Santhosh Kumar Sunkara (2002051)

Under Guidance of
Prof. Sumi Jha

National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) Mumbai

1|Page
Analysis on Educational Supply Chain in India

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to take this opportunity to express our profound gratitude and deep regard
to Prof. Sumi Jha, for her exemplary guidance, valuable feedback, and constant
encouragement throughout the duration of the project. Her valuable suggestions were of
immense help throughout project work. Working under her was an extremely
knowledgeable experience for us.

We would also like to give our sincere gratitude to all those who filled in the survey and
agreed for interviews without which this research would be incomplete.

2|Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The objective of our study was to identify, understand and explore the different types of
problems faced in educational supply chain predominantly in Engineering college of
India

To classify and understand the different types of problems, we divided the problems
into student grievances, teachers’ grievances, Alumni Connections and availability of
research and entrepreneurship opportunities.

For the analysis we developed a survey questionnaire which covered all the variables and
a total of 111 response were collected from the online survey.
Based on the responses we tried to validate our hypothesis through Anova and
Descriptive analysis.

Accepted Hypothesis:

From Anova analysis, we found out the factors that significantly impact the development
of Educational System in India
INDEX

Acknowledgement.....................................................................................................................2
Executive Summary..................................................................................................................3
1. Introduction & Problem Statements..................................................................................5
2. Literature Review.................................................................................................................7
3. Objective of the Study........................................................................................................11
4. Variables.............................................................................................................................12
5. Hypothesis...........................................................................................................................14
6. Research Methodology.......................................................................................................15
7. Analysis...............................................................................................................................16
7.1 Descriptive Statistics.......................................................................................................16
7.2 Correlations.....................................................................................................................17
7.3 Hypothesis Result............................................................................................................22
8. Limitations..........................................................................................................................23
9. Suggestions/Recommendations........................................................................................24
10. Conclusion.........................................................................................................................26
Reference.................................................................................................................................27
Appendix..................................................................................................................................28
1. INTRODUCTION
In terms of economics, engineering serves as a powerhouse and considered as the backbone
of the country’s economy and are core of the overall development of people’s quality of
life. It dates to the British rule and the need to develop infrastructure for infrastructural
development. Post-independence, engineering education has taken on a new significance in
India as institutions grew steadily up until 1990, the situation began to change with the
advent of computers. Today we produce around 1.5 million engineers out of more than
6000 colleges in India. The responsibility for producing competent engineers for meeting
the changing requirements of the industry lies with educational institutions and engineering
educators. A series of machines, algorithms, and robotics are augmenting the profession's
evolving contours. As the job market changes, technical colleges face a serious challenge as
companies expect their employees to have uncompromised skills. A new generation of
technology courses will likely replace traditional engineering courses in the near future.
Examples include Artificial Intelligence, Full Stack Engineering, Robotics, Cloud
Computing, Big Data Analytics, etc.

The present study aimed to enumerate the various means of addressing the challenges and
robustness of the education system in terms of its ability to address industry-specific skills
shortages, as well as to identify the substantial and emerging strengths of Indian
engineering education.to graduate engineers for the future from stakeholders’ perspective.
For analysis of these issues and challenges, focus groups are comprised of engineering
students, engineering educators, Alumni, and academic heads of institutions are formed.
With the advent of new age technologies, capricious students' mindsets, and the need to
enhance classroom education, focus group consultations revealed that trends in recruitment
processes are changing.
1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT

An analysis and classification of problems in Educational Sector. How the problems in


the industry differ from student to student based on geography, Engineering
specialization and facilities provided by the University.

1. Is Research and Entrepreneurship encouraged by the university?


2. Do colleges provide incubation center and seed funding for startup ideas?
3. How relevant is the academic curriculum and what is the frequency of Industry interaction?
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Paper 1: Performance Measurement of an Indian Higher Education Institute

Objectives of the Study:

1. To measure the efficiency of 19 academic departments of IIT Roorkee, India for


academic year

2. To Experimental setup that includes Data collections, Model, DEA and GHG

General Findings:
The findings of analysis can be listed as National policies on a living secondary and higher
education, Institutional policy on quality and progression secondary to higher education
achieving more effective alignment between secondary and higher education, and so on.
Thus the development of models of SCQM in education can benefit supply chain
integration and improve it's performance thus sharing of effective information will not be
lacked.

Conclusions:
SCM does not make sense for just one entity as it depends on the involvement of all links in
the chains. It is interesting conceptualise education as a supply chain and investigate the
SCQM practises in education. In all universities there are special programmes subject to the
level of competence. Since education is decided national level and cannot be changed at
school level, in terms of institutional good practice able to identify mechanism that reflect
the good practise put forward by OECD. SCQM is an under researched sector education.

Paper 2: Integrated Educational Supply Chain Management (IESCM)


for the Universities

Objectives of the Study:

1. To study the coordination and information sharing up and down the process among
all relevant parties

2. To analyse the coordination of all supply chain stakeholders to achieve desired


educational outcomes
General Findings:

The proposed conceptual IESCM model for the universities provides a novel approach for
decision makers of each supply chain components to review and appraise their performance
toward fulfilment of ultimate goals, i.e. producing high-calibre graduates and high-impact
research outcomes for the betterment of the society. This model links educational
management with general business management. From a managerial perspective, this
research provides a novel approach to developing and assessing supply chain management
application in the academia.

Conclusion:

The model is obtained through the gathering and analysis of a vast amount of primary and
secondary data. The applicability of the model is then verified and validated via Delphi.
The interrelationships among all integrated educational supply chain components are
investigated and confirmed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique. The
applicability of the model can be confirmed empirically. However, model evaluation by
actual implementation is suggested for prospective investors or current university
administrators.

Paper 3: The Supply Chain Quality Management in High Education: A


Case Study in Indonesia

Objectives of the study:


To formulate the supply chain quality management model by identifying the importance
factors which contribute the success of supply chain quality management practice in the
perational academic process

General Findings:

The commitment of top management in SCM is shown by various concepts such as:
corporate culture change, management support, participatory management, and
cooperation, but in the SCM and TQM case the concept is the same.
Customer focus in TQM includes customer complaints, satisfaction, close partnership with
customers, and customer responsiveness are like those found in SCM.

Conclusion:
The research presents the importance input for the concept regarding the integration of total
quality management and supply chain management implementation of study program’s
operations academic process in high education. This study compiling the development of
the concept of supply chain quality management implementation concept and proposition
in the form of a causal model that links the influence between several related concepts in
supply chain quality management.

Paper 4: Major Challenges Facing Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in


Asia and Solutions for Mitigating them

Objectives:

To provide the society value by producing high quality graduates and quality research
outcomes. Realizing that the research on academic supply chain management may also be
conducted for their own educational institutions.

General Findings:
The factor that highly contributed to the university is students. Research suppliers are the
most significant factor in the university. the society consists of graduates and research
outcomes. The most significant factor in the society is education customers.

Conclusion:

They show the significant relationship among different factors in educational supply chain
to produce quality graduates and quality research outcomes for the betterment of the
society. There are significant relationship between education suppliers and students as well
as research suppliers and research projects to enhance the universities. From the research
findings, students and research suppliers are highly contributed to the universities.

Paper 5: Performance measurement of an Indian higher education Institute:


a sustainable educational supply chain management perspective

General Findings:

1. Education sector can be considered as a service based industry; a non-profit


organization where the objective is to serve the nation by producing quality
graduates and research outcomes.
2. In an ordinary supply chain the objective is to integrate and optimize the activities
within and across the organization so as to satisfy the customer.
3. Likewise, in an Educational Supply Chain the nation plays the role of supplier as
well as the customer and the institution pays the role of the service industry.

Conclusions:

1. Some departments like Chemistry, Earthquake Engineering, Earth Sciences,


Humanities and Social Sciences, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering and
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering are high in research supply chain efficiency
but low in teaching supply chain efficiency measured by DEA without considering
GHG Emission. This could indicate that their focus for educational SCM is more on
research activities than teaching activities.

2. In contrast, a few departments supply chain efficiency measured by DEA while


considering GHG emission, for example Biotechnology, Civil Engineering, Earth
Sciences, Electrical Engineering and Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, have
high teaching efficiency but low research efficiency. This could imply that this
department is more competent, productive and sustainable in teaching supply chain
but less capable in conducting research with taking care of sustainability aspect
3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The main objective of the study is to identify major problems and constraints in
Education Sector and highlight the factors that contribute to the overall improvement of
the education system in India. Moreover, it provides a source of information on the
existing issues that can be studied and can be reduced by taking effective measures.

The specific objectives of the Research are to:


1. Analyze the current situation of the education system and the facilities provided by the colleges.
2. Study the effect of Alumni Connect, Industry Interaction and teacher student
interaction on students’ career

3. Study the contribution of universities in providing seed funding to encourage the


startup ideas
4. Investigate the different types of problems in education sector
5. Define strategy options for the entrepreneurial development of students at universities.
6. Identify the constraints to be overcome by the universities to improve the academic
curriculum.

3.2 SCOPE OF RESEARCH

This study focuses on analysis and classification of problems in Education Sector and
highlight the factors that contribute to the overall improvement of the education system in
India. Moreover, it provides a source of information on the existing issues that can be studied
and can be reduced by taking effective measures.
4. VARIABLES

In this study, the demographics of the Engineering students like their age, education and
education location are studied and, we have considered 8 Independent Variables,
Infrastructure, Alumni Interactions, Industry connects, Research Mentorship, Student
teacher Interaction, Academic curricular, Distance learning Adoption and place of
Education

The Alumni Interactions and Industry connects have significant effect in improving the
exposure to the industry practices and also will guide the students to adopt the latest
technologies required in the current job Market.

Infrastructure and Research Mentorship will impart practical exposure of the theoretical
concepts the students learn in the classrooms. These promote the research culture among
the students.

The Dependent Variable include Exposure to Industrial problems, Increase in


Entrepreneurship Activities, creation of research culture, Technology Adoption and job
opportunities
Government Policies

Infrastructure Moderating Variable


Exposure to Industrial
problems
 Creation
Alumni of research culture
Interactions

Increase in
Industry connects entrepreneural
activities

Research Mentorship
Creation of research
culture

Student Teacher Interaction

Technology Adoption 
Academic curriculum

Distance learning technology

Place of Education

Moderating Variable
Research Funding
5. HYPOTHESIS
 Increase in entrepreneur activities

Hypothesis 1: Lack of incubation centers results in less entrepreneurship activities


Hypothesis 2: Lack of push from college side leads to decrease in entrepreneur interest
Hypothesis 3: Lack of angel investors or seed funding leads to failure of startups

 Exposure to industrial problems

Hypothesis 1: Insufficient Alumni interactions lead to less exposure to industrial problems


Hypothesis 2: Insufficient guest lectures from industry experts result in lack of exposure to
practical industry problems
Hypothesis 3: Outdated curriculum results in poor understanding of on the job
requirements

 Creation of research culture

Hypothesis 1: Lack of guidance provided by professors hampers research prodigy


development
Hypothesis 2: Lack of mentorship from seniors, assistant staff or industry personnel
obstructs the creation of research culture
Hypothesis 3: Inadequate laboratory facilities lead to inadequate research development
Hypothesis 4: Amount of time and resources dedicated by professors and college is
directly proportional to promotion of research culture

 Technology adoption

Hypothesis 1: Adoption of distance learning is ambiguous and depends on response time


from teachers’ as well as on the medium (technology) used
Hypothesis 2: The UI/UX of the platform used for online learning influences technology
adoption

14 | P a g e
6. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The data contained detailed information about the shortcomings that 111 students faced
in the current education system.
PRIMARY DATA: To get the data from small business owners, the Survey and
Interview method was used. The data has been collected from 111 respondents by using a
Convenience Random Sampling method to fetch the results from the business owners in
different cities of India with the help of a structured questionnaire and 10 respondents by
interview. Both Quantitative and Qualitative Data is collected.
SECONDARY DATA: The data has been collected from research articles, journals,
writ- up theses, and web sources.
RESEARCH DESIGN: The present study is analytical and descriptive. The study
highlights the classification of problems faced by small business owners in different
sectors.
SAMPLING PLAN:
1) SAMPLE UNIT: Engineering student
2) SAMPLE SIZE: 111
3) SAMPLE SELECTION: Convenience Random Sampling Method
4) SAMPLING TECHNIQUES: Nonprobability
5) SAMPLING INSTRUMENTS: Structured Questionnaire and Interview
6) TOOL FOR ANALYSIS: ANOVA, Descriptive
Correlation and regression are used to study relation of demographics of the business
owners and the overall business growth and performance.

15 | P a g e
7. ANALYSIS

7.1 Descriptive Statistics


Minimu Standar
Question N Range m Maximum Mean d Dev
0.6
Categorical
1. Does your college have Incubation center? 111 486 0.4774
2. Does your college promote Entrepreneurship 0.7
Categorical
Events? 111 658 0.4235
3. Does your college have sufficient Alum 0.5
Categorical
Connect? 111 946 0.4910
4. How Frequently do Alum Interactions happen 2.4
yearly? 111 1-5 1 5 775 1.4633
5. How happy are you with the amount of time you
spend speaking with your teacher during your 2.9
1.3258
Study? 111 1-5 1 5 099
6. How confident are you that teachers can
motivate students to learn in the current model? 6.3
2.3169
(1 – least to 10- Maximum) 111 1-10 1 10 694
7. Do you think online learning platforms will
change the way education would be imparted in 3.8
1.3852
the future? 111 1-5 1 5 649
8. How happy are you with the guidance provided
by Professor (Project Mentor) for your Research 3.0
1.3523
projects? 111 1-5 1 5 090
9. How difficult or easy is it to use the distance
learning technology (computer, tablet, video calls, 4.1
1.2191
learning applications, etc.)? 111 1-5 1 5 351
10. If you are participating in distance learning,
how often do you hear from your teachers 2.9
1.3882
individually (Frequency of 1-1 counselling)? 111 1-5 1 5 009
11. Does your college offer mentor ship for 0.5
Categorical
research projects? 111 676 0.4954
12. Does your college provide seed funding for in 0.3
Categorical
house startup ideas? 111 333 0.4714
13. Are the Lab facilities adequate to gain practical 3.2
exposure of theoretical concepts ? 111 1-5 1 5 793 1.0325
14. How frequently does industry expert guest 3.1
lectures happen in your college? 111 1-5 1 5 982 1.1688
15. Do you feel the current college curriculum is 2.5
up-to date with the industry practices? 111 1-5 1 5 315 1.7389

16 | P a g e
7.2 Correlations

17 | P a g e
18 | P a g e
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
7.3 Hypothesis Results

Hypothesis Significance Result


Level
Lack of incubation centers results in less entrepreneurship <0.001 Accepted
activities
Lack of push from college side leads to decrease in <0.001 Accepted
entrepreneur interest
Lack of angel investors or seed funding leads to failure of startups <0.001 Accepted

Insufficient Alumni interactions lead to less exposure to industrial <0.001 Accepted


problems
Insufficient guest lectures from industry experts result in lack of <0.001 Accepted
exposure to practical industry problems
Outdated curriculum results in poor understanding of on the job <0.001 Accepted
requirements
Lack of guidance provided by professors 0.435 Rejected
hampers research prodigy development
Lack of mentorship from seniors, assistant staff or <0.001 Accepted
industry personnel obstructs the creation of research
culture
Inadequate laboratory facilities lead to inadequate <0.001 Accepted
research development
Amount of time and resources dedicated by professors and 0.002 Accepted
college is directly proportional to promotion of research culture
Adoption of distance learning is ambiguous and depends 0.542 Rejected
on response time from teachers’ as well as on the medium
(technology) used
The UI/UX of the platform used for online learning 0.015 Accepted
influences technology adoption

22 | P a g e
8. LIMITATIONS
 Alumni representations are less.
 Teachers/Educator representation are less
 Demographical distribution is not even
 The survey was taken from representative samples. The responses are purely on the
perceptions of the respondents.

23 | P a g e
9. SUGGESTION/RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Current power consumption (2019-20) at the undergraduate and post-graduate level is 50%
lower (approx.) (Capacity Vs. Enrollment). Building more capacity is a never-ending
investment in investment because, at a basic level, it involves building infrastructure that
looks like infrastructure and laboratory infrastructure. We recommend that we do not build
new strengths from the 2020 teaching year. The latest capacity build can be reviewed every
two years at that time.
2. As we make such a big decision, we also see that there are other applications within the
pipeline for new / new energy used in the last one or two years. This is further awaited due to
the requirement of certain permissions. Therefore, applications made this year and the last
two years can be considered even starting institutions if the infrastructure is already in place.
3. We recommend that AICTE should take energy use seriously as it provides additional
capacity to many universities across the country.
4. Poor employment of students with engineering degrees is a sign of weakness - a lack of
quality, and teaching. tourism is important to wish for immediate action to improve the
quality of our teachers.
a. Faculty skills need to be developed, especially within the areas of recent technology
and research on critical intellectual development programs. The training of teachers in
teacher training institutions, using quality management systems (QIPs) and the use of
IIT / NIT and infrastructure skills are the kind of interventions we recommend
immediately.
b. to achieve the necessary change within education in the immediate future, we
recommend an industry visit with a strong focus on exposure to the expertise of the
most advanced technologies. Industrial organizations are also finding strength in
helping this.
c. To strengthen teaching, we recommend engineering excellence by certification /
diploma / degree in education.
5. Also, we may require additional technical interventions such as MOOCs to avoid the type
of barriers that are lacking in intelligence and therefore the level of education. Students
should rely on greater flexibility in using MOOCs in their basic and optional subjects.
Universities and private institutions should be authorized to use MOOCs in the short term.
6. Low enrollment, inclusion, and employment prospects is a matter of concern.Service
delivery is essential for national economic development. While acknowledging the role that
educational institutions can play in improving the quality of education and indirectly
contributing to its use, all other stakeholders including government and industry should also
begin to address remedial measures to strengthen generation use.
7. As research becomes more democratic, finances may need to be spent wisely. Institutions
should build project management skills in research to strengthen rapid transformation, reduce
costs and over-planning, and better industrial and educational collaboration.
8. Educational institutions must continue to monitor future skills needs and make appropriate

24 | P a g e
changes to content and teaching so that graduates have the right skills for the job market.
Therefore, the institutional approach to the industry from time to time in the development of
technology and its impact on job roles should be put in place.
9. There is evidence to suggest that this industrial and academic partnership needs to be
improved. We recommend the following interventions:
a. Analysis tools should be familiar with the impact of different teaching methods and
identify unique ways of doing lessons and learning lessons - firmly strengthen work-
based learning and teaching.
b. Vocational training should be made compulsory in the industry (somehow available
but requires strong implementation) and compulsory in educational institutions
(ranging from 25% to 100% in five years.
c. Two industry representatives to be part of the board of all institutions.
d. The promotion of industrial and academic collaboration in the included research
should be encouraged.
e. Establish 20 National Knowledge Functional Hubs (NKFH) as a pilot at AICTE
accredited facilities to create an environmental program for industrial and academic
engagement.
f. We recommend that AICTE take into account the needs of the local environmental
industry while creating new capabilities or expanding existing capacity to deepen
domain knowledge and meet industry needs.
g. At the same time, we recommend that AICTE measure this measure in line with
national and international requirements by introducing courses to disrupt virtual
technology nationally and internationally.
10. We have evidence to point out that new environments, incubators and ecosystems are
lacking in educational institutions. As appropriately adopted by GOI, priority is a key driver
for job creation and wealth creation. All educational institutions must be accredited to do the
following:
a. Entrepreneurship should be a small choice for graduate students regardless of
whether they graduate or university
b. Thinking labs such as Atal Innovation Labs will be set up in all centers.
c. To further start-ups, educational institutions should develop and incorporate
incubator centers, counseling clubs, and accelerator programs.
11. Research into future trends in education shows that learner-centered learning should be a
priority.
a. We recommend that students be encouraged to design ideas and practical learning
methods.
b. Students should also be made aware of the world's social and economic problems in
order to solve them using technical learning.
c. Technology should be used for each learning method

25 | P a g e
10. CONCLUSION
Education is that the art of preparing the individuals with skills and overall development.
University may be a place where creative minds converge and ideas germinate. An empirical
survey to grasp the perceptions of stakeholders of engineering education was applied through
focus group consultations. In general, students have mixed perceptions on the the quality of
engineering knowledge imparted to them. But most of them were optimistic on the longer term
of engineering education and also the parents’ major motive behind choosing engineering for
his or her ward’s career is that the availability of job opportunities. Faculty members also
expressed positively on the longer term of engineering education but were apprehensive on the
students’ mindset. Overall, international competition, changing global scenario, expectations of
the task markets and advent of latest technologies pose challenges and necessitates the analysis
of the present curricula and their relevance to the planet in future. Hence there's great must shift
the main focus of upper education institutions, technical teachers, and therefore the universities
to update and construct curriculum to reinforce 21st century skills.

26 | P a g e
References
1. Acherjee and Kumar, 2016, Dr.BappaAcherjee and Prof. Ashutosh Kumar,
Department of Production Engineering and Department of Mechanical
Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology,
https://www.thehighereducationreview.com/magazine/higher-professional-
education-inindia-a-critical-review-WQSS724597993.html
2. AISHE, All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) Report 2017-18.
https://news.careers360.com/aishe-report-2017-18-ger-close-26- phd-enrolment-
just-05-total-student-enrolment
3. Assessment and Teaching of 21st century skills. (2012).What are 21st century
skills? Melbourne, Australia: Author.
4. Aspiring Minds, 2019, National Employability Survey Engineers,
https://www.aspiringminds.com/research-reports/national-employabilityreport-
for-engineers-2019/
5. Cognizant, 2017, 21 Jobs of the Future: A Guide to Getting – and Staying – E
mployed for the Next 10 Years, https://www.cognizant.com/whitepapers/21-jobs-
of-the-future-a-guide-to-getting-and-staying-employed-over-the-next-10-years-
codex3049.pdf
6. ET bureau, 2019, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/et-india-dialogues-
india-needs-to-shift-the-focus-to-large-
scaleemployment/articleshow/71750594.cms)
7. ET online, 2018,
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/india-is-in-the-
middle-of-an-engineering-educationcrisis/articleshow/63680625.cms?from=mdr
8. GER, 2018, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/indias-gross-
enrolment-ratio-in-higher-education-very-lownaac/article24597284.ece
9. Hong, E., Hartzell, S. A., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the
classroom: Effects of teachers' epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal
orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 192-208.

27 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business
APPENDIX

Survey Questionnaire
Section A – General Questionnaire on Educational Supply Chain

28 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

29 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

30 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

31 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

32 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

33 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Business

Interviewer: Sunil Kumar Behera


Interviewee: Vishnu M (Assistant Professor: Malla Reddy Engineering College,
Hyderabad)
Mode: Telephonic Date: 30/08/2021
Q1) Your Teaching area
A) Mining, 1st year and 2nd year students
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with students?
A) Not very much, earlier we used to interact with each one in the class, now most
of them just switch on and leave and we also cannot be able to allocate much time for
interaction as we must cover entire syllabus also. But it is good for the students who
are really interested as they utilize time of entire class
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) No, it took 1-2 months to adjust in the new system but post that it is all ok
Q4) Did any of your student face difficulty in attending classes
A) Yes, a few attends through mobile (due to lack of mobile), Few do not witch
videos due to internet issue and few leave class in-between due to power cut and all
issue
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No, but we tied up with Telangana T hub to provide support for our students
Q6) How frequent students utilize this opportunity (T-Hub incubation center)
A) Most of them are focused about placements but very few do utilize and work on
their dreams (last year 4 teams registered from our college). I believe day by day
students are getting interested over startups
Q7) How frequent do your college organize any entrepreneurial event or competitions
A) Twice, one as part of Annual Technical fest and other by E-cell. But we do
encourage students to participate in various national level competitions (like IIT’s and
IIM and various state sponsored events)
Q8) Do you get enough support from Director
A) Yes, director sir is very supportive and always encourage us to push students

Q9) Do you think online education platform will change the way education is
imparted in future
A) Not really, I think for next generation this might have significant impact as kids
are already tied
up with gadgets and all, but for this generation students offline will be the best way of
teaching

Q10) How is alumni connections of the college and how supportive are they
A) Frankly speaking, not very much. Alumni’s who are in topmost positions do
support for few events and functioning, but they are limited to very few. We are
actively trying to build our alumni relationship.
Q11) Do you feel any changes required in current curriculum
A) Yes, few subjects related to business, finance and Analytics should be
introduce to all as common in First year and then course specific afterward

34 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Sunil Kumar Behera Business
Interviewee: Sagar (Alumni- NIT Jamshedpur)
Mode: Telephonic Date: 30/08/2021
Q1) Your present occupation
A) City Business head, Hyderabad; Bro4u (startup)
Q2) Are you satisfied with your contribution as alumni to your institute?
A) Yes, there will be alumni meet held every year in which we all have a chance to
meet once and contribute what we can to our institute
Q3) How many people from your batch do purse entrepreneurship as carrier?
A) In my batch out of 700 people who graduated, almost 100 people has started
entrepreneurship as carrier
Q4) How frequent do you get invitation from your institute for any social gather or
knowledge sharing
A) Yearly once we get a chance to interact with our institute students and there
will be alumni meet held every year
Q5) Do you feel yourself connected to your institute
A) Yes, very much, I hope everyone does as it holds strong blend in all our carrier
paths
Q6) Are you interested to allocate your time for mentoring/Guiding present students
at your institute
A) I will be glad to take up this if I get a chance, interacting with young talent
always gives a refreshment
Q7) How frequent do your college organize any entrepreneurial event or
competitions? (during graduation)
A) There will a technical fest held every year in which there are few
entrepreneurial competitions
Q8) Do you get enough support from Director
A) Our director is very student friendly; we never faced any issue in approaching
to him

Q9) Do you think online education platform will change the way education is
imparted in future
A) The one-on-one interaction stands far ahead from online education

Q10) How is alumni connections of the college and how supportive are they
A) They are very supportive; we maintain our social media platform very actively
celebrating and wishing our alum success
Q11) Do you feel any changes required in current curriculum
A) As far as I feel its quite sufficient and good, I would suggest some courses to be
added on management and entrepreneurship

35 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Manoj B Business
Interviewee: Ramakrishna S (Professor: Government Engineering College, JNTU
Kakinada)
Mode: Telephonic Date: 27/08/2021
Q1) Your Teaching area
A) Mechanical (Head of Department)
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with students?
A) Yes, we have come up with lot of initiatives to help students (providing books,
arranging extra session for interaction only, tracking their attendance)
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) No, we provide faculty with laptops and special allowance also for internet. But
yes, we cannot be able to do practical’s properly in online mode, we tried for 3d
views for better perspective but still offline are best
Q4) Did any of your student face difficulty in attending classes
A) No, they also get adapted to the situation very quickly and supportive in this
mode
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No, we have various clubs and committees
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) No, not many students demand for it and if required we can look for tie-up
Q7) Do you think students are not much interested about entrepreneurship or owning
their own business
A) Most of students look for decent placement and their focus is getting into best
company and other go for higher studies, very few 1-2 from entire batch (600
strength) do choose to purse entrepreneurship
Q8) Do you feel entrepreneurship or starting own business will be good as a carrier
prospect for students
A) Yes, being a job creator is always good, but I do understand about their family
needs, financial conditions, and burden of loans for pursing this course

Q9) Do you think online education platform will change the way education is
imparted in future
A) Yes, looking at foreign institute and other countries I think online education
will change the way education is taught and moreover the way knowledge is
transformed

Q10) How is alumni connections of the college and how supportive are they
A) Yes, we have good support of alumni, and we organize various interaction
sessions with them

Q11) Do you feel any changes required in current curriculum


A) We do change our curriculum from time to time to match with changing
requirements

36 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Manoj B Business
Interviewee: Vamsi (Computer science Student,3rd year JNTU Kakinada)
Mode: Online Meet (G Meet) Date: 01/09/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
A) Offline as we lack peer learning and interaction in this online mode, but with
present covid conditions online is preferred
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
A) Yes, they are bit friendly and provide the opportunity to mail/text them if any
doubt being missed out while classes
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) Yes, sometimes I cannot be able to attend classes due to network issue or
power cut
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
A) Yes, sometimes
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) Yes, it will help provide support to us and motivate us to do something in those
lines
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
A) Yes, during annual fest
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
A) Yes, we mainly ask for help during our placements and try to gain insights
from them
Q9) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) No, not much
Q10) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education
system of future
A) Yes, and it should reduce the cost of education also in India
Q11) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
A) I do not know exactly

37 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Nirmal Business
Interviewee: Shiva (Mining ,4th year IIT Dhanbad)
Mode: Virtual Meeting Date: 03/09/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
B) Offline mode
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
B) NO, feel like left out and not learning much from the discussion
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
B) Yes. I lack proper internet services at my area, and I do not have any other
option due to covid, planning to go to hostel as early as possible
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
B) No disturbance from surroundings. Internet is my main issue.
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
B) Yes, and as startup culture is at a growing stage in India, I feel every college
needs one.
6) Do you planning to start any startup or business in future
A) Yes, post B-tech I want to experience office culture and want to gain a bit of
experience post that I want to start my own firm
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
B) Yes, a numerous events are organized and most of them are by E-cell
committee of institute
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
B) Yes, we got great support from alumni (they participate in various events
(formal and informal))
Q9) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education system
of future
B) Yes, digital mode of education will play an important role, and we must adopt
for it
Q10) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
B) No. As the changes are rapid, the curriculum needs to be updated more often.

38 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Bhaskar Santosh Business
Interviewee: Bhawana (Computer science Student,3rd year BIT’s Palani)
Mode: Virtual Meeting (G Meet) Date: 30/08/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
A) Offline mode
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
A) Not completely but slowly adapted to it
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) Lack of proper setup which we get in classroom and hostel.
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
A) Yes, at times I feel disturbed.
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) Yes, I certainly feel there is need for incubation center in my college.
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
A) Yes, but only few events in a year
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
A) Not at all, I think alumni should conduct more sessions to give insights and
motivate students.
Q9) Do you want to start any business in future
A) Not really, I want to get into best company through placements
Q10) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education
system of future
A) Yes, I think we can see paradigm shift in preference of education mode in
future
Q11) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
A) No, though colleges are introducing new separate streams with respect to
changes in the trend, but they aren’t trying to update the curriculum of existing
traditional courses.

39 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Deepak A Business
Interviewee: Yogesh (ECE, Student,2nd year COEP, Pune)
Mode: Google Meet (Virtual mode) Date: 01/09/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
A) Physical over digital as much better approachability.
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
A) It is the good given the present situational constraints.
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) Bandwidth and Power issues do occur once in a while.
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
A) Yes, at home it does get noisy sometimes and the vehicles noise do disturb
while classes.
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No.
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) Yes. Might not produce results as soon as start but will help to motivate and
provide results after certain period
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
A) Yes. And we generally discuss about it in the classes also (like students will be
asked to share their experience)
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
A) Yes. We had good relationship with our alumni
Q9) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education system
of future
A) Yes, because it helps you to schedule/ record sessions if allowed by the faculty
and learn at your own pace. Also there has been a marked behavioral shift which I
think will stick even when the pandemic goes away.
Q10) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
A) No, needs more industry interactions.

40 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Deepak A Business
Interviewee: Deepak (Chemical, Student,1st year COEP, Pune)
Mode: Google Meet (Virtual mode) Date: 03/09/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
A) Online as I do not have to travel much and stay in hostel
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
A) Yes, considering situational constraints and it is not much different from offline
format
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) Sometimes due to network issue
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
A) No, I have separate room and I can do my classes peacefully
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No but they are planning to start one (as informed by director)
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) Yes, it will help us to think beyond our curriculum
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
A) Not many as most of time we occupied with core subjects and their related
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
A) I didn’t interact much with them but whatever I required I do approach our
professors and they help us
Q9) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education system
of future
A) Yes, definitely
Q10) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
A) Do not know as first year we all have common subjects and exactly don’t know
much about core subjects

41 | P a g e
Analysis and Classification of Problems in Small
Interviewer: Nirmal Business
Interviewee: Chaitanya (Civil Eng’n Student,4th year JNTU Hyderabad)
Mode: Telephonic Date: 01/09/2021
Q1) which mode of education is preferred
A) Offline
Q2) Are you satisfied with the present online mode interaction with professors?
A) No, I am not satisfied
Q3) Did you face any difficulties in online mode (like adaptability, lack of
equipment’s or proper internet)
A) Initially there was no WiFi connection at my home, since the change of online
mode my parents had to afford a good WiFi connection but even then, I face
connectivity issues sometimes
Q4) Do you feel disturbed because of surrounding environment while online classes
A) My home is just beside a road which has a medium traffic all day. The horn
sounds and noise on the road sometimes disturbs me while listening to classes.
Q5) Do your college have incubation cell
A) No
Q6) Do you feel the need for incubation center in your college
A) Yes, it will help us to start our own business
Q7) Do your college organize any competitions or events related to entrepreneurship
A) Yes, sometimes
Q8) Are you satisfied with interaction or support from alumni of the college?
A) No, I do not feel we got that connection with alumni
Q09) Do you feel that online education will play a crucial role in the education
system of future
A) It may play crucial role in the future but not now as there are lot of problems
that are to be investigated. There is no proper mentoring of students, no smooth
interaction with the professors. Thus, the online are no way helping us to learn new
things
Q10) Do your feel the curriculum is up to date with present system
A) Yes, it is up to date and follows most changes from time to time with
requirement

42 | P a g e

You might also like