Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pranav Kumar Churchil v. Bihar State Information Commission
Pranav Kumar Churchil v. Bihar State Information Commission
Versus
INDEX
DATE EVENTS
26.01.2020 The petitioner sent a letter vide Ref. No. –
A/H/2080120/2180 to Bihar State Information
Commission highlighting the issues that
1) The information provided on filing the RTI by him is
incorrect and fabricated.
2) The first appeal was filed on 6.11.2019 and till date no
any hearing has been done.
In the matter of an
application under Article
226 of the Constitution of
India
AND
Pranav Kumar Churchil, C/o Sridhar Singh, Siddharthpuri Colony, Road No.1,
Manpur, Gaya
... Petitioner
Versus
…Respondent
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: -
1. The present writ petition is being filed before this Hon'ble Court under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:
2. That the present writ petition may be allowed on the following main grounds.
GROUNDS
4. That the petitioner as well as Respondent Authorities are amenable to the writ
jurisdiction of this court.
5. That Pranav Kumar Churchil, C/o Sridhar Singh, Siddharthpuri Colony, Road
No.1, Manpur, Gaya is a teacher, RTI activist employed in Inter School Koakol,
Nawada. He in his first RTI on 29.08.2019 demanded the information regarding
the following of session 2017-2018.
7. That the petitioner in his third RTI on 29.08.2019 demanded the information
regarding the following of session 2017-2018.
1) The total amount sent to the account of Inter School Koakol for the
purchasing of laboratory instruments.
2) The attested copy of the three quotations taken for the purchasing of
laboratory
8. That on 24.10.2019 the appellant sent a letter filling first appeal to District
Education Officer highlighting the issue that the information provided by the
Public Information Officer Shyam Kumar Verma, Principal, Inter School is
incorrect, incomplete and fabricated. He prayed before District Education
Officer to act in accordance with Section 18 of the act and demanded penalty
for the intentional act of Public Information Officer.
10. That on 19/08/2020 the State Information Commissioner sent a Letter vide
Ref. No A4602/2020 to Public Information Officer highlighting the issues that
the adequate information should be provided to the appellant and the reason for
delaying in providing the information should also be stated.
A true copy of the letter vide Ref
No. - A4602/2020 issued by State
Information Commissioner to
Public Information Officer has
been annexed herewith as
Annexure- 4
11. That on 08.09.2020 State Information Commission sent a letter vide Ref.
No. 1028 to Smt. Sangita Mishra, State Information Officer highlighting the
issue that the information provided to the appellant is incomplete and such
information must be provided within a month and all the photocopies of the
required documents must be provided.
12. That on 07.10.2020 Inter School Koakol sent a letter vide Ref. No. 86 to
Shri Shyam Kumar Verma highlighting the issues that the documents which is
with him must be produced before 15.10.2020 in Inter School Koakol, Nawada.
14. That on 02.11.2020 the Inter School Koakol, Nawada sent a letter vide Ref.
No. - 98 to the Pranav Kumar Churchil highlighting the issues related to the
Case No. A4600/2020 that the documents was not submitted by former
principal so the inspection of the said documents cannot be made.
15. That on 12.12.2020 the Pranav Kumar Churchil sent a letter to the
Superintendent of Police, Nawada highlighting the issue that he was provided
with incorrect and fabricated information intentionally and requests for a fair
inquiry.