The History of Healthcare Finance in USA From 1950

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

The History of Healthcare Finance in USA from 1950

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Submission Date
The History of Healthcare Finance in USA from 1950

Introduction

The history of health care in the United States can be traced back to the 1920s. The

healthcare system has evolved from basic medical discoveries to the most cutting-edge and

complex system over the decades. These discoveries have contributed to the expansion and

improvement of health care. For instance, the invention of adhesive bandages in 1923 while the

first cancer hospital was opened in New York City in 1921 (Morrisey, 2013). During this period,

vitamin D was commercially synthesized and manufactured for consumption in the US. In 1929,

the first air ambulance was launched. In 1931, the first antiacid was in supply in the US,

following the introduction of the yellow fever vaccine in 1932. In 1932 the polio vaccine was

introduced together with the insurance cover for health care. Later after one year, a non-profit

insurance firm, Blue Cross, began its operations. The social security law was signed by D.

Roosevelt in 1935 and later signed the Drug, Cosmetic, and Food Act of 1938. This resulted in

the expansion of the FDA powers to control drugs (Morrisey, 2013). The first regulation to

license hospitals was exercised in 1938 in Arkansas and Texas following the establishment of the

National Institute of Mental health.

During the 1940s, various developments in health care were encountered. This included

passing the Lanham Act in 1941, which enhanced the US government to provide funds and aid to

non-profit and private hospitals. Later in 1944, the GI bill was enacted to assist war veterans to
readopt civilian life. In 1947, the Hill-Burton Act and National Mental Health Act were signed.

In 1947, the first television broadcast of surgery was practiced. In 1948, the World Health

Organization was established. Between 1950 and 1970, great advances and development in the

US health care system were experienced. This included the passing of Medicaid and Medicare

bills into law, the discovery of the polio vaccine, and the invention of CT scans. Other advances

had the first open-heart surgery by the use of lung and heart machines (Morrisey, 2013). In 1970,

the Poison Prevention Packaging Act was passed in an effort to protect children aged below five

years from the consumption of products such as aspirin. In 1977, the Health Care Financing

Administration, today is known as CMS, was created to administer Medicaid and Medicare

programs.

Healthcare finance has shifted dramatically in the United States over the last 70 years,

with several suggestions being given to assist Americans in paying for medical services. National

health insurance plans have been developed, with others in favour and others against them.

President Trump recently attempted to pull back several elements of President Obama's

Affordable Care Act, which allowed for the coverage of more individuals. This exemplified the

split that still exists when it comes to healthcare finance (Morrisey, 2013). The private sector's

participation in health finance has grown in recent years, especially new ideas such as healthcare

delivery, subsidized health care, private medical insurance premiums, and even private medical

initiatives for the poor capitalist appearing. Medicaid and other old age schemes also have

evolved. Medicare and other elderly schemes have also evolved. This includes both employed

older citizens as well as those who would not be employed. In view of the foregoing initiatives,

it's critical to comprehend how United arrived at its current state of healthcare funding, which is
characterized by a range of government and private schemes. This research aims to assess the

history of healthcare finance in the United States since 1950. The study will also look at how

changes in healthcare financing have affected the provision of healthcare services to the general

public.

The 1950s

The developments in funding in the United States in 1950 are based on the Social

Security Act. In 1935, the Social Security Act was approved, allowing healthcare expenses to be

included in regular aid contributions for low-income people. The regular aid contributions

granted to poor individuals, on the other hand, were always so modest that those who collected

them battled to afford to house and disregarded their individual healthcare services (Jost, 2012).

The Social Security Act was amended in 1950 to include vendor payment money for public

support, allowing Congress to broaden the scope of public assistance. In contrast to welfare

recipients, vendor money was paid directly to governmental health systems, nurses, and

physicians. The Social Security Act was amended to establish an institutional framework for

benefit healthcare programs.

By 1958, the law was already amended to allow the national government to distribute

additional types of medical reimbursements in addition to the financial benefits among residents

who satisfied the government's measure of poverty. In 1952, under Truman's leadership, the

federal government shifted its attention from trying to implement a single-payer healthcare

coverage for all Residents to lobbying for healthcare amongst the agricultural community. In

1952, under Truman's leadership, the national government shifted its attention from attempting

to implement a public health insurance scheme for all Americans to campaigning for medical

assistance for the elderly (Jost, 2012). The American Medical Association (AMA) first
condemned the initiative but later changed their minds. By November 1964, 39 states and the

District of Columbia had launched initiatives to give medical support to the seniors. Physician

visits, all hospital services, nursing facility care, and prescription medicines were all guaranteed

mostly in the majority of states.

Whereas the public administration enacted all of the other measures, the corporate market

proceeded to be more imaginative with its health insurance services, boosting the number of

people who will be insured. Private medical insurance businesses began offering substantial

medical expenditure coverage options within the late 1950s (Jost, 2012). As a result, such

coverages were designed to protect insurance recipients against the expensive health care that

could emerge as a consequence of a long sickness or a devastating catastrophe. Advantages from

extensive health coverage jumped from a ceiling of $50000 to millions of dollars in a matter of

years (Aaron, 2010). In 1957, optical coverage was introduced, supplemented by integrated

treatment institution advantages in 1959, and oral healthcare coverage in 1960. In the 1950s,

developments in medical coverage, which happened both in public and private sectors, enhanced

the demographic's access to healthcare services more than those in earlier decades, when the

majority of the public was unable to obtain medical care (Jost, 2012). The old, a far more

disadvantaged group, was also able to get medical treatment under government-funded medical

assistance programs for senior citizens.

The 1960s

The enactment of Medicare in 1965 was one of the key breakthroughs in healthcare

funding in the United States throughout the 1960s. Physicians might examine compensation for

appropriate, usual, and existing rates under the Medicare Act. Medicare also aimed to strengthen

Medicaid, which authorized the state and federal governments to split the expenditures of
healthcare programs by 50%. States also were free to design their own strategies. The federal

government covers Medicare costs to the tune of half. As a result, Medicare was created to assist

a select group of adults over the age of 65. This is attributable to the fact that males born in 1950

had an average lifespan of sixty-five years, whereas females had an expected lifespan of 70.7

years (McGlynn, 2014).

The 1965 unanimous passage of the Medicare/Medicaid Act signalled the end of

government health insurance schemes in the United States, with just about any type of socialized

healthcare initiatives losing popular backing, particularly among Conservatives, and being

considered as a communist (Aaron, 2010). The passage of Medicare in 1965, which was

primarily aimed at the geriatric population over the age of 65, squandered the advances made in

the previous decade in terms of medical care distribution to disadvantaged populations. Low-

income people found it difficult to obtain the medication, particularly when the expense of these

treatments continued to rise. Because only a small percentage of people was over 65, the

enactment of Medicare to benefit only those over Sixty-five was intended to minimize the

number of people who depended on such benefits (Aaron, 2010). The elderly's short survival rate

indicated that they would not be reliant on the initiatives for longer, putting an economic burden

on the state and federal governments.

The 1980s

Modern medical advances and insurance companies and the Medicare service's expense-

based reimbursement methods drove the significant rise in health coverage rates in the 1980s.

Lawmakers modified the way Medicare reimbursed healthcare facilities in 1983. Instead of

compensating depending on permissible expenditures, the proposed program featured

progressive reimbursements, wherein the medical facilities were compensated a set amount
based on the diagnosis of patients who were admitted (McGlynn, 2014). The healthcare

insurance sector was transforming at about the same time for many similar purposes. Prepaid

group practice programs, generally known as HMOs, continued to attract more members, as did

other healthcare delivery types, such as favoring different providers (McGlynn, 2014) and point-

of-service health plans. In 1981 States were required to make increased Medicaid health

insurance premiums that treat a significant portion of Medicaid and low-income patients under

the federal budget reconciliation act (OBRA 81) (Aaron, 2010). It also eliminates the necessity

that government Medicaid agendas recompense medical facility rates that are equal to or higher

than those charged by Medicare. Under the Boren Amendment, states are required to pay nursing

facilities "reasonable and acceptable" prices (applied to hospitals the following year).

The 1990s

Compulsory membership in a health insurance plan, incentives to ensure accessibility

throughout all socioeconomic classes, as well as the formation of medical partnerships in every

jurisdiction were all part of the Clinton national healthcare proposal of 1993. As a result, medical

treatment would indeed be provided to every citizen or legal resident (McGlynn, 2014).

Conservatives, led by William Kristol, slammed the idea, expressing concern that a Liberal

single-payer would "revitalize the character of... Moderates as the benevolent protectors of

middle earners concerns." Simultaneously, it will deal a severe defeat to Conservative assertions

that federal restraint will protect the working class." The bill failed to become law. Just at the end

of Summer 1994, the "Health Security Express," an off-road journey by numerous buses

transporting proponents of Clinton's comprehensive healthcare legislation, began (McGlynn,

2014). The bus passengers then discuss their personal anecdotes, wellbeing tragedies, and also

why they believed it was critical for all American citizens to have medical coverage at every
destination. In 1994 Clinton prioritized national wellbeing transformation early in his term,

proposing an "accomplished opposition" method and delivering a comprehensive proposal to

Legislature in 1993. It advocated for affordable healthcare, individual and employer mandates,

insurance competition, and state intervention to keep costs in check. Independent directors'

cooperation was frequently constrained and restricted. The National Federation of Independent

and, the businesses Health Insurance Association of America both of which believe that reform

will harm their smaller members, were at the forefront of the resistance. This resistance

undermined the president’s healthcare financing plans.

The 2000s

In 2001, Congress discussed a Patients' Bill of Rights that would have given sick people

an unambiguous set of rights related to their health care. This effort essentially applied several of

the Buyers' Bill of Rights concepts to the realm of medical services. It was accomplished in order

to preserve the quality of health services delivered to all consumers by safeguarding the

confidentiality of the processes occurring in the medical sector. This method of harmonizing the

character of medical centers turned to be somewhat controversial. Several special interests,

particularly the pharmaceutical business American and Medical Association (AMA), were

outspoken in their opposition to the convention. Extending immediate care to anybody,

regardless of medical coverage status and a person's power to retain their healthcare program

responsible for any and all damage caused, appeared to be the bill's largest roadblocks.

The Patients' Bill of Rights initiative was rejected by Congress in 2002 as a consequence

of this fierce resistance. Bush signed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Enhancement, and

Revitalization Act into legislation as president, which contained a pharmaceutical drug program

for the disabled and elderly. This transformation ensured many people had got medical
insurance, and the healthcare services became more affordable. In 2010 President Obama signed

the patient protection and care act that provided that Obama care would encompass the destitute

of the impoverished. Those with low and moderate earnings who do not have access to adequate

insurance via their work will be able to purchase insurance via new "American Health Benefit

Exchanges" with government money. The company is not required to provide health advantages,

but huge companies that would provide medical coverage discounts to their workers will face

legal consequences. Through a different Marketplace, medium firms will be able to obtain more

plans. Healthcare plans would not be able to refuse coverage.

Conclusion

Between the 1980s and 2000s, great advancement of health care in the US was encountered.

During this period, the advancement and development included the passing of the Americans

with Disabilities act, eradication of global smallpox, and passing of the HIPAA privacy rule. The

Needlestick Safety and prevention act was enacted to prevent needlestick injuries. Later in 2005,

the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act was passed into law. Currently, in 2010, the

health care plan bill was signed into law by President Obama. These transformations have helped

in making health more affordable.


References

Aaron, H. (2010). Serious and unstable condition: financing America's health care. Brookings

Institution Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?

hl=en&lr=&id=cKQ1wOoDb6oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&

dq=HISTORY+OF+HEALTH+CARE+FINANCING+IN+THE+USA+SINCE+1950+&

ots=imDygCb68V&sig=GN3TLdZpnVH2-fxc2-

Wr8jVlw5I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Jost, T. S. (2012, September). Eight decades of discouragement: The history of health care cost

containment in the USA. In Forum for Health Economics and Policy (Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.

158-166). De Gruyter.https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2012-0009/

https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=h8pLDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA158&lpg=PA158&dq=E

ight+Decades+of+Discouragement:+The+History+of+Health+Care+Cost+Containment+

in+the+USA&source=bl&ots=HdpJ8vAcZg&sig=ACfU3U31Wc82m7Qp8lE4OVAHjjm

IyFLGDw&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiX3YaE8IbzAhWr_CoKHWpRCvEQ6AF6BA

gMEAM#v=onepage&q=Eight%20Decades%20of%20Discouragement%3A%20The%2

0History%20of%20Health%20Care%20Cost%20Containment%20in%20the%20USA&f

=false

McGlynn, E. A. (2014). Life, liberty, and the pursuit of health reform in the USA. The

Lancet, 384(9937), 19-20. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-

6736(14)61117-X/fulltext

Morrisey, M. A. (2013). Health insurance in the United States. In Handbook of Insurance (pp.

957-995). Springer, New York,NY.http://poshukach.com/redir?

user_type=57&type=sr&redir=eJxNzEEKwjAQhe
GeQQ_gCdLRVgRdt9CFFGkF10MSbSFNQmYwegXduHMteFCrK9ff_17H7GkDEGN

M5UDpyZ2h0aQxyE60jNwT95JEgYwCrRLtlVgPBH-2D9oq-mmjvQtMUI_oLJpKo-

GuvPix-F5A4aI1DhVBNa5d6CWauip36HVIvTomyWKVZ_NsvVzlCb7s4-

C3k9nNvKfPe_0B5j0-ww&src=94d2d2&via_page=1

You might also like