Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sales Forcast of KLG Systel
Sales Forcast of KLG Systel
Submitted by:
Aditi Goel (05)
Arjun Malhotra (17)
Ashneet (20)
Chandani Kripalani (25)
Prince Arora(47)
Vinay Ajmera(62)
About KLG Systel
When India emerged on the global scene as a strong economy, the IT industry played
a major role in its development, by putting India on the global IT map. Most Indian IT
companies grew by providing outsourced solutions to companies in need of their
services overseas and opened up spaces in the global economy. A few IT companies
also took the pioneering path of nurturing the IT initiative on the home ground. Out of
the limelight, but growing stronger, nevertheless, these niche players emerged in the
areas of providing solutions to Indian Public and Private sector companies. They have
spent the last couple of years in acquiring domain knowledge, IPR development,
marketing and distribution, as well as being the enablers for the growth of Indian
Private and Public Sector Companies.
KLG Systel is one such company that has been an enabler in the burgeoning growth
of Indian Industry and Infrastructure, providing support and IT enablement to Top
500 Indian companies (both from the government & private sector) and the Indian
arms of Fortune 500 companies.
KLG Systel started with a vision of being a 'Knowledge Company' right from
inception. The company drives growth and development of the Indian economy, by
providing solutions for IT enablement to organisations in the areas of Oil and Gas,
Manufacturing, Retail, Infrastructure, Power, Process, and new economy industries
such as Information Technology, Telecommunications and the service sector.
Project objective
Our project objective was to forecast quarterly sales for the year 2008-2009.
Methodology
1) Collected data
2) Analysed trend and seasonality in past data
3) Application of suitable models on the basis of our analysis
Data analysis
Sales (in
Years Quarters crores)
2002 I 521.63
II 705.74
III 689.3
IV 725.17
2003 I 724.82
II 741.31
III 1125.19
IV 1295.56
2004 I 872.64
II 806.36
III 1015.03
IV 1109.91
2005 I 1192.99
II 1206.13
III 1251.98
IV 1586.14
2006 I 1841.86
II 2378.47
III 4169.24
IV 3908.15
2007 I 4357.94
II 5749.21
III 9257.59
IV 7768.46
2008 I 5806.89
Trend analysis
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000 Series1
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Now we can clearly see that the sales data is following a trend over the years but no
seasonality.
As the data have only treand but not the seasonality we can apply the following
statistical models –
1) Naïve Method
2) Moving Average method
3) HOLT’s model
Now using these models we have forecasted sales figure for the next for quarters.
NAÏVE METHOD
We have used data of first 20 quarters for initialization and the data for next 5 quarter
for checking the error through ex-post forecast.
forcasted
year quarter t sales sales error
2002 I 1 521.63
II 2 705.74
III 3 689.3
IV 4 725.17
2003 I 5 724.82
II 6 741.31
III 7 1125.2
IV 8 1295.6
2004 I 9 872.64
II 10 806.36
III 11 1015
IV 12 1109.9
2005 I 13 1193
II 14 1206.1
III 15 1252
IV 16 1586.1
2006 I 17 1841.9
II 18 2378.5
III 19 4169.2
IV 20 3908.2
Ex-Post
2007 I 21
4357.9 3647.06 710.88 forecast
Ex-Post
II 22
5749.2 4807.73 941.48 forecast
Ex-Post
III 23
9257.6 7140.48 2117.11 forecast
- Ex-Post
IV 24
7768.5 12765.97 4997.51 forecast
Ex-Post
2008 I 25
5806.9 6279.33 -472.44 forecast
II 3845.32 Forecasted
d d2
forcast (=sales- d1 (=d/sales d3
Year quarter sales (F3) F3) (=IdI) *100) (=Id2I) d4 (=d*d)
2002 I 521.63
II 705.74
III 689.30
IV 725.17 638.89 86.28 86.28 13.50 13.50 7444.24
2003 I 724.82 706.74 18.08 18.08 2.56 2.56 327.01
II 741.31 713.10 28.21 28.21 3.96 3.96 795.99
III 1125.19 730.43 394.76 394.76 54.04 54.04 155832.83
IV 1295.56 863.77 431.79 431.79 49.99 49.99 186439.73
2004 I 872.64 1054.02 -181.38 181.38 -17.21 17.21 32898.70
II 806.36 1097.80 -291.44 291.44 -26.55 26.55 84935.33
III 1015.03 991.52 23.51 23.51 2.37 2.37 552.72
IV 1109.91 898.01 211.90 211.90 23.60 23.60 44901.61
2005 I 1192.99 977.10 215.89 215.89 22.09 22.09 46608.49
II 1206.13 1105.98 100.15 100.15 9.06 9.06 10030.69
III 1251.98 1169.68 82.30 82.30 7.04 7.04 6773.84
IV 1586.14 1217.03 369.11 369.11 30.33 30.33 136239.73
2006 I 1841.86 1348.08 493.78 493.78 36.63 36.63 243815.40
II 2378.47 1559.99 818.48 818.48 52.47 52.47 669904.05
III 4169.24 1935.49 2233.75 2233.75 115.41 115.41 4989639.06
IV 3908.15 2796.52 1111.63 1111.63 39.75 39.75 1235713.85
2007 I 4357.94 3485.29 872.65 872.65 25.04 25.04 761523.84
II 5749.21 4145.11 1604.10 1604.10 38.70 38.70 2573136.81
III 9257.59 4671.77 4585.82 4585.82 98.16 98.16 21029775.64
IV 7768.46 6454.91 1313.55 1313.55 20.35 20.35 1725404.85
-
2008 I 5806.89 7591.75 1784.86 1784.86 -23.51 23.51 3185737.12
II 7610.98 MSE 1687655.98
Now since MSE (Mean Square Error) for 3 quarter moving average is less than that of
5 quarter moving average. We will use 3 quarter moving average for forecasting sales.
HOLT’s Method
We have minimized the values of alpha and beta using SOLVER Function in excel
sheet.
Alpha = 0.999
Beta = 0.010
SUMMARY
Moving Moving
Average Average
year Quarter Naïve (3) (5) HOLTS
2008 II 3845.32 7610.98 6588.018 6002.516
III 6195.964
IV 6389.411
2009 I 6582.859
II 6776.306
III 6969.754
IV 7163.201