Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L328932592 OBE Syllabus Technical Writing
L328932592 OBE Syllabus Technical Writing
Vision: The University of Perpetual Help System DALTA shall emerge as a premiere university in the Philippines. It shall provide a venue for the pursuit of
excellence in academics, technology and research through community partnership.
The university shall take the role of a catalyst for human development. It shall continue to inculcate Christian values – catholic in doctrine, as a way of
strengthening the moral fiber of the Filipino – a people who are “Helpers of God”, proud of their race and prepared for exemplary global participation in the
arts, sciences, humanities and business.
It foresees the Filipino people enjoying a quality of life in abundance, living in peace, and building a nation that the next generation will nourish, cherish and
value.
Mission: The University of Perpetual Help System DALTA is dedicated to the development of the
Filipino as a LEADER. It aims to graduate DYNAMIC STUDENTS who are physically, intellectually, socially and spiritually committed to the achievement of
the highest quality of life.
As a system of service in health and in education, it is dedicated to the FORMATION OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE AND RESEARCH – ORIENTED
PROFESSIONALS, LEADERS AND CITIZENS WITH GREAT SOCIAL CONCERN and COMMITMENT TO THE DELIVERY OF QUALITY EDUCATION
AND HEALTH CARE.
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
Core Values:
Love of God;
Love of self, neighbor and family;
Love of country and good governance;
Academic and professional excellence;
Health and ecological consciousness;
Peace and global solidarity;
Filipino Christian leadership;
Celebration of life according to Catholic Doctrine.
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE DESCRIPTION : The course revolves around fundamental principles in scientific and technical writing. It jumpstarts with the nature
characteristics, attributes, and properties of a technical account and zeroes in to the various material that fall under technical
literature. The course prepares the student in writing various technical material such as proposals, reports, thesis, journalistic
outputs, and business letters.
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
PROGRAM OUTCOMES Program Educational Objectives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G. Demonstrate an understanding of the professional and ethical consideration of communication.
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
COURSE COVERAGE
Understand the content of Nature of Technical Writing 6 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
technical writing Content of Technical
Writing Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
Discuss the properties of Properties of Technical
technical writing Writing Seatwork
Principles of Technical Board work
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
ASSESSMENT TOOLS &
TIME FRAME LEARNING ACTIVITIES/
COURSE OBJECTIVES TOPICS STRATEGIES/ RESULTS &
NO. OF HOURS PERFORMANCE TASKS
EVIDENCES
Adapt the principles of Writing
technical writing
Define definition Definition 3 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
Formal Definition
Discuss different types of Informal Definition Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
definition
Seatwork
Differentiate formal and Board work
informal definition
PRELIM EXAMINATION
Define classification Classification 3 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
Oral reporting
Identify types of description Description 3 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
Description of
Discuss the techniques used Mechanism Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
for description Description of a
process Seatwork
Distinguish description of a Board work
process from description of
mechanism Oral reporting
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
ASSESSMENT TOOLS &
TIME FRAME LEARNING ACTIVITIES/
COURSE OBJECTIVES TOPICS STRATEGIES/ RESULTS &
NO. OF HOURS PERFORMANCE TASKS
EVIDENCES
Oral reporting
Define plain language Plain language 6 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
What is plain
Discuss the principles of plain language? Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
language What is not plain
language? Seatwork
Apply plain language Why use plain Board work
language?
How to develop Oral reporting
documentation in plain
English
Principles of plain
language: readability,
organizing information,
designing an effective
document
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Define audience question Audience question 6 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
What is an audience?
Identify types of audience Types of audiences Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
ASSESSMENT TOOLS &
TIME FRAME LEARNING ACTIVITIES/
COURSE OBJECTIVES TOPICS STRATEGIES/ RESULTS &
NO. OF HOURS PERFORMANCE TASKS
EVIDENCES
Captive vs. non-captive
Differentiate captive from non- audiences Board work Seatwork
captive audience Experts, technicians,
executives, and non-
specialist audiences
Primary, secondary and
tertiary audiences
Real or intended
audience
Write your audience:
meeting audience’s
needs; audience
analysis; creating an
audience profile
Write a draft Technical writing process 3 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
Preparing to write
Organizing information Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
Writing the draft
Revising Seatwork
Board work
Determine the purpose and Writing: 6 hours Lectures/Handouts Written Examination
audience of a letter Effective letters
Memos Graded Recitation
Interactive discussion
Describe the format Proposals
Seatwork
Apply appropriate style Board work
Letters, memos or proposals
Identify the types of memos Sample letters, memos and
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
ASSESSMENT TOOLS &
TIME FRAME LEARNING ACTIVITIES/
COURSE OBJECTIVES TOPICS STRATEGIES/ RESULTS &
NO. OF HOURS PERFORMANCE TASKS
EVIDENCES
Write an effective memos and proposals
proposals
REFERENCES:
Alred, G. (2012). Handbook of technical writing. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
De Belen, R. (2015). Elements of business writing and technical writing. Quezon City: Wiserman’s Books.
Schwarzman, S. (2011). Technical writing management. USA: [S.I.].
Smith-Worthington, D. (2013). Technical writing for success. 3rd ed. Andover: Cengage Learning.
Attested By:
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director
7. Participation in required Related School Activities (RSA)
GRADING SYSTEMS:
Base 40 Grade Computation = Class Standing – 70% (Raw Score/Total Score x .70) + Major Examinations – 30%
Course Code Date Effective Date Revised Revised By: Recommending Approval: Approved By:
ABC 227-3: June 2015 June 2015 Ms. Anadelfa Bernardo Dr. Lara A, Maguad Dr. Reno R. Rayel
Technical Writing Chairperson, Communication Dept. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences School Director