e-ISSN: 2582-5208

International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science

( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com

ESTIMATION OF VISCOSITY OF BINARY SYSTEM AT VARIOUS

TEMPERATURES BY JOUYBAN ACREE MODEL AND MCALLISTER MODEL
Naveen Awasthi*1
*1Assistant Professor, Department Of Chemistry, Janta College Bakewar Etawah India.
ABSTRACT
From the measured work of Jose M. Navaza, the Theoretical results of viscosity for a non-polar binary liquid
mixture cyclohexane+ 2,2,4-trimethylpentane at 298.15,303.15,308.15,313.15,318.15,323.15 K have presented
over the whole composition (0.0762-0.9650) range and atmospheric pressure. Theoretical calculations were
performed using Jouyban Acree model, McAllister three body and four body model and compared with the
measured data. Redlich Kister polynomial equation was to determine the coefficients and standard deviation.
Jouyban Acree Model and McAllister model were used to estimate the experimental findings. Jouyban Acree
Model and McAllister four body model correlate the experimental findings more accurately than McAllister
three body.
Keywords: Viscosity, Jouyban Acree, Mcallister Model, Cyclohexane, Binary System.
I. INTRODUCTION
Viscosity of binary system is an important transport property having considerable physicochemical interest
and is essential in designing calculations various of thermophysical properties. In various industrial and
thermodynamic processes experimental and calculated results of viscosity were used to design apparatus,
development of solution related theories and molecular dynamics [1-2]. Transport behaviour and molecular
interactions between the binary system depend on the viscous behaviour of liquid mixtures. processing and
product formulation [3] were performed using viscosity data in many industrial applications. A theoretical
prediction of various thermodynamic and transport properties of multi component liquid system have its own
importance because many times it is impractical to measure various thermo dynamic and physical properties at
all external conditions of interests. R.K Shukla [4] has published a research work on viscosity for associated
binary system at various temperatures. The present analysis is concerned with the corelation of viscosity for
cyclohexane+ 2,2,4-trimethylpentane at 298.15,303.15,308.15,313.15,318.15,323.15 K over the whole
composition range and atmospheric pressure from the experimental work of Jose M. Navaza [5] by Jouyban
Acree Model[6-12] which obey the least square method and McAllister model[13] based on Eyring’s absolute
theory[14].the change in the viscosity (∆ɳ) were calculated and apply to Redlich Kister polynomial[15] to derive
the coefficients and standard deviation. The main aim of this research work to simulate different corelation
models which could describe the transport properties of all types of liquids well.
II. MODELING AND ANALYSIS
A. Jouyban Acree model
Jouyban Acree model [6-12] depend on the least square method was used to correlate the physicochemical
property of binary system at different temperatures:
( )
[ ] [ ]

( )
[ ] ( )

where Zm, T, A1, T and B2, T are physico chemical properties of mixture, component A and B respectively; X1 and X2
are mole fractions of pure component A and B respectively. T is absolute temperature: and J0, J1, J2 are
coefficients that could be computed using a no -intercept regression of the measured data by:
( ) ( )
[ ] [ ] [ ] ( )

where ɳm, T, ɳ1, T and ɳ2, T are viscosity of binary liquid mixture, component A and B respectively.

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[865]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
B. McAllister three body model
McAllister model [13] is mainly used to correlate the viscosity of liquid system with mole fraction assuming the
concept of additivity. Eyring [14] proposed the equation which relate the kinematic viscosity of liquid with
temperature
⁄
( )

The movement of the components between two layers of liquid may be regarded as the passage of the system
over a potential energy barrier, related to .
McAllister assume different planar three body encounters in the analysis of the viscosity of a mixture of type A
and B.he considered that there is a very close relation between the total free energy of activation of individual
interaction ( ) and their occurrences ( ). Hence
( )
He made the following assumption as
and
Also

( )

Hence equation (4) can be written as

( )
Now applying equation (3) for following interactions (i.e., 111, 121, 211,112; 212,122 ,221; and 222) and then
taking logarithm of equations so obtained to eliminate free energy terms, following equation is obtained
[ ⁄ ] [( ⁄ )⁄ ]
[( ⁄ )⁄ ]
[ ⁄ ] ( )
Where

( )

C. McAllister four body model

If there is a large difference in the size of component molecules then four body model behaves like three body.
again, considering different interaction and their total occurrences along with activation energy may be written
as sum of energy of activations of various interactions

( )
By adopting the same procedure, the following equation is obtained for four-body interaction as:
[( ⁄ )]
[( ⁄ )⁄ ] [( ⁄ )⁄ ] [( ⁄ )⁄ ]
( ⁄ ) ( )
Table 1. Coefficients of Redlich- Kister Polynomial and Standard Deviation
T/K A0 A1 A2 A3 ∆δ
298.15 -0.3770 0.3783 -0.8727 -0.2423 0.1561
303.15 -0.4171 0.9458 -1.2078 -0.0408 0.1634
308.15 -0.4282 1.0727 -1.3899 -0.0602 0.1703
313.15 -0.4539 1.2036 -1.5900 0.0382 0.1755
318.15 -0.4556 1.3187 -1.7876 -0.0382 0.1810
323.15 -0.4470 0.9310 -1.8143 -0.0655 0.1854

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[866]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
Where  is the viscosity of the binary system and x1, 1, M1, x2, 2 and M2 are the mole fractions, viscosities, and
molecular weights of pure liquids A and B respectively. McAllister coefficient a, b and c are adjustable
parameters that are characteristic of the liquid system.
III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Viscosity deviation (∆ɳ) calculated mathematically by Redlich- Kister polynomials [15] for correlating
experimental data as:
( )∑ ( ) ( )
Where y is the deviation in the viscosity (∆ɳ), x1 is the mole fraction and Ai is the coefficient. the values of
coefficients were calculated by multiple regression analysis assuming the least square method and are
summarized along with the standard deviation was presented in Table 1. Standard deviation( ) is defined by.
⁄

[∑ ( ) ] ( )
( )
Table 2. Absolute Average % Deviation
Absolute Average % Deviation
T/K J Acree Mc-3 Body Mc-4 Body
298.15 0.6530 0.6582 0.6529
303.15 0.1730 0.2447 0.1730
308.15 0.1594 0.2459 0.1593
313.15 0.1600 0.1622 0.1600
318.15 0.1021 0.1297 0.1021
323.15 0.1867 0.1861 0.1868
Where m is the number of experimental point and p is presented as adjustable functions. ∆δ values lie between
0.1561-0.1854. Table 2 presents the comparison of average absolute% deviation for Jouyban Acree model,
McAllister three body model and McAllister four body model at temperature.
298.15,303.15,308.15,313.15,318.15,323.15K. it is observed that average absolute % deviation (AAPD)
decreases as temperature increases for all the models. AAPD obtained from Jouyban Acree Model and
McAllister four body model are almost similar except lower and higher temperature, while in case of McAllister
3 body interaction model the value of AAPD lower at 323.15K. Table3 presents Experimental viscosity,
Theoretical viscosity calculated from Jouyban Acree Model (JA), McAllister three body (Mc3) and McAllister
four body (Mc4) models and their percent deviations for binary systems at different temperatures.
Table 3. viscosity % deviation calculated from various models at different temperatures
X1 ɳmix ɳ JA ɳMc3 ɳMc4 %∆ɳJA %∆ɳMc3 %∆ɳMc4
T=298.15K
0.0762 0.4888 0.4862 0.4876 0.4862 0.5366 0.2472 0.5365
0.1483 0.5006 0.4972 0.4989 0.4972 0.6711 0.3408 0.6710
0.2166 0.5135 0.5108 0.5120 0.5108 0.5322 0.2869 0.5323
0.2815 0.5267 0.5262 0.5268 0.5262 0.0935 -0.0184 0.0937
0.3431 0.5406 0.5431 0.5430 0.5431 -0.4654 -0.4425 -0.4652
0.4018 0.5549 0.5612 0.5605 0.5612 -1.1440 -1.0114 -1.1437
0.4577 0.5752 0.5804 0.5792 0.5804 -0.8983 -0.6966 -0.8981
0.5109 0.5959 0.6003 0.5989 0.6003 -0.7372 -0.5093 -0.7370
0.5618 0.6219 0.6210 0.6197 0.6210 0.1422 0.3554 0.1423

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[867]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
0.6105 0.6484 0.6425 0.6414 0.6425 0.9160 1.0827 0.9160
0.657 0.6717 0.6645 0.6639 0.6645 1.0672 1.1660 1.0672
0.7016 0.6954 0.6873 0.6872 0.6873 1.1653 1.1831 1.1653
0.7443 0.7147 0.7107 0.7112 0.7107 0.5594 0.4931 0.5594
0.7853 0.7344 0.7348 0.7359 0.7348 -0.0563 -0.2008 -0.0562
0.8246 0.7572 0.7596 0.7612 0.7596 -0.3165 -0.5229 -0.3164
0.8624 0.7806 0.7851 0.7871 0.7851 -0.5829 -0.8265 -0.5828
0.8988 0.8041 0.8115 0.8135 0.8115 -0.9239 -1.1721 -0.9237
0.9338 0.8283 0.8387 0.8405 0.8387 -1.2580 -1.4711 -1.2578
0.965 0.8617 0.8646 0.8658 0.8646 -0.3406 -0.4789 -0.3405

T=303.15K
0.0762 0.4625 0.4613 0.4629 0.4613 0.2638 -0.0799 0.2635
0.1483 0.4737 0.4727 0.4745 0.4727 0.2188 -0.1741 0.2185
0.2166 0.4848 0.4853 0.4868 0.4853 -0.1128 -0.4051 -0.1129
0.2815 0.4963 0.4990 0.4997 0.4990 -0.5491 -0.6824 -0.5492
0.3431 0.5132 0.5135 0.5133 0.5135 -0.0506 -0.0236 -0.0506
0.4018 0.5306 0.5286 0.5278 0.5286 0.3825 0.5371 0.3826
0.4577 0.5454 0.5443 0.5430 0.5443 0.2066 0.4428 0.2067
0.5109 0.5607 0.5605 0.5590 0.5605 0.0313 0.2992 0.0314
0.5618 0.5768 0.5774 0.5760 0.5774 -0.1061 0.1470 -0.1061
0.6105 0.5933 0.5950 0.5938 0.5950 -0.2808 -0.0808 -0.2808
0.657 0.6129 0.6132 0.6125 0.6132 -0.0472 0.0712 -0.0472
0.7016 0.6330 0.6322 0.6321 0.6322 0.1236 0.1452 0.1236
0.7443 0.6528 0.6521 0.6526 0.6521 0.1108 0.0322 0.1108
0.7853 0.6732 0.6729 0.6740 0.6729 0.0461 -0.1247 0.0461
0.8246 0.6953 0.6947 0.6964 0.6947 0.0878 -0.1554 0.0880
0.8624 0.7180 0.7176 0.7197 0.7176 0.0529 -0.2335 0.0531
0.8988 0.7410 0.7418 0.7439 0.7418 -0.1063 -0.3978 -0.1061
0.9338 0.7645 0.7672 0.7691 0.7672 -0.3574 -0.6074 -0.3572
0.965 0.7932 0.7920 0.7933 0.7920 0.1529 -0.0100 0.1531

T=308.15K

0.0762 0.4368 0.4353 0.4366 -0.2102 0.3349 0.0412 0.3347

0.1483 0.4475 0.4457 0.4472 -0.3582 0.4040 0.0686 0.4039
0.2166 0.457 0.4571 0.4582 -0.4595 -0.0184 -0.2682 -0.0184
0.2815 0.4668 0.4693 0.4698 -0.5255 -0.5338 -0.6477 -0.5336
0.3431 0.4812 0.4821 0.4820 -0.5646 -0.1944 -0.1711 -0.1941
0.4018 0.496 0.4956 0.4949 -0.5830 0.0871 0.2199 0.0874
0.4577 0.5098 0.5095 0.5085 -0.5856 0.0530 0.2555 0.0532

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[868]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
0.5109 0.524 0.5240 0.5228 -0.5757 0.0014 0.2307 0.0016
0.5618 0.539 0.5390 0.5379 -0.5559 -0.0075 0.2090 -0.0073
0.6105 0.5545 0.5547 0.5538 -0.5282 -0.0360 0.1348 -0.0359
0.657 0.5717 0.5710 0.5704 -0.4940 0.1271 0.2284 0.1272
0.7016 0.5895 0.5880 0.5879 -0.4543 0.2582 0.2767 0.2583
0.7443 0.6066 0.6057 0.6061 -0.4099 0.1432 0.0760 0.1433
0.7853 0.6242 0.6243 0.6252 -0.3614 -0.0221 -0.1682 -0.0220
0.8246 0.6438 0.6438 0.6452 -0.3091 -0.0027 -0.2110 -0.0026
0.8624 0.6639 0.6643 0.6659 -0.2534 -0.0591 -0.3043 -0.0589
0.8988 0.6844 0.6858 0.6876 -0.1945 -0.2113 -0.4609 -0.2111
0.9338 0.7054 0.7085 0.7100 -0.1325 -0.4404 -0.6544 -0.4402
0.965 0.7312 0.7305 0.7315 -0.0727 0.0937 -0.0457 0.0938

T=313.15K

0.0762 0.4131 0.4135 0.4140 0.4131 -0.0985 -0.2082 -0.0987

0.1483 0.421 0.4223 0.4229 0.4210 -0.3175 -0.4430 -0.3177
0.2166 0.4315 0.4320 0.4324 0.4315 -0.1074 -0.2003 -0.1075
0.2815 0.4424 0.4423 0.4425 0.4424 0.0168 -0.0253 0.0168
0.3431 0.4546 0.4533 0.4533 0.4546 0.2754 0.2841 0.2755
0.4018 0.4671 0.4650 0.4648 0.4671 0.4427 0.4919 0.4428
0.4577 0.4781 0.4773 0.4770 0.4781 0.1580 0.2332 0.1581
0.5109 0.4895 0.4903 0.4898 0.4895 -0.1548 -0.0695 -0.1548
0.5618 0.5029 0.5038 0.5034 0.5029 -0.1851 -0.1046 -0.1851
0.6105 0.5166 0.5181 0.5177 0.5166 -0.2834 -0.2199 -0.2834
0.657 0.5322 0.5329 0.5327 0.5322 -0.1365 -0.0989 -0.1366
0.7016 0.5483 0.5485 0.5484 0.5483 -0.0341 -0.0273 -0.0341
0.7443 0.5646 0.5647 0.5649 0.5646 -0.0216 -0.0467 -0.0216
0.7853 0.5813 0.5817 0.5820 0.5813 -0.0659 -0.1202 -0.0659
0.8246 0.6 0.5993 0.5998 0.6000 0.1090 0.0318 0.1091
0.8624 0.6192 0.6178 0.6183 0.6192 0.2299 0.1391 0.2300
0.8988 0.6377 0.6370 0.6376 0.6377 0.1088 0.0165 0.1090
0.9338 0.6567 0.6570 0.6575 0.6567 -0.0478 -0.1268 -0.0476
0.965 0.6779 0.6762 0.6766 0.6779 0.2461 0.1945 0.2463

T=318.15K

0.0762 0.3929 0.3926 0.3933 0.3926 0.0662 -0.1085 0.0660

0.1483 0.4013 0.4013 0.4021 0.4013 0.0094 -0.1904 0.0091
0.2166 0.4106 0.4105 0.4111 0.4105 0.0212 -0.1269 0.0211
0.2815 0.4203 0.4203 0.4206 0.4203 -0.0036 -0.0709 -0.0037
0.3431 0.4305 0.4306 0.4305 0.4306 -0.0221 -0.0085 -0.0222

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[869]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
0.4018 0.4411 0.4414 0.4410 0.4414 -0.0589 0.0199 -0.0590
0.4577 0.4527 0.4526 0.4520 0.4526 0.0245 0.1447 0.0244
0.5109 0.4647 0.4643 0.4636 0.4643 0.0920 0.2278 0.0917
0.5618 0.4762 0.4765 0.4759 0.4765 -0.0593 0.0691 -0.0596
0.6105 0.488 0.4892 0.4887 0.4892 -0.2536 -0.1522 -0.2539
0.657 0.5024 0.5025 0.5022 0.5025 -0.0259 0.0341 -0.0262
0.7016 0.5172 0.5164 0.5164 0.5164 0.1465 0.1573 0.1462
0.7443 0.5318 0.5310 0.5312 0.5310 0.1556 0.1157 0.1554
0.7853 0.5467 0.5462 0.5467 0.5462 0.0938 0.0072 0.0937
0.8246 0.5628 0.5621 0.5628 0.5621 0.1275 0.0042 0.1274
0.8624 0.5793 0.5787 0.5796 0.5787 0.0972 -0.0480 0.0972
0.8988 0.5952 0.5962 0.5971 0.5962 -0.1676 -0.3154 -0.1675
0.9338 0.6115 0.6145 0.6152 0.6145 -0.4844 -0.6114 -0.4843
0.965 0.6323 0.6321 0.6326 0.6321 0.0308 -0.0519 0.0309

T=323.15K

0.0762 0.3727 -0.0164 0.3727 0.3733 -0.1634 -0.0123 -0.1635

0.1483 0.3804 -0.0320 0.3805 0.3811 -0.1919 -0.0192 -0.1920
0.2166 0.3888 -0.0461 0.3885 0.3890 -0.0469 0.0813 -0.0468
0.2815 0.3975 -0.0581 0.3969 0.3971 0.0995 0.1578 0.0997
0.3431 0.4059 -0.0679 0.4057 0.4056 0.0661 0.0544 0.0664
0.4018 0.4147 -0.0754 0.4150 0.4147 0.0024 -0.0658 0.0027
0.4577 0.4251 -0.0806 0.4248 0.4243 0.1813 0.0773 0.1815
0.5109 0.4358 -0.0836 0.4351 0.4346 0.2827 0.1650 0.2828
0.5618 0.4457 -0.0844 0.4460 0.4455 0.0522 -0.0593 0.0522
0.6105 0.4559 -0.0834 0.4574 0.4570 -0.2468 -0.3350 -0.2468
0.657 0.4687 -0.0805 0.4694 0.4692 -0.1066 -0.1590 -0.1067
0.7016 0.482 -0.0760 0.4821 0.4820 -0.0045 -0.0142 -0.0045
0.7443 0.4944 -0.0701 0.4953 0.4954 -0.2101 -0.1756 -0.2101
0.7853 0.5072 -0.0629 0.5091 0.5095 -0.4450 -0.3698 -0.4450
0.8246 0.5235 -0.0545 0.5235 0.5240 -0.0987 0.0083 -0.0986
0.8624 0.5402 -0.0451 0.5385 0.5391 0.1982 0.3238 0.1983
0.8988 0.5565 -0.0348 0.5541 0.5548 0.3095 0.4370 0.3097
0.9338 0.5733 -0.0238 0.5703 0.5709 0.4186 0.5277 0.4188
0.965 0.5887 -0.0131 0.5858 0.5862 0.4227 0.4942 0.4228

A close observation of table 3 it pointed out that as the mole fraction (X1) increases the percentage deviation
decreases except few points for all six temperatures. Jouyban Acree and McAllister four body model shows
almost similar and more accurate results than McAllister three body model.

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[870]
 e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:03/Issue:09/September-2021 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
IV. CONCLUSION
It is concluded from the above discussion that computed results of average absolute % deviation of viscosity
from Jouyban Acree model related to least square method and McAllister three and four body model related to
Eyring’s absolute reaction theory decreases with increase in temperature except few points. At low
temperature McAllister three body model show large absolute percent deviation in comparison to Jouyban
Acree and McAllister four body but at high temperature McAllister three body show a very close result to
Jouyban Acree and McAllister four body model. Jouyban Acree and McAllister four body model show almost
similar results for all the temperatures and are more consistent with experimental findings.
V. REFERENCES
[1] Wang, L. C., Xu, H. S., Zhao, J. H., Song, C. Y., & Wang, F. A. (2005). Density and viscosity of (3-picoline+
water) binary mixtures from T=(293.15 to 343.15) K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 37(5),
477-483.
[2] Mchaweh, A., Alsaygh, A., Nasrifar, K., & Moshfeghiam, M. (2004). A simplified method for calculating
saturated liquid densities. Fluid phase equilibria, 224(2), 157-167.
[3] Bauer, K., Garbe, D., & Surburg, H. (2008). Common fragrance and flavor materials: preparation,
properties and uses. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Awasthi, N., Gangwar, V. S., Prakash, S. K. S. G., & Shukla, R. K. (2017). Viscosity and Excess Viscosity for
Associated Binary Systems at T= (298.15, 308.15 and 318.15). International Journal of
Thermodynamics (IJoT), 20(4), 183-189.
[5] Gómez-Díaz, D., Mejuto, J. C., & Navaza, J. M. (2001). Physicochemical properties of liquid mixtures. 1.
Viscosity, density, surface tension and refractive index of cyclohexane+ 2, 2, 4-trimethylpentane binary
liquid systems from 25 C to 50 C. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 46(3), 720-724.
[6] Jouyban, A., Fathi-Azarbayjani, A., & Khoubnasabjafari, M. (2005). Mathematical representation of the
density of liquid mixtures at various temperatures using Jouyban-Acree model.
[7] Jouyban, A., Soleymani, J., Jafari, F., Khoubnasabjafari, M., & Acree, W. E. (2013). Mathematical
representation of viscosity of ionic liquid+ molecular solvent mixtures at various temperatures using
the Jouyban–Acree model. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 58(6), 1523-1528.
[8] Jouyban, A., & Acree Jr, W. E. (2018). Mathematical derivation of the Jouyban-Acree model to represent
solute solubility data in mixed solvents at various temperatures. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 256,
541-547.
[9] Jouyban, A., Khoubnasabjafari, M., Vaez-Gharamaleki, Z., Fekari, Z., & Eugene Jr, W. (2005). Calculation
of the viscosity of binary liquids at various temperatures using Jouyban–Acree model. Chemical and
Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 53(5), 519-523.
[10] Khattab, I. S., Bandarkar, F., Fakhree, M. A. A., & Jouyban, A. (2012). Density, viscosity, and surface
tension of water+ ethanol mixtures from 293 to 323K. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29(6),
812-817.
[11] Jouyban, A., & Acree Jr, W. E. (2020). A single model to represent physico-chemical properties of liquid
mixtures at various temperatures. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 115054.
[12] Mirheydari, S. N., Soleymani, J., Jouyban-Gharamaleki, V., Barzegar-Jalali, M., Jouyban, A., & Shekaari, H.
(2018). Viscosity prediction of ionic liquid+ molecular solvent mixtures at various
temperatures. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 263, 228-236.
[13] McAllister, R. A. (1960). The viscosity of liquid mixtures. AIchE Journal, 6(3), 427-431.
[14] Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J., & Eyring, H. (1941). The theory of rate processes; the kinetics of chemical
reactions, viscosity, diffusion and electrochemical phenomena (No. 541.39). McGraw-Hill Book
Company.
[15] Redlich, O., & Kister, A. T. (1948). Algebraic representation of thermodynamic properties and the
classification of solutions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 40(2), 345-348.

www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[871]