“The order is not rationalistic and underlying but is simply order,Conditions
like that of continuity, one thing after another.” ONAL Juno‘The field deseribes a space of propagation, of effects. It con
tains no matter material points, eather Funetons, vectors and
speeds It describes loca relations of difference within fells of|
celerty, transmission oF of careering points, in 2 word, what
Minkowski called the world” saNFORD xwineR, 1986"
1 FROM oper ro FieLo
Field conlitins moves fram the one toward the many rm indi-
viduals to collectives, rom objeets to feds. In its mast complex
‘manifestation, the concep of fell condition refers to mathemati~
cal field theory, to nonlinear dynamis, and to computer sim
tions of evolutionary change, However, my understanding of fld
conditions in architecture is somewhat distinct from its more exact
earing in the physical sciences. | intend the phrase to resonate
With a more tactical sense, as it would for an anthropologist or a
botanist engaged in “eldwork,” for 3 general facing the field oF
bottle, or the architect who cautions a builder to “verify in fe"
My concer parallels a shit in recent technologies from the analog
to the digital It pays close attention to precedents in visual art
from the abstract panting of Piet Mondrian in te 1920s to mini-
mals and postminimalst sculpture ofthe 1880s Postwar com
posers, as they moved away from the strictures of seraism,
‘employed concepts such as “lout” of sound orn the cas of lan=
is Xenakis, “statistical” music in which complex acoustical events
‘cannot be broken down inte their constituent elements? The na
structural elements of the modem city, by their nature linked
together in open-ended networks, offer another example of Feld
conditions in the urban contest. A complete examination of the
Implications of field conditions in architecture would necessarily
refiect the complex and dyramic behaviors of architecture's users,
and speculate on new methodologies to model program ard space.
To.genealiz, a ild condition could be any formal er spatial
matrix capable of unifying diverse elements while respecting the
Identity ofeach eld configurations ae loosely bound aggregates
characterized by porosity and loal interconnect. Overall shape
and extent are highly Mud and less important than the internal
relationships f parts, which determine the behavior ofthe field
Feld canitions are bottom-up phenomena defined not by oveat-
ching geometrical schemas but by intricate local conaections.
Interval, repetition, and seility are key concepts Fm matters,
‘but nat so much tne forms of things asthe forms between things
Field contins cannot claim to produce a systematic theory
of architectural form or composition. The theoretical made pro=
posed here anticipates its own ielevance when faced with the
realities of practice, These ate working concepts derived fom
‘experimentation in contact with the eal
42.2 GEOMETRIC VS, ALGEBRAIC COMBINATION
‘The diverse elements of classical architecture ae orgaized into
coherent wholes by means of georetic systems of proportion.Shake wea lndeates
[Although ratios can be expressed numerically, the relationships
Intended are Fundamentally geometric Alberts well know axiom
that “Beauty isthe consonance ofthe pats Such that nothing can
be aed or taken away" expresses an ideal of organic geometric
unity Te conventions of classical architecture dictate not ony the
proportions of indiviual elements but also the relationship
‘between individual elements Parts form ensembles which in turn
form lager wholes Precise rules of axality, symmetry, ar formal
sequence govern the organization ofthe whole Classical architee-
ture displays 2 wide variation on these eles, but the principle of
erarcical distribution of parts to whole is constant. Individual
clements sre maintained in hiercchical order by extensive geo~
‘metic relationships inorder ta preserve overall unity
‘The Great Mosque of Cordoba, Span, constructed over a span
‘of nearly eight centuries offers an instructive counterexample?
‘The fom of the masque hal been cleary established: an enclosed
forecourt, flanked by a minaret tower, opening onto @ covered
space for worship (pethaps derived from market structures,
‘adapted rom the Roman basic) The enclosures loosely oriented
toward the gibt, 3 continuous prayer wall marked by 2 smal niche
(the mira. In the fst stage of constuction (c. 785-800) the
typological precedent was respected, resulting in simple structure
(oF ten paral walls perpendicular tothe qb. These wall, Sup-
ported on columns and pierced by arches, defining a covered space
‘of equal dimension to the pen court. The arched walls operate in
‘counterpoint tothe framed vistas across the grain ofthe space. The
columns ate located at the intersection of these to vectors, form=
ing an undiferentsted tut highly charged fel, This Red gener-
ates complex parallax effects that prey on vistors a they move
through the space. The entice west wall isopen tthe courtyard, so
that once within the precinct af the mosque there fs no single
‘entrance. The axial, processional space of the Chistian church
‘ives way toa nondirectonal space, a serial order of “one thing
after anothex"*
‘The mosque was subsequently enlarged in four stages. Signfi~
‘antly, with each alton the fabric ofthe orignal has remained
substantially intact. The typological structure i reiterated at larger
‘sale wile the local relationships have remained fixed. By com=
parison with lasial Westem architecture, t's possible to identcontesting principle of cambination ane algebraic working with
rumerial units combined one ser nother, and the other geo-
‘metric, working with figures (lines planes, solids) organized in
space to form larger wholes In Cordoba, for example, independent
ements are combined additively to frm an indeterminate whole
“The relations of part to part are identical in the fst and ast ver
sons constructed. The lca syntax i xed, but there is no overar
ching geometric scaffolding. Parts are not Fragments of wholes, but
‘Smly parts, Unlike the idea of closed! unity enforced in western
classical architecture, the structure can be added onto without
substantial morphological transformation Field configurations are
Inherently expandable; the possibilty of incremental growth is
‘anticipated inthe mathematical relations of the parts.
I-could be argued that there ae numerous examples of clas-
sical Western buldings that have grown incrementally and have
been transformer overtime, St, Peter'in Rome or example has an
qualy long history of constuction and rebuilding, But there is 2
significant difeence. At St. Peters aditins are morphological
transformations, elaborating and extending 2 basic geometric
schema, and tending toward compositional closure. This contrasts
with the masque at Cordoba where each stage replicates and gre=
serves the previous sage of construction by the sélition of similar
pats. And at Cordoba, even in later stages when the mosque was
consecrated as Christian church and a Gothic cathedral was
inserted into the continuous and undifferentiated fabric of the
mosque, the existing spatial order resisted the cenalor axial focus
Le Corrie, ene Hospital, 968-65
typical of the Western church. As Rafel Moneo has observed"! do
not believe thatthe Cordoba Mosaue has been destroyed by all
these modifications Rather, | think thatthe fact that the masque
continues to be itself in face ofall these interventions fs wibute
twits own integrity
To brily extend the argument to 2 more recent example, Le
Corbusers Venice Hospit (1868-65) employs a syntax of
repeated slt-same pats, establishing multiple links at its peiph-
ery with the ety fabric. The project develops horizontal through 2
logic of secumulation The basic lock of program, the “car uit
formed of twenty-eight beds, is repeated throughout, Consulting
rooms occupy open circulation spaces in the covered areas
between. The tating placement of blocks establishes connections
and pathways from ward to ward hile the dislacement of the
blocks opens up voids within the horizontal eld ofthe hospital
Ther is no single focus, no unifying geometric schema, AS in the
‘mosque at Cordoba, the overall frm isan elaboration of conditions
established lcaly?0.3 WALKING OUT OF CUBISM
Barnett Newman, it has been seid, used a sequence of
planeflneplane to “walk out ofthe imperatives of cubist space and
close the dor behind hia" The story of postwar American pint=
Ing and seulptue isin large part a story ofthis efor to move
lueyond the limits of cubist compositional syntax. Sculptors in par
‘cla, working under the shadow ofthe achievements of abstract
expressionist painting, felt that @ complex language of faceted
Planes and figural fagments inherited from prewar European
artists was inadequate to ther larger ambitions. It is out ofthis
sense of exhaustion that minimalism emerged inthe mid-sivtis,
Robert Morris's refusal of composition in favaraf process, ar Don-
ald Judes critique of Yeompostion by pats evidence this eat to
proce @ new model for working that might be a5 simple and
immediate a5 the painting ofthe previous decades they o admite,
Minimalist work ofthe sntes and seventies sought to empty
the artwork ofits figurative or decorative character in order to
Foreground its architectural condition The constuction of mean-
ing was displaced from the object isl to the spatial ed between
the viewer and the object: a id zone af perceptual interference,
populated by moving boces. Artists such as Carl Arde, Dan Flavin
Mortis, ane Jud sought to go beyond formal or compositional var-
ation to engave the space of the gallery and the body ofthe viewer
In writen statements, both Jude and Morris express their skepti-
‘sm toward European (ie, cubist} compositional norms. They place
ir work instead inthe context of recent American developments
‘As Moris wrote: "European at since Cubism hasbeen a history of
ermuting eatinships around the general premise that reation-
Ships should ein tical. American art has developed by uncov-
ring suceesve premises for maling ise" Bath Mois and ud
Single out lctson Pollok fr his decisive contribution Jul notes
that "Most sculpture is made par by pat bation, composed
For Jud, what i equi is consolation: “Inthe new work the
shape, image, color and surface ae single and not partial and seat-
tee There are’ any neta or moderate areas or pa any con
ection or tansiiona aress™ The sspiations of minimalist work
are therefore toward unitary forms, dec se finda materie
als and simple combinations: 2 “pre-exeeute" clarity of intliec-
tual and material tems. Minimalsn’s dective tectonic sit
eta the wewing space and eastertd the artwork’ contion
35 “specie object‘seus te Vas earings
‘Ang yeti minimalism represents 2 significant overturning of
prewar compositional principles, it remains indebted to certain
cent
‘materials Its objects are cley delimited and solidly constructed,
U's later architectural constructions confirm tis essential tec=
ing mosels in its reduetive form language and use of
‘oie conservatism.) Minimalism develops in sequences, but rarely
in eds, Its for this reason thatthe work of artists wsvallydesig-
nated “pastminimal” i of particular interest here." In contrast to
Ande or Jud, the work of artists such as Bruce Nauman, Lynda
Benglis Keith Sonnet, Alan Saret, Eva Hesse, and Barry Le Va is
‘materially diverse and improper. Werds, movement, technology
Aid and perishable materials, representations ofthe bocall oF
these “extrnsc® contents that minimalism had repessed~etuen,
Postminimalism is marked by hesitation and ontological doubt
ere the minimaliss are definitive; i is paintecly and informal
where the minimalist are restrained; it remains commited to tan-
sible things and visibility where the minimaliss are coneemed
with underving structures ard idees. These works, fom the wire
construetions of Alan Saret othe pourngs of Lynds Benglis to the
“nonsites" of Robert Smithson introduce chance and contingency
into the work ofa. They shift even mare eadicaly the perception
ofthe wor, from discrete object toa record of the process ofits
‘making in the Feld
The artist who moves most decisively inthe direction of what
| am calling Feld conditions is Bary Le Va, Partly tained as an
architect, Le Va is acutely aware af the spatial Feld implicated bythe sculptural work. Beginning in the mid-satis, he began making
pieces, some planned in advance, others incorporating random
‘races, that thoroughly dissolve te idea oF “sculture™ as adelin~
ited entity, an object dstinet fom the Fld it occuples He called
tributions" "Whether ‘random or ‘oder a dste-
butions detined as eationshia of points and configurations to
cach othe’ or concomitantly, sequences of events" Loalrla-
tionships ae more important than overall form. The generation of
form through "sequences of events’ is somewhat related to the
generative rules for floc behavior or algebraic combination Le Va
these works
signals key compositional principle emercing out of postminimal-
ism: the dsplacement of conta toa series of intiate local rules
for combination, ors 3 “sequences of events” but nat as an over-
all formal configuration. In the case of postminimalisy, this i
‘often related to material choices. When working with mater
‘such as wie mesh (Saet, poured latex Beng] or blown flour Le
Vo) the artist simply cannot exercise a precise formal control over
the materia, Instead the artist establishes the conitions within
‘hich the material willbe deployed, and then direct its Now. In
the ease of Le Ve pees of Fel cloth itisa matter of relating fold
10 fod ine t Tine, In later works from the sates, the materials
themselves become so ephemeral 2st function as delicate egis-
tration of process and change,
All grids ae elas, but not all Fels are gids One ofthe potentials
‘ofthe fields to redefine the relation between figure and ground
We think ofthe figure not as @demereated object read against @
stable field, but as an effect emerging fom the field ite
moments of intensity, 3s peaks or valleys within @ continuous
Field—than it might be possible to imagine figure and fel 2s more
lose allied, What is intended here isa cose attention tothe pro-
ction of eiference at the local sale, even while maintaining a
telative inference tothe fxm of the whale. Authentic and pro-
ductive social altferences, its suggested, thrive at the local evel,
‘and notin the form of large sale semiotic messages or sculpturl
forms. Hence the study of these Feld combinations would be &
study of models that wok nthe zone between figure and abstrae-
tion, models that refgue the conventional opposition between fg-
ure and abstraction, or systems of organization capable of
producing vortexes, peaks and protuberances out ofidvdualele-
rents that are themselves regular or repetitivePe
il
a
2)
y
[A moir is figural effet produced by the superposition oF
two regular fields. Unexpected effects, exhibiting complex and
apparentyiregular behaviors result om the combination af ele-
ments that are in and of themselves repetitive and regular But
more effects ate not random. They shift abruptly in scale, ana
repeat according to complex mathematical rules, Moiré effets are
often use to measure hidden stresses in continuous fil’, orto
sap complex figural forms. In either ease there isan uncanny
coexistence ofa regular fed and emergent figure
In the architectural or urban contest, the example of moire
effects begs the question ofthe surface. The field i fundamentally
2 horizontal shenomenon=even a graphic one—and all of the
examples deserived thus fer funetion in the plan dimension
[Although certain postmodern cities (Tyo for example) might be
characterized fully three dimensional field, the prototypical
cites ofthe late twentieth century ae distinguished by horizontal
extension. What these field combinations seem to promise inthis
contents thickening and intensification of experience at spec-
fied moments within the extended fel ofthe city. The monuments
ofthe past, including the skyscraper, a modernist monument f0|
efficient preducton stood out fom the fabric ofthe ety as pii-
leged vertical moments The new institutions ofthe ety wil r=
haps occur at moments of intensity, inked tothe wider network of
the urban fel, and marked by not by demarcating lines but by
thickened surfaceseth)
In the late 1980s, atl intligence theorist Craig Reynold ere-
ated a computer program to simulate the flocking behavior of
bins. AS described by M. Mitchel Waldrop in Complexity: The
Emerging Science ot the Edge of Order ond Choos, Reynolds placed
2 large number of autonomous, bedike agents, which he called
“oid
grammed to follow thre simple ules of behaviorist to maintain
Into an on-sereen envionment. The bolds were pro-
4 minimum distance From oter objets in the environment fobsta-
cles 35 well 2 other bois: second, to match velocities with other
bods inthe neighborhood; third, to move tawerd the perceived
canter of mass of bods in its neighborhood, As Wildrop nates:
“What is striking about these rales i hat rane of them said "Form
4 Mlack’.the rules were ently local, refering only to what an
individual bold could do and seein its ov vieinity IF Rock was
going to Form at alt would have todo so rom the bottom up, 25
‘an emergent phenomenon, And yet lacks a form, every time"
“The Mocks eal a fel phenomenon, defined by precise and
‘imple local coitions, and relatively indferent to overall form
and extent. Because the rules are define locally, obstructions are
‘not eatatrophie tothe whole. Vaviations and obstacles inthe en
ronment are accommodated by Rid adjustment. A smll lack and
8 lage Nock display fundament
ly the same structure. Over many
Iterations, patterns emerge. Without repeating exact, flock
luehavior tends toward roughly similar configurations, not a fxed
type, but as the cumulative result of localized behavior patternslane Xenati, Symes 859, Gap verian fled atte”
Crowds present a eitferent dynamic, motivated by move com=
plex desies, and interacting in less predictable pattems. las
Canetti in Crowds and Power hs proposed a broader taxanomy:
‘open and closed crowds sytimic and stagnotng crowds; the slow
‘crowd and the quik crowd. He examines the varieties of the crow,
from the religious trong forme by pilgrims tothe mass of prtc-
ipants in spectacle, even extending his thoughts tothe Towing of
tives, the piling up of raps, and the density of the Forest. Accord
Jing to Canetti, the erowd has four primary attributes: "The crowd
sways wants to grow: Within a crowd there i equality; The crowd
faves density; The crowd needs & direction" The ration to
Reynolds rules outlined above is oblique, but vse. Canet,how-
ver isnot interested in prediction or verification, His sources are
literary, historical, and personal. Moreover, hes always aware that
the crows! can be fiberating 85 well as confining, angry and
dlestvctive as well as joyous.
(Composer Iannis Xenakis conceived his early work Metastasis
25 the acoustical equivalent to the phenomenon of the crowd,
Specitically, he was looking fora compositional techsique aéc-
uate to express powerful personal memories
‘henson anil demonstation-hundeds af thousands of
people chanting a slogan wich reproduces se ke a gigantic
‘yh, The combat wid he enemy The rhythm busts into an
enormous chaos of sharp sounds: the whisting of bul; the
‘acing of machine guns. The sounds bait to espe. Slowlysilence fls back on the town. Taken uriuel from an aul pont
of view and detached fom any oer aspect these sound events
made out of large rumber of individual sounds are not sepa-
rately perceptible, but reunite Yer aguin and a new sound is
formed whieh may be perceived in its entirety tthe same ease
withthe song ofthe cicadss ar the sound of hallo an, the
crathng of waves onthe cif the his of waves onthe higle*
In attempting to reproduce these “global acoustical even”
enokis drew upon his evn considerable graph imagination, and
bis teaming in descriptive geometry to invert conventional proce
ures of composition. That is oa, he began with 2 grape nota-
tion desribing the desired effect of "ets" or “loud” of sound,
ard only later reduced these graphics to conventional musical
‘notation, Working as he was with material that was beyond the
cotder of magnitude of the avaliable compositional techniques, he
had to invent new procedures in order to choreograph the 'harac-
teristic dstibution of vast numbers of events"°
‘Crowds and swarms operate atthe edge of contr Aside from
‘the suggestive Formal possiblities, with these two examalesareh-
tecture could profitably shift is attention fom its wationaltop-
‘down forms of contro ane bein to investigate the possibilities ofa
‘more fu, bttom-up approach. Feld conditions offers a tentative
‘opening in architecture toes the dynamics of use, behavior of
crowds, andthe complex geometries of masses in motion
0 INSTITUTIONS.
There exists = strong histrial connection Between the preise
rules of axa, symmetry, ard formal hierarchy that govern cass-
‘al architecture and the traditional type-forms of Wester institu
tions The iran the museum, and the concert halls much asthe
bank thecity hall oF the capitol all appeal to the stability of cass-