Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

View Article Online

View Journal

RSC Advances
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: A. M. Demin, A. G.
Pershina, K. V. Nevskay, L. V. Efimova, N. N. Shchegoleva, M. Uimin, D. K. Kuznetsov, V. Ya. Shur, V.
Krasnov and L. M. Ogorodova, RSC Adv., 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6RA13178F.

This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the


Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
accepted for publication.

Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after


acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading.
Using this free service, authors can make their results available
to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited
article. This Accepted Manuscript will be replaced by the edited,
formatted and paginated article as soon as this is available.

You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the


Information for Authors.

Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes


to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s
standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still
apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held
responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript
or any consequences arising from the use of any information it
contains.

www.rsc.org/advances
Page 1 of 5 PleaseRSC
do not adjust margins
Advances

View Article Online


DOI: 10.1039/C6RA13178F
RSC Advances

COMMUNICATION

pHLIP-Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles for Targeting Acidic


Published on 13 June 2016. Downloaded by University of California - Santa Barbara on 17/06/2016 14:49:08.

Diseased Tissues
Received 00th January 20xx,

RSC Advances Accepted Manuscript


a‡ b,c‡ b b d
Accepted 00th January 20xx A. M. Demin, A. G. Pershina* K. V. Nevskaya, L. V. Efimova, N. N. Shchegoleva, M. A.
d e e a b
Uimin, D. K. Kuznetsov, V. Ya. Shur, V. P. Krasnov and L. M. Ogorodova
DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

www.rsc.org/

8,9
A covalent immobilization of a pH-low insertion peptide for their selective transport in the acidic tissues. In particular,
(pHLIP) to Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles was carried out there are no information about obtaining of the MNP–pHLIP
resulting in formation of MRI-visible materials able to nanoconjugates. Taking into account high potential of magnetic
10
specific accumulation in the acidic damaged tissues. The nanoparticles for diagnosis (e.g. MRI) as well as theraphy, for
pH-dependent pHLIP-mediated binding of the obtained instance by magnetic hyperthermia in high frequency magnetic field
nanoconjugates to the cell in acidic environment was or magneto-mechanical actuation in low frequency alternating
11
demonstrated on HTC cells in vitro and in a mouse LLC magnetic field, the design of such nanoconjugate seems to be
tumour model in vivo. promising. In order to preserve the biological activity, it is accepted
to conjugate pHLIPs at the amino group of L-Ala (N-terminal amino
acid) or the thiol group of L-Cys.
1
pHLIPs (pH Low Insertion Peptides) are a class of peptides
In the work a method for immobilization of pHLIP to the APS-
possessing pH-dependent transmembrane activity; these peptides
modified MNPs (MNPs-APS) through covalent binding to the L-Cys
are able to insert into the cell membrane at slightly acidic pH (<7.0).
thiol group using 6-maleimidohexanoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide
Acidification of the intercellular space is a property of tumour,
ester (EMCS) as a linker is offered (Scheme 1).
inflammatory, ischemic and other damaged tissues. Therefore,
pHLIPs have been successfully used for targeting the therapeutic Derivatives containing the maleimide moiety have been used for
2, 3 4, 5 6 12,13
molecules and tracers to acidic tissues. modification of the SH groups in biomolecules, and their
14,15
conjugation to nanoparticles. The nucleophilic addition reaction
The purpose of the work was to develop an approach for
of thiols to double bond of the maleimide residue results in the
production of a new nanoconjugate based on the Fe3O4 magnetic
stable 3-thio-succinimidyl ester. Thus, the proposed approach of a
nanoparticles (MNPs) modified by 3-aminopropylsilane (APS) and
covalent binding of pHLIP to the MNP surface provided a
conjugated to pHLIP, and to test it as magnetic resonance imaging
nanoconjugate stability in the biological environments is carried
(MRI) visible contrast agent for acidic tissues (eg tumour) targeting.
out.
One of the most effective methods for modification of MNPs for
MNPs with an average diameter of 10 nm and a spinel phase state
biomedical applications is covalent binding of organic molecules 3+ 2+
7 Fe3O4 (Fig. 1A) were prepared by co-precipitation from Fe /Fe
that are pre-modified by alkoxysilane reagents, for example, by 3-
salt solutions. At the first step, the surface of nanoparticles 1 was
aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS). To the best of our 16,17
modified using APTMS (2) in a similar to previously described
knowledge, there is a limited number of publications on
(Scheme 1). The number of APS residues immobilized on the
immobilization of pHLIP on the surface of inorganic nanoparticles –1
surface was 0.75 mmol g according to the elemental analysis
based on the measurments of carbon content in the sample, as well
18
as the IR spectroscopy data (Fig. 2).
Then, EMCS (4) cross-linker was attached to MNPs-APS through the
coupling of the hydroxysuccinimide-activated carboxyl group to the
amino groups on the MNPs surface followed by conjugation with
pHLIP (Scheme 1).
Immobilization of pHLIP on MNPs was confirmed by the IR
spectroscopy (Fig. 1). In the FTIR spectra of nanoconjugate 7 the
–1
characteristic absorption bands of MNPs ( 546 cm , Fe-O) and
–1 -1
pHLIP ( 3272 cm , stretching vibrations of NH; 2922 cm ,

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 1

Please do not adjust margins


PleaseRSC
do not adjust margins
Advances Page 2 of 5

COMMUNICATION Journal Name


–1 –1
stretching vibrations of CH; 1648 cm , amide I; 1533 cm , amide II; explained by the fact that the shell formed by a peptide had a
View Article Online
–1 low contrast in the TEM images and was almost invisible.
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA13178F
1453 and 1390 cm amide III) were indicated. Small shifts in the
–1
absorption bands position were observed due to pHLIP binding to The specific magnetization of MNPs-pHLIP was 52 emu g and
–1
the MNP surface (S1). The number of pHLIP residues immobilized was lower than the magnetization of initial MNPs (81 emu g ),
on the surface of MNPs was calculated from the carbon content in which can be explained by the presence of a silane coating and
17 -6 –1 peptide on the surface of MNPs (S5).
the sample similar to and amounted to 6.7 10 mol g (27.6 mg
–1
g MNPs) (S2).
According to the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Fig. 2) heating
of the obtained MNPs to 150 C resulted to a weight loss (1.2%),
which is associated with the thermodesorption of physically
Published on 13 June 2016. Downloaded by University of California - Santa Barbara on 17/06/2016 14:49:08.

adsorbed water from the nanoparticle surface. Further heating to


530 C leaded to the decomposition and removal of organic

RSC Advances Accepted Manuscript


molecules bound to the surface of MNPs. The weight loss of those
samples was related with decomposition of 3-aminopropylsilane, 6-
maleimidohexanoyl and peptide fragments and with their partial
removal as simple volatiles (for example, H2O, CO2, NH3) in the
gaseous phase.
The comparison between values of the weight loss of MNPs-EMCS
and MNPs-APS, MNPs-pHLIP and MNPs-EMCS allows to calculate
the amount of EMCS and pHLIP (20.8 and 19.8 mg/g MNPs
correspondingly). The less amount of a peptide on MNPs surface
according to TGA data in comparison with the elemental analysis
Fig. 1 FTIR spectra of initial MNPs (1), MNPs-APS (2), MNPs-
data can be explained by incomplete decomposition and removal of
pHLIP (3) and pHLIP (4).
organic molecules fragments from MNPs surface.
The hydrodynamic characteristics of MNPs-pHLIP 7
suspensions in aqueous media were studied using of dynamic
light scattering method. It has been shown that the obtained
nanoconjugates form stable suspensions in water (mean
particle hydrodynamic diameter, Dh = 155 nm; polydispersity
index, PdI = 0.2; zeta potential = –22 mV), and in DMEM with
10% fetal bovine serum (Dh = 180 nm, PdI = 0.2, zeta potential
= –10 mV) (S3).
According to the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data,
significant changes in the morphology of MNPs after surface
modification and conjugation with the peptide did not occur:
the average diameter was 10 nm, the nanoparticle phase state
remained unchanged (Fig. 3 B–D). According to scanning Fig. 2 TGA data of MNPs-APS (1), MNPs-EMCS (2) and MNPs-
electron microscopy (SEM), MNPs-pHLIP particles have a
pHLIP (3).
spherical shape with an average diameter of about 12 nm (Fig.
3 E, F); (S4). The slight difference between these data can be

Scheme 1 Immobilization of pHLIP on MNPs.

2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx

Please do not adjust margins


Page 3 of 5 PleaseRSC
do not adjust margins
Advances

View Article Online


DOI: 10.1039/C6RA13178F
RSC Advances

COMMUNICATION

The ability of nanoconjugate to accumulate in acidic tissue in


vivo was studied on the model of LLC tumour in mice. Forty
hours after nanoconjugate intravenous administration the
Published on 13 June 2016. Downloaded by University of California - Santa Barbara on 17/06/2016 14:49:08.

intensive accumulation of nanoparticles in tumour however

RSC Advances Accepted Manuscript


not in liver was evidenced by histological analysis (Fig. 4 D). In
the meantime, in 40 hours after intravenous injection of
parent (non-targeted) MNPs-APS, no iron accumulation in
tumour tissue was observed (S6).
21
According to the MTT test, the obtained nanoconjugate at a
–1
concentration up to 100 mg L did not exhibit a cytotoxicity in the
HTC cells (Fig. 4 C).

Fig. 3 A: TEM image and the electron diffraction pattern of


initial MNPs; B: TEM image, С: electron diffraction pattern and
D: the size distribution of MNPs-pHLIP; E: SEM image and F:
the size distribution of MNPs-pHLIP.

Relaxivity r2 is a key feature of MNPs used for MRI. The higher


relaxivity is, the less amount of nanoconjugate can be detected in
the tissues by MRI. To characterize the MR-contrasting properties
of MNPs-pHLIP the T2 relaxivity for suspensions of nanoconjugate Fig. 4 A: T2-weighted MR images and T2 relaxivity plots of
with different concentrations were registered at 11.7 T (Fig. 4 A). aqueous suspensions of MNPs-PHLIP at concentrations of 2–40
–1 –1
The calculated value of r2 was equaled to 117.21 mmol s and M (11.7 T, Biospec 117/16 USR, Bruker); B: binding of MNPs-
exceeded that of some commercial contrast agents approved by pHLIP to the HTC cells in vitro; the cells were incubated with
–1
FDA (USA), for example, Feridex and Combidex (98 and 60 mmol MNPs-pHLIP at pH 6.0 (blank columns) and pH 7.4 (gray
–1 19
s , respectively).
columns); asterisks denote to the statistically significant
Efficiency of the MNPs-pHLIP nanoconjugate binding to the cells at differences based on the Student’s t-test (p  < 0.01); С: MTT
normal (7.4) and weakly acidic pH (6.0) was studied in vitro in the assay of cell viability; HTC cells were incubated with MNPs-
8
rat hepatoma (HTC) cell line (Fig. 4 B). The cells incubated with pHLIP for 2 (blank columns) and 24 (gray columns), pH 7.4; D:
MNPs-pHLIP at pH 6.0 showed a 1.7-2.7-fold higher cell uptake in Prussian blue stained liver and LLC-tumour sections; the mice
comparison with the cells incubated at pH 7.4 (according to the were intravenous administrated with MNPs-pHLIP in dose of 2
measurements of iron concentration in cell lysate by ferrozine- mg/kg, the tissues were extracted in 40 hours after
20
based assay ). These data evidenced the pH-dependent pHLIP- administration.
mediated uptake of nanoconjugate by the cells.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3

Please do not adjust margins


PleaseRSC
do not adjust margins
Advances Page 4 of 5

COMMUNICATION Journal Name

Conclusions Nikiforidis, S. Xanthopoulos, D. Psimadas, M. Paravatou-


View Article Online
Petsotas, L. Palamaris, J. D. Hazle and G. C. 10.1039/C6RA13178F
DOI: Kagadis, J. Colloid
Immobilization of pHLIP on the Fe3O4-based MNPs was carried Interface Sci., 2014, 433, 163.
out for the first time. pHLIP was fixed on the APS-modified 16 A. M. Demin, V. P. Krasnov and V. N. Charushin, Mendeleev
MNPs surface using a heterofunctional linker EMCS through Commun., 2013, 23, 14.
17 A. M. Demin, A. Yu. Vigorov, I. A. Nizova, M. A. Uimin, N. N.
the conjugation to the peptide thiol group. It has been shown Shchegoleva, A. E. Ermakov, V. P. Krasnov and V. N.
that the resulting nanoconjugate exhibits good MRI Charushin, Mendeleev Commun., 2014, 24, 20.
contrasting properties, binds efficiently to cells in a weakly 18 A. M. Demin, O.V. Koryakova and V.P. Krasnov, J. Appl.
acidic environment both in vitro and in vivo and has no Spectrosc., 2014, 81, 565.
cytotoxic effect on the cells. Thus, the obtained pHLIP- 19 Y.-X. J. Wang, Quant. Imaging Med. Surg., 2011, 1, 35.
20 J. Riemer, H. H.Hoepken, H.Czerwinska, S. R. Robinson and
modified MNPs can be used as MR-visible contrast agent for R.Dringen, Anal. Biochem., 2004, 331, 370.
Published on 13 June 2016. Downloaded by University of California - Santa Barbara on 17/06/2016 14:49:08.

tumours targeting. 21 T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 1983, 65, 55.

RSC Advances Accepted Manuscript


Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation
(project no. 14-15-00247).
The authors thank Prof. Sergey V. Vtorushin for conducting of
histological analysis, Dr. Igor A. Klimov for helping in animal
experiments, Artyom A. Minin for providing DLS analysis and
Oleg B. Shevelev for assisting in MRI scanning.

Notes and references


1 J. C. Deacon, D. M. Engelman and F. N. Barrera, Arch.
Biochem. Biophys., 2015, 565, 40.
2 M. An, D. Wijesinghe, O.A. Andreev, Y.K. Reshetnyak and
D.M. Engelman, PNAS, 2010, 107, 20246.
3 C. J. Cheng, B. Bahal, I. A. Babar, Z. Pincus, F. Barrera, C. Liu,
A. Svoronos, D. T. Braddock, P. M. Glazer, D. M. Engelman,
W. M. Saltzman and F. J. Slack, Nature, 2015, 518, 107.
4 S. Macholl, M. S. Morrison, P. Iveson, B. E. Arbo, O. A.
Andreev, Y. K. Reshetnyak, D. M. Engelman and E.
Johannesen, Mol. Imaging Biol., 2012, 14, 725.
5 A. L. Vāvere, G. B. Biddlecombe, W. M. Spees, J. R. Garbow,
D. Wijesinghe, O. A. Andreev, D. M. Engelman, Y. K.
Reshetnyak and J. S. Lewis, Cancer Res., 2009, 69, 4510.
6 M. C. M. Arachchige, Y. K. Reshetnyak and O. A. Andreev, J.
Biotechnol., 2015, 202, 88.
7 C. Sanchez, P. Belleville, M. Popall and L. Nicole, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2011, 40, 696.
8 L. Yao, J. Daniels, A. Moshnikova, S. Kuznetsov, A. Ahmed,
D.M. Engelman, Y.K. Reshetnyak and O.A. Andreev, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, 110, 465.
9 Z. Zhao, H. Meng, N. Wang, M.J. Donovan, T. Fu, M. You, Z.
Chen, X. Zhang and W. Tan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
7487.
10 Y. I. Golovin, S. L. Gribanovsky, D. Y. Golovin, N. L. Klyachko,
A. G. Majouga, A. M. Master, M. Sokolsky, A. V. Kabanov, J.
Control. Release, 2015, 219, 43.
11 Q. A. Pankhurst, N. K. T. Thanh, S. K. Jones and J. Dobson, J.
Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2009, 42, Article 224001, DOI
10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001.
12 J. Conde, J. T. Dias, V. Gracú, M. Moros, P. V. Baptista and
J.M. de la Fuente, Frontiers in Chemistry, 2014, 2, Article 48,
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2014.00048.
13 G. K Ehrlich, H. Michel, T. Truitt, W. Riboulet, P. Pop-Damkov,
P. Goelzer, D. Hainzl, F. Qureshi, B. Lueckel, W. Danho, K.
Conde-Knape and A. Konkar, Bioconjugate Chem., 2013, 12,
18.
14 I. Vikholm and W. Alberts, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 3872.
15 I. Tsiapa, E. K. Efthimiadou, E. Fragogeorgi, G. Loudos, A. D.
Varvarigou, P. Bouziotis, G. C. Kordas, D. Mihailidis, G. C.

4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx

Please do not adjust margins


Published on 13 June 2016. Downloaded by University of California - Santa Barbara on 17/06/2016 14:49:08.
Page 5 of 5
RSC Advances

38x18mm (300 x 300 DPI)


DOI: 10.1039/C6RA13178F
View Article Online

RSC Advances Accepted Manuscript

You might also like