1. Ato Birru is survived by a wife and an unborn child.

The law considers the children of a person are his/her closest relatives

W/o chaltu is entitled to the property,because-

A merely conceived child could be considered born whenever his interest so requires.
When the father of a merely conceived child dies, the law considers that the interest of
the child requires his consideration as a person. Such a child shall not be treated as a
non-existent being. In such a case, his/her interest requires that he/she is a person
subject to rights. Hence, although he/she is an unborn child, the law allows him/her to
participate in the succession. However, his rights in the succession shall be realized
after his/her viability is proved.
2. If the boy’s death was caused by a disease or in this case HIV/AIDS, according to
the statement from Article 4 of the civil code, the child would have been ruled not
viable,and w/ro Chaltu won’t be a descendant.thus the property would be to ato
birru’s parent.

3. Meseret got married at 17, and she made the contract to sell her car to Zenebe after
getting married. This deems her to be capable to consent and make a contract, so the
contract will not be invalidated.
4. I advice belay to find a witness that confirms kassa renounced the job.