Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Diary of High-Tech Management: Instructor Name
Learning Diary of High-Tech Management: Instructor Name
Learning Diary of High-Tech Management: Instructor Name
Management
Instructor Name:
Innovation management includes a set of tools that allow managers plus workers or users to cooperate
with a common understanding of processes and goals. Innovation management allows the organization
to respond to external or internal opportunities, and use its creativity to introduce new ideas, processes
or products. It is not relegated to R&D; it involves workers or users at every level in contributing
creatively to an organization's product or service development and marketing.
By utilizing innovation management tools, management can trigger and deploy the creative capabilities
of the work force for the continuous development of an organization. Common tools include
brainstorming, prototyping, product lifecycle management, idea management, design thinking, TRIZ,
Phase–gate model, project management, product line planning and portfolio management. The process
can be viewed as an evolutionary integration of organization, technology and market by iterating series
of activities: search, select, implement and capture.
The product lifecycle of products or services is getting shorter because of increased competition and
quicker time-to-market, forcing organizations to reduce their time-to-market. Innovation managers
must therefore decrease development time, without sacrificing quality or meeting the needs of the
market.
High technology (high tech) is technology that is at the cutting edge: the most advanced technology
available. It can be defined as either the most complex or the newest technology on the market. The
opposite of high tech is low technology, referring to simple, often traditional or mechanical technology;
for example, a slide rule is a low-tech calculating device.
Startups working on high technologies (or developing new high technologies) are sometimes referred to
as deep tech; the term may also refer to disruptive technologies based on scientific discoveries in
several branches.
High-tech, as opposed to high-touch, may refer to self-service experiences that do not require human
interaction.
The transition to the shakeout stage occurs because of the establishment of production efficiencies and
the standardization of product designs, a process that leads to a dominant model. On the demand side,
as users become more familiar with the industry’s products, their preferences stabilize, and product
variety decreases. Thus, this stage is characterized by an increasing emphasis on process innovation
relative to product innovation, and an increasing share of the innovation stems from large, established
firms that focus on efficient mass production. The competitive pressures unleashed in consequence of
economies of scale, and specialized manufacturing processes that increase efficiency, result in a rapid
decline in the number of firms. The rate of change in sales and price begins to decline towards the end
of this stage, though output generally increases, and prices continue to fall, particularly when adjusted
for quality.
During the mature phase of the industry, growth slows, and the technological and competitive
environments are relatively stable. This stage is characterized by a stable number of firms. Although
entry and exit of firms occur and are positively correlated, these rates are lower than they are in the
other stages of the industry life cycle. Similarly, although some product and process innovation takes
place, most of the innovations are incremental. The industry exhibits stable prices, level sales growth,
and a well-established infrastructure supporting its activities.
Finally, industries in periods of stability may either transition into decline or spiral back into emergence
as the result of disruptions by discontinuous technological change. This cycle may repeat multiple times
as waves of discontinuous technological change invade an industry over time.
Technology and Markets
But, consumers were unimpressed with these new products. Sales were well below forecasts: Procter &
Gamble abandoned its product after only two years and Kimberly Clark’s product is confined to a
regional market where executives say that sales are so small that they are financially insignificant.
Despite their market research, did Kimberley Clark (and Procter & Gamble) really understand their
customers’ needs in this situation? The Fresh Roll wipes product was designed to be conveniently
dispensed via a refillable plastic container that clipped to the standard toilet paper holder. Careful
attention was paid to developing a dispenser that blended in with the consumer’s bathroom. Both
companies, however, underestimated the role of consumer embarrassment associated with toileting
(e.g., Associated Press, 2003). Although many consumers already used some sort of makeshift wet
cleaning method in the bathroom, they didn’t like others knowing about it. The extra dispenser attached
to the holder was right out in the open, possibly causing guests to wonder if something was wrong with
household members because they were using these ‘alternative’ wipes. Although numerous mistakes
were made in this case (e.g., Nelson, 2002), it seems clear that Kimberly Clark and Procter & Gamble did
not completely understand their customers’ needs.
Unfortunately, this example is not unique. New product failure rates of up to 90 % are commonly cited
in the popular and academic press, and these suggest that successful innovation is the exception rather
than the rule (e.g., Power, 1992; 1993; Stevens and Burley, 1997; Brand Strategy, 2003). The road to
riches is littered with many stories of new product failure (e.g., Schnaars, 1989; Gershman, 1990;
Kirchner, 1995; McMath and Forbes, 1998; Franklin, 2003). Not surprisingly, many pundits take these
failures to mean that it is impossible to truly understand customer needs. Headlines such as ‘Ignore Your
Customer’ (Martin, 1995), ‘Shoot First, Do Market Research Later’ (Elliot, 1998), and statements like ‘The
public does not know what is possible, we do’ (Morita, 1986) fuel this viewpoint. At the same time,
however, a consistent finding from benchmarking studies on the factors related to successful innovation
is that understanding customer needs is a fundamental, although challenging, activity (e.g., Montoya-
Weiss and Calantone, 1994; Cooper, 1999; Henard and Szymanski, 2001). There are just as many, if not
more, examples in which firms used various traditional (e.g., customer surveys, focus groups) and
nontraditional (e.g., ethnography, contextual inquiry, empathic design) research approaches to gain
insight into their customers’ needs, and to develop highly successful new products (e.g., Urban and
Hauser, 1993; Leonard-Barton, 1995; Burchill and Shen, 1995; Otto and Wood, 2001; Shillito, 2001;
Sanders, 2002; Squires and Byrne, 2002; Crawford and Di Benedetto, 2003; Ulrich and Eppinger, 2004).
Thus, there is persuasive evidence that it is indeed possible to understand customer needs and that this
insight can be used in the innovation process. Rather than ignoring customers, it is more prudent only to
ignore customers’ specific ideas on how to fulfill their needs – it is the company’s job to develop new
products!
FIGURE 3.1 The innovation space.
Conceptually, understanding customer needs leads to products that are desirable, feasible, and salable
(to the mass market). Note that ‘product categories’ are often defined by firms and not by customers
(e.g., the SLR camera category, the digital camera category, the disposable camera category); thus
product categories typically relate to feasible combinations of attributes that are salable (and hopefully
desirable). As suggested by Figure 3.1, ideas, concepts, and new products can be classified based on
their location in the desirable-feasible-salable space. Thus, highly successful innovations are desirable,
feasible, and salable. Casual observations indicate that many existing products fall primarily in the
feasible and salable region (e.g., Fresh Rollwipes), and that fresh looks at already established categories
can lead to more desirable new products (e.g., consider the efforts of Oxo in the kitchen tools market
and its greatly acclaimed Good Grips peeler, salad spinner, and angled measuring cup). Gizmos and
gadgets such as the Segway Human Transporter are mainly in the feasible and desirable overlap (e.g.,
Waters and Field, 2003), but are not really salable to the mass market. Many innovations that are mainly
technology-driven reside only in the feasible region for a number of years, for example directional sound
systems for use in automobiles, advertising, and special office-based applications (Schwartz, 2004),
brain-computer interfaces that allow the direct bi-directional interfaces between the brain, nervous
system and computer (Cyberkinetics, 2004), and Michelin’s Tweel, a single piece airless tire with ‘spokes’
that never go flat (Mayersohn, 2005). Astute business analysts note that most firms are still product-
driven rather than customer-driven (i.e., firms first determine what is feasible for them to develop; they
then fashion marketing strategies to sell the products and services that can deliver; only later finding out
that their offerings may not really be desirable).
Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship is defined as ‘The activity of setting up a business or businesses, taking on financial
risks in the hope of profit.’
Traditionally entrepreneurship has been defined as the process of designing, launching and running a
new business. Entrepreneurs start businesses, offering either products or services, or both. They are
innovative and creative and happy to break the norm.
An entrepreneur is a person who is typically more comfortable with taking risk. They have given up the
‘Security’ of a job to startup a company to employ staff. They have to be comfortable as a leader and as
a manager of people.
The level of risk that an entrepreneur takes is very much dependent on the individual. But where an
entrepreneur is comfortable with taking higher levels of risk, a small business can become a much larger
organization.
An entrepreneur is the person who brings the product or service into reality. Sometimes being the
inventor, whilst other times starting a new business to provide an existing product or service, but in a
better way.
Entrepreneurial Process
Discovery: An entrepreneurial process begins with the idea generation, wherein the entrepreneur
identifies and evaluates the business opportunities. The identification and the evaluation of
opportunities is a difficult task; an entrepreneur seeks inputs from all the persons including employees,
consumers, channel partners, technical people, etc. to reach to an optimum business opportunity. Once
the opportunity has been decided upon, the next step is to evaluate it.
An entrepreneur can evaluate the efficiency of an opportunity by continuously asking certain questions
to himself, such as, whether the opportunity is worth investing in, is it sufficiently attractive, are the
proposed solutions feasible, is there any competitive advantage, what are the risk associated with it.
Above all, an entrepreneur must analyze his personal skills and hobbies, whether these coincides with
the entrepreneurial goals or not.
Developing a Business Plan: Once the opportunity is identified, an entrepreneur needs to create a
comprehensive business plan. A business plan is critical to the success of any new venture since it acts as
a benchmark and the evaluation criteria to see if the organization is moving towards its set goals.
An entrepreneur must dedicate his sufficient time towards its creation, the major components of a
business plan are mission and vision statement, goals and objectives, capital requirement, a description
of products and services, etc.
Resourcing: The third step in the entrepreneurial process is resourcing, wherein the entrepreneur
identifies the sources from where the finance and the human resource can be arranged. Here, the
entrepreneur finds the investors for its new venture and the personnel to carry out the business
activities.
Managing the company: Once the funds are raised and the employees are hired, the next step is to
initiate the business operations to achieve the set goals. First of all, an entrepreneur must decide the
management structure or the hierarchy that is required to solve the operational problems when they
arise.
Harvesting: The final step in the entrepreneurial process is harvesting wherein, an entrepreneur decides
on the future prospects of the business, i.e. its growth and development. Here, the actual growth is
compared against the planned growth and then the decision regarding the stability or the expansion of
business operations is undertaken accordingly, by an entrepreneur.
The entrepreneurial process is to be followed, again and again, whenever any new venture is taken up
by an entrepreneur, therefore, it’s an ever ending process.
Intrapreneurship
The act of behaving like an entrepreneur while working within a large organization.
Intrapreneur however is a term found in the Oxford Dictionary, and is defined as ‘A manager within a
company who promotes innovative product development and marketing.’
Intrapreneur however is a term found in the Oxford Dictionary, and is defined as ‘A manager within a
company who promotes innovative product development and marketing.’
1) Innovative Thinking
Innovative thinking is key as intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs aim to make their companies ahead of the
game. They need to look out for new opportunities, technologies, and methods to grow.
Both entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs have to have the confidence of achieving success and the
willingness to fail. They take the leap and act on the ideas in their head.
3) Always Learning
To be ahead of the game, intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs need to continuously pick up new
information and new skills. Those skills may be business-related, product/service related, or skills like
creative thinking or marketing.
4) Flexibility
Things just don’t always go the way as expected or planned. If intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs are not
flexible with workload or schedules, their ventures may fail even before it gets off the ground. They
need to think on their feet and go with the flow.
5) No giving up
Both will face more failures than successes. In order to achieve success, intrapreneurs and
entrepreneurs need to be persistent
Few successful start-ups become great companies, in large part because they respond to growth and
success in the wrong way. Entrepreneurial success is fueled by creativity, imagination, bold moves into
uncharted waters, and visionary zeal. As a company grows and becomes more complex, it begins to trip
over its own success—too many new people, too many new customers, too many new orders, too many
new products. What was once great fun becomes an unwieldy ball of disorganized stuff. Lack of
planning, lack of accounting, lack of systems, and lack of hiring constraints create friction. Problems
surface—with customers, with cash flow, with schedules.
Strategic Leadership
Strategic leadership refers to a manager’s potential to express a strategic vision for the organization, or
a part of the organization, and to motivate and persuade others to acquire that vision. Strategic
leadership can also be defined as utilizing strategy in the management of employees. It is the potential
to influence organizational members and to execute organizational change. Strategic leaders create
organizational structure, allocate resources and express strategic vision. Strategic leaders work in an
ambiguous environment on very difficult issues that influence and are influenced by occasions and
organizations external to their own.
The main objective of strategic leadership is strategic productivity. Another aim of strategic leadership is
to develop an environment in which employees forecast the organization’s needs in context of their own
job. Strategic leaders encourage the employees in an organization to follow their own ideas. Strategic
leaders make greater use of reward and incentive system for encouraging productive and quality
employees to show much better performance for their organization. Functional strategic leadership is
about inventiveness, perception, and planning to assist an individual in realizing his objectives and goals.
Strategic leadership requires the potential to foresee and comprehend the work environment. It
requires objectivity and potential to look at the broader picture.
A few main traits / characteristics / features / qualities of effective strategic leaders that do lead to
superior performance are as follows:
Loyalty- Powerful and effective leaders demonstrate their loyalty to their vision by their words
and actions.
Keeping them updated- Efficient and effective leaders keep themselves updated about what is
happening within their organization. They have various formal and informal sources of information in
the organization.
Judicious use of power- Strategic leaders makes a very wise use of their power. They must play
the power game skillfully and try to develop consent for their ideas rather than forcing their ideas upon
others. They must push their ideas gradually.
Have wider perspective/outlook- Strategic leaders just don’t have skills in their narrow specialty
but they have a little knowledge about a lot of things.
Motivation- Strategic leaders must have a zeal for work that goes beyond money and power and
also they should have an inclination to achieve goals with energy and determination.
Compassion- Strategic leaders must understand the views and feelings of their subordinates,
and make decisions after considering them.
Self-control- Strategic leaders must have the potential to control distracting/disturbing moods
and desires, i.e., they must think before acting.
Readiness to delegate and authorize- Effective leaders are proficient at delegation. They are
well aware of the fact that delegation will avoid overloading of responsibilities on the leaders. They also
recognize the fact that authorizing the subordinates to make decisions will motivate them a lot.
Articulacy- Strong leaders are articulate enough to communicate the vision (vision of where the
organization should head) to the organizational members in terms that boost those members.
Constancy/ Reliability- Strategic leaders constantly convey their vision until it becomes a
component of organizational culture.
Patient
While patience is an essential leadership attribute, it also demands skills more often associated with
management. Our ability to lead patiently requires us to manage the situations in which we find
ourselves. Understand the situation and establish the facts. A patient leader understands the situation.
Flexible
Flexible leaders are those who can modify their style or approach to leadership in response to uncertain
or unpredictable circumstances. In addition, flexible leaders can adapt to changes as they come. They
can revise their plans to incorporate new innovations and overcome challenges, while still achieving
their goals.
Open to Feedback
One key characteristic of a good leader is that they are able to reach organizational goals by motivating
others. Giving constructive feedback helps individuals grow by learning how they can improve and by
reinforcing the activities they are doing well.
Bold
Bold leaders are no different. Being a bold leader does not mean being bold without a clear vision,
direction or purpose. Bold leaders channel their bold ideas, opinions, and actions to motivate, inspire,
and guide others toward a greater good. Today, more than ever, this type of leadership is in high
demand.
Willing to delegate
As a leader, delegating is important because you can't—and shouldn't—do everything yourself.
Delegating empowers your team, builds trust, and assists with professional development. And for
leaders, it helps you learn how to identify who is best suited to tackle tasks or projects.
Goal oriented
Goal-oriented leadership involves setting clear and specific goals where it is known, based on
established experience that they know can be achieved. ... Examples of goal-oriented leaders include
sales managers, teachers, sports coaches, or mentors who set a series of challenges to encourage
learning and development.
Today in industries of rapid change there is increasing value from CEO’s who are immersed in their own
particular industry. Given the rise of autonomous responsibility of the CEO’s who are immersed in their
own particular industry.
A collaborator
Collaborative leadership is all about breaking down walls and silos and building close cross-functional
relationships based on trust and communication. ... It takes strong relationship skills and a great deal of
influence to be able to lead a horizontal team. This is the true hallmark of a collaborative leader.
A strong recruiter
As it becomes more challenging for CEO’s to stay abreast of rapid changes and growing opportunities
and as business units gain autonomy it becomes more critical to be capable of hiring strong managers.
An evangelist
In a business climate characterized by rapid changes there is great difficulty in predicting the future.
With competing visions of the future floating around, corporations needs a persuasive and aggressive to
extol the corporate vision and to help usher in favorable changes in the competitive landscape.
Organizational Culture
Organizational culture is the collection of values, expectations, and practices that guide and inform the
actions of all team members. Think of it as the collection of traits that make your company what it is. A
great culture exemplifies positive traits that lead to improved performance, while a dysfunctional
company culture brings out qualities that can hinder even the most successful organizations.
Culture and core values
Having clear company values helps you ensure that all your employees are working towards the same
goals. Your core values support the company's vision and shape its culture. That's why every single
business decision should be aligned with these values.
Your core company values shape your company culture and impact your business strategy. They help
you create a purpose, improve team cohesion, and create a sense of commitment in the workplace.
What makes for an innovative company? An innovation initiative is not enough. Having the word
“innovation” in your company slogan or all over your web site is not enough. Indeed, I would argue that
any kind of focus on innovation as an end is detrimental to innovation. Innovation is nothing more than
a tool that enables companies to achieve unique, strategic goals. Here are seven essential characteristics
of innovative companies. How well does your organization do?
4. Innovators Implement
Most businesses have a lot of creative employees with a lot of ideas. Some of those ideas are even
relevant to companies’ needs. However, one thing that differentiates innovators from wannabe
innovators is that innovators implement ideas. Less innovative companies talk more about ideas than
implementing them!
5. Failure Is an Option
I would argue the most critical element of business culture, for an innovative company, is giving
employees freedom and encouragement to fail. If employees know that they can fail without
endangering their careers, they are more willing to take on risky, innovative projects that offer huge
potential rewards to their companies. On the other hand, if employees believe that being part of a failed
project will have professional consequences, they will avoid risk – and hence innovation – like the
plague. More importantly, if senior managers reward early failure, employees are far more likely to
evaluate projects regularly and kill those projects that are failing — before that failure becomes too
expensive. This frees up resources and budget for new innovative endeavors. However, in businesses
where failure is not an option, employees will often stick with failing projects, investing ever more
resources in hopes that the project will eventually succeed. When it does not, losses are greater and
reputations are ruined. As a result, companies that reward failure often fail less than those that
discourage it.
6. Environment of Trust
The Innovative Company provides its employees with an environment of trust. There is a lot of risk
involved in innovation. Highly creative ideas often initially sound stupid. If employees fear ridicule for
sharing outrageous ideas, they will not share such ideas. Likewise, if employees fear reprimand for
participating in unsuccessful projects, they will not participate (see item 5 above). If employees do not
trust each other, they will be watching their backs all the time. If they fear managers will steal their
ideas and claim them as their own, employees will not share ideas. On the other hand, if employees
know they can take reasonable risks without fear, if they know outrageous ideas are welcome, if they
know that their managers will champion their ideas and credit them for those ideas, these employees
can be creative, implement ideas and drive the company’s innovation. In short, creativity and innovation
thrive when people in an organization trust each other and their organization.
7. Autonomy
Along with trust, individual and team autonomy is a key component of innovation. If you give individuals
and teams clear goals together with the freedom to find their own paths for achieving those goals, you
create fertile ground for innovation. But, if managers watch over their subordinates’ shoulders, micro-
managing their every move, you stifle the creativity and individual thought that is necessary for
innovation. Of course giving employees autonomy means they may make mistakes. They may choose
inefficient routes to achieving goals. But at worst, they will learn from their mistakes and inefficiencies.
At best, they will discover new and better ways of accomplishing objectives. Most importantly, if you
hire intelligent, capable, creative people and give them the freedom to solve problems, they will do so.
And, in so doing, they will help innovation to thrive throughout the company.