Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2001, pp. 604–608.

Translated from Teoreticheskie Osnovy Khimicheskoi Tekhnologii, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2001, pp. 643–647.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Zueva, Magiera.

Mathematical Model of Heat Transfer in a Solar Collector


and Its Experimental Validation
G. A. Zueva* and J. Magiera**
* Ivanovo State University of Chemical Technology, pr. Engel’sa 7, Ivanovo, 153460 Russia
** Instytut Inzynierii Chemicznej i Chemii Fizycznej, Politechnika Krakowska, ul. Warszawska 24, Krakow, 31-155 Poland
Received November 16, 2000

Abstract—A mathematical model is proposed for heat transfer in a system involving a solar collector and a
heat exchanger. An analytical solution is obtained for the problem of heat conduction through the collector wall
under the Cauchy boundary conditions with regard for internal heat sources due to the solar energy flux. A sche-
matic of an experimental setup involving a Solahart solar collector is presented, in which solar radiation heats
a heat-transfer medium flowing by gravity. The observed temperatures of the heat-transfer medium at the col-
lector outlet agree satisfactorily with those calculated within the proposed model.

At present, utilizing solar energy is particularly top- be regarded as an infinite plate of thickness R with a
ical. A promising way of doing this is by converting constant initial temperature (T0 = const). The ambient
solar energy into thermal energy in solar collectors. temperature Θ is constant, as well as the temperature Tl
Design and optimization of solar collectors require of the heat-transfer medium on the inner side of the
well-grounded models of heat transfer in these appara- wall. The solar energy flux is incident on the collector
tuses. panel. The radiant energy flux density is E0 = const. It
The purpose of this work is to construct a physical can be assumed that these conditions are satisfied in a
and mathematical model of heat transfer in a solar col- short time interval ∆t. Let us divide the calculation time
lector. span into such short time intervals. As the initial condi-
Heat transfer in a system involving a solar collector tions in a given time interval ∆t, we can take the final
and a heat-exchange tank (Fig. 1) can be described as conditions for the preceding time interval. Similarly,
follows. The solar energy flux Qr incident on the collec- the time-variable process parameters (e.g., the solar
tor heats the heat-transfer medium flowing through the energy flux density and the heat-transfer coefficients of
collector. The heat-transfer medium should not freeze the liquid and gas phases) can be approximated by
at low temperatures (one can use, e.g., ethylene glycol, piecewise constant functions; i.e., in these time inter-
whose melting point is –12.3 K). The heat-transfer vals, these parameters are assumed to take constant but
medium passes through the heat-exchanger jacket and generally different values.
heats water, which can then be used for domestic pur- We assume that the absorption of the radiant energy
poses. The heat-transfer medium may flow by gravity by the wall obeys Bouguer’s law [1]. According to this
(driven by the difference between its densities in the law, internal heat sources emerge in the wall, whose
collector and the heat exchanger) or be pumped. Along intensity decreases in the direction of the radiant flux:
with the radiant energy flux Qr , there is also a convec-
tive heat flux Qc. The flux Qc may be directed toward or q(x) = µ(1 – ω)E0exp(– µ(R – x)).
away from the collector, depending on whether the col-
lector surface temperature is lower or higher than the
ambient temperature. If the collector surface tempera-
ture exceeds the ambient temperature, there is a heat
Hot
loss due to the heat flux away from the collector. Inside 2 water
Q
the thermally insulated heat exchanger, the heat Q is
transferred between the hot liquid in the jacket and Qc
water. The problem is to formulate a mathematical Qr
model of heat transfer from the collector to the heat 1 Cold
water
exchanger under the condition that Q is maximum.
Let us consider the case of a constant flow rate of the Heat-transfer medium
heat-transfer. Our main purpose is to model the heating
of the collector wall. We assume that the thickness of Fig. 1. Heat fluxes in the (1) solar collector and (2) heat
the collector wall (Fig. 2) is so small that this wall can exchanger.

0040-5795/01/3506-0604$25.00 © 2001 MAIK “Nauka /Interperiodica”


MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF HEAT TRANSFER IN A SOLAR COLLECTOR 605

í ∞

M n cos  µ n ---

E0 A x
× -----2 ( 1 – exp ( aµ t ) ) – 2
2
q1 (α1)
µ  R 
q0 (α0) n=2

2
Θ
  aµ 2n t 2 
íl 1 ×  exp  – ----------
- – exp ( aµ t ) + D ( – 1 – H 1 )
  R  
2
0
R x
Heat-transfer Wall Environment ∞
medium flow
 x
∑K
A
× --- – W exp ( aµ t ) + 2 n cos  µ n ---
2

Fig. 2. Heat transfer through the collector wall: (1)T0 =


µ R
n=1
const and (2) T = T(x, t).
 aµ 2n t
- + H 1  T 0 – Θ – -----0 – A
E
Here, ω is the reflection coefficient, µ is the attenuation
× exp  – ----------
 R 
2  α 0 ∫
coefficient, and x is the coordinate along the wall thick-
ness. ∞
 x  aµ 2n t
∑ B n cos µ n --- exp  – ----------
- + H 2 ( T l – T 0 )R
2
Convective heat transfer takes place between the +2
wall and the environment and between the wall and the  R  R 
2
n=1
liquid in the collector. It is required to find the temper-
ature as a function of time and x. ∞
Bn µn
 ----- cos µ
× A(1 + H1 x ) – 2 ∑ ----- + H 1 sin µ n
µ R 
The mathematical formulation of the problem is the 2 n
following: n=1 n
(5)
∂T ( x, t ) ∂ T ( x, t )
2  aµ 2n t
× sin  µ n --- exp  – ----------
x
------------------- = a --------------------- - + Dµ exp ( µR )H 2
∂t ∂x
2  R  R 
2

µ
+ ------ ( 1 – ω )E 0 exp ( – µ ( R – x ) ), (1)
M


cρ Ax
× ( – 1 – H 2 ) ------2 ( 1 – exp ( aµ t ) ) – 2R
2
------2-n
t > 0, 0 < x < R; µ µ
n=1 n

T(x, 0) = T0, (2)


x   aµ 2n t 2 
× sin  µ n ---  exp  – ----------
- – exp ( aµ t )
∂T ( R, t )  R   R 
2

λ -------------------- = α 0 [ Θ – T ( R, t ) ] + E 0 , (3)
∂x

∂T ( 0, t ) Bn
∑ -----K
Ax
+ DH 2 ( – 1 – H 1 ) ------ – W exp ( aµ t ) + 2
2
λ ------------------- = α 1 [ T ( 0, t ) – T l ]. (4)
∂x µ µ n
n
n=1

It is required to find T(x, t) at t > 0 and 0 < x < R.


 x  aµ 2n t
This heat-conduction boundary-value problem was × sin µ n exp  – ----------
--- -
solved by the operational method [2].  R  R 
2

The solution of the problem was obtained in the


form
+ H 1 H 2  T 0 – Θ – -----0 – Ax -
E
 α 0
T ( x, t ) = T 0 + H 2 ( T 0 – T l ) – A ( 1 + H 1 R ) -

Bn  x   aµ 2n t

+ 2R ∑ µ n  R  R 
2
- – H 2 ( T l – T 0 )x
----- sin µ n --- exp  – ----------
H1 R n=1

∑ B n  cos µ n + ---------- sin µ n cos  µ n ---


x
+2
 µn   R 1
+ D exp ( µx ) -----2 ( exp ( aµ t ) – 1 )
2
n=1
µ
 aµ 2n t
× exp  – ----------
- + Dµ ( 1 + H 1 ) exp ( µ n R )
2 1
+ D -----2 ( exp ( µx ) exp ( aµ t ) – µx – 1 ).
2
 R 
2
µ

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 35 No. 6 2001


606 ZUEVA, MAGIERA

Water discharge

Heat-transfer medium
Water
Hot water
2

9 8

7
3 4

Hot-water 1 1
offtake

25°–60°
Discharge
of heat-transfer
medium

Cold water
3
Water discharge

Fig. 3. Schematic of the experimental setup: (1) Solahart solar collector with a heat-transfer medium flowing by gravity, (2) heat
exchanger, (3) pulse flow meter, (4) total liquid flow meter, (5) thermal energy meter, (6) resistance heater, (7) control block,
(8) transducers, (9) additional collector for heated water.

Here, µ
B n = -----n [ 2 + R ( H 1 + H 2 ) ] sin µ n
R
1
A = -------------------------------------------- ,
µ
2 –1
H1 + H2 + H1 H2 R
+ -----n – RH 1 H 2 – ( H 1 + H 2 ) cos µ n ,
µ R
D = --------- ( 1 – ω )E 0 exp ( – µR ),
cρa 2 –1
µ
M n = B n µ + -----n2
2
H 1 = α 0 /λ, H 2 = α 1 /λ, ,
R
( sinh ( µR ) + cosh ( µR ) ) sinh ( µx )
µ
K n = M n  -----n sin µ n – µ cos µ n ,
W = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-,
µ [ sinh ( µR ) ( µ + H 1 H 2 ) + µ cosh ( µR ) ( H 1 + H 2 ) ]
2
R 

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 35 No. 6 2001


MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF HEAT TRANSFER IN A SOLAR COLLECTOR 607

and µn are the roots of the characteristic equation T lout, K


µ
2
80
-----n2 – H 1 H 2
R
cot µ n = ------------------------------, n = 1, 2, … . (6) 60
µ
( H 1 + H 2 ) -----n
R 40
The operational method gives the solution of the
problem at both large and small Fourier numbers Fo = 20
at/R2 [2]. Since the plate thickness is small (R = 6 ×
10–4 m), the Fourier numbers are rather large (Fo Ⰷ 0.1). 0
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 t, h
This is the reason why the solution was obtained in the
form of the sum of trigonometric series. As data anal- Fig. 4. Calculated time variation of the heat-transfer
ysis showed, it is sufficient to retain only the first term medium temperature at the collector outlet (thick line) and
in these series (because the Fo values are relatively water temperature in the heat exchange tank (dashed line)
small and the roots of Eq. (6) show the property of during the daylight hours of one day at Θ = 12–34°C and
µ1 < µ2 < … < µn < …). E0 = 511–882 J/(m2 s). The thin lines represent the results
of replica experiments performed during the daylight hours
The liquid temperature at the collector outlet was of three consecutive days.
found as [2]
out α 0 T ( 0, t ) – kΘ
Tl = -----------------------------------
-, (7)
α0 – k block and heat exchanger, the flux densities of the heat-
transfer medium and water, the thermal energy trans-
where ferred by the flowing heat-transfer medium, ambient
1 parameters (temperature and humidity), and the radiant
k = ----------------------------- energy flux density.
1 R 1
----- + --- + -----
α0 λ α1 The basic geometrical and physical parameters that
were used in model validation were dictated by the oper-
is the heat-transfer coefficient and T(0, t) is the temper- ating conditions of this experimental setup (G = 8.3 ×
ature of the inner surface of the wall at the collector out- 10−6 m3/s, l = 1.87 m, S = 2.68 × 10–3 m2, and τ = 603 s).
let. The heat transferred to the liquid flowing through the
If the wall is flat and its heat-transfer resistance is collector was calculated as
very low, the wall temperature is usually determined as
out
[3] Q = Gρlcl( T l – Tl )τ.
α0 Θ + a1 T l The radiant energy flux density E0(t) as a function of
T 2 = --------------------------
-. (8)
α0 + α1 time was calculated as proposed in the literature [4].
In the simplest case, the wall temperature calculated Figure 4 presents the calculated and observed liquid
by Eq. (8) is close to T(0, t) calculated in terms of our temperatures at the collector outlet. One can see that the
model (5) (E0 = 0, R = 6 × 10–4 m, α0 = 30 W/(m2 K), model fits the experimental data well. The relative error
α1 = 231 W/(m2 K),Θ = 303 K, T0 = 293 ä, Tl = 283 ä, in the calculated temperature of the heat-transfer
and t = 80 s). Equation (8) gives T2 = 285.2901 K. From medium at the collector outlet does not exceed 10%
Eq. (5), we obtain T(0, t) = 285.2909 K. However, within time intervals that are important in practice.
unlike Eq. (8), Eq. (5) gives the collector wall tempera- Using this model, we calculated the time variation
ture distribution as a function of both time and the nor- of the water temperature in the heat-exchange tank dur-
mal coordinate. Moreover, Eq. (5) takes into account ing the daylight hours (from 9 a.m. till 5 p.m. of one day
how heat transfer is affected by the solar energy flux. (Fig. 4, dashed line)). Calculation has shown that the
The adequacy of the model was tested using data circulation of the heat-transfer medium through the
obtained experimentally at the Institute of Chemical heat-exchanger jacket should be stopped at 5 p.m.,
Engineering and Physical Chemistry, Krakow Polytech- because the difference between the heat-transfer
nical University. The experimental setup (Fig. 3) medium temperatures at the inlet and outlet of the heat
involved a block of two Solahart flat solar collectors. The exchanger becomes smaller than 10 K and, in a short
outer surface area of the collector block was 3.72 m2, and time, the heat-transfer medium in the heat exchanger
the inner volume of the heat-exchange tank was 180 dm3. will be cooled rather than heated.
The setup was equipped with a computer system, which Thus, the mathematical model proposed enables one
simultaneously measured the temperatures of the heat- to optimize the operation of the system involving a
transfer medium at the inlet and outlet of the collector solar collector and a heat-exchange tank.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 35 No. 6 2001


608 ZUEVA, MAGIERA

NOTATION ρ, ρl—densities of the plate and the heat-transfer


a—thermal diffusivity of the plate, m2/s; medium, respectively, kg/m3;
c, cl—specific heats of the plate and the heat-trans- τ = l/w—average residence time of the liquid in the
fer medium, respectively, J/(kg K); collector, s.
G—flow rate of the heat-transfer medium, m3/s;
l—liquid path length in the collector, m; REFERENCES
S—cross-sectional area of the collector, m2; 1. Shashkov, A.G., Sistemno-strukturnyi analiz protsessa
T(x, t)—temperature field in the plate, K; teploobmena i ego prilozheniya (Systems and Structural
Tl—liquid temperature in the collector, K; Analysis of Heat Transfer and Its Applications), Mos-
cow: Energoatomizdat, 1983.
t—time, s;
2. Kartashov, E.M., Analiticheskie metody v teorii teplo-
w = G/S—velocity of the heat-transfer medium, provodnosti tverdykh tel (Analytical Methods in the The-
m2/s; ory of Heat Conduction in Solids), Moscow: Vysshaya
α0—coefficient of heat transfer from the outer sur- Shkola, 1985.
face of the wall to the air, W/(m2 K); 3. Klimenko, A.P. and Kanevets, G.E., Raschet teploob-
α1—coefficient of heat transfer from the inner sur- mennykh apparatov na elektronnykh vychislitel’nykh
mashinakh (Computer-Aided Design of Heat-Transfer
face of the wall to the liquid, W/(m2 K); Apparatuses), Moscow: Energiya, 1966.
Θ—ambient temperature, K; 4. Nowicki, J., Promieniowanie s loneczne jako źród lo
λ—thermal conductivity of the plate, W/(m K); energii, Warsaw: Arkady, 1980.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 35 No. 6 2001

You might also like