The document discusses the differences between using "was/were able to" and "could" when referring to abilities in the past. It states that "was/were able to" and "could" both refer to abilities that existed in the past but no longer do. However, "was/were able to" is used for abilities related to a single past event, while "couldn't/wasn't/weren't able to" are used for negative statements regarding abilities, whether for a single past event or a period of time in the past.
The document discusses the differences between using "was/were able to" and "could" when referring to abilities in the past. It states that "was/were able to" and "could" both refer to abilities that existed in the past but no longer do. However, "was/were able to" is used for abilities related to a single past event, while "couldn't/wasn't/weren't able to" are used for negative statements regarding abilities, whether for a single past event or a period of time in the past.
The document discusses the differences between using "was/were able to" and "could" when referring to abilities in the past. It states that "was/were able to" and "could" both refer to abilities that existed in the past but no longer do. However, "was/were able to" is used for abilities related to a single past event, while "couldn't/wasn't/weren't able to" are used for negative statements regarding abilities, whether for a single past event or a period of time in the past.