The document summarizes significant project and organizational issues facing the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center (NURFC) including a funding shortfall, declining operating revenue projections, sustainability issues shown in financial statements and projections, inadequate accounting for future capital expenditures, and contractual reporting obligations that must be met.
The document summarizes significant project and organizational issues facing the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center (NURFC) including a funding shortfall, declining operating revenue projections, sustainability issues shown in financial statements and projections, inadequate accounting for future capital expenditures, and contractual reporting obligations that must be met.
The document summarizes significant project and organizational issues facing the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center (NURFC) including a funding shortfall, declining operating revenue projections, sustainability issues shown in financial statements and projections, inadequate accounting for future capital expenditures, and contractual reporting obligations that must be met.
Significant Project / Organizational Issues for Discussion
June 5, 2007
Project funding model demonstrates that the project is not full-funded:
o $9M (from investment income) used to reach full funding was supposed to be a temporary solution while fundraising was completed; o Without that $9M, NURFC has a $6.9M shortfall; o Shortfall in capital campaign partly due to $3.8M in “Federal TBD” never received (was supposed to be received in 2005) – it is still being used in their funding model; o The term of our base lease is 3 years shorter than the investment income projection horizon, bringing the investment income eligible for full-funding down to $6 million if it were allowed.
Operating revenue projections show continued decline:
o Has paying attendance peaked? o City has recently reduced its $1M annual contribution to $800K; o Other government support (projected at $3.7M annually) sources unknown; o Projecting post-“Bridge to the Future” annual private support at $2.8M based on similar institutions – unknown assumptions.
Financial statements and projections show an organization with sustainability issues:
o Small operating surplus is really a deficit after depreciation; o We do not see an operating endowment (NURFC reference having one in a recent phone conference, but the financial reports; o Projections show a contracting organization – deficit as a percentage of revenue and as a percentage of assets is increasing; o Forecast of contraction appears to not reconcile with Rep. Yates’ assertions of “something big” coming.
NURFC not adequately accounting for future capital expenditures:
o Based on useful life projections used by their accountant, capital renewal/replacement/large maintenance anticipated beginning in year 3 of operations (this year) and growing through the years – deferral is not a long-term strategy; o Pro forma projecting only $100K for capital improvements per year (only 2% of depreciation expense, which is not shown on the pro forma); o Caution: depreciation calculated on historical value, renewal/replacement likely to be more expensive.
NURFC must meet contractual reporting obligations:
o Monthly fundraising pledge/receipts report; o Quarterly investment account recap; o Annual audited financial statements and updated financial projections; o Annual tax certification, insurance certificates, etc.
M:\NURFC Request Output\NURFC Highlights for 5 June 2007 Meeting.doc