Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Counter Balisi Vs Banguel
Counter Balisi Vs Banguel
Counter Balisi Vs Banguel
COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT
1. That I’m the respondent in the criminal complaint with NPS Docket No.
II-04-INV-21D-00440 for Acts of Lasciviousness in relation to RA No.
7610;
2. That I deny the all the allegations stated in the complaint of the Valerie
Banguel y Larsen;
3. The truth of which is that on April 14, 2021 at around 7 o’clock in the
morning, I went out to buy cigarette. While it is true that I saw the
complainant Banguel in the store owned by Anastacia Frogoso. That I
was pulling my from my pocket when the complainant walked towards
the counter to get the things she bought. As I was pulling my hand, the
back of my hand accidentally touched her back but not her butt;
6. Juan Laman Sr., was arrested and is now under the custory of BJMP
Cabagan. The father of herein complainant and Juan Laman Sr are
relatives and it is known in the community that they are determined to
file a case against me since my daughter is determined to prosecute
the rape case she filed against Laman. They tried several times to settle
the rape case amicably but as a father I will never agree as my 15 year
old daughter’s future is trashed by Laman. He even publicly humiliated
my daughter in the barangay telling the public that my daughter is his
girlfriend which is not true. My daughter is now pregnant, helpless and
depressed because of the defloration, humiliation and destruction
caused by Lam who is a rapist and a criminal. Matias Banguel even
went inside my house and furiously told me that her daughter will file
this case against me as leverage to the rape case filed against Laman.
Attached hereto is the affidavit of Salvacion Taguinod as proof that the
true intention of this complaint is to harass me and my daughter and
that there is no truth to the allegations of complainant Banguel.
PEDRO BALISI
Respondent/Affiant
Copy Furnished:
AFFIDAVIT
2. That all the allegations stated in the complaint of the Valerie Banguel y
Larsen against Pedro Balisi are not true;
3. The truth of the matter is that on April 14, 2021 at around 7 o’clock in
the morning, Pedro Balisi, my father in law went out of the house and
crossed the street out to buy cigarette in the store owned by Anastacia
Frogoso. The private complainant Vanessa Banguel was there also
buying something. I was outside and saw him while buying his cigarette
and right after went back to the house, I did not hear any commotion
nor any reaction from Vanessa Banguel.
Copy Furnished: