Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The History of Healthcare Finance in USA From 1950
The History of Healthcare Finance in USA From 1950
The History of Healthcare Finance in USA From 1950
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Submission Date
The History of Healthcare Finance in USA from 1950
Introduction
The history of health care in the United States can be traced back to the 1920s. The
healthcare system has evolved from basic medical discoveries to the most cutting-edge and
complex system over the decades. These discoveries have contributed to the expansion and
improvement of health care. For instance, the invention of adhesive bandages in 1923 while the
first cancer hospital was opened in New York City in 1921 (Morrisey, 2013). During this period,
vitamin D was commercially synthesized and manufactured for consumption in the US. In 1929,
the first air ambulance was launched. In 1931, the first antiacid was in supply in the US,
following the introduction of the yellow fever vaccine in 1932. In 1932 the polio vaccine was
introduced together with the insurance cover for health care. Later after one year, a non-profit
insurance firm, Blue Cross, began its operations. The social security law was signed by D.
Roosevelt in 1935 and later signed the Drug, Cosmetic, and Food Act of 1938. This resulted in
the expansion of the FDA powers to control drugs (Morrisey, 2013). The first regulation to
license hospitals was exercised in 1938 in Arkansas and Texas following the establishment of the
During the 1940s, various developments in health care were encountered. This included
passing the Lanham Act in 1941, which enhanced the US government to provide funds and aid to
non-profit and private hospitals. Later in 1944, the GI bill was enacted to assist war veterans to
readopt civilian life. In 1947, the Hill-Burton Act and National Mental Health Act were signed.
In 1947, the first television broadcast of surgery was practiced. In 1948, the World Health
Organization was established. Between 1950 and 1970, great advances and development in the
US health care system were experienced. This included the passing of Medicaid and Medicare
bills into law, the discovery of the polio vaccine, and the invention of CT scans. Other advances
had the first open-heart surgery by the use of lung and heart machines (Morrisey, 2013). In 1970,
the Poison Prevention Packaging Act was passed in an effort to protect children aged below five
years from the consumption of products such as aspirin. In 1977, the Health Care Financing
Administration, today is known as CMS, was created to administer Medicaid and Medicare
programs.
Healthcare finance has shifted dramatically in the United States over the last 70 years,
with several suggestions being given to assist Americans in paying for medical services. National
health insurance plans have been developed, with others in favour and others against them.
President Trump recently attempted to pull back several elements of President Obama's
Affordable Care Act, which allowed for the coverage of more individuals. This exemplified the
split that still exists when it comes to healthcare finance (Morrisey, 2013). The private sector's
participation in health finance has grown in recent years, especially new ideas such as healthcare
delivery, subsidized health care, private medical insurance premiums, and even private medical
initiatives for the poor capitalist appearing. Medicaid and other old age schemes also have
evolved. Medicare and other elderly schemes have also evolved. This includes both employed
older citizens as well as those who would not be employed. In view of the foregoing initiatives,
it's critical to comprehend how United arrived at its current state of healthcare funding, which is
characterized by a range of government and private schemes. This research aims to assess the
history of healthcare finance in the United States since 1950. The study will also look at how
changes in healthcare financing have affected the provision of healthcare services to the general
public.
The 1950s
The developments in funding in the United States in 1950 are based on the Social
Security Act. In 1935, the Social Security Act was approved, allowing healthcare expenses to be
included in regular aid contributions for low-income people. The regular aid contributions
granted to poor individuals, on the other hand, were always so modest that those who collected
them battled to afford to house and disregarded their individual healthcare services (Jost, 2012).
The Social Security Act was amended in 1950 to include vendor payment money for public
support, allowing Congress to broaden the scope of public assistance. In contrast to welfare
recipients, vendor money was paid directly to governmental health systems, nurses, and
physicians. The Social Security Act was amended to establish an institutional framework for
By 1958, the law was already amended to allow the national government to distribute
additional types of medical reimbursements in addition to the financial benefits among residents
who satisfied the government's measure of poverty. In 1952, under Truman's leadership, the
federal government shifted its attention from trying to implement a single-payer healthcare
coverage for all Residents to lobbying for healthcare amongst the agricultural community. In
1952, under Truman's leadership, the national government shifted its attention from attempting
to implement a public health insurance scheme for all Americans to campaigning for medical
assistance for the elderly (Jost, 2012). The American Medical Association (AMA) first
condemned the initiative but later changed their minds. By November 1964, 39 states and the
District of Columbia had launched initiatives to give medical support to the seniors. Physician
visits, all hospital services, nursing facility care, and prescription medicines were all guaranteed
Whereas the public administration enacted all of the other measures, the corporate market
proceeded to be more imaginative with its health insurance services, boosting the number of
people who will be insured. Private medical insurance businesses began offering substantial
medical expenditure coverage options within the late 1950s (Jost, 2012). As a result, such
coverages were designed to protect insurance recipients against the expensive health care that
extensive health coverage jumped from a ceiling of $50000 to millions of dollars in a matter of
years (Aaron, 2010). In 1957, optical coverage was introduced, supplemented by integrated
treatment institution advantages in 1959, and oral healthcare coverage in 1960. In the 1950s,
developments in medical coverage, which happened both in public and private sectors, enhanced
the demographic's access to healthcare services more than those in earlier decades, when the
majority of the public was unable to obtain medical care (Jost, 2012). The old, a far more
disadvantaged group, was also able to get medical treatment under government-funded medical
The 1960s
The enactment of Medicare in 1965 was one of the key breakthroughs in healthcare
funding in the United States throughout the 1960s. Physicians might examine compensation for
appropriate, usual, and existing rates under the Medicare Act. Medicare also aimed to strengthen
Medicaid, which authorized the state and federal governments to split the expenditures of
healthcare programs by 50%. States also were free to design their own strategies. The federal
government covers Medicare costs to the tune of half. As a result, Medicare was created to assist
a select group of adults over the age of 65. This is attributable to the fact that males born in 1950
had an average lifespan of sixty-five years, whereas females had an expected lifespan of 70.7
The 1965 unanimous passage of the Medicare/Medicaid Act signalled the end of
government health insurance schemes in the United States, with just about any type of socialized
healthcare initiatives losing popular backing, particularly among Conservatives, and being
considered as a communist (Aaron, 2010). The passage of Medicare in 1965, which was
primarily aimed at the geriatric population over the age of 65, squandered the advances made in
the previous decade in terms of medical care distribution to disadvantaged populations. Low-
income people found it difficult to obtain the medication, particularly when the expense of these
treatments continued to rise. Because only a small percentage of people was over 65, the
enactment of Medicare to benefit only those over Sixty-five was intended to minimize the
number of people who depended on such benefits (Aaron, 2010). The elderly's short survival rate
indicated that they would not be reliant on the initiatives for longer, putting an economic burden
The 1980s
Modern medical advances and insurance companies and the Medicare service's expense-
based reimbursement methods drove the significant rise in health coverage rates in the 1980s.
Lawmakers modified the way Medicare reimbursed healthcare facilities in 1983. Instead of
progressive reimbursements, wherein the medical facilities were compensated a set amount
based on the diagnosis of patients who were admitted (McGlynn, 2014). The healthcare
insurance sector was transforming at about the same time for many similar purposes. Prepaid
group practice programs, generally known as HMOs, continued to attract more members, as did
other healthcare delivery types, such as favoring different providers (McGlynn, 2014) and point-
of-service health plans. In 1981 States were required to make increased Medicaid health
insurance premiums that treat a significant portion of Medicaid and low-income patients under
the federal budget reconciliation act (OBRA 81) (Aaron, 2010). It also eliminates the necessity
that government Medicaid agendas recompense medical facility rates that are equal to or higher
than those charged by Medicare. Under the Boren Amendment, states are required to pay nursing
facilities "reasonable and acceptable" prices (applied to hospitals the following year).
The 1990s
throughout all socioeconomic classes, as well as the formation of medical partnerships in every
jurisdiction were all part of the Clinton national healthcare proposal of 1993. As a result, medical
treatment would indeed be provided to every citizen or legal resident (McGlynn, 2014).
Conservatives, led by William Kristol, slammed the idea, expressing concern that a Liberal
single-payer would "revitalize the character of... Moderates as the benevolent protectors of
middle earners concerns." Simultaneously, it will deal a severe defeat to Conservative assertions
that federal restraint will protect the working class." The bill failed to become law. Just at the end
of Summer 1994, the "Health Security Express," an off-road journey by numerous buses
2014). The bus passengers then discuss their personal anecdotes, wellbeing tragedies, and also
why they believed it was critical for all American citizens to have medical coverage at every
destination. In 1994 Clinton prioritized national wellbeing transformation early in his term,
Legislature in 1993. It advocated for affordable healthcare, individual and employer mandates,
insurance competition, and state intervention to keep costs in check. Independent directors'
cooperation was frequently constrained and restricted. The National Federation of Independent
and, the businesses Health Insurance Association of America both of which believe that reform
will harm their smaller members, were at the forefront of the resistance. This resistance
The 2000s
In 2001, Congress discussed a Patients' Bill of Rights that would have given sick people
an unambiguous set of rights related to their health care. This effort essentially applied several of
the Buyers' Bill of Rights concepts to the realm of medical services. It was accomplished in order
to preserve the quality of health services delivered to all consumers by safeguarding the
confidentiality of the processes occurring in the medical sector. This method of harmonizing the
particularly the pharmaceutical business American and Medical Association (AMA), were
regardless of medical coverage status and a person's power to retain their healthcare program
responsible for any and all damage caused, appeared to be the bill's largest roadblocks.
The Patients' Bill of Rights initiative was rejected by Congress in 2002 as a consequence
of this fierce resistance. Bush signed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Enhancement, and
Revitalization Act into legislation as president, which contained a pharmaceutical drug program
for the disabled and elderly. This transformation ensured many people had got medical
insurance, and the healthcare services became more affordable. In 2010 President Obama signed
the patient protection and care act that provided that Obama care would encompass the destitute
of the impoverished. Those with low and moderate earnings who do not have access to adequate
insurance via their work will be able to purchase insurance via new "American Health Benefit
Exchanges" with government money. The company is not required to provide health advantages,
but huge companies that would provide medical coverage discounts to their workers will face
legal consequences. Through a different Marketplace, medium firms will be able to obtain more
Conclusion
Between the 1980s and 2000s, great advancement of health care in the US was encountered.
During this period, the advancement and development included the passing of the Americans
with Disabilities act, eradication of global smallpox, and passing of the HIPAA privacy rule. The
Needlestick Safety and prevention act was enacted to prevent needlestick injuries. Later in 2005,
the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act was passed into law. Currently, in 2010, the
health care plan bill was signed into law by President Obama. These transformations have helped
Aaron, H. (2010). Serious and unstable condition: financing America's health care. Brookings
hl=en&lr=&id=cKQ1wOoDb6oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&
dq=HISTORY+OF+HEALTH+CARE+FINANCING+IN+THE+USA+SINCE+1950+&
ots=imDygCb68V&sig=GN3TLdZpnVH2-fxc2-
Wr8jVlw5I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Jost, T. S. (2012, September). Eight decades of discouragement: The history of health care cost
containment in the USA. In Forum for Health Economics and Policy (Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.
158-166). De Gruyter.https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2012-0009/
https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=h8pLDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA158&lpg=PA158&dq=E
ight+Decades+of+Discouragement:+The+History+of+Health+Care+Cost+Containment+
in+the+USA&source=bl&ots=HdpJ8vAcZg&sig=ACfU3U31Wc82m7Qp8lE4OVAHjjm
IyFLGDw&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiX3YaE8IbzAhWr_CoKHWpRCvEQ6AF6BA
gMEAM#v=onepage&q=Eight%20Decades%20of%20Discouragement%3A%20The%2
0History%20of%20Health%20Care%20Cost%20Containment%20in%20the%20USA&f
=false
McGlynn, E. A. (2014). Life, liberty, and the pursuit of health reform in the USA. The
6736(14)61117-X/fulltext
user_type=57&type=sr&redir=eJxNzEEKwjAQhe
GeQQ_gCdLRVgRdt9CFFGkF10MSbSFNQmYwegXduHMteFCrK9ff_17H7GkDEGN
M5UDpyZ2h0aQxyE60jNwT95JEgYwCrRLtlVgPBH-2D9oq-mmjvQtMUI_oLJpKo-
GuvPix-F5A4aI1DhVBNa5d6CWauip36HVIvTomyWKVZ_NsvVzlCb7s4-
C3k9nNvKfPe_0B5j0-ww&src=94d2d2&via_page=1