C.Mis.125 New

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
(JR.DN) AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2006.
BETWEEN
1) Smt.Parvathamma,
W/o Venkateshappa,
Aged about 26 years,
2) Kum.Shantha,
D/o Venkateshappa,
Aged about 8 years,
Both are residing at

Chudenahalli Village,
Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. ……. PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Venkateshappa,
S/o Venkatappa,
Residing at
Kurubharahalli Village,
ManakanaDurga Tarpu,
DenkaniKote Taluk,
Krishnagiri District. ……… RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 125 (3) OF THE CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
The petitioner above named begs to state as follows:-
1. The address of the petitioner for the purpose of

services and court notices and summons from this
Hon’ble court is as given in the cause title above. The
petitioner may also be served through her counsel
Sri.M.Manjunath and H.Srinivas, No.2, First Floor,
Yellappa Building, Near Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road,
Anekal, Bangalore-562106.
-2-
2. The addresses of the respondent for the purpose of
services of court notices and summons from this
Hon’ble court is as given in the cause title above.
3. The 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the

respondent and the 2nd petitioner the daughter of the
respondent. The 2nd petitioner is the minor represented
by the 1st petitioner who is the mother and legal
guardian, next friend of minor care and custody of her.
The petitioners having neglected by the respondent
and failed to provide the livelihood of the petitioners
which are daily essential requirements such as
clothing shelter, food medical expenses and other
expenses and in turn the petitioners deserted the
petitioners. And as such the petitioners approached
this Hon’ble court seeking the monthly maintenance.
After issue of notice to the respondent, the respondent
remained absent and was placed exparte. After trial
and hearing on both sides the Hon’ble Court was
pleased to pass an order on merits by allowing the
petition directing the respondent to pay the monthly
maintenance a sum of Rs.1000/- to the petitioners. As
per the orders passed by the Court and petitioners are
entitled to get a sum of Rs.1000/- for a month from
the date of filing the petitioner, by its order
dated:7/1/2006.
4. The petitioners submit that the respondent is well

awared of the orders passed by this Hon’’ble Court and
even though failed to pay the maintenance to the
petitioner. And now the respondent is liable to pay
maintenance for the period from 24-1-2006 to 24-8-
2006 intentionally avoided to pay the monthly
maintenance, and as such the petitioner sustained
irreparable loss injury and hardship. Under the said
circumstances, the petitioners humbly prayed that
this Hon’ble court may be pleased to pass an order
directing the respondent to pay the maintenance a
sum of Rs.7000/- for the period from 24-1-2006 to 24-
8-2006 with costs in the circumstances stated above.
5. The Petitioners paid the fixed Court fee on the

petition to allow the same and fixed well within the
territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
Wherefore, the petitioners above named humbly

prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass
an order/issue leavy Warrant against the respondent
for amount of Rs.7000/- + cost awarded amount of
Rs.200/- in all Rs.7200/- for the period from 24-1-
2006 to 24-8-2006 and directing him to pay the
maintenance amount in future dates and when fails
due in the circumstances and to award the costs of the
petition and for such other relief or reliefs as this
Hon’ble Court deems fit to be grant under the
circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice
and equity.
1.
2.
Advocate for Petitioners.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
We, the above named petitioners do hereby declare
that what is stated above is true and correct to the
best of our knowledge, information and beliefs.
1.
2.
Anekal.
Date: Petitioners.
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)
AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Yashodamma,
D/o Anjanappa,
W/o H.V.Chandrappa,
Residing at
Vanakanahalli village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.H.V.Chandrappa,
S/o Late Venkataramappa,
Aged about 51 Years,
Residing at
Huskur village,
Sarjapura Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. ………
RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE.

3. The petitioner is the legally Wedded wife of

Respondent. The marriage was solomnised on
20/8/1981 at Thimmaraya Swamy Temple Anekal
according to the Hindu Rites and Customs. Out of the
wedlock three children were born to the petitioner. Out
of three children two are dead and one is alive by
name Geetha aged about 22 years. The marriage
Invitation is produced herewith for the kind perusal of
this Hon’ble court.
4. The petitioner respectfully submits that after the

marriage the petitioner and the Respondent were living
happily for a period of four years and got three female
children out of which two are dead. Thereafterwards
the Respondent and his mother began to ill-treat the
petitioner and used to beat her forcing her to bring
dowry from her parents. As such her parents lodged a
Police complaint before the Anekal Police. The Anekal
Police have Registered a Criminal case against the
respondent and his mother Narayanamma punishable
under section.498(A) of IPC. The petitioner submits
that on 9/9/1987 the Anekal Police have registered a
case in Crime No.534/87.
5. The petitioner submits that on 29/1/88 the

respondent has married one K.Soubhagyamma, D/o
Krishnappa residing at Bannerghatta village, Anekal
Taluk. The said illegal second marriage was
solomnised at Narasimha Swamy Temple, Sardarshetti
Halli village, Attimogamtarapur, Hosur Taluk,
Krishnagiri District. One Venkataramaiah was the
Archak or Purohit for the said marriage.
6. The petitioner submits that as such in Law the

respondent is bound to maintain the petitioner. The
petitioner has to be maintained by the Respondent
where he has got sufficient means to maintain her.
The petitioner cannot remain in the house of her
parents for a long time. The parents of the petitioner
being poor, they cannot maintain her for a long time.
The petitioner has no source of income to lead her life.
The petitioner further requires funds to her
maintenance i.e., for food, clothing and Shelter. As the
respondent purposely necked out the petitioner and
married for the second time, in law he has to provide
maintenance to the petitioner where the petitioner is
unable to maintain herself. As the position of the
petitioner has become too ugly financially this petition
is filed against the respondent for maintenance.
7. The petitioner submits that the respondent doing

land business and also the respondent doing business
of selling the Mangalore tiles and also the respondent
owning building at Huskur village. The respondent is
having income per month of Rs.10000/- (Ten
Thousand Only). The respondent as purpose fully
neglected the petitioner to maintain. The respondent is
a capable to give maintenance to the petitioner.
8. The petitioner submits that the petitioner requires a

monthly maintenance of Rs.5000/- for her
maintenance of food, cloth and shelter.
9. The petitioner submits that the petitioner already

filed one Crl.Misc.No.16/1988 on the file of Munsiff
and JMFC, at Anekal seeking maintenance from the
respondent. The notices also served to the respondent,
and the respondent appeared before this Hon’ble court
through his counsel and finally the matter is settled in
the presence of the panchayathdars and as per the
decision of the panchayath the repondent agreed to
take back the petitioner, and the respondent agreed to
maintain the petitioner by taking separate house at
Hebbagodi village. As per the say of the respondent,
the petitioner believed the words of the respondent
and petitioner filed memo in Crl.Mis.No.16/1988 and
not pressed the petition. After that the respondent
failed to obey the decision of panchayathdars and also
failed to take back the petitioner and also failed to
maintain her. And again the respondent deserted the
petitioner after one month of decision. Subsequently
the petitioner residing in her parents house till today.
10. The petitioner submits that the respondent is

capable to give a monthly maintenance of Rs.5000/- to
the petitioner.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner prays

that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to award the
monthly maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month and
direct the respondent to pay a monthly maintenance of
Rs.5000/- to the petitioner from the date of deserted
by the respondent and to grant such other relief or
reliefs as deems fit in the circumstance of the case in
the interest of justice and equity.
Advocate for Petitioner. Petitioner.
VERIFICATION
I, the above named petitioner do hereby declare that
what is stated above is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge, information and belief.
Anekal.
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR
DIVISION) AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Premamma,
D/o Munishamappa,
W/o V.Ramesh,
Residing at
Sollur village,
Vanakanahalli post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.V.Ramesh,
S/o H.D.Venkatarayappa,
Residing at
Kuppahalli village,
Nandi Hobli,
Chikkaballapura Taluk,
Kolar District. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.



19/6/1987 at Chikkaballapura according to the Hindu
Rites and Customs in the presence of the elders, well
wishers, friends and relatives of both the parties. After
the marriage the respondent took the petition and
both lived together as husband and wife for some
period at Kuppahalli village, Nandi Hobli,
Chikkaballapura, Kolar District. After sometime the
respondent began to misbehave with the petitioner.
Along with the petitioner and respondent, the parents
of the respondent were also living together. The
respondent is of the habit of believing the words of his
parents even without justifying whether they are
correct or not. The parents of the respondent for the
reasons best known to them were always telling
something lie against the petitioner to the respondent.
As such after hearing the words of the parents the
respondent use to abuse and also assault the
petitioner every day. That was the habit of the
respondent everyday. Apart from that even the parents
of the respondent were always abusing and assaulting
the petition and the respondent and his parents
altogether demanding to bring Rs.10,000/- as balance
dowry amount from the parents of the petition. Since
her parents, the respondent and his parents were
always giving all sorts of troubles to the petitioner. In
spite of all ill-treatment of respondent and his parents
the petitioner was living as a dutiful wife of the
respondent.
4. The petitioner submits that on 7/1/1988 the

respondent and his parents all joined together and
brutally assaulted the petitioner and that day, entire
day no food was provided to the petitioner and on
8/1/88 the respondent and his parents physically
necked out the petitioner from their house at
Kuppahalli. She was necked out in the morning on
8/1/88. On the same day till 3.00 p.m. inspite of
repeated requests and demands the door of the house
was not opened by the respondent and his parents till
upto 3.00 p.m.. As the petitioner had no other choice
by borrowing the traveling expense from that village to
her native place from her neighbour she came to
Sollur village which is her native place. Since then she
is residing at Sollur village itself under the mercy of
her parents.
5. The petitioner submits that to the utter surprise of

the petitioner, after one week she received a legal
notice issued by the respondent dated:12/1/88
making some false and unbelievable allegations
against the petitioner and her parents. But the said
notice was properly replied by a reply notice
dated:27/1/88. Subsequent to the said notice
transactions there was a panchayath held at Solur
village in the house of petitioner’s parents and as per
the decision of the panchayathdars the respondent
had agreed to live with the petitioner at the Solur itself
and he also agreed to attend to his duties everyday by
traveling from Solur itself. As per the said
understanding from March 19th 1988, the respondent
was living with the petitioner at Solur village itself. But
every month the respondent was used to send his
portion of salary to his parent for their maintenance.
In this manner the respondent has lived with the
petitioner happily for a period of over 8 months at
Solur village, Anekal Taluk. Again once the respondent
went to his native place for some reason. Then he
stayed there for a period of one week. Afterwards again
the respondent sent words to the petitioner and her
parents that she should come and join the respondent
with an amount of Rs.10,000/- within one week and it
is also informed orally to the petitioner if she is coming
without money, she will not be allowed inside the
house. Since the petitioners parents are not in a
position to pay the huge amount they have not agreed
to pay, but they went and requested the respondent to
come and joint the petitioner at Solur or take her to
the house, for both the requests the respondent
refused and he further refused to accept the petitioner
as his wife unless she pays an amount of Rs.10,000/-.
6. The petitioner submits that under the

circumstances stated above, since January-89 the
petitioner and respondent living separately and the
respondent is not paying any maintenance to the
petitioner. Further the respondent has spoiled the life
of the petitioner for the sake of money. Since it is his
duty of the respondent to maintain the petitioner, he
has not discharged his duties legally. Hence the
petitioner is entitled for her maintenance from the
respondent and respondent is liable to pay the same to
the petitioner.
7. The petitioner submits that the respondent has got

sufficient income to pay the maintenance to the
petitioner. The respondent is getting an amount of
Rs.10000/- per month by way of other incomes. The
respondent previously working at as a Store Keeper at
M/s.Venson Electrical Company, Peenya, Bangalore-
53, and recently the respondent taken Volutary
Retirement from his duty. As such the respondent
received huge amount from the Company with other
benefits. Out of the VR’s amount and other benefits
the respondent purchased the land at Kuppahalli. Now
the respondent doing agricultural business and other
side business and also respondent having sources
amount of Rs.5000/- per month and further the
respondent his getting nearly Rs.25,000/- income out
of his parents property. As such the respondent is
capable to paying a separate maintenance to the
petitioner.
8. The petitioner submits that she requires a minimum

amount of Rs.2500/- per month towards her separate
maintenance. The petitioner has no other source of
income since the parents of the petitioner are the poor
agriculturists and they are not in a position to
maintain the petitioner.
9. The petitioner submits that this petition filed the

C.Mis.No.60/90 on the file of Principal Civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) and JMFC, at Anekal for maintenance. The
Hon’ble Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC,
Anekal awarded Rs.300/- per month as maintenance.
The respondent is also filed M.C.Case No.2/90 for
divorce before the Civil Judge Court, Chikkaballapura,
Kolar District, for divorce, but in the said case the
Hon’ble Civil Judge Court, Chikkaballapura allowed
the petition filed by the respondent. The respondent
herein prepared Crl.R.P.No.61/97 before the 1st
Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore District,
Bangalore by challenging the order passed in orders
passed in C.Mis.No.60/90. The Hon’ble District and
Sessions Judge, Bangalore rural District, Bangalore
allowed the petition filed by the respondent herein.
Subsequently the C.Mis.5/2002 filed by the petitioner
came to be dismissed.
10. The petitioner further submits that the respondent

also filed O.S.No.950/93 on the file of Addl.Civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) at Chikkaballapura against the petitioner
herein. But unfortunately the petitioner placed exparte
and passed Judgement and Decree against the
petitioner, but the petitioner challenged the same by
filing the Mis.No.16/96 before the Addl.civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) at Chikkaballapura. The Hon’ble Addl.Civil
Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Chikkaballapura allowed the
petition by set-asiding and restoring the
O.S.No.950/93. Subsequently the respondent herein
filed memo and not pressed the O.S.No.950/93 and
the suit came to be dismissed as not pressed.
11. The petitioner submits that the petitioner

challenged the orders passed in Crl.Petition No.61/97
by the 1st Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore
rural District, Bangalore, before the Hon’ble High
Court of Karnataka in Crl.Petition No.4408/2004. The
Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka dismissed the
petition with direction that “However, it is open for
the petitioner to file an application under section
125 Cr.Pc. afresh, under the changed
circumstances, if she so chooses and if the law
provides for it, before the Magistrate Court. The
trial court shall decide the matter in accordance
with law.” As per the direction of the Hon’ble High
Court of Karnataka now this petitioner is filing the
fresh petition before this Hon’ble court.
the petitioner.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner prays that

this Hon’ble court may be pleased to award the
VERIFICATION

Anekal.
Date: Petitioner.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE
C.Mis.No.40/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Nanjamma and others. ……. PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Venkataswamy. ..…… RESPONDENT
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 125 OF CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
1. The petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed

this present petition against the respondent for
maintenance.
2. The petitioner submits that the respondent has

appeared before this Hon’ble court and filed vakalath
and failed to file the objections to this petition. The
petitioner No.1 has lead her side evidence as PW1, but
the respondent has failed to cross-examine the PW1.
While at the time of adducing of evidence of PW1, the
PW1 has not produced some relevant documents on
her side. But today the PW1 is going to produce some
documents to show the property is standing in the
name of the respondent. Hence this application to
recall the PW1 to lead further chief in the above case.
Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this

Hon’ble court may be pleased to recall the PW1 to lead
further chief in the above case in the interest of justice
and equity.
Anekal. Advocate for
petitioner.
Date: 15/10/2008.

(JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.117/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Bharathi & another. …….

PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Chandrashekar. ………
RESPONDENT
PW2-EVIDENCE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT
I, Sri.Ramakrishnappa, S/o Muniyappa, aged about

47 years, residing at 8th Cross, Weavers Colony, Opp:
KSRTC Depot, Anekal Town, Bangalore District, do
hereby state on oath as follows:-
1. I submit that I am the know the petitioner and 2 nd

petitioner in the above case. I know the facts and
circumstances of the case, Hence I am swearing this
affidavit.
2. I submit that the petitioner is the legally wedded

wife of Respondent and the 2nd petitioner is the son of
petitioner and respondent. The marriage between the
petitioner and respondent was solemnized on
24/5/2000 at Yoginarayanaswamy Kalyana Mantapa
according to the Hindu Rites and Customs. At the time
of marriage I was present. Out of the wedlock one Male
child was born to the petitioner and Respondent. One
male child namely Master.C.Venkatesh who is the 2 nd
petitioner herein.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
3. I further submit that after the marriage petitioner
and the Respondent were living happily for a period of
one year at Matrimonial home. After one year the
respondent picked quarrel with the 1st petitioner and
demanded more dowry from the petitioner, but the 1 st
petitioner are not in position to give further dowry to
the respondent. Thereby the respondent kicked out 1st
and 2nd petitioner from the Matrimonial house by
giving threatened to her life.
4. I further submit that panchayathi also held and I

was present at the time of panchayath, in the said
panchayath Kenchappa, Lakshminarayana, Rajamma
and Nagaraju were also present with regard to the
above subject. Under the advice of myself and other
panchayathdars again the respondent took the 1st
petitioner to his house. But the respondent was doing
the same and finally the respondent kicked out the 1 st
petitioner and his son from the house of respondent
on 19/12/2003.
5. I further submit that the 1 st petitioner had lodged

complaint before the Anekal Police. The Anekal Police
have registered a criminal case against the respondent
and his family members.
6. I further submit that the respondent where he has

got sufficient means to maintain the 1 st petitioner and
2nd petitioner. The 1st petitioner and 2nd petitioner
cannot remain in her parent house for a long time.
Their parents being poor, they cannot maintain 1 st and
and 2nd petitioner for a long time. The 1 st and 2nd
petitioner have no source of income to lead their life.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
7. I further submit that the respondent doing Power
looms at his residence for that the respondent is
having income per month of Rs.16000/- (Rupees
Sixteen Thousand Only). The respondent as purpose
fully neglected the 1st and the 2nd petitioner to
maintain. The respondent is a capable to give
maintenance to 1st petitioner and the 2nd petitioner.
Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble court

may be pleased to award the maintenance amount of
Rs.5000/- to both 1st and 2nd petitioner in the above
case in the interest of justice and equity.
Identified by me. Deponent.
Advocate. Sworn to before

me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No._____/2006.
BETWEEN
1) Smt.Manjula,
W/o Madesha,
2) Master.Shantha Kumar,
S/o Madesha,
Aged about 8 years,
3) Kum.Radha,
D/o Madesha,
Aged about 6 years,
4) Master.Byresha,
S/o Madesha,
Aged about 1 ½ years,
Since 2 to 4 are minors represented by

their mother Smt.Manjula,
as legal and natural guardian,
All are residing at

Kuvempunagara,
Muttagatti Dinne,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Madesha,
S/o Byyamma &
S/o Late Byrappa,
Residing at
Thigalara Beedhi,
Anekal Town,
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.
The petitioners above named begs to state as follows:-

-2-

3. The petitioners submit that the 1st petitioner is the

legally wife of Respondent, the petitioners No.2 to 4 are
the sons and daughters of the petitioner No.1 and
respondent. The marriage between the 1st petitioner
and respondent was solemnized on 15/5/1997 at
Sri.Kambada Ganapathi Temple at Anekal Town and
the same was registered before the Office of the Sub-
Registrar, Anekal. At the time of marriage the parents
of the petitioner No.1 were given a dowry amount of
Rs.30,000/-, one gold ring, one Watch to the
respondent. Subsequent to the marriage the petitioner
No.1 land respondent lived in Badripura at Anekal
Town in a rented house. Subsequent to the marriage
the petitioner No.1 and respondent lived happily for a
period of 4-5 years. Out of the wedlock two children
were born to the 1st petitioner and Respondent. One
male child namely Master.ShanthaKumar and another
female child namely Kum.Radha who are the petitioner
No.2 and 3 herein. Subsequent to the born of
petitioners No.2 and 3, the respondent started to ill-
treat the 1st petitioner and demanded to bring the
dowry from the parents of the petitioner No.1. The
respondent also given harassment by physically and
mentally to the petitioner No.1 and as such the 1 st
petitioner tolerated the illegal and cruelty and
-3-
harassment of the respondent. The petitioner No.1 is
herewith producing the copy of the Registered
marriage certificate for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
court and marked as Document No.1.
4. The Petitioner No.1 further submits that the

respondent subsequently in the year 2001 deserted
the petitioner No.1 and kicked out the 1st petitioner
along with the petitioners No.2 and 3 from the
respondent house and subsequently the petitioner also
lodged a complaint before the Anekal Police station on
3/9/2001 and the Anekal Police also registered the
case against the respondent in Cr.No.125/2001 for the
offences punishable U/s.498(A) of IPC. Subsequently,
the Anekal Police have filed the charge sheet against
the respondent and the respondent also appeared
before the court and call for settlement. And this
Hon’ble court advised both 1st petitioner and
respondent to settle the matter and live amicably in
the society. As such under the advise of the elder
persons and under the oral advise of this Hon’ble
court, the 1st petitioner compromised the case and
turned hostile to the case. During the pendency of the
case the respondent take away the petitioners No.1 to
3 and keep the petitioner No.1 to 3 in a rented house
at Badripura, Anekal Town. Finally the said case is
ended in acquittal. The petitioner No.1 is herewith
producing the copy of the FIR for the kind perusal of
this Hon’ble court and marked as Document No.2.
5. The petitioner No.1 submits that subsequent to the

acquittal of the case, the respondent and 1 st petitioner
lived happily for a period of one year, during that
period the 4th petitioner namely Byresha was born on
24/10/2004 at Government Hospital, Anekal.
Subsequently again the respondent caused
unnecessary harassment and trouble to the petitioner
No.1 and also caused physically and mentally
harassment to the petitioner No.1. The
-4-
respondent also about 6 months picked a quarrel and
further he demanded to bring dowry of Rs.50,000/- to
purchase a second handle car. The 1st petitioner also
expressed her inability to bring the amount from her
parents house. Since their parents are very poor and
they are not in position to pay a amount as demanded
by the respondent. Finally the respondent again
kicked out the 1st petitioner along with petitioners No.2
to 4. Now the petitioner No.1 to 4 are living her
parents house. But the parents of the 1 st petitioner is
also very poor and the father of the 1 st petitioner is a
patient and he is suffering from paralyses stroke. The
petitioner No.1 is herewith producing the Birth
Certificate of petitioner No.4 issued by the Government
Hospital, Anekal for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
court and marked as Document No.3.
6. The petitioner No.1 submits that the 2nd petitioner is

the student studying in 2nd Standard and 3rd petitioner
is also student studying in 1 st standard at Thimaraya
Swamy School, at Anekal Town. To prove the same the
petitioner No.1 is herewith producing the school
certificate of the petitioner No.2 and 3 for the kind
perusal of this Hon’ble court and marked as
Document No.4 and 5. Now the petitioners No.2 to 4
are living with the 1st petitioner. The 1st petitioner
waited till today and arranged several panchayaths in
Anekal Town, but the respondent was not maintain
the petitioners No.1 to 4 by providing food, cloth and
shelters to the petitioners and he is not take away the
petitioners No.1 to 4 to matrimonial house. The
petitioner No.1 is herewith producing the two
photographs for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble court
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble court and marked
as Document No.6 and 7.
-5-
7. The petitioner No.1 submits that the respondent
having his own car and he is the driver of the said car
and earning Rs.5000/- per month. The respondent is
also having agriculture land and also having house at
Anekal. For that the respondent having income of
Rs.5000/- per month. As such in Law the respondent
is bound to maintain the petitioners. The respondent
where he has got sufficient means to maintain them.
The petitioners cannot remain in the house of her
being poor, they cannot maintain them for a long time.
The petitioners have no source of income to lead their
life. The petitioners further requires funds to her
maintenance i.e., for food, clothing, Shelter and
Education. As the position of the petitioners has
become too ugly financially this petition is filed against
the respondent for maintenance.
8. The petitioners submit that the petitioners requires

a monthly maintenance of Rs.4000/- for their
maintenance of food, cloth, shelter, Education and
Medical expenses and other legal necessary expenses.
9. The petitioners submit that the respondent is

the petitioners.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioners prays

Rs.4000/- to the petitioners from the date of deserted
-6-
1.
2.
3.
4.
Advocate for petitioners. Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
best of my knowledge, information and belief.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Anekal. Petitioners
Date:
C.Mis.No.243/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Bhagya. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Varadaraju. ………
RESPONDENT
OBJECTIONS FILED THE RESPONDENT TO THE
PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
The Respondent above named begs to state as follows:-
1. At the outset the petition filed by the petitioner is

not maintainable either in law or on facts. It is liable to
be dismissed in lamine. The litigation which is created
by the petitioner under this petition is a third round
litigation. The petitioner is in the habit of creating a
litigation against the Respondent and to spoil the life
of the Respondent again and again.
2. The allegations contained in para 3 of the petition

that the respondent are the husband and wife, the
marriage between the petitioner and respondent was
performed on 24/2/2000 at Champakadama Swamy
Modaliar Chowltry, at Bannerghatta village, Jigani
Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore as per the Hindu rites
and customs is true and correct. At the time of
marriage the petitioner parents has given cash of
Rs.50,000-00, one Gold chain, one Gold Bracelet, one
Gold ring to the respondent is hereby denied as false
and incorrect. The petitioner submits that after the
marriage the petitioner and respondent lived together
at Anekal for some time is true and correct. After that
the respondent started ill-treating the petitioner
without providing food, and other daily requirements
to the petitioner and assaulted the petitioner on so
many occasions and demanded more dowry from her
parents is hereby denied as false and incorrect. The
petitioner submits that since the parents of the
petitioner are very poor they could not afford to meet
the demands of the respondent, therefore the
respondent and his family members on 27/8/2003
assaulted the petitioner and thrown away the
petitioner out of the matrimonial house and
threatened the petitioner if she returns without more
dowry they will kill her, hence the petitioner without
any other way returned to her parental house is
hereby denied as false and incorrect.

that she has filed a complaint before the Jurisdictional
Police against the respondent in Cr.No.116/2003 is
true and correct. Now she is residing with her parents,
the petitioner has no any income to meet her daily
needs such as food, clothing and shelter is hereby
denied as false and incorrect. The petitioner required
Rs.2000/- per month to meet her food, clothing,
shelter and medical expenses, but she has no
independent income to afford, hence she is filing this
petition for maintenance is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

that the respondent is running twisting factory and 10
power looms at Anekal and earning Rs.20,000/- per
month, but the respondent is not providing food,
clothing, shelter and other daily requirements to the
petitioner is hereby denied as false and incorrect. The
respondent being her husband is legally bounded to
provide the daily requirements of the petitioner, but
the respondent is not providing the petitioner daily
requirements of the petitioner is hereby denied as false
and incorrect. The Respondent is having sufficient
income to provide the daily needs of the petitioner is

that, she requires Rs.2000/- per month for her food,
clothing, shelter, and other daily requirements and the
respondent is having sufficient income to pay to the
petitioner is hereby denied as false and incorrect.
6. The Respondent submits that he is suffering from

ill-health due to snake bite. The respondent is unable
to work and he is mentally unable work. The entire his
family members are depending upon the respondent
brother’s income. His father and mother are old aged
persons, they have no sufficient income to lead their
livelihood. The Respondent submit that the father of
the respondent and respondent has no any income.
7. The respondent further submit without consent and

knowledge of the respondent she ran away from the
respondent’s house. As such she is living at her
parents house. The respondent submits that the
petitioner parents have good sufficient income,
sufficient agricultural lands to lead their livelihood.
The respondent submits that the petitioner is working
at Garments factory and she is earning Rs.3000/- per
month. The petitioner can live herself and lead her
livelihood without depending upon anybody. On the
other hand the respondent has no income.
8. The respondent further submit that he is ready to

take to his matrimonial house. Under the above
circumstances, there is no obligation to the
respondent to maintain the petitioner and the
petitioner is not entitled for any sort of maintenance.
Further, the respondent has not having the capacity of
paying a separate maintenance to the petitioner and
further the petitioner is an earning member.
-4-
9. Under the above circumstances, the petitioner is not
entitled for any maintenance form this respondent and
the above petition filed by her is liable to dismissed
with cost.
Advocate for Respondent.

Respondent.
VERIFICATION
I, the above named Respondent do hereby declare
Anekal.
Respondent.
Date: 28/3/2006.
IN THE COURT OF 2ND ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL
FAMILY COURT, AT BANGALORE.
C.Mis.No.662/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Radha. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.G.Srinivas. ………
RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 125 OF CODE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE
The above named respondent begs to state as follows:-
1. The respondent submit that the petitioner herein

filed this present petition seeking maintenance against
the respondent herein.
2. The Respondent submits that after receiving the

summons and notices from this Hon’ble court, the
respondent could not able to appear before this
Hon’ble court due to ill health on 10/3/2006.
3. The respondent submits that on 10/3/2006 the

respondent could not able to meet his counsel to file
vakalath or I could not able to appear this Hon’ble
court personally, the said mistake is purely un-
intentional one and above said bonafide reason only.
Wherefore, the respondent humbly prays that this
Hon’ble court may be pleased to set-aside the exparte
order dated:10/3/2006 and the respondent may be
permitted to contest the proceedings in the above case
in the interest of justice and equity.

Respondent.
Bangalore.
Date:
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
C.Mis.No._______/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Mariyama,
W/o Bettappa,
Residing at
Karpur village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Bettappa,
KSRTC Driver,
S/o Late Muniyappa,
Working at
KSRTC, Kolar Depot,
Kolar District. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.


26/06/1980 at Sri.
Aswathanarayaswamy Temple, Chokkanathapura
Village, Hosur Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu,
according to the Hindu Rites and Customs.
Subsequent to the marriage, the petitioner and the
respondent lived happily for 6-7 years at Karpur
Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. Out of the
wedlock two children were born to the petitioner by
name Munirathnamma aged about 24 years and
Manjula aged about 22 years. The marriage Invitation
is produced herewith for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble court and the same is marked as Document
No.1.
4. The petitioner respectfully submits that, subsequent

to the birth of Manjula, the respondent always giving
trouble to the petitioner with one or the other reasons.
The respondents also get the job at KSRTC, Kolar as a
Driver. Subsequent to the birth of 2nd daughter, the
respondent deserted the petitioner, and he joined at
Kolar, where he was doing work. On several occasions,
the petitioner requested the respondent to rejoin the
home and live beautiful life with her, but the
respondent not listened to the words of the petitioner.
5. The petitioner submits that, with great difficulty the

respondent taken care about her daughters for a long
time by taking hand loans and by doing coolie. The
petitioner herself performed the marriage of her 1st
daughter by spending Rs. 2,00,000/-. The petitioner
also obtained loans from different persons for having
performed the marriage of her 1 st daughter. For that,
the respondent not taken any care about the marriage,
and the respondent also not helped to the marriage of
his daughter.
6. The petitioner respectfully submits that, as such in

Law the respondent is bound to maintain the
petitioner. The petitioner has to be maintained by the
Respondent where he has got sufficient means to
maintain her. The respondent is working as a Driver
and he is getting a salary of Rs. 10,000/- per month.
The respondent is also having landed properties at
Karpur Village, Anekal Taluk. From that, the
respondent is having an income of Rs. 10,000/- per
month. The petitioner cannot remain in the house of
her parents for a long time. The parents of the
petitioner being poor, they cannot maintain her for a
long time. The petitioner has no source of income to
lead her life. The petitioner further requires funds to
her maintenance i.e., for food, clothing and Shelter. As
the respondent purposely kicked out the petitioner. It
is the duty of the respondent to provide maintenance
to the petitioner where the petitioner is unable to
maintain herself. As the position of the petitioner has

the petitioner.
-4-

VERIFICATION

Anekal.
Petitioner.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Mariyama, …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Bettappa, ………
RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
1. The Wedding Invitation Card.

2. Zerox copy of the Genealogical tree.

petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2006.
BETWEEN
1) Smt.BhagyaLakshmma,
W/o Ramachandrareddy,
2) Kum.DhruthiNayana,
D/o Ramachandrareddy,
Aged about 7 years,
No.2 is minor
Represented by her
Mother and natural guardian
Smt.BhagyaLakshmamma.

Pujari Hanumanthappa,
Sapthagiri Layout,
Hosur Road,
Anekal Town,
PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Ramachandrareddy,
S/o Late Narayanareddy,
Residing at
Rachamanahalli Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.
-2-


3. The petitioner No.1 submits that she is the legally

Wedded wife of Respondent. The marriage was
solemnized on 20/1/1999 at Sri.Lakshmi
Venkateshwara Kalyana Mantapa at Attibele according
to the Hindu Rites and Customs. Out of the wedlock
one child was born to the petitioner No.1 and
respondent namely Kum.Dhurthinayana. The marriage
Invitation is produced herewith for the kind perusal of
this Hon’ble court and marked as Document No.1 the
petitioner is also herewith producing the photo and
Study certificate of Kum.Dhurthi Nayana for the kind
perusal of this Hon’ble Court and marked as
Document No.2 and 3.
4. The petitioner No.1 further submits that after the

marriage the petitioner No.1 and the Respondent were
living happily for a period of two years. There
afterwards the Respondent and his mother began to
ill-treat the petitioner No.1 and used to beat her
forcing her to bring dowry from her parents. As such
Petitioner No.1 lodged a Police complaint before the
Attibele Police. The Attibele Police have Registered a
Criminal case against the respondent and his mother
and her sister punishable under section.324, 326,
506,
-3-
114 r/w 34 of IPC. The petitioner submits that on

14/2/2006 the Attibele Police have registered a case in
Crime No.17/06.
4. The 1st petitioner submits that after one year the

respondent picked quarrel with the 1st petitioner and
demanded more dowry from the 1st petitioner but the
1st petitioner and parents are not in position to give
further dowry to the respondent. Thereby the
respondent kicked out the 1st and 2nd petitioner from
the home by beating the 1 st petitioner with dare and
devil consequences and threatened to her life also.
5. The 1st petitioner that so many panchayathi also

held with regard to the above subject, under the advice
of panchayathdars again the respondent took the 1st
petitioner to his house. But even though the
respondent doing the same and finally the respondent
kicked out the 1st petitioner and 2nd petitioner from the
matrimonial house. From that day the 1 st petitioner
and 2nd petitioner are living her father house.
6. The 1st petitioner submits that the father of the 1 st

petitioner are poor persons, having nobody support in
the locality and the father of the 1 st petitioner doing
coolie for their livelihood. The father of the 1 st
petitioner is the bread earning member of the family
and he is not in position to look after the 1 st petitioner
and 2nd petitioner. The 1st petitioner taken care about
the 2nd petitioner and now the 2nd petitioner is
studying in 2nd Standard at St.Joseph English Higher
Primary School. The 1st petitioner took hand loan from
different persons and joined her to the school.
-4-
8. The 1st petitioner the respondent is running Photo
Studio in name and Style as RNR Studio and Video at
Mirza Road, Anekal Town, Bangalore District and
respondent earning per month of Rs.15,000/- and the
respondent is having agricultural landed properties
and house properties. Totally the respondent is
earning Rs.20,000/- per month. The respondent is a
capable to give maintenance to the petitioner.
9. The 1st petitioner submits that the 1st petitioner

requires a monthly maintenance of Rs.3000/- for her
maintenance of food, cloth and shelter and the 2 nd
petitioner is required monthly maintenance of
Rs.2000/- per month for her education expenses and
other requirements.
monthly maintenance of Rs.3000/- per month to the
1st petitioner and direct the respondent to pay a
monthly maintenance of Rs.2000/- to the 2 nd
petitioner from the date of deserted by the respondent
and to grant such other relief or reliefs as deems fit in
the circumstance of the case in the interest of justice
and equity.
1.
2.

Petitioners.
-5-
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
Anekal.
Date: Petitioners.
6. The petitioner No.1 submits that as such in Law the
respondent is bound to maintain the petitioner. The
petitioner has to be maintained by the Respondent
where he has got sufficient means to maintain her.
The petitioner cannot remain in the house of her
being poor, they cannot maintain her for a long time.
The petitioner has no source of income to lead her life.
The petitioner further requires funds to her
respondent purposely necked out the petitioner and
married for the second time, in law he has to provide
maintenance to the petitioner where the petitioner is
unable to maintain herself. As the position of the
petitioner has become too ugly financially this petition
is filed against the respondent for maintenance.
7. The petitioner submits that the respondent doing
land business and also the respondent doing business
of selling the Mangalore tiles and also the respondent
owning building at Huskur village. The respondent is
having income per month of Rs.10000/- (Ten
Thousand Only). The respondent as purpose fully
neglected the petitioner to maintain. The respondent is
a capable to give maintenance to the petitioner.


the petitioner.

VERIFICATION

Anekal.
Date: Petitioner.

C.Mis.No.260/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Padmavathi,
W/o Jayaramareddy,
Residing at
Bellandur Village and Post,
Bangalore South Taluk,
Bangalore. ………..
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Jayaramareddy,
S/o Late Papanna,
Residing at
Kalkere Village,
Sakalavara Post,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. ……….
RESPONDENT
COMPROMISE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION

125 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.
The Petitioner and respondent above named begs to

file the following joint compromise petition as
hereunder: -
1. The Petitioner and respondent submits that at the

intervention of villagers, elderly persons of the locality,
the dispute involved between the petitioner and
respondent has been settled out of the court and the
parties hereto intends to enter into this compromise
petition as hereunder.
2. The Petitioner and respondent submits that the

petitioner herein already filed Crl.Mis.No.44/2000
before this Hon’ble Court for maintenance. After
contesting this Hon’ble Court awarded maintenance
amount of Rs.500/- per month to the petitioner. Upon
the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court now this
petitioner
-2-
filed this present petition U/s.125(3) of Cr.Pc. As per
the amicable settlement arise between the petitioner
and respondent, the respondent agreed to hand over
the below schedule property in favour of petitioner as
full and final settlement for maintenance of petitioner.
The petitioner also agreed to take the below schedule
property as full and final settlement for her
maintenance from the respondent.
3. The respondent submits the respondent purchased

the schedule property from Honagangappa of
Nelamangala. The said Honagangappa also executed
agreement of sale cum possession certificate and also
GPA in favour of the respondent. As such the
respondent become the absolute owner of the schedule
property and as such the respondent has got every
right to hand over the schedule property in favour of
petitioner for maintenance.
4. The respondent submits that from this day onwards

the petitioner is at liberty to use and enjoy the suit
schedule property as she likes. Further the petitioner
is entitled to get the relevant documents in respect of
the suit schedule property in her favour. The petitioner
is entitled to sell, mortgage, gift or to alienate the
property and to transfer and conveying the property in
any manner, whatsoever as she likes. The petitioner is
also entitled to raise loan from any Government
schedule banks, or from any Co-operative Societies, or
from any Financial Institutions, in any manner. The
respondent has no any manner of right, title and
interest in respect of the suit schedule property. He
undertakes that he will not going to interfere with the
possession of petitioner in respect of the property. He
is not going to raise any objection.
-3-
4. The Petitioner submits that further she is not going
to file any maintenance petition nor require of
maintenance petition nor petition for enhancement
against the respondent. Today onwards there is no
relationship between the petitioner and respondent.
The petitioner also undertake to appear before the
Family Court or any other Court for taking divorce
from the respondent by mutual consent.
5. This Compromise is in the interest of all the parties,
and accordingly the parties hereto humbly prayed that
this Hon’ble court be pleased to record the joint
compromise petition and dispose the same
accordingly.
Wherefore, the Petitioner and Respondent above

named humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court be
pleased to record the Joint Compromise petition and
dispose the case accordingly in the interest of justice
and equity.
SCHEDULE
All the part and parcel of the property bearing Site
Nos.374 and 375 formed in Sy.No.11 measuring East
to West situated at G.MalliKarjunappa Colony, Kalkere
Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District,
bounded as:-
East by:- Site No.373.

West by:- Site No.376.
North by: 10 feet road.
South by:- Property belong to K.R.Krishnappa.
Advocate for Petitioner.

Petitioner.
-4-

Respondent.
VERIFICATION
We, the above named petitioner and Respondent do
hereby declare that what is stated above is true and
correct to the best of our knowledge, information and
beliefs.
Petitioner.
Respondent.
Anekal.
Date:

C.Mis.No.139/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Rajammma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.S.Gopalappa. ..……
RESPONDENT
OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE

PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER
SECTION 125 OF CR.PC.
The respondent above named begs to state as follows:-
1. The respondent submits that at the outset the very

petition filed by the petitioner is not at all
maintainable in law or on facts. On this ground itself
the very petition filed by the petitioner is liable to be
dismissed in lamine.
2. The respondent submits that the averments made

in the para 2 of the petitioner, the marriage between
the petitioner and respondent is solemnized about 20
years back is true and correct and further admits that
they have got one daughter and one son namely
Venkateshbabu and Mamatha. The marriage of
Venkateshbabu may be true and correct, but the
marriage of his daughter namely Mamatha is not
aware by this respondent. It is further submitted that
when the respondent went to Sabrimala Temple in the
year 1997, the daughter namely Mamatha ran away
from the house with some other person without
consent and knowledge of respondent.
-2-
3. The respondent further submit that the averments
made in para 3 of the petition that since from 2 years,
the respondent addicted to drinking alcohol is false
and incorrect and further averment made in the same
para that after marriage of her son and daughter they
are living separately is false and incorrect. Further it is
false to say the respondent is having illicit relationship
with Rathnamma of Hanumanthapura. It is further
false to say that the respondent neglected the
petitioner to maintain by providing all requirement
amenities. Further it is false to say that this
respondent given harassment to the petitioner.
Further it is false to say that the petitioner given one
Cow worth of Rs.20,000/- to respondent.
4. The respondent further submits that the averments

made in para 4 of the petition that this respondent
brought the above said Rathnamma and her children
to the petitioner’s house are all false and incorrect. It
is also false to say that this petitioner given physical
torture and to life of petitioner and it is further false to
say that on 27/12/2004, the respondent kicked out
the petitioner from the house.

made in para 5 of the petition is totally false and
incorrect.
6. The respondent submits that the respondent acting

as a dutiful husband and in fact the petitioner failed to
act as a dutiful wife. In fact this respondent conducted
the marriage of his son Venkateshbabu. Before
conducting the marriage, the respondent also
purchased one site at Attibele Village in the name of
Venkateshbabu. By investing so much amount and by
obtaining the loan from other third persons, this
respondent purchased the site in the name of
Venkateshbabu.
-3-
7. The respondent submits that the petitioner is

aregent lady, she failed to perform her part of the duty
and always picking quarrel with the respondent for no
reasons. The petitioner herself ran away from the
matrimonial home about 4 years back without consent
and knowledge of this respondent. Earlier the
respondent and petitioner living at Argahara village,
Tamilnadu. Now the petitioner with her parents house
at Muthanallur, Anekal Taluk. The petitioner is also
having cow and sheeps for that she is earning
Rs.10,000/- per month and she is also doing
agricultural operation in the village and for that she is
getting Rs.2000/- per month. Hence she is capable to
maintain herself without depending upon anybody or
her husband. As such the very petition filed by the
petitioner is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
8. The respondent further submits that the respondent

is physically weak person and earlier he has with met
with an accident, for which he has sustained fracture
injury to his left leg. As such he is not in a position to
work in any where. As such he has no income for his
own. But he is depending upon some body and by
doing coolie he is getting Rs.30/- per day. The said
amount is not sufficient to maintain himself. As such
the respondent is not in a position to give monthly
maintenance of Rs.3000/- to the petitioner. On the
other hand the respondent and petitioner son namely
Venkateshbabu doing electric contract work at
Bangalore for which he is getting Rs.8000/- per
month. The said Venkateshbabu is a capable person to
maintain petitioner and respondent. As such the very
petition filed by the petitioner is liable to be dismissed
in lamine.
-4-
9. The respondent submits that the respondent is
always ready and willing to take back the petitioner to
his matrimonial house and the respondent is also
undertake to provide all the amenities like food, cloth
and shelter and other legal requirements to the
petitioner.

Hon’ble court may be pleased to dismiss the petition
filed by the petitioner with exemplary cost in the
interest of justice and equity.

Respondent.
VERIFICATION
I, the above named respondent do hereby declare

C.Mis.No.148/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Geetha. ……. PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Ravi. ..……
RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 125 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE.
1. The respondent submits that the petitioner has filed

the present petitioner for maintenance.
2. The respondent submits that after filing of the

petition by the petitioner, this Hon’ble Court was
pleased to issue the notice to me. In fact the notice has
been duly served on me and subsequently I have
engaged my counsel to file the Vakalath. Subsequently
this Hon’ble Court posted the case for objections to
petition.
3. The respondent further submits that due ill-health I

was not able to meet my counsel and give instructions
to file the objections. On last date of hearing this
Hon’ble Court taken the objections of respondent as
closed and posted for petitioner evidence. Now the
respondent has given the instructions and the
objections to the petition is ready. Hence there is a
delay in filing the objections to the petition. Hence this
application to condone the delay in filing the
objections.
-2-

Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit him to file the
objections to the petition in the above case in the

Respondent.
VERIFICATION

Anekal.
Respondent.
Date:
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE
C.Mis.No.45/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Susheela & another. …….

PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Krishnappa. ………
RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER NO.1-BY WAY OF

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Susheela, W/o Krishnappa, Aged about 28

years, residing at YeniMuchandra Village, Denkanikote
Taluk, Krishnagiri District, do hereby state on oath as
follows:-
1. I submit that I am the 1st petitioner in the above

case, the petitioner No.2 and Petitioner No.3 is my son
and mmy daughter. I know the facts and
circumstances of the case, Hence I am swearing this
affidavit.
2. I submit that I am the legally wedded wife of

respondent. The marriage between myself and
respondent was solemnized on 29/5/1994 at
Sri.Bettarayaswamy Temple, Therupet, Denkanikote
Taluk, Krishnagiri District as per the Hindu rites and
customs.
3. I further submit that subsequent to the marriage
myself and respondent happily for a period of 2 years
at Vaddarapalya Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
District. Out of the wedlock the petitioner No.2 namely
Kum.Swetha was born and subsequently the
respondent always giving unnecessary torture to
myself and the advise of elderly persons, the
respondent kept quite for some time and subsequently
out of wedlock the 2nd male child was born namely
Master.AjithKumar. Subsequent to the born of 2 nd
child, the respondent always abusing me with filthy
language and also the respondent also having habit
taking alcohol daily and as such he demanded me to
bring more and more money from the parents house
and so many times I have also refused to bring the
dowry amount. Some times I have also brought dowry
amount from my parents house and same is handed
over to respondent also. In fact I have also purchased
the house property in the name of my husband. My
parents given sale amount to me. I had good faith on
the respondent purchased the house property in the
name of the respondent. But subsequently the
respondent assaulted me and deserted myself and my
son and my daughter by kicking out from the
matrimonial house. Thereby I have also lodged
complaint before the Attibele Police, in fact the Attibele
Police also registered the case.
4. I further submit that now myself and my children

are residing at my parents house. My parents are very
poor persons and they are not in a position to look
after myself and my children.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
5. I further submit that the respondent is having
landed properties and house properties in his name. In
fact the respondent is also running Departmental
Store at Vaddarapalya Village, in which the
respondent getting Rs.10,000/- per month, the
respondent has also got house properties and he has
given seven houses for rent for different
persons, for which the respondent is getting
Rs.10,000/- income. Further in the agricultural
operation, the respondent is getting Rs.2000/- per
month and he is doing water man work at Neralur
Grama Panchayath, for which the respondent is
getting Rs.2000/- income. In all the respondent is
earning Rs.24,000/- per month. As such the
respondent is a capable person to maintain myself and
my children by providing food, cloth, shelter and other
legal amenities and education to the minor children.
6. I further submit that the petitioner No.2 is studying

in 7th Standard at Jayabharathi Co-operative Society
School, Attibele, Anekal Taluk and the petitioner No.3
is studying in 4th Standard at St.Philomena School,
Attibele.
7. I further submit that myself have no income for my

own and I am depending upon purely on my parents
and I am not in a position to look after myself and my
minor children. I require Rs.6000/- per month for my
maintenance like food, cloth, shelter, medical
expenses, school expenses and other legal amenities.
The respondent is capable to maintain a monthly
maintenance amount of Rs.6000/- to myself and my
children.
No.of.Corrections.
-4-
Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court

may be pleased to award the monthly maintenance
amount of Rs.6000/- per month to myself and my
children in the above case in the interest of justice and
equity.
Advocate. Sworn to
before me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.
C.Mis.No.168/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Shanthamma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Nagireddy. ………
RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Shanthamma, D/o Chinnappa Reddy, W/o

NagiReddy, aged about 33 years, residing at
Bandebommasandra Village, Bidarahalli Hobli,
Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby
state on oath as follows:-
1. I submit that I am the petitioner in the above case.

Hence I know the facts and circumstances of the case.
Hence I am swearing this affidavit.

Respondent. The marriage between myself and
respondent was solomnised on 10/11/1985 at
Champaka Dhama swamy Temple, Bannerghatta,
Anekal Taluk according to the Hindu Rites and
Customs. Out of the wedlock one female child was
born to myself and respondent namely Kum.Divya.
The marriage Invitation card, photo and School
certificate are produced herewith for the kind perusal
of this Hon’ble court.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
3. I further submit that after the marriage between

myself and Respondent were living happily for a period
of 2 years. There afterwards the Respondent began to
ill-treat me and used to beat me. After sometime the
respondent began to misbehave with me. Along with
me and respondent, the parents of the respondent
were also living together. The respondent is of the
habit of believing the words of his parents even
without justifying whether they are correct or not. The
parents of the respondent for the reasons best known
to them were always telling something lie against me
to the respondent. As such after hearing the words of
the parents the respondent use to abuse and also
assault me every day. That was the habit of the
respondent everyday. Apart from that even the parents
of the respondent were always abusing and assaulting
me. The respondent and his parents were always
giving all sorts of troubles to me. In spite of all ill-
treatment of respondent and his parents I was living
as a dutiful wife of the respondent. Since then she is
residing at Bandebommasandra village, itself under
the mercy of my parents.
4. I further submit that as such in Law the respondent

is bound to maintain me. The respondent has to be
maintained me where he has got sufficient means to
maintain myself. I cannot remain in the house of my
parents for a long time. My parents being poor, they
cannot maintain me for a long time. I have no source
of income to lead my life. I further requires funds to
position of myself has become too ugly financially this
petition is filed against the respondent for
maintenance.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
5. I further submit that the respondent doing land

business and also doing business of land developing
and Agricultural. The respondent is having income per
month of Rs.25000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Only).
The respondent as purpose fully neglected me to
maintenance to myself.
7. I further submit that myself requires a monthly

maintenance of Rs.2000/- for maintenance of food,
cloth, shelter and Medical expenses and other legal
necessary expenses.

amount of Rs.2000/- per month to myself in the above
Advocate. Sworn to
before me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No.117/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Bhagyalakshmamma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Ramachandrareddy. ………
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
1. The petitioner above named has filed the present

petition against the respondent for maintenance. After
filing of the petition, the respondent has appeared
before this Hon’ble Court and filed his objections.
Subsequently the petitioner also filed lead her evidence
by way of affidavit as PW1. While at the time of filing
the petition, the petitioner has produced the Xerox
copy of the documents. Today the case is posted for
cross of PW1 and the petitioner is producing the
certified copy of the documents to prove her case.
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
1. Original Medical Certificate in respect of Physically

Handicapped.

petitioner.
Date: 14/3/2007.

C.Mis.No.114/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Yashodamma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Chandrappa. ………
RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PW2 FILED -BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT
I, Sri.H.T.Padman Rao, S/o Tholasoji Rao, aged

about 48 years, residing at Huskur Village, Sarjapura
Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby
1. I submit that I know the petitioner and respondent.

The marriage between the petitioner and respondent
was solemnized on 20/8/1981 at Thimmaraya Swamy
Temple, Anekal according to the Hindu rites and
customs. I was also present during the time of
marriage. Out of the wedlock three children were born
to the petitioner and respondent. Out of three children
two are dead and one is alive.
2. I submit that after the marriage the petitioner and

respondent were living happily for a period of four
years. There afterwards the Respondent and his
mother began to ill-treat the petitioner and used to
beat her forcing her to bring dowry from her parents.
As such the petitioner parents lodged a Police
complaint before the Anekal Police. The Anekal Police
have Registered a Criminal case against the
respondent and his mother Narayanamma punishable
under section.498(A) of IPC.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
3. I further submit that the respondent is bound to
maintain the petitioner. The petitioner has to be
maintained by the Respondent where he has got
sufficient means to maintain her. The petitioner is
staying with her parents house. The parents of the
petitioner being poor, they cannot maintain the
petitioner for a long time. The petitioner has no source
of income to lead her life. The petitioner further
requires funds to her maintenance i.e., for food,
clothing and Shelter. As the respondent purposely
necked out the petitioner. As the position of the
petitioner has become too ugly financially the present
maintenance.
4. I further submit that doing business of selling the

Mangalore tiles and also the respondent owning
building at Huskur village. The respondent is having
income per month of Rs.10000/- (Ten Thousand Only).
The respondent is a capable to give maintenance to the
petitioner. The petitioner is have no income for her
livelihood. The petitioner required Rs.5000/- per
month for her maintenance.

may be pleased to award the maintenance amount of
Rs.5000/- per month to the petitioner by allowing this
petition in the above case in the interest of justice and
equity.

me.
Anekal.
Date:26/2/2007.
No.of.Corrections.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN)
C.Mis.No.114/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Yashodamma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Chandrappa. ………
RESPONDENT
APPLICATION UNDER 125 OF THE CODE OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
1. The petitioner above named has filed the present

petition against the respondent for maintenance. After
filing of the petition, the respondent has appeared
before this Hon’ble Court and filed his objections.
Subsequently the petitioner also filed lead her evidence
by way of affidavit as PW1. The respondent counsel
has been fully cross-examined the PW1. Now the case
is posted for further chief of PW1. Today the petitioner
is herewith filing the list of witnesses and hence permit
the PW1 to file the list of witnesses.
LIST OF WITNESSES:-
Sri.Narayanappa,
S/o Nanjappa,
Residing at
Chandapura Village,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District.
Sri.Krishnareddy.P, 2) Sri.Munireddy,
S/o Pillareddy, S/o
MuniswamyReddy,
Aged about 50 years, aged about 50
years,
Residing at R/at
Kammanahalli Handenahalli Village,
Village, Kasaba Hobli,
Sarjapura Village, Anekal Taluk,
Anekal Taluk, Bangalore
District.
Bangalore District.

petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No.223/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Prabhavathi. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.C.Chennappa. ………
RESPONDENT
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE

OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

the petition for maintenance. Subsequently this
Hon’ble Court issued notice to the respondent. In fact
the notice has been duly served on the respondent.
2. The respondent submits that on 3/1/2007, the

respondent could not able to appear before this
Hon’ble Court due to ill-health. On the day this
Hon’ble Court called out the case and was placed
exparte. The above said mistake is purely
unintentional one and it is above said bonafide reason
only. The respondent has got good merits to defend the
case.

Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set-aside the exparte
order dated: 3/1/2007 and permit the respondent to
conduct the case in the interest of justice and equity.
Respondent.
Anekal.
Date:
N THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RATHNAMMA,
W/o Anandkumar,
2) MASTER.MANJUNATH,
S/o AnandKumar,
Aged about 8 years,
3) KUM.YASHODA,
S/o Anandkumar,
Aged about 4 years,
Since 2 and 3 being minors

Represented by her mother,
Smt.Rathnamma as legal
And natural guardian.
All are now residing at

C/o Krishnappa,
No.75, Bayasab Layout,
New Pet, (Behind KEB)
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. ……
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.ANANDKUMAR,
S/o Venkataswamy Reddy,
R/at Kumbar Street,
Thali Village and Post,
Denkanikote Taluk,
Krishnagiri District,
Tamilnadu. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.
-2-
1. The address of the petitioners for the purpose of

3. The petitioners submit that the petitioner No.1 is

the legally wedded wife of the respondent. The
marriage between the petitioner No.1 and the
respondent was solemnized on 8/4/1998 at Aryavysya
Vasavi Kalyana Mantapa at Thali Village, Denkanikote
Taluk. To prove the same the petitioners are herewith
producing the Wedding Invitation Card and
Photographs for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court
and marked as Document No.1 to 3. After marriage
between the petitioner No.1 and respondent lived
happily at Javalagere village, Denkanikote Taluk. Out
of the wedlock one male child namely
Master.Manjunath born at Javalagere village and
subsequently petitioner No.1 and 2 along with you
were shifted to petitioner No.1 parental house at
Gumlapura village. Out of the wedlock another female
child was also born namely Kum.Yashoda. When such
being the facts and circumstances, after born of female
child namely Kum.Yashoda, the respondent turned the
mind and treated the petitioner No.1 with cruel
manner. The petitioner No.1 also on several times
resisted the cruel manner of the respondent. One day
without informing to the petitioner No.1, the
respondent ran away from the parental house of the
petitioner No.1 by taking jewels, clothes and other
valuable things to Thali village.
-3-
4. The petitioners further submit that the petitioner
No.1 and her parents also approached the respondent
and requested to rejoin to petitioner No.1. As the
respondent ran away from the parental house about 3
years back. Recently the petitioner No.1 came to know
that you have married second time with
Smt.Kanthamma of Chikka-Ubbanur of Krishnagiri
District and the petitioners are living separately at
Gumalpura by doing coolie.
5. The petitioners further submit that now the

petitioners are living separately from the date of
deserted of the respondent. The petitioner No.1
parents are very poor and helpless person having no
income for them and they are not in a position to
maintain the petitioners. The petitioner No.2 namely
Master.Manjunath, aged about 8 years studying at 3 rd
Standard and Kum.Yashoda is aged about 4 years and
newly admitted to School at Gumalapura. The
petitioner No.1 obtained hand loan from different
persons and admitted the petitioner No.2 and 3 to
school. Now the petitioner No.1 is looking after the
petitioner No.2 and 3.
6. The petitioners further submit that the petitioner

No.1 is not in a position to maintain herself and also
maintain petitioner No.2 and 3. The petitioner No.1 is
doing coolie in which the petitioner No.1 is not in a
position to maintain herself and children. The
respondent is doing bangle business at Thali, in which
the respondent have got monthly income of
Rs.10,000/- and also doing other land business, in
which the respondent getting monthly income of
Rs.5000/-. As such the respondent is capable to
maintain the petitioners by providing legal amenities
like food, cloth, shelter and medical expenses and
other school expenses.
7. The petitioners further submit that the petitioners

are required a monthly maintenance amount of
Rs.1000/- each for their legal amenities like food,
cloth, shelter, medical expenses, school expenses and
other legal expenses. The respondent is capable to pay
monthly maintenance amount of Rs.1000/- each in all
Rs.3000/- per month to the petitioners.
8. The petitioners submits that the respondent is

each petitioner.

1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
-5-
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
3.
Anekal. Petitioners.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.NANJAMMA,
W/o Venkataswamy,
2) KUM.SWETHA,
D/o Venkataswamy,
3) MASTER.AJITHKUMAR,
S/o Venkataswamy,
Aged about 9 years,
Since Petitioners No.2 and 3 are minors

Represented by her mother
SMT.NANJAMMA as the legal and
natural guardian,
All are residing at

YeniMuchandra Village,
Denkanikote Taluk,
Krishnagiri District. ……
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.VENKATASWAMY,
S/o Late Venkataramanappa,
R/at Vaddarapalya, Icchangur Village,
Yadavanahalli Post,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District.
(Attibele Police Jurisdiction) ………

RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.
-2-



legally wedded wife of respondent. The marriage
between the 1st petitioner and respondent was
solemnized on 29/5/1994 at Sri.Bettarayaswamy
Temple, Therupet, Denkanikote Taluk, Krishnagiri
District as per the Hindu rites and customs. To prove
the same the petitioner No.1 is herewith producing the
Wedding Invitation card for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble court and marked as Document No.1.

marriage the petitioner No.1 and respondent happily
for a period of 2 years at Vaddarapalya Village, Attibele
Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. Out of the
wedlock the petitioner No.2 namely Kum.Swetha was
born and subsequently the respondent always giving
unnecessary torture to the 1st petitioner and the advise
of elderly persons, the respondent kept quite for some
time and subsequently out of wedlock the 2nd male
child was born namely Master.AjithKumar.
Subsequent to the born of 2 nd child, the respondent
always abusing the petitioner No.1 with filthy language
and also the respondent also having habit taking
-3-
alcohol daily and as such he demanded the petitioner

No.1 to bring more and more money from the parents
house and so many times the petitioner No.1 also
refused to bring the dowry amount. Some times the
petitioner No.1 taken dowry amount from her parents
house and same is handed over to respondent also. In
fact the petitioner No.1 also purchased the house
property in the name of her husband. The parents of
the petitioner No.1 given sale amount to the petitioner
No.1. The petitioner No.1 with good faith on the
respondent purchased the house property in the name
of the respondent. But subsequently the respondent
assaulted the petitioner No.1 and deserted the
petitioners by kicked out from the matrimonial house.
Thereby the petitioner No.1 also lodged complaint
before the Attibele Police, in fact the Attibele Police
also registered the case in FIR No._______/2006.
5. The petitioners submit that now the petitioners are

residing at per parents house. The petitioner No.1
parents are very poor persons and they are not in a
position to look after the petitioners.

having landed properties and house properties in his
name. In fact the respondent is also running
Departmental Store at Vaddarapalya Village, in which
the respondent getting Rs.10,000/- per month, the
respondent has also got house properties and he has
given seven houses for rent for different persons, for
which the respondent is getting Rs.10,000/- income.
Further in the agricultural operation, the respondent
is getting Rs.2000/- per month and he is doing water
man
-4-
work at Neralur Grama Panchayath, for which the
respondent is getting Rs.2000/- income. In all the
respondent is earning Rs.24,000/- per month. As such
the respondent is a capable person to maintain the
petitioners by providing food, cloth, shelter and other

studying in 7th Standard at Jayabharathi Co-operative
Society School, Attibele, Anekal Taluk and the
petitioner No.3 is studying in 4 th Standard at
St.Philomena School, Attibele.
8. The petitioners submit that the petitioner No.1 have

no income for her own and she is depending upon
purely on her parents and the petitioner No.1 is not in
a position to look after herself and minor children. The
petitioners are required Rs.6000/- per month for their
maintenance amount of Rs.6000/- to the petitioners.

the petitioners.

by the respondent and to
-5-
grant such other relief or reliefs as deems fit in the

circumstance of the case in the interest of justice and
equity.
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
3.
Date:
N THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.S.R.JAYANTHI & others. ……

PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.NAGARAJ. ………
RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE PETITIONERS
1. Original Wedding Invitation Card.
2. Xerox copy of Transfer certificate of Kum.N.Roopa.
3. Copy of the legal Notice dated:14/8/2009.
4. Copy of the Reply notice dated:31/8/2009.
5. Postal receipt.
6. Postal acknowledgement.
Anekal. Advocate for Petitioners.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SUSHEELA,
W/o Krishnappa,
2) KUM.RAKSHITHA,
D/o Krishnappa,
Aged about 5 years,
Since Petitioner No.2 is minor

SMT.SUSHEELA as the legal and
natural guardian,
All are residing at

Lakshmipura Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.KRISHNAPPA,
S/o Late Patlaiah,
Residing at
ByatarayanaDoddi Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

Sri.M.Manjunath and H.Srinivas,
-2-
No.3, First Floor, Yellappa Building, Near Mohan
Clinic, Attibele Road, Anekal, Bangalore-562106.


between the 1st petitioner and respondent was
solemnized on 9/6/1995 at the house of respondent at
ByattarayanaDoddi Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District as per the Hindu rites and
customs. To prove the same the petitioner No.1 is
herewith producing the Wedding Invitation card for the
kind perusal of this Hon’ble court and marked as
Document No.1.

marriage the petitioner No.1 and respondent lived
happily for a period of 1 year at ByatarayanaDoddi
Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District.
Out of the wedlock the petitioner No.2 namely
Kum.Rakshitha was born and subsequently the
respondent always giving unnecessary torture to the
1st petitioner and the advise of elderly persons, the
respondent kept quite for some time and respondent
always abusing the petitioner No.1 with filthy language
and also the respondent also having habit taking
alcohol daily, playing cards and as such he demanded
the petitioner No.1 to bring more and more money
from the parents house and so many times the
petitioner No.1 also refused to bring the dowry
amount. Some times the petitioner No.1 taken dowry
amount from her parents house and same is handed
over to respondent also. But subsequently the
respondent assaulted the petitioner No.1 and deserted
the petitioners by kicked out
-3-
from the matrimonial house. Thereby the petitioner
No.1 also lodged complaint before the Bannerghatta
Police. The petitioners are herewith producing the
Immunization card for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
Court and marked as Document No.2.
5. The petitioners submit that now the petitioners are

residing at per parents house. The petitioner No.1
parents are very poor persons and they are not in a
position to look after the petitioners.

having landed properties and house properties in his
name. In fact the respondent is doing to mason work
and he is earning daily of Rs.200/- per day and the
respondent is also having agricultural operation, the
respondent is getting Rs.3000/-. In all the respondent
is earning Rs.9,000/- per month. As such the
respondent is a capable person to maintain the

studying in Government Primary School, at
Lakshmipura Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore
District.
8. The petitioners submit that the petitioner No.1 have

no income for her own and she is depending upon
purely on her parents and the petitioner No.1 is not in
a position to look after herself and minor children. The
petitioners are required Rs.5000/- per month for their
maintenance amount of Rs.5000/- to the petitioners.
-4-
the petitioners.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioners pray

monthly maintenance amount of Rs.5000/- per month
for both petitioners from the date of deserted by the
respondent and to grant such other relief or reliefs as
deems fit in the circumstance of the case in the
1.
2.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Susheela & another. ……

PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Krishnappa. ………
RESPONDENT
2. Original Immunization Card.

Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
SMT.BHAGYAMMA,
W/o Rajashekar.M,
Major,
Residing at
Mellanallasandra Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
AND
SRI.RAJASHEKAR.M.
S/o Mani Pillai,
Residing at
J.P.Nagar 8th Phase,
Bangalore-78. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.


-2-
3. The petitioners submit that the petitioner is the
between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized
on 2/5/2004 at Sri.ChampakaDhama Swamy Temple
at Bannerghatta as per the Hindu rites and customs.
To prove the same the petitioner is herewith producing
the Marriage Certificate, receipt and Photograph for
the kind perusal of this Hon’ble court and marked as
Document No.1 to 3.
4. The petitioner submits that subsequent to the

marriage the petitioner and respondent lived happily
for a period of 6 months at J.P.Nagar, Bangalore. Out
of the wedlock no children were born to the petitioner
and respondent and subsequently the respondent
always giving unnecessary torture to the petitioner
and the advise of elderly persons, the respondent kept
quite for some time and respondent always abusing
the petitioner with filthy language and also the
respondent also having habit taking alcohol daily,
playing cards and as such he demanded the petitioner
to bring more and more money from the parents house
and so many times the petitioner also refused to bring
the dowry amount. Some times the petitioner taken
dowry amount from her parents house and same is
handed over to respondent also. But subsequently the
respondent assaulted the petitioner and deserted the
petitioners by kicked out from the matrimonial house.
5. The petitioners submit that now the petitioner is

residing at per parents house. The petitioner parents
are very poor persons and they are not in a position to
look after the petitioner.
6. The petitioner further submit that the respondent is

professionally by Gold Smith at Bangalore and also
having house and site properties in his name. The
respondent is getting Rs.12,000/-. In all the
respondent is earning Rs.12,000/- per month. As such
petitioner by providing food, cloth, shelter and other
legal amenities.
7. The petitioner submit that the petitioner has no

income for her own and she is depending upon purely
on her parents and the petitioner is not in a position to
look after herself. The petitioner are required
Rs.5000/- per month for her maintenance like food,
cloth, shelter, medical expenses and other legal
amenities.

the petitioner.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner pray that

from the date of deserted by the respondent and to
equity.
-4-
VERIFICATION

our knowledge, information and beliefs.
Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Bhagyamma. ……
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Rajashekar.M. ………
RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE PETITIONER
2. Original Immunization Card.

Date:

C.Mis.No.223/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.T.Prabhavathi. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.D.Chennappa. ..……
RESPONDENT



in the para 2 of the petition, the marriage between the
petitioner and respondent is solemnized on 14/5/1992
is true and correct and it is false to say that the
parents of the petitioner have given Rs.50,000/- as
dowry amount and Gold chain weighing 32 grams, Ole
6 grams, 6 grams Gold Drops, valuable clothes and
table and chairs.

made in para 4 of the petition that out of the wedlock
one male child was born namely Master.Nandeesh and
the said male child is aged about 13 years is true and
correct. Further it is false to say that about 6 years
back the respondent began to ill-treat the petitioner
and was giving torture to the petitioner. It is further
submitted that the respondent was not living with the
-2-
petitioner and was abusing with filthy language and
demanded to bring the dowry from her parents house
and get the site at Anekal Town is hereby denied as
false and incorrect.

made in para 5 of the petition that the respondent was
not looking after the petitioner and he was having
connection with other women and he was coming once
in 2 months is hereby denied as false and incorrect.
The respondent had married with one Smt.Yashoda,
D/o Kenchappa of Kandakanahalli, Malur Taluk is
hereby denied as false and incorrect. The other
averments made in same para is hereby denied as
false and incorrect. It is further false to say that the
respondent neglected the petitioner to maintain by
providing all requirement amenities. Further it is false
to say that this respondent given harassment to the
petitioner.

made in para 6 of the petition is totally false and
incorrect.
5. The respondent submits that the marriage between
the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on
14/3/1992 as per the Hindu rites and customs.
Subsequent to the marriage the petitioner joined to
matrimonial house and lived for a period of 1 year.
Subsequently the petitioner picked quarrel with the
respondent for pinpricks reasons. Out of wedlock one
male child was born on 3/3/1993 namely
Master.Nandeesh. Subsequent to the born of male
child, the petitioner taken care for a period of 1 years.
Subsequently the petitioner picked quarrel with the
respondent and ran away from the matrimonial house
by living the respondent and the
-3-
petitioner son. Now the respondent taking cared about
his son.
6. The respondent submits that on several occasions

the respondent approached the petitioner and
requested to come and join the matrimonial house and
also requested to the petitioner to take the care about
her son, since the petitioner son being a minor child.
But the petitioner refused to join matrimonial house
and also failed to take care about the minor child.
Several Panchayath are also held with regard to the
same, but all become vain. The respondent is taking
care about his sons from the date of deserted by the
petitioner. The respondent giving all the facilities to
minor child and now the respondent son is studying in
8th standard in Government High School at
Besthamanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore
District.

always ready and willing to perform his duty as dutiful
husband, but the petitioner utterly failed to act as a
dutiful wife. The respondent is always ready and wiling
to take back to matrimonial house and also undertake
to provide all the amenities like food, cloth, shelter and
medical expenses and other legal requirements. But
the petitioner not chosen to join the respondent.

having old aged father and mother and they are
suffering from old aged diseases and the respondent
along taking care about his old aged parents by
spending huge amount. The respondent is taking care
about his sister by providing little bit help, but the
respondent doing coolie at Bricks Factory at
Besthamanahalli Village for which the respondent
getting Rs.50/- per day.
-4-
Totally the respondent getting Rs.1500/- if the
respondent done the work for 30 days. If suppose the
respondent put leave for the job the respondent get the
Rs.1500/- per month. The said amount is not
sufficient even for the respondent and his family
members livelihood. As such the respondent is not in a
position to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.3000/- to
the respondent.
9. The respondent further submits that the petitioner

is also working in some where at Menasignahalli
Village, Anekal Taluk, for that the petitioner is getting
Rs.2000/- per month. As such the petitioner is
capable to maintain her self. As such the question of
giving maintenance amount of Rs.3000/- by the
respondent to the petitioner does not arise at all.
10. The respondent submits that the petitioner

parents and brothers are very much rich persons
having landed properties and they are also taking very
much care about the petitioner. As such the earning of
the respondent is not sufficient for his livelihood.
Hence the question of paying monthly maintenance
amount of Rs.3000/- to the petitioner does not arise at
all.

petitioner.
-5-


Respondent.
VERIFICATION

Anekal.
Date:
Respondent.

C.Mis.No.223/2006.
BETWEEN
Smt.Bharathi. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.D.Chennappa. ..……
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

the petition for maintenance. Subsequently this
Hon’ble Court issued notice to the respondent. In fact
the notice has been duly served on the respondent and
the respondent has engaged the advocate and filed his
detail objections.
2. The respondent submits that the petitioner has lead

her evidence by way affidavit as PW1 and marked the
documents and the case was posted for cross-
examination of PW1. On last date of hearing the
respondent counsel was engaged in some other cases
at Bangalore, hence he was not able to attend the
court and cross-exam the PW1 and PW2. The Junior
counsel appearing for the respondent and prayed time
to cross-examine the PW1, but this Hon’ble Court has
closed evidence of petitioner side the posted for
respondent evidence. The respondent has got good
case on merits to defend the case.
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to recall the PW1 for
cross-examination in the above case in the interest of
justice and equity.
Anekal Advocate for

Respondent.
Date: 4/7/2008.
C.Mis.No.139/2005.
BETWEEN
Smt.Rajamma. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.S.Gopalappa. ..……
RESPONDENT
EXAMINATION IN CHIEF OF THE RESPONDENT

(RW-1) BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT
I, the Respondent herein do hereby solemnly affirm

and state on oath as follows:-
Name : Sri.S.Gopalappa.
Father’s Name : Late Sampangiyappa @

Bodappa.
Age : 46 Years.
Occupation : Coolie.
Residence : MuduganaPalli.
Hosur Taluk.
1. I submit that I am the respondent in the above case.

The petitioner is my legally wedded wife. I am acting as
a dutiful husband and in fact the petitioner failed to
act as a dutiful wife. I have conducted the marriage of
my son Venkateshbabu. Before conducting the
marriage, I have also purchased one site at Attibele
Village in the name of Venkateshbabu. By investing so
much amount and by obtaining the loan from other
third persons, I have purchased the site in the name of
Venkateshbabu.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
2. I further submit that the petitioner is arogant lady,

she failed to perform her part of the duty and always
picking quarrel with me for no reasons. The petitioner
herself ran away from the matrimonial home about 4
years back without my consent and knowledge. Earlier
myself and petitioner living at Argahara village,
Tamilnadu. Now the petitioner is with her parents
house at Muthanallur, Anekal Taluk. The petitioner is
also having cow and sheeps for that she is earning
Rs.10,000/- per month and she is also doing
agricultural operation in the village and for that she is
getting Rs.2000/- per month. Hence she is capable to
maintain herself without depending upon anybody or
on myself. As such the very petition filed by the
petitioner is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
3. I further submit that I am a physically weak person

and earlier I was with met with an accident, for which
I have sustained fracture injury to my left leg. As such
I am not in a position to work in any where. As such I
have no income for my own. But I am depending upon
some body and by doing coolie I am getting Rs.30/-
per day. The said amount is not sufficient to maintain
myself. As such I am not in a position to give monthly
maintenance of Rs.3000/- to the petitioner. On the
other hand myself and petitioner son namely
Venkateshbabu doing electric contract work at
Bangalore for which he is getting Rs.8000/- per
month. The said Venkateshbabu is a capable person to
maintain petitioner and myself. As such the very
petition filed by the petitioner is liable to be dismissed
in lamine.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
4. I further submit that I am always ready and willing
to take back the petitioner to my matrimonial house
and I also undertake to provide all the amenities like
food, cloth and shelter and other legal requirements to
the petitioner.
Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble court

may be pleased to dismiss the petition filed by the
petitioner with exemplary cost in the interest of justice
and equity.

me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.LAKSHMI,
W/o Y.Ramesh,
D/o Choodappa,
2) MASTER.NANDA KISHORE,
S/o Y.Ramesh,
Aged about 5 years,
C/o Muniyappa,
Iggalur Village,
Chandapura Post,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.Y.RAMESH,
S/o Late Yellappa,
Residing at
C/o Krishnappa,
Opp: Kumar Electricals,
Near Police Quarters,
Mirza Road,
Anekal Town,
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

-2-


the legally wedded wife of respondent. The marriage
between the petitioner No.1 and respondent was
solemnized on 1/6/2001 at Sri.Manjunatha Swamy
Temple, Dharmasthala, as per the Hindu rites and
customs. To prove the same the petitioners are
herewith producing the Photograph, Xerox copy of
Ration Card for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble court
and marked as Document No.1 & 2.
4. The petitioners submits that subsequent to the

happily for a period of 1 ½ years at Channabasappa
Building, Anekal Town, Bangalore District. Out of the
wedlock one male child was born namely
Master.Nanda Kishore-petitioner No.2 to the petitioner
No.1 and respondent and subsequently the respondent
always giving unnecessary torture to the petitioner
No.1 and always the respondent use to come late night
to the house by drinking alcohol and on several times
the petitioner No.1 questioned the respondent with
regard to the same by that time the respondent used
to abuse the petitioner No.1 with filthy language and
so many times the respondent assaulted the
petitioner, but the petitioner No.1 tolerated all such
type of torture and acted as a dutiful wife and the
respondent also having habit taking alcohol daily, and
as such he demanded the petitioner No.1 to bring
more and more money from the parents house and so
many times
-3-
the petitioner No.1 also refused to bring the dowry
amount. Some times the petitioner No.1 taken dowry
amount from her parents house and same is handed
over to respondent also. But subsequently the
respondent assaulted the petitioner No.1 and deserted
the petitioners by kicked out from the matrimonial
house in the month of December-2002 and
subsequently the petitioner No.1 and 2 were living at
her parental house at Hosur.
5. The petitioners submits that on several time the

panchayathi was held between the petitioner No.1 and
respondent and their family members. Accordingly the
parents of the petitioner No.1 given Rs.50,000/- dowry
amount to the respondent and there after the
respondent taken back the petitioner No.1 and 2 to the
matrimonial house and they lived separately at
Bahadurpura. Where the petitioners and respondent
lived happily for a period of one year. Again the
respondent used to abuse the petitioner No.1 and also
so many time assaulted the petitioner No.1 with pin
pricks reasons and the respondent also demanded to
bring the dowry amount of Rs.20,000/- from her
parental house and the petitioner No.1 also expressed
her difficulties to bring the dowry, but even though the
petitioner No.1 approached her parents and brought
Rs.20,000/- from parents house and the same is given
to the respondent. Subsequently the respondent kept
quite for some days and about 1 year back, again that
on 23/11/2006 the respondent demanded the
petitioner No.1 to bring another dowry amount of
Rs.20,000/- from the parental house. When the
petitioner No.1 refused to bring the dowry amount
from her parental house, the respondent as usually by
drinking alcohol and assaulted the petitioners and
kicked out the petitioners and her son from the
matrimonial house. Now the petitioner No.1 and her
-4-
minor children namely Master.Nanda Kishore are
living separately at Iggalur Village, Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District.
6. The petitioners further submits that on several
occasions panchayathi was held between the petitioner
No.1 and respondent and their family members, but
the respondent not chosen take back the petitioners to
the matrimonial house. The petitioner No.1 parents
look after the petitioners.
7. The petitioners submits that now the petitioner No.2

is studying at Guru Vidya School, at Hosur as a LKG
Student. The petitioner No.1 admitted the petitioner
No.2 to School by obtaining hand loan from known
persons.
8. The petitioners further submit that the respondent

is a Physical Training Teacher working at St.Joseph
School, Anekal Town, since from beginning and also
having house property. The respondent is getting
Rs.5,000/- and also he is doing land develop business
for which he is getting Rs.10,000/- per month. In all
the respondent is earning Rs.15,000/- per month. As
such the respondent is a capable person to maintain
the petitioners by providing food, cloth, shelter,
medical expenses, School expenses and other legal
amenities.
9. The petitioner No.1 submit that the petitioner No.1

has no income for her own and she is depending upon
purely on her parents and the petitioners are not in a
position to look after themselves. Now the petitioners
are residing at Iggalur Village by taking rented house.
The petitioners are required Rs.5000/- per month for
their maintenance like food, cloth,
-5-
shelter, medical expenses, School expenses and other
legal amenities.
both the petitioners.

equity.
1.
2.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION

Anekal. Petitioner
No.1.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2007.
BETWEEN
1) Smt.Bharathi,
W/o Chandrashekar,
2) Master.C.Venkatesh,
S/o Chandrashekar,
Aged about 4 years,
Since minor represented by

her mother Smt.Bharathi

Vinayaka Badavane,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. ….
PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Chandrashekar,
S/o Channappa,
Residing at
Sundaraju Layout,
Behind A.K.Colony,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District.. ………
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

-2-


respondent and the 2nd petitioner the son of the
respondent. The 2nd petitioner is the minor represented
by the 1st petitioner who is the mother and legal
guardian, next friend of minor care and custody of her.
The petitioners having neglected by the respondent
and failed to provide the livelihood of the petitioners
which are daily essential requirements such as
clothing shelter, food medical expenses and other
expenses and in turn the petitioners deserted the
petitioners. And as such the petitioners approached
this Hon’ble court seeking the monthly maintenance.
After issue of notice to the respondent, the respondent
appeared through his counsel and failed to file
objections to the main petition. After petitioner
evidence and after hearing on main petition, this
Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass an order on merits
by allowing the petition directing the respondent to
pay the monthly maintenance a sum of Rs.1000/-
each of the petitioners. As per the orders passed by the
Court and petitioners are entitled to get a sum of
Rs.1000/- each for a month from the date of filing the
petitioner, by its order dated:23/4/2007.
-3-
well awared of the orders passed by this Hon’’ble Court
and even though failed to pay the maintenance to the
maintenance, and as such the petitioners sustained


an order/issue Fine Leavy Warrant against the
respondent for amount of Rs.22000/- for the period
from 7-12-2005 to 7-11-2006 and directing him to pay
the maintenance amount in future dates and when
fails due in the circumstances and to award the costs
of the petition and for such other relief or reliefs as
this Hon’ble Court deems fit to be grant under the
and equity.
1.
2.
Petitioners.
-4-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Anekal.
Date: Petitioners.

C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SHANTHAMMA,
W/o Thimmarayappa,
2) KUM.ASHA,
D/o Thimmarayappa,

M.Medihalli Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Thimmarayappa,
S/o Muniyappa,
Residing at
Karpur Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Sri.H.Srinivas, First Floor, Yellappa Building, Near
Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road, Anekal, Bangalore-
562106.
-2-
3. The petitioners submit that 1 st petitioner is the

legally wedded wife of the respondent, the marriage
has been solemnized under the Hindu rights and
customs Act, and thereby petitioner No.2 was born to
the 1st petitioner and respondent. Thereafter the
respondent started to ill-treat and acted upon
inhumanly and given all sorts of pinprick trouble to
the petitioner and also demanded the petitioner No.1
to bring the dowry from her parental house. There
after the respondent thrown out the petitioners from
the matrimonial house and then the petitioners lived
separately at the address furnished in the cause title.
The petitioners are not in a position to eak out their
livelihood and bread, and as such the petitioners have
filed Criminal Mis.No.93/93, on the file of Hon’ble
Prl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, at Anekal for
maintenance and in the said case, the respondent
appeared before the Court through his counsel and
filed the detailed objections for the said petition. After
contesting the proceedings, the Hon’ble Prl.Civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Anekal, passed an order by
granting the maintenance for a sum of Rs.300/- to the
1st petitioner and Rs.250/- to the 2nd petitioner and the
said order is in force.
4. The respondent is very well aware of the orders

passed by the Court and even though the respondent
is failed to pay the maintenance amount from
4/6/2008 to 3/5/2009 and now the respondent is
liable to pay a sum of Rs.6050/- (Rupees Six
Thousand Fifty Only) as per the orders passed by this
Hon’ble Court. When the respondent failed to pay the
-3-
said maintenance amount to the petitioners, as such
the petitioners filed the present petition before this
Hon’ble Court for the recovery of the maintenance
amount from the respondent. In the said fact and
circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court be
pleased to pass the order directing the respondent to
pay the maintenance amount of Rs.6050/- (Rupees Six
Thousand Fifty Only) from 4/6/2008 to 3/5/2009, to
the petitioners with future maintenance to the
petitioners. Hence this petition.

prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass an
order directing the respondent to pay the maintenance
from 4/6/2008 to 3/5/2009 a sum of Rs.6050/-
(Rupees Six Thousand Fifty Only) and in the case the
respondent failed to pay the said maintenance
amount, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to detain the
respondent in Civil Prison and to award the costs of
the case, and for such other relief or reliefs as this
Hon’ble Court be pleased to deems fit to be grant
under the circumstances of the case, in the interest of
justice equity and law.
1.
2.

Petitioners.
-4-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:
C.Mis.No.22/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Rathnamma & others. …….

PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.AnandKumar. ………
RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Rathnamma, W/o AnandKumar, aged about

27 years, residing at C/o Krishnappa, No.75, Bayasab
Layout, New Pet, (Behind KEB), Anekal Town,
Bangalore Dstrict, do hereby state on oath as follows:-

case, the petitioner No.2 is my sons and petitioner
No.3 is my daughter. I know the facts and
circumstances of the case. Hence I am swearing this
affidavit.
2. I submit that I am the legally wedded wife of the

respondent. The marriage between myself and the
respondent was solemnized on 8/4/1998 at Aryavysya
Vasavi Kalyana Mantapa at Thali Village, Denkanikote
Taluk. After marriage between myself and respondent
lived happily at Javalagere village, Denkanikote Taluk.
Out of the wedlock one male child namely
Master.Manjunath born at Javalagere village and
subsequently myself and my sons along with the
respondent were shifted to my parental house at
Gumlapura village. Out
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
of the wedlock another female child was also born
namely Kum.Yashoda. When such being the facts and
circumstances, after born of female child namely
Kum.Yashoda, the respondent turned the mind and
treated me with cruel manner. On several times I have
resisted the cruel manner of the respondent. One day
without informing to myself, the respondent ran away
from my parental house by taking jewels, clothes and
other valuable things to Thali village.
3. I further submit that myself and my parents also

approached the respondent and requested to rejoin
me. As the respondent ran away from the parental
house about 3 years back. Recently I came to know
that the respondent has married for second time with
Smt.Kanthamma of Chikka-Ubbanur of Krishnagiri
District and myself and petitioner No.1 and 2 are living
separately at Gumalpura by doing coolie.
4. I further submit that now myself and my son and

daughter are living separately from the date of
deserted of the respondent. My parents are very poor
and helpless person having no income for them and
they are not in a position to maintain myself and my
son and my daughter. The petitioner No.2 namely
Master.Manjunath, aged about 8 years studying at 3 rd
Standard and Kum.Yashoda is aged about 4 years and
newly admitted to School at Gumalapura. I have
obtained hand loan from different persons and
admitted the petitioner No.2 and 3 to school. Now I am
looking after the petitioner No.2 and 3.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
5. I further submit that I am not in a position to
maintain myself and also maintain petitioner No.2 and
3. I am doing coolie in which I am not in a position to
maintain myself and my children. The respondent is
doing bangle business at Thali, in which the
respondent have got monthly income of Rs.10,000/-
and also doing other land business, in which the
respondent getting monthly income of Rs.5000/-. As
such the respondent is capable to maintain myself and
my children by providing legal amenities like food,
cloth, shelter and medical expenses and other school
expenses.
6. I further submit that I have required a monthly

maintenance amount of Rs.1000/- each for my legal
amenities like food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses,
school expenses and other legal expenses. The
respondent is capable to pay monthly maintenance
amount of Rs.1000/- each in all Rs.3000/- per month
to myself, my son and my daughter.

equity.
Advocate. Sworn to
before me.
Anekal.
Date:26/9/2007.
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No.148/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Geetha. ……. PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Ravi. ..…… RESPONDENT


2. The Respondent submits that the averments made

in para 2 of the petition that she is the legally wedded
wife of the respondent. The marriage between the
petitioner and the respondent was performed on
16/4/2000 at Munireddy Kalyana Mantapa,
Kudlugate, Bangalore. After the marriage the petitioner
and the respondent were lived together at Hebbagodi
Village as a husband and wife for a period of one year.
At the time of marriage the father of the petitioner had
paid Rs.1,00,000/- and fifteen (15) Sovereign of Gold
to the respondent as a dowry on the demand of the
respondent. After one year the respondent started
demanding further dowry amount from the petitioner.
Everyday in the night he used to come to house by
consuming alcohol and he used to demand the
petitioner to bring further dowry amount from
-2-
her parents. Since the petitioner was not agreeing to
bring the further amount of dowry, he used to give all
sorts of physical torture and also mental torture to the
petitioner. And on so many occasions the petitioner
brought her parents and they have also advised the
respondent to have peacefully. In spite of it the
respondent continue to give all sorts of harassment to
the petitioner is hereby denied as false and incorrect,
except admitting the relationship between the
petitioner and respondent.

in para 3 of the petition that on 23/10/2003 the
respondent, his mother and his brother-in-laws came
near the garment factory where she was working and
created nuisance in the garment factory and all of
them have assaulted the petitioner in the factory itself
demanding the dowry amount. Since the respondent
used to create nuisance at the garment factory
repeatedly the management of the Garment factory
had removed the petitioner from the service, now
because of the respondent the petitioner has become
unemployed. As such the petitioner had lodged a
complaint on 9/11/2003 and the same is registered
against the respondent under Sec.498(A) of IPC read
with Section 3 and 4 of D.P.Act. And the said crime is
pending on the file of the Addl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and
JMFC, Anekal in C.C.No.56/2005 is hereby denied as
false and incorrect, but the register of Case in
C.C.No.56/2005 before this Hon’ble Court is true and
correct and the case is false case with the instigation
of her parents. In fact the C.C.No.56/2005 contested
by the petitioner and his family finally the said case
was ended in acquittal.
-3-
in para 4 of the petition that the petitioner lodged the
complaint against the respondent on 9/11/2003.
Immediately after three days that is on 12/11/2003
the respondent physically necked out the petitioner
from the house. And in spite of repeated requests the
respondent had not allowed the petitioner to entered
the house. As such since from that day the petitioner
took the shelter in the house of her father. Now the
petitioner is not having any source of income of her
own. And the father of the petitioner is also a poor
person, he is also not having any income of his own.
As such the father of the petitioner also not in a
position to maintain the petitioner. And further from a
month of November-2003 the respondent has not paid
any thing to the petitioner towards her maintenance.
On the other hand the respondent had deserted the
life of the petitioner is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

in para 5 of the petition that she learnt from the
reliable source that, he had developed some illegal
intimacy with some other woman at Hebbagodi Village.
As such he has no interest with the petitioner. And
under the said circumstances the petitioner also is not
interested to live with the respondent bearing all his
tortures. As such the petitioner has decided to live
separately from the respondent is hereby denied as

in para 6 of the petition that the respondent is working
in a factory and he is getting a salary of Rs.8000/-
p.m. and it is a private factory. And further the
respondent is running a provision store at Hebbagodi
Village and apart from that the respondent is doing the
land business as a broker. As such from the
-4-
provision store business and from the broker
business, the respondent is getting a minimum
amount of Rs.25,000/- per month is hereby denied as

in para 7 of the petition that the petitioner has no
income of her own. And she has to live in rented
house. As such for payment of rent and her separate
maintenance, for her food, clothing etc., she needs
minimum amount of Rs.8000/- per month. And the
respondent is capable of paying the same is hereby
denied as false and incorrect.
8. The Respondent respectfully submits that the father

of the petitioner is nothing but the blood relative of the
respondent and in fact the father of the petitioner is
nothing but brother of the respondent mother. Since
respondent and petitioner are close blood relative and
as such the marriage between the petitioner and
respondent was conducted by simple without
expending more and more amount. In fact the
respondent and his family members have spent the
marriage expenses and other expenses while at the
time of marriage.
9. The Respondent further submits that in fact during

the pendency of the case in C.C.No.56/2005 on the
advise of the elder persons and as per the court
direction, the petitioner also again rejoined with
respondent, but in fact the again the petitioner turned
her mind and lodged complaint before the Hebbagodi
Police Station and in fact the Hebbagodi Police have
registered the case and submitted the charge sheet in
C.C.No.440/2007 against this respondent and other
family members, the said case is also ended with
acquittal.
-5-
10. The Respondent further submits that only with an
intention to harass the respondent and also give
trouble to the respondent and his family members and
also to give mental torture to this respondent, this
petitioner has filed the present petition seeking
maintenance from the respondent.
11. The Respondent further submits that earlier the
petitioner was working at Sona Garments Factory at
Konappanagrahara Village, Bangalore and she was
getting income in the factory. The said facts is also
admitted by the petitioner in the evidence given by the
petitioner in C.C.No.56/2005 and in
C.C.No.440/2007. In fact the father of the petitioner
also admitted that she was working in a factory during
the course of cross-examination in C.C.No.56/2005
and C.C.No.440/2007. Not only these cases the father
of the petitioner also issued a Cheque in favour of
brother of the respondent namely Sri.H.N.Prakash and
in fact the said cheque was bounced and immediately
Sri.H.N.Prakash filed complaint before the 12 th
Addl.Chief Matropolitan Magistrate at Bangalore City
in C.C.No.3712/2004 against the father of the
petitioner, but the said case was acquitted due to
some reason.
12. The Respondent further submits that recently the

petitioner resigned the job in the above said factory
and subsequently she was joined to Narayana
Hrudulaya Hospital at Huskur Branch, Anekal Taluk.
Now she is doing to work as a Nurse and she is getting
around Rs.7000/- per month. She is a capable to
maintain her self out of the income arrived in the
above said work. As such the question of seeking
maintenance from the respondent does not arise at all.
-6-
13. The Respondent further submits that the
respondent does not have any work and he is in
unemployed person. The respondent have no any own
income. The Respondent is depending upon income of
his father and brother. In fact his father and brother
are doing coolie. As such the say of the petitioner that
the respondent working in a factory for which he is
getting Rs.8000/- per month and the respondent
running provision store for which he is getting income
amount of Rs.25,000/- are false and incorrect and no
document is produced by the petitioner to show that
the respondent is working in the above said factory.

petitioner.


Respondent.
VERIFICATION
Anekal.
Respondent.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2008.
BETWEEN
SMT.UMA,
W/o Ramesh,
Residing at
Adigarakallahalli Village,
Sarjapura Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
AND
SRI.RAMESH,
S/o Late Gundappa,
Residing at
Adigarakallahalli Village,
Sarjapura Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.

-2-
3. The petitioners submit that the petitioner is the
legally wedded wife of the respondent. The marriage
between the petitioner and the respondent was
solemnized on 12/11/2006 at Chikkathirupathi
Venkataramana Swamy Temple, Malur Taluk, Kolar
District. After marriage between the petitioner and
respondent lived happily at Adigarakallahalli Village,
Sarjapura Hobli for a period of Six month. Out of the
wedlock Female child namely Kum.Yashvini and the
petitioner is now pregnant. Subsequently the
respondent turned the mind and treated the petitioner
with cruel manner by demanding dowry and finally the
respondent deserted the petitioner and also given ill-
treatment continuously under the influence of
alcoholic drinks. Finally the petitioner lodged the
complaint before the Jurisdictional Police for the
offence punishable U/s.498(A) of IPC in
Cr.No.104/2008. The respondent has obtained the
anticipatory bail in Crl.Mis.No.676/2008 before the
Hon’ble Prl.District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore
Rural District, where in the Hon’ble Prl.District and
Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore
has granted the bail and directed the respondent to
deposit a sum of Rs.2000/- per month to the
petitioner by way of Demand Draft or by way of
depositing it before this Hon’ble Court. As per the
orders of Prl.District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore
Rural District, Bangalore the respondent has not
deposit the amount. Hence this petition.
-3-
for the month of June-2008 a sum of Rs.2000/-
(Rupees Two Thousand Only) and in the case the
VERIFICATION

Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2008.
BETWEEN
SMT.YELLAMMA @ AMMAIAH,
W/o M.Venkataramaiah @ Abraham,
Residing at
Menasiganahalli Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
AND
SRI.M.VENKATARAMAIAH @ ABRAHAM,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Retired Assistant Director
Vetrinary Department,
Residing at
“Abbumane”, SoppuGudde,
Near Fish Market,
Thirthahalli Town,
Shimoga District. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

Dr.Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road, Anekal, Bangalore-
562106.
-2-


Respondent. The marriage between the petitioner and
respondent was solomnised on 20/4/1961 at
Menasiganahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District, according to the Hindu Rites and
Customs.
4. The petitioner further submits that earlier the

respondent married with one Smt.Padmavathi. Out of
the wedlock between Smt.Padmavathi and respondent
one male child was born namely Sri.V.Rajendra.
Subsequent to the death of Smt.Padmavathi,
immediately the respondent married with the
petitioner. In fact before marriage the parents of this
petitioner was gifted one property bearing Sy.No.142 to
144 situated at Kalkondapalli Village, Hosur Taluk,
Krishnagiri District, in favour of the respondent and
the petitioner, the said Gift made by way of sale deed
in favour of the respondent and petitioner.
5. The petitioner further submits that subsequent to
the marriage the petitioner and respondent lived
happily upto 1991. Out of the wedlock between the
petitioner and respondent one male child born namely
Sri.V.Mallesh.

earlier doing work as Assistant Director at Vetrinary
Department in various places. Recently he was retired
from the above said Department.
-3-
7. The petitioner further submits that subsequent to

the 1991, the respondent picked a quarrel with the
petitioner and deserted the petitioner. Since from
1991, the petitioner leaving separately at
Menasigenahalli Village without any support. The
petitioner leaving separately and she is suffering
without food and shelter.
8. The petitioner further submits that in fact in the

year 1990, the respondent sold the above said
properties in favour of some third persons without
giving money to the petitioner. In fact on demand of
the respondent, this petitioner also put signature on
the sale deed in respect of the above said property, but
no benefit or profit or share allotted to this petitioner.
9. The petitioner submits that it is the bound duty of

the respondent to maintain the petitioner by providing
the food, cloth, shelter and medical aid and other legal
amenities to the petitioner. The petitioner has to be
sufficient means to maintain her. Since the respondent
being the retired Government official and he is drawing
pension monthly salary amount of Rs.10,000/-. The
petitioner being poor, she cannot maintain herself for
a long time. The petitioner has no source of income to
lead her life. As the position of the petitioner has
-4-
10. The petitioner submits that the respondent having

landed properties at Menasigenahalli Village and as
well as surroundings of Thirthahalli, for which the
respondent have got income amount of Rs.10,000/-
per month. The respondent as purpose fully neglected
the petitioner to maintain. The respondent is a capable
to give maintenance to the petitioner.
11. The petitioner submits that the petitioner requires

a monthly maintenance of Rs.5000/- for her

the petitioner.
13. The petitioner is herewith producing the

Photographs and Genealogical tree issued by the
Vanakanahalli panchayath for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble Court.
-5-
VERIFICATION

Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No.40/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Nanjamma and others. …….

PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Venkataswamy. ..……
RESPONDENT
1. Certified copy of the Entire Order sheet in

O.S.No.22/07 on the file of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and
JMFC, Anekal.
2. Certified copy of the Encumbrance Certificate.
3. Certified copy of the sale deed dated:18/2/08.

Anekal. Advocate for petitioners.
Date: 15/10/2008.

C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RAMAMANI,
W/o Krishnamurthy,
2) KUM.MAMATHA,
D/o Krishnamurthy,
3) MASTER.VENUGOPAL,
S/o Krishnamurthy,
No.2 and 3 are minors

Represented by their
Mother Smt.Ramamani
As legal and natural guardian.
All are residing at

Choodenahalli Village,
Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
-2-
petitioner may also be served through their counsel
562106.


respondent and the 2nd petitioner and 3rd petitioners
are the daughter and son of the respondent. The 2 nd
and 3rd petitioners are the minors represented by the
1st petitioner who is the mother and legal guardian,
next friend of minors care and custody of their. The
petitioners having neglected by the respondent and
failed to provide the livelihood of the petitioners which
are daily essential requirements such as clothing
shelter, food medical expenses and other expenses and
in turn the petitioners deserted the petitioners. And as
such the petitioners approached this Hon’ble court
seeking the monthly maintenance. After issue of notice
to the respondent, the respondent appeared through
his counsel and failed to file objections to the main
petition. After petitioner evidence and after hearing on
main petition, this Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass
an order on merits by allowing the petition directing
the respondent to pay the monthly maintenance a sum
of Rs.700/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.500/- each to
the petitioner No.2 and 3 from the date of this petition.
As per the orders passed by the Court and petitioners
are entitled to get a sum of Rs.700/- to the 1st
petitioner and Rs.500/- each to petitioner No.2 and 3
for a
-3-
month from the date of filing the petitioner, by its
order dated:16/9/2004.

sum of Rs.20,400/- for the period from 25-1-2008 to
24-1-2009 with costs in the circumstances stated
above.

respondent for amount of Rs.20,400/- for the period
and equity.
-4-
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.DEVIKA,
W/o Venkatesh @ Yellappa,
D/o Late Nagarappa,
Now residing at
C/o Smt.Chandramma,
Near Vidhatha School,
Anekal Town,
PETITIONER
AND
SRI.VENKATESH @ YELLAPPA,
S/o Krishnappa,
Residing at
Dyavappana Gudi Village and post,
Jagamakote Hobli,
Sidhlaghatta Taluk,
Chikkaballapura District. ………
RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

562106.

-2-
3. The petitioner submits that the petitioner is the
on 8/10/2004 at Dyavappa Swamy Temple, Dyavappa
Gudi Village, Sidhalaghatta Taluk, as per the Hindu
rites and customs. At the time of marriage the
petitioners mother and brother have given a dowry
amount of Rs.20,000/- to the respondent, Neck chain,
One Watch and costliest clothes as per the demand
made by the respondent and his family members. The
mother and brother of the petitioner given two paid ear
rings, one pair hangings and sarees to petitioner as
per the demands made by the respondent and his
family members.

for a period of 2 years at Dyavappana Gudi Village,
Sidlaghatta Taluk. Out of the wedlock one male child
was born namely Master.Karthik @ Murali to the
petitioner and respondent and subsequently the
petitioner. Along with respondent, the respondent
mother, father and two sisters were living together at
Dyavappana Gudi Village, Sidlaghatta Taluk. As per
the ill-advice of respondent’s father, mother and
sisters, the respondent demanding dowry to petitioner
and also giving physical and mental torture to the
petitioner. So many times the petitioner refused to
bring the dowry amount, since the parents of the
petitioner are poor. The petitioner tolerated all types of
torture, physical and mental agony from the
respondent and his family members. Finally in the
month of May-2008, the respondent and his family
members picked quarrel with petitioner and demanded
to bring dowry, by that time the petitioner refused to
bring dowry. As such the respondent and his family
members have kicked out the petitioner from the
-3-
matrimonial house by taking her child namely
Master.Karthik @ Murali forcibily. The boy is aged
about 3-4 years and the child is required mother’s love
and care of the mother and even though without
showing the mercy towards the petitioner and as well
her child, the respondent and his family members
kicked out the petitioner from the matrimonial house.
Now the child namely Master.Karthik @ Murali is in
the custody of respondent.
5. The petitioner submits that on several time the

panchayathi was held between the petitioner and
respondent and their family members. Even though
the respondent not listen the advise of the
panchayathdars and not taken back the petitioner to
the matrimonial house and the respondent is also
allowed to see her child. The petitioner acted as a
dutiful wife and on the other hand respondent failed
to act as a dutiful husband. The petitioner parents are
very poor persons and they are not in a position to

working as a Driver in a private vehicle for which the
respondent is getting Rs.6,000/- per month. The
respondent is also doing land development business,
for which the respondent is earning Rs.10,000/- per
month. The Respondent is also having Cows, sheeps in
the house for which the respondent is having income
of Rs.5000/-. The respondent is having landed
properties in which the respondent raising ragi and
other crops in the land, for which the respondent is
earning Rs.7,500/- per year and further the
respondent is also having own house at above said
village. In all the respondent is earning more than
Rs.21,000/- per month. As such the respondent is a
capable person to
-4-
maintain the petitioner by providing food, cloth,
shelter, medical expenses and other legal amenities.
9. The petitioner submit that the petitioner has no

income for her own and nobody taking care about the
petitioner. The petitioner is required Rs.5000/- per
month for her maintenance like food, cloth, shelter,
medical expenses and other legal amenities.

the petitioner.

equity.
VERIFICATION

Anekal. Petitioner
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.NANJAMMA,
W/o Venkataswamy,
2) KUM.SWETHA,
D/o Venkataswamy,
3) MASTER.AJITHKUMAR,
S/o Venkataswamy,
Since Petitioners No.2 and 3 are minors

SMT.NANJAMMA as the legal and
natural guardian,
All are residing at

YeniMuchandra Village,
Denkanikote Taluk,
Krishnagiri District. ……
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.VENKATASWAMY,
S/o Late Venkataramanappa,
R/at Vaddarapalya, Icchangur Village,
Yadavanahalli Post,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District.
(Attibele Police Jurisdiction) ………

RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
The petitioners above named beg to state as follows:-
-2-
562106.

services of court notice and summons from this

his counsel and filed objections to the main petition.
After petitioner evidence and after hearing on main
petition, this Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass an
order on merits by allowing the petition directing the
respondent to pay the monthly maintenance a sum of
Rs.2000/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.1000/- each to
the petitioner No.2 and 3 from the date of the order
passed on 20/1/2009. As per the orders passed by the
Court and petitioners are entitled to get a sum of
Rs.2000/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.1000/- each to
-3-
petitioner No.2 and 3 for a month from the date of
4.The petitioners submit that the respondent is well


and equity.
-4-
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.NETHRAVATHI,
W/o M.Venkatesh,
2) MASTER.AKASH,
S/o M.Venkatesh,
Aged about 3 years,
3) KUM.CHANDRIKA @ BINDHU,
D/o M.Venkatesh,
Aged about 5 months,
All are residing at

Bhovi Colony,
Anekal Town,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.M.VENKATESH,
S/o Muniyappa,
Residing at
No.262, 3rd Cross,
RajgopalNagar,
Peenya 2nd stage,
RESPONDENT
PROCEDURE.

562106.
-2-

solemnized on 28/4/2003 at Ravisutha Kalyana
Mantapa, Bannerghatta Road, Anekal Town, as per the
Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage the
petitioner No.1 father has given a dowry amount of
Rs.20,000/- to the respondent, Neck chain, One
Watch and costliest clothes as per the demand made
by the respondent and his family members. The father
of the petitioner No.1 given two pair ear rings, one pair
hangings and sarees to petitioner as per the demands
made by the respondent and his family members.

happily for a period of 1 year at Bangalore.
Subsequently he has demanded to bring the dowry
amount and jewels from the parents of the petitioner
No.1 and when the petitioner No.1 refused to bring the
same the respondent treated her as cruely. When she
was pregnant, by that time the respondent given
torture to the petitioner No.1 and as such one male
child is born and the said child was dead. During the
year July-2005, the respondent assaulted the
petitioner No.1 and kicked out from Matrimonial
house directing her to bring the dowry. In fact she was
admitted to the hospital for having sustained the
injuries on her body at Anekal. Subsequently there
was a Panchayath held and as per the panchayathdar
advice, the respondent taken back the petitioner No.1
to his matrimonial house and some time they are lived
happily where one male
-3-
child was born on 27/1/2007 namely Master.Akash
who is the petitioner No.2 herein. Subsequently when
she was 3 months pregnant for second child, once
again the respondent picked quarrel and demanded to
bring the dowry amount from her parental house,
when she refused to bring the same again the
respondent assaulted the petitioner No.1 physically
and given torture mentally and kicked out the
petitioner No.1 and 2 from the matrimonial house.
From that day till today the petitioner No.1 is residing
at her parental house. The second female child was
also born on 3/11/2008 namely Kum.Chandrika @
Bindhu, even though the respondent has no courtesy
to see the petitioners No.1 to 3. The petitioners are
herewith producing the Original Wedding Invitation,
Wound Certificate, Birth Certificate of petitioners No.2
and 3 for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court and
marked as Document No.1 to 4.

panchayathi was held between the petitioner No.1 and
the respondent not listen the advice of the
panchayathdars and not taken back the petitioners to
the matrimonial house. The petitioner No.1 acted as a
dutiful wife and on the other hand respondent failed to
act as a dutiful husband. The petitioner No.1 parents
look after the petitioners. The petitioner No.1 parents
have spent heavy amount for hospital and for
maternity expenses and also for having conducted
naming ceremony and other functions by obtaining the
loan from the different persons.
-4-
working as a labourer at Departmental store at
Bangalore for which the respondent is getting
Rs.5,000/- per month. The respondent is also having
rented houses, for which the respondent is earning
Rs.15,000/- per month. In all the respondent is
earning more than Rs.20,000/- per month. As such
petitioners by providing food, cloth, shelter, medical
expenses and other legal amenities.
9. The petitioners submit that the petitioners have no

income for their own and nobody taking care about the
petitioners. The petitioners are required Rs.5000/- per
month for their maintenance like food, cloth, shelter,

the petitioner.
equity.
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
-5-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Anekal. Petitioners
Date:
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN)
C.Mis.No.142/2008.
BETWEEN
Smt.Yellamma @ Ammaiah …….

PETITIONER
AND
Sri.M.Venkataramaiah @ Abraham. ………

RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER BY WAY OF

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Yellamma @ Ammaiah, W/o
M.Venkataramaiah @ Abraham, aged about 60 years,
residing at Menasiganahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby state on
oath as follows:-
1. I submit that I am the petitioner in the above case. I

know the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence I
am swearing to this affidavit.
2. I submit that I am the legally Wedded wife of

Respondent. The marriage between myself and
Menasiganahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District, according to the Hindu Rites and
Customs.
3. I submit that earlier the respondent married with

one Smt.Padmavathi. Out of the wedlock between
Smt.Padmavathi and respondent one male child was
born namely Sri.V.Rajendra. Subsequent to the death
of Smt.Padmavathi, immediately the respondent
married with
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
me. In fact before marriage my parents were gifted one
property bearing Sy.No.142 to 144 situated at
Kalkondapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri
District, in my favour and respondent, the said Gift
made by way of sale deed in my and as well as in
favour of the respondent.
4. I further submit that subsequent to the marriage

myself and respondent lived happily up to 1991. Out
of the wedlock between myself and respondent one
male child born namely Sri.V.Mallesh.
5. I further submit that the respondent earlier doing

work as Assistant Director at Vetrinary Department in
various places. Recently he was retired from the above
said Department.
6. I further submit that subsequent to the 1991, the

respondent picked a quarrel with me and deserted me.
Since from 1991, I am living separately at
Menasigenahalli Village without any support. I am
living separately and I am suffering without food and
shelter.
7. I further submit that in fact in the year 1990, the

respondent sold the above said properties in favour of
some third persons without giving money to me. In
fact on demand of the respondent, I have also put
signature on the sale deed in respect of the above said
property, but no benefit or profit or share allotted to
me.
8. I further submit that it is the bound duty of the

respondent to maintain me by providing the food,
cloth, shelter and medical aid and other legal
amenities to me. I have to be
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
sufficient means to maintain me. Since the respondent
being the retired Government official and he is drawing
pension monthly salary amount of Rs.10,000/-. I
being poor, I cannot maintain myself for a long time. I
have no source of income to lead my life. As the
position of myself has become too ugly financially this
maintenance.
9. I further submit that the respondent having landed

properties at Menasigenahalli Village and as well as
surroundings of Thirthahalli, for which the respondent
have got income amount of Rs.10,000/- per month.
The respondent as purpose fully neglected me to
maintenance to me.
10. I further submit that I require a monthly

maintenance of Rs.5000/- for my maintenance of food,
cloth and shelter.
Wherefore, I humbly pray that this Hon’ble Court

amount of Rs.5000/- per month to myself in the above
Advocate. Sworn to
before me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.N.LAKSHMI,
W/o D.Ravi @ Ravikumar,
2) MASTER.ABHISHEK,
S/o D.Ravi @ Ravikumar,
Aged about 4 years,

Mahanthalingapura Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.D.RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR,
S/o DoddaMuniyappa,
Residing at
Mahanthalingapura Village,
Kallabalu Post,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.


solemnized on 10/12/2003 at Sri.Champakadama
Swamy Temple, Bannerghatta Village, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District, as per the Hindu rites and
customs. At the time of marriage the petitioner No.1
father has given a dowry amount of Rs.10,000/- and
One Watch and one Ring as per the demand made by
the respondent and his family members. The father of
the petitioner No.1 given One pair ear rings, one pair
hangings and sarees to petitioner as per the demands
made by the respondent and his family members.

happily for a period of 1 year at Mahanthalingapura
Village. Subsequently he has demanded to bring the
dowry amount and jewels from the parents of the
petitioner No.1 and when the petitioner No.1 refused
to bring the same the respondent treated her as
cruely. When she was pregnant, by that time the
respondent given torture to the petitioner No.1 and
subsequently the respondent sent her to parental
house for delivery and that on 21/2/2005 the
petitioner No.1 gave birth to male child at Y.K.Hospital
at Jigani. The petitioner No.1 is herewith producing
the Photographs, Xerox copy of the Birth Certificate for
the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court and marked as
Document No.1 to _________. Even after gave birth
the respondent come to see his child. After few months
the respondent never taken back the petitioner No.1
and her child
-3-
to his matrimonial house. Several Panchayath and
request made by the petitioner No.1 and her parents
become vain. Since from above said period the
petitioner is living at her parental house. The
petitioner No.1 submits that the petitioner No.1 also
came to know that again the respondent married with
Lavanya without consent and knowledge of this
petitioner No.1. Now the respondent and Lavanya have
got one female child who gave birth on 1/3/2009. The
petitioner No.1 is herewith producing the Xerox copy of
the Birth Certificate for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble Court and marked as Document No._____.
5. The petitioner No.1 submits that for mental and

physical torture committed by the respondent, the
petitioner No.1 also lodged complaint before the
Bannerghatta Police on 31/8/2008. In fact the
Bannerghatta Police have also registered the case in
Cr.No.218/2008 for the offence punishable U.s,498(A)
and 506 IPC. The petitioner No.1 is herewith
producing the Certified copy of the FIR, Complaint and
Charge sheet for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court
and marked as Document No._______. Several times
the petitioner No.1 and her parents demanded the
respondent to take the petitioner No.1 to his house
and even though he refused to take back the petitioner
No.1 and his child to his matrimonial house. Now the
petitioner No.2 is joined to Anganawadi School.

Owner and Driver of T.T. Vehicle and the said vehicle
is hire to company, for which the respondent has got
income of Rs.20,000/- and the respondent is running
Provision Store at Mahanthalingapura Village and the
respondent also got landed property at
Mahanthalingapura Village. The
-4-
Respondent has got house and site at
Mahanthalingapura Village. The respondent has got
Rs.10,000/- per month from the above said properties.
In all the respondent is earning more than
capable person to maintain the petitioners by
providing food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses and
other legal amenities.
7. The petitioner No.1 submit that the petitioners have
no income for their own and nobody taking care about
the petitioners. The petitioners are required Rs.5000/-
per month for their maintenance like food, cloth,
shelter, medical expenses and other legal amenities.

the petitioner.

equity.
1.
2.

Petitioners.
-5-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Anekal. Petitioners
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RADHAMMA,
W/o C.Gopala,
2) MASTER.SHARATHKUMAR,
S/o C.Gopala,
3) KUM.ROOPASHREE,
D/o C.Gopala,
Aged about 8 years,
Since 2 and 3 being minors

Represented by her mother,
Smt.Radhamma as legal
And natural guardian.
All are residing at

Sakalavara Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.C.GOPAL,
S/o Chinnappa,
Residing at
Ward No.64,
4th Cross, Krishnappa Garden,
Madiwala,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Sri.H.Srinivas, First Floor,
-2-

solemnized on 4/3/1993 before the Registrar of
Marriage, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. At the
time of marriage the petitioner No.1 father has given a
dowry amount of Rs.50,000/- cash as per the demand
made by the respondent and his family members and
also given some Jewels to the petitioner No.1 and
respondent.
4. The petitioners submit that subsequent to the

happily for a period of 3 years at Sakalavara Village,
Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. Out of
the wed lock the petitioner No.2 and 3 were born.
5. The petitioners submit that subsequent to the born

of petitioner No.2 and 3, the respondent, his father,
his brother, sister-in-law were given mental and
physical torture to the petitioner No.1 and also
demanded for further dowry amount from the
petitioner No.1. The Respondent and his father and
mother also threatened the petitioner No.1, that if the
petitioner No.1 not bring the amount from the parental
house, the respondent is going to marry second time
with another girl. Even though the petitioner No.1
tolerated all the tortures given by the respondent and
his family members. Finally about 1 year back, the
respondent not turned up to see the
-3-
petitioners and neglected the petitioners by providing
legal amenities like food, cloth, shelter and medical
expenses and educational expenses to petitioner No.2
and 3. The Respondent abscond without intimating to
the petitioner No.1. After thorough search the
petitioner No.1 came to know that he was residing at
Madiwala, Bangalore with another lady and after due
enquiry, the petitioner No.1 came to know that the
respondent married for second time with a lady called
namely Ammu. The petitioner No.1 also questioned
with regard to the same, but the respondent and his
family members threatened to the life of petitioner
No.1. That on 20/10/2008 the petitioner No.1 escaped
from the clutches from the hands of the respondent
and his family members, since they are going to finish
the petitioner No.1 by pouring kerosene. Subsequently
the petitioner No.1 also lodged complaint before the
Bannerghatta Police, Anekal Taluk and in fact the
Bannerghatta Police registered FIR vide
Cr.No.297/2008 for the offence punishable
U/s.498(A), 506, 120(B) r/w 149 of IPC. The
petitioners are herewith producing the Xerox copy of
the marriage Certificate, Xerox copy of the FIR and
Complaint, Xerox copy of the Voter’s identity card and
Ration card for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court
and marked as Document No.1 to 5.

studying in 9th Standard at Government School,
Gottigere and Petitioner No.3 is studying in 3rd
Standard at Government School, Sakalavara Village,
Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District.
-4-
7. The petitioner No.1 submits that on several times
the petitioner No.1 and her parents demanded the
respondent to take the petitioner No.1 to his house
and even though he refused to take back the petitioner
No.1 and his child to his matrimonial house.
8. The petitioners further submit that the respondent

is working in a Factory at Jigani Industrial Area, for
which the respondent has got income of Rs.10,000/-
and the respondent and the respondent also got
landed property at Sakalavara. The Respondent has
got house and site at Sakalavara Village. The
respondent has got Rs.10,000/- per month from the
above said properties. In all the respondent is earning
more than Rs.20,000/- per month. As such the
petitioners by providing food, cloth, shelter, medical
9. The petitioner No.1 submits that the petitioners

have no income for their own and nobody taking care
about the petitioners. The petitioners are required
Rs.9000/- per month for their maintenance like food,
amenities.

the petitioner.
-5-
equity.
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Anekal. Petitioners
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.N.NETHRAVATHI,
W/o H.Manjunath,
D/o Narasappa,
Residing at
B.N.Reddy Layout,
Bommasandra Village and Post,
Bommasandra Industrial Area,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.H.MANJUNATH,
S/o Late Hanumanthappa,
Residing at
Bommasandra,
Hosur Main Road,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.
-2-
on 19/9/1999 at Sri.Manjunatha Swamy Temple,
Dharmasthala as per the Hindu rites and customs. At
the time of marriage the petitioner father has given
Jewels to respondent like 44 grams Gold Bracelet,
Gold 3 finger rings, 24 grams Gold Neck Chain, 8
grams Gold Neck Dollar and Rs.5000/- cash and at
the time of marriage the parents of the petitioner were
given the following Gold items to the petitioner like 1)
Gold Mangalya Chain, 2) Gold Bangles, 3) Gold 6
Finger rings, 4) 7 pair Gold Ear Rings, 5) Gold
Necklace, 6) Gold Bracelet, 7) One pair Silver Leg
chin, 8) One Pair Gold Matti, 9) One Pair Long Gold
matti and costliest clothes to the petitioner. The said
items given by the parents of the petitioner as a dowry
and as demanded by the respondent. The petitioner
parents also performed the marriage expenses by
spending huge amount.

for a period of 1 ½ years at Bommasandra Village,
Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. Out of
the wedlock no children were born to the petitioner
and respondent. Subsequently the respondent with ill-
advise of his sister and brother-in-law given mental
and physical torture to the respondent and even
though the respondent tolerated all the torture given
by the respondent. Finally at about 1 ½ years back the
respondent with the ill advise of his sister and brother-
in-law kicked out the petitioner from the matrimonial
house. Subsequently the petitioner joined to his
parental house.
-3-
5. The petitioner submits that it is the duty of the
respondent to provide all the legal amenities to the
petitioner like food, cloth, shelter and medical aid and
other legal amnities. But the respondent not acted as a
dutiful husband, on the other hand the petitioner
acted as a dutiful wife.
6. The petitioner further submits that all these days

the petitioner kept quite that the respondent may
turned his mind and the respondent may turn his
attitude and he may come and take back to the
matrimonial house. Even though on several
Panchayath were held the respondent has not taken
back the petitioner to the matrimonial home to live
happily.
7. The petitioner further submits that finally this

petitioner also filed a complaint before the Hebbagodi
Police with regard to the physical and mental torture
given by the respondent and his family members. In
fact the Hebbagodi Police also filed FIR vide
Cr.No.262/2009 for the offences punishable
U/s.498(A) r/w 34 of IPC.
8. The petitioner submits that now the petitioner is

residing at per parents house. The petitioner parents
is having Vehicle Transport called as SMT Transport at
Bommasandra. The respondent is having One Lorry,
Two Goods Vehicle and one Scorpio car. The above
said vehicles running in a factory called Bill Forge at
Bommasandra, under the control of Respondent. In
which the respondent is getting income of
Rs.1,25,000/-. The respondent is having house
property at Bommasandra in which the respondent
-4-
constructed 24 rented houses the said building is
constructed in Khaneshmari No.135/3 and 135/15. In
which the respondent is getting Rs.50,000/- income
per month. The respondent is having another house,
in which he is residing in a Ground Floor and in the
first floor given rent to some body, in which the
respondent has got income of Rs.2500/- per month.
The respondent has got landed and house properties
at Chinthamani Town, Chikkaballapura District. In all
the respondent is earning Rs.1,77,500/- per month.
As such the respondent is a capable person to
shelter and other legal amenities.
10. The petitioner submits that the petitioner has no

income for her own and she is depending upon purely
on her parents and the petitioner is not in a position to
look after herself. The petitioner is required
Rs.10,000/- per month for her maintenance like food,
amenities.

capable to give a monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/-
to the petitioner.
monthly maintenance amount of Rs.10,000/- per
month from the date of deserted by the respondent
and equity.
-5-
VERIFICATION

Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN)
C.Mis.No.142/2008.
BETWEEN
Smt.Yellamma @ Ammaiah …….

PETITIONER
AND
Sri.M.Venkataramaiah @ Abraham. ………

RESPONDENT
MEMO
The Undersigned Advocate appearing for the
Petitioner is herewith reporting the death of the
Respondent who died on ____________ in the above

petitioner.
Date: 7/10/2009
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.S.R.JAYANTHI,
D/o Late S.V.Rajappa,
W/o K.Nagaraj,
2) KUM.N.ROOPA,
D/o K.Nagaraj,
Being minor represented by

her mother Smt.S.R.Jayanthi,
Both are Residing at

Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Colony,
Sarjapura Post,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.NAGARAJ,
S/o Kaverappa,
Residing at
Chinthalamadivala Village,
Huskur Post,
Sarjapura Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

-2-
562106.


solemnized on 19/5/1991 at Sardar Vallabai Patel
High School ground, Sarjapura, Anekal Taluk as per
the Hindu rites and customs. The petitioner No.1
spending huge amount. In order to prove the same the
petitioners are herewith producing the Invitation card
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court and marked
as Document No.1.
4. The petitioners submit that the respondent being

the brother of petitioner No.1 mother and as such the
marriage between petitioner No.1 and Respondent was
solemnized at Sarjapura. Subsequent to the marriage
the petitioner No.1 acted as a dutiful wife and out of
the wedlock three children were born namely 1)
N.Babu, 2) Kum.N.Roopa-petitioner No.2 herein, 3)
N.Vinay. The Respondent being the teacher at Primary
School, Sammanahalli. Since from 4 years the
respondent turned hostile to the interest of petitioners
and not provided food, cloth, shelter to the
-3-
petitioners. Even the respondent not paid any school
fees and college fee to petitioner No.2. The Petitioner
is herewith producing the Transfer certificate of
Kum.N.Roopa for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
Court and marked as Document No.2.
5. The petitioners submit that on several times the

respondent treated the petitioner No.1 cruely and
assaulted some time and given physical and mental
torture to Petitioner No.1. The Respondent is having
the habit of taking alcohol and by that time the
Respondent was abusing the petitioner No.1 filthy
language and assaulted the petitioner No.1 without
reason and given mental and physical torture to
petitioner No.1.
6. The petitioners submit that since from 4 years the

respondent developed illicit relationship with one lady
namely Smt.Savitha and kept her in a house at
Attibele, Anekal Taluk. Since from 4 years the
respondent giving harassment and torture to the
petitioner No.1 and so many times the respondent also
not reached his house and stayed with above said
lady. The petitioner No.1 also tolerated all these things
believing that today or tomorrow, the Respondent may
turn his mind towards the petitioners. But even
though the respondent not turned up his mind and
not provided food, cloth and other legal amenities to
the petitioners. In fact that on 1/7/2009 a
Panchayathi also held and in the Panchayathi the
respondent also agreed to provide all the legal
amenities to the petitioners and agreed that he is not
going to stay with above said lady. Even though the
respondent is not acted as a dutiful husband.
-4-
7. The petitioners submit that about 3 months back,
the petitioner No.1 seriously questioned with regard to
the illicit relationship with Smt.Savitha, by that time
the respondent picked a quarrel with the petitioner
No.1 and kicked away the petitioners namely N.Babu,
N.Roopa and N.Vinay from the house. As such the
petitioners have no other alternative remedy and came
back to their parental house at Sarjapura.
8. The petitioners submit that recently the respondent

uncle namely Sri.Muniyappa came to petitioner No.1
parents house and told that the grand father of
petitioner No.1 i.e., father of respondent fell ill-well
and told that he want to see the children and as such
as per the request made by above said Sri.Muniyappa,
the petitioner No.1 sent her children namely N.Babu,
but he is not returned back due to the respondent
attitude. Now the petitioners No.2 and 3 with care and
custody of petitioner No.1. The Respondent has sent
the legal notice through his Advocate on 14/8/2009
and the Petitioner has also sent the reply notice dated:
31/8/2009. The petitioner is herewith producing the
Copy of the legal Notice dated:14/8/2009 and Reply
notice dated:31/8/2009, Postal receipt and
Acknowledgement for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
Court and marked as Document No.3 to 6.
9. The petitioners further submits that the respondent

is being the Teacher at Primary School at
Samannahalli and he is getting Rs.10,000/- and the
respondent is also having landed and site properties
shelter and other legal amenities.
-5-
income for their own and they are depending upon
position to look after themselves. The petitioners are
required Rs.9,000/- per month for their maintenance
like food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses and other
legal amenities.

to the petitioners.

and equity.
1.
2.
3.
Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioners.

-6-
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
3.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2009.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.MAHADEVAMMA @ SUKANYAMMA,
W/o Somashekar @ Shekar,
2) MASTER.GIRISHA,
S/o Somashekar @ Shekar,
3) KUM.CHAITRA,
D/o Somashekar @ Shekar,
Being minors represented by

their mother SMT.MAHADEVAMMA
@ SUKANYAMMA,
All are Residing at

Bommasandra Village,
Attibele Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
(HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.SOMASHEKAR @ SHEKAR,
S/o Huchappa @ Huchegowda,
Residing at
Madar Sabara Doddi Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Sugganahalli Post,
Ramanagaram Taluk,
Ramanagaram District. ………
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

-2-
SRI.H.SRINIVASA, First Floor, Yellappa Building,
Near Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road, Anekal, Bangalore-
562106.


solemnized on 7/5/1995 at Kenjigarahalli,
Ramanagaram Taluk as per the Hindu rites and
customs. The petitioner No.1 parents also performed
the marriage expenses by spending huge amount. In
order to prove the same the petitioners are herewith
producing the Invitation card for the kind perusal of
this Hon’ble Court and marked as Document No.1.
4. The petitioners submit that after the marriage

between the petitioner No.1 and respondent were lived
happily for 3 years at Madarsabara Doddi,
Ramanagaram Taluk. Subsequently the petitioners
and respondent were shifted their house to
Bommasandra Village. Out of the wedlock two children
were born namely 1) Master.Girisha, 2) Kum.Chaitra-
who are the petitioners No.2 and 3 herein. The
petitioners No.2 is studying in 9 th Standard at Swamy
Vivekananda School at Chandapura and petitioner
No.3 is studying in 7th Standard at Government
School, Bommasandra, Anekal Taluk. Since from 1
year the respondent neglected the petitioners without
providing food,
-3-
cloth, shelter, medical expenses, Education expenses
and other legal amenities to the petitioners.
5. The petitioners submit that on several times the

respondent treated the petitioner No.1 cruely and
assaulted some time and given physical and mental
torture to Petitioner No.1. The Respondent is having
the habit of taking alcohol and by that time the
Respondent was abusing the petitioner No.1 filthy
language and assaulted the petitioner No.1 without
reason and given mental and physical torture to
petitioner No.1.
6. The petitioners submit that when such being the

facts and circumstances the petitioner No.1 seriously
questioned with regard to the mental and physical
torture made by the respondent, by that time the
respondent quarreled with petitioner No.1 and ran
away from the house and now he is living separately at
the cause title address. Upon enquiry recently the
petitioner No.1 came to know that the respondent
married again second time with Smt.Bhagyamma of
Kotamaranahalli Village, Channapatna Taluk,
Ramanagaram District. The petitioner No.1 acted as a
dutiful wife, on the other hand the respondent failed to
act as a dutiful husband.
7. The petitioners further submits that the respondent

is being the Supplier at Kapali Bar and Restaurant at
Ramanagaram, and he is getting salary of amount
Rs.4,000/- and addition tips amount of Rs.10,000/-
and the respondent is also having landed and site
properties at Madarsabara Doddi Village,
Ramanagaram Taluk. From the landed properties he is
legal amenities.
-4-

legal amenities.

to the petitioners.
and equity.
1.
2.
3.
-5-
VERIFICATION

1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RAMAMANI,
W/o Krishnamurthy,
2) KUM.MAMATHA,
D/o Krishnamurthy,
S/o Krishnamurthy,

Mother Smt.Ramamani
All are residing at

Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
-2-
562106.


for a
-3-
month from the date of filing the petitioner, by its

above.

and equity.
-4-
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No.91/2009.
BETWEEN
Smt.Anitha. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.R.Venkatesh. ..……
RESPONDENT



in para 2 of the petition that the petitioner and
respondent are wife and husband, and their marriage
was performed on 28/2/2008 at B.V.Appajaiah Shetty
Kalyana Mantapa, M.G.Road, Denkanikote Town, as
per the Hindu rites and rituals is true and correct.
Further averments made in same para that the
petitioner submits that at the time of marriage the
parents of the petitioner given Mangalya Chain, one
gold ring, and one gold neck chain as per the direction
and demand of the respondent and his parents and
the parents of the petitioner had spent more than
1,00,000/- for the performance of marriage, and the
respondent also demanded and received Rs.5,000/-for
the purchase of cloths is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.
-2-
in para 4 of the petition that subsequently after the
marriage the petitioner lived as dutiful wife as per the
Hindu rights in her law house with lots of dreams but
all her dreams remained as dream only has
respondent and his parents started to give harassment
physically and mentally for one or other reason and
demanded money of Rs.30,000/- as a dowry to
purchase vehicle and for the other reason best known
to them, for this reason respondent kept the petitioner
outside the house so many days without giving food
properly is hereby denied as false and incorrect.
in para 5 of the petition that the petitioner being a
Hindu tolerated all the trouble given by the respondent
and in-laws but the tragic day she was assaulted by
respondent and his family members and insisting her
to bring money of Rs.30,000/- otherwise she will be
not allow the inside the house as such petitioner
without alternative return back her parents house and
intimated her mother that all the harassment, mental
torture given by the respondent and his parents,
thereafter the mother of the petitioner convinced the
many panchayaths to solve the misunderstanding and
problems between the petitioner and respondent. But
the respondent and his family members ignored their
advice and in turn picked up quarrels with them is

in para 6 of the petition that the mother of the
petitioner, is a widow leading her lively word great
difficulty as such she could not able to maintain
petitioner in this hard days. Such being the facts the
petitioner is literarily starving to maintain herself. The
respondent being the husband of the petitioner is
under
-3-
legal obligation to provide basic necessities of
petitioner life. But the respondent so far failed to
provide the basic necessities of life to the petitioner. It
is further submitted that respondent driver by
profession earning Rs.6000/- per month and getting a
rent of Rs.4000/- from the tenant is hereby denied as
6. The Respondent submits that the marriage between

the petitioner and respondent has been solemnized
with the consent of the both the families. The
respondent being the residence of Denkanikote,
Tamilnadu having no income and no work and even
though the petititioner’s parents agreed to marry with
the respondent.
7. The Respondent submits that the petitioner’s

mother being the widow and no income to her and the
petitioner’s mother getting the pension, since her
husband was a BMTC Conductor. By seeing the
financial position and the poverty of the petitioner’s
family, the respondent family came forward to marry
the petitioner without obtaining any assistance by way
of finance or other things. As such the respondent and
their family themselves performed the marriage at
B.V.Appajaiah Shetty Kalyana Mantapa, Denkanikote
Town. The cost of the marriage has been spent by the
respondent and his family members by obtaining the
loan from the different persons. As such the allegation
made by the petitioner in para 3 and 4 of the petition
is totally false and baseless one.
-4-
8. The Respondent submits that the respondent
mother doing coolie and the respondent’s mother
providing food, cloth and shelter to the petitioner and
respondent, due to the respondent being unemployed.
In fact the respondent searching job for his own
livelihood. Till then the respondent depending upon
her mother income. Knowing fully very well the
petitioner agreed to marry with the respondent.
9. The Respondent submits that subsequent to the
marriage the petitioner demanded to live separately at
Anekal Town, for which the petitioner mother also
instigating her daughter to live separately at Anekal
Town. In fact the mother of the petitioner approached
the respondent and demanded to live at Anekal and
she also undertake to provide job for respondent.
When the respondent refused to fulfill the demands of
the petitioner and her mother and the respondent
openly expressed that he is not going to live separately
at Anekal Town, since he has to look after her old age
mother. Now the respondent and her mother living at
respondent’s sister house at Denkanikote. When the
respondent refused to demands of the petitioner, the
petitioner picked quarrel with the respondent for no
reason and ran away from the matrimonial home.
Subsequently on so many times the respondent
arranged the panchayath and requested the petitioner
to come back and rejoin to the matrimonial home to
live happily, but she refused to rejoin. In fact the
respondent also made complaint before the Mahila
Police at Denkanikote against the petitioner. In fact
the petitioner and her mother appeared before the
Mahila Police and made statement before the Police
and refused to rejoin the matrimonial home, by that
time the petitioner was not wearing the Manglya and
leg finger ring and subsequently filed this false
petition.
-5-
petitioner. Since the respondent has no income and as
such he could not able to pay monthly maintenance
amount of Rs.2,000/- to the petitioner as she
demanded in the petition, on the other hand he
undertake to provide all the amenities to the
petitioner.


Respondent.
VERIFICATION
Anekal.
Respondent.
Date:10/2/2010.

C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.MANJULA
W/o Somashekar,
2) KUM.S.SHREYA,
D/o Somashekar,
Aged about 1 ½ year,
Being minor represented by

her mother SMT.MANJULA,
Both are Residing at

Vinayakanagar,
Dommasandra Village and Post,
Sarjapura Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
(SARJAPURA POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.SOMASHEKAR,
S/o Yellappa,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.


solemnized on 15/4/2001 at Prasanna Venkateshwara
Swamy Temple, Chikkathirupathi, Malur Taluk, Kolar
District, as per the Hindu rites and customs. At the
time of marriage the respondent also received the
dowry by way of jewels and cash. The petitioner No.1
spending huge amount. In order to prove the same the
petitioners are herewith producing the Xerox copy of
the Invitation card and Photographs for the kind
Document No.1 to 3.
4. The petitioners submit that after the marriage

between the petitioner No.1 and respondent were lived
happily for 1 year at Rachamanahalli Village, Anekal
Taluk. Subsequently the petitioner No.1 and
respondent were shifted their house to Dommasandra
Village to the parental house of the petitioner No.1 and
they were lived happily for a period of 4 years. Out of
the wedlock one female child was born namely
Kum.S.Shreya-who is the petitioners No.2 herein. In
order to prove the same the petitioner No.1 is herewith
producing the Original Birth Certificate of Petitioner
No.2 for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble court and
marked as Document No.4. Subsequently the
respondent was habit of giving torture to the petitioner
No.1 physically and mentally and so many times the
respondent never joined to the parental house. When
the petitioner No.1 questioned the same, the
respondent again picked up quarrel with the petitioner
No.1 and assaulted the petitioner No.1. The petitioner
No.1 tolerated all the harassment given by the
respondent. Finally one day the petitioner No.1 came
to know that the respondent married second time with
one Smt.Vanitha and subsequently the respondent
brought Smt.Vanitha to the parental house of
petitioner No.1 and demanded to stay at parental
house of the petitioner No.1 along with second wife.
When she refused to same again that on 7/4/2006 the
respondent and some others have assaulted the
petitioner No.1 and ran away from the parental house
of the petitioner No.1 along with second wife. So many
panchayath were also held, but no settlement arrived
between the petitioner No.1 and respondent. Now the
petitioner No.1 is taking care and custody of the minor
child who is the petitioner No.2 herein. For the
harassment given by the respondent, the petitioner
No.1 lodged the Police complaint before the Sarjapura
Police, Anekal Taluk and the Sarjapura Police also
registered a case in Cr.No.37/06 (C.C.No.1278/06)
and the said case is pending. The petitioners are
herewith producing the Xerox copy of the FIR,
Complaint, Charge sheet for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble Court and marked as Document No.5.
5. The petitioners further submit that since from 5-6

years back the respondent neglected the petitioners
without providing food, cloth, shelter, medical
expenses, Education expenses and other legal
amenities to the petitioners. The
-4-
Respondent is being the Employee under a Garment
Factory at Belandur Gate and he is getting salary of
amount Rs.6,000/- and the respondent is also having
house and landed properties at Rachamanahali
Village, Anekal Taluk. From the landed properties he is
legal amenities.

legal amenities.

to the petitioners.

and equity.
1.
2.

-5-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:
C.Mis.No.95/2009.
BETWEEN
Smt.Nethravathi. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.H.Manjunath. ………
RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER BY WAY OF

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Nethravathi, W/o H.Manunath, aged about

27 years, residing at B.N.Reddy Layout, Bommasandra
Village and Post, Bommasandra Industrial Area,
Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby state on
oath as follows:-
1. I submit that I am the petitioner in the above case, I

know the facts and circumstances of the case, Hence I
am swearing this affidavit.

Sri.Manjunatha Swamy Temple, Dharmasthala as per
the Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage
my father has given Jewels to respondent like 44
grams Gold Bracelet, Gold 3 finger rings, 24 grams
Gold Neck Chain, 8 grams Gold Neck Dollar and
Rs.5000/- cash and at the time of marriage my
parents were given the following Gold items to the
petitioner like 1) Gold Mangalya Chain, 2) Gold
Bangles, 3) Gold 6 Finger rings, 4) 7 pair Gold Ear
Rings, 5) Gold Necklace, 6) Gold Bracelet, 7) One pair
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
Silver Leg chin, 8) One Pair Gold Matti, 9) One Pair
Long Gold matti and costliest clothes to me. The said
items given by my parents as a dowry and as
demanded by the respondent. My parents also
performed the marriage expenses by spending huge
amount.
3. I submit that subsequent to the marriage myself

and respondent lived happily for a period of 1 ½ years
at Bommasandra Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. Out of the wedlock no children
were born to myself and respondent. Subsequently the
respondent with ill-advise of his sister and brother-in-
law given mental and physical torture to me and even
though I have tolerated all the torture given by the
respondent. Finally at about 1 ½ years back the
respondent with the ill advise of his sister and brother-
in-law kicked out me from the matrimonial house.
Subsequently I have joined to my parental house.
4. I submit that it is the duty of the respondent to

provide all the legal amenities to me like food, cloth,
shelter and medical aid and other legal amenities. But
the respondent not acted as a dutiful husband, on the
other hand I have acted as a dutiful wife.
5. I submit that all these days I have kept quite that

the respondent may turned his mind and the
respondent may turn his attitude and he may come
and take back to the matrimonial house. Even though
on several Panchayath were held the respondent has
not taken back me to the matrimonial home to live
happily.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
6. I submit that finally I have also filed a complaint
before the Hebbagodi Police with regard to the physical
and mental torture given by the respondent and his
family members. In fact the Hebbagodi Police also filed
FIR vide Cr.No.262/2009 for the offences punishable
U/s.498(A) r/w 34 of IPC.
7. I submit that now I am residing at my parents

house. My parents are very poor persons and they are
not in a position to look after me.
8. I submit that the respondent is having Vehicle

Transport called as SMT Transport at Bommasandra.
The respondent is having One Lorry, Two Goods
Vehicle and one Scorpio car. The above said vehicles
running in a factory called Bill Forge at
Bommasandra, under the control of Respondent. In
which the respondent is getting income of
Rs.1,25,000/-. The respondent is having house
property at Bommasandra in which the respondent
constructed 24 rented houses the said building is
constructed in Khaneshmari No.135/3 and 135/15. In
which the respondent is getting Rs.50,000/- income
per month. The respondent is having another house,
in which he is residing in a Ground Floor and in the
first floor given rent to some body, in which the
respondent has got income of Rs.2500/- per month.
The respondent has got landed and house properties
at Chinthamani Town, Chikkaballapura District. In all
the respondent is earning Rs.1,77,500/- per month.
maintain me by providing food, cloth, shelter and
other legal amenities.
No.of.Corrections.
-4-
9. I submit that I have no income for my own and I am
depending upon purely on my parents and I am not in
a position to look after myself. I require Rs.10,000/-
per month for my maintenance like food, cloth, shelter,

equity.
Advocate. Sworn to
before me.
Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.
C.Mis.No.95/2009.
BETWEEN
Smt.Nethravathi. …….
PETITIONER
AND
Sri.H.Manjunath. ………
RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE PETITIONER

1. Original Lagna Patrika.
2. Original Electricity Bills 22 in Nos.
3. One Photograph.
4. Endorsement issued by the Tahsildar, Anekal

Taluk,
dated:9/3/2010.
5. Certified copy of the Sale deed dated:4/10/1996.
6. Certified copy of the Sale deed dated:25/4/1997.
7. Certified copy of the Encumbrance Certificate from

1-4-
1995 to 31-3-04.
8. Certified copy of the Encumbrance certificate from
1-4-04
to 8-3-2010.
9. Certified copy of the RTC extracts in respect of

Sy.No.135/15.
10. Certified copy of the RTC extracts in respect of

Sy.No.4/1.
Anekal. Advocate for petitioner.
Date: 17/3/2010
C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.RUKMANAMMA @ RUKMINI,
W/o RaghuRamreddy,
Residing at
Thirupalya Village,
Jigani Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
(HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.RAGHURAMREDDY,
S/o S.G.Ramakrishnareddy,
Residing at
Gorantla Village and Mandalam,
Hindupuram Taluk,
Anantapuram District,
Andhra Pradesh. ………
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.
-2-

on 2/8/1993 before the Marriage Officer, Registrar of
Marriage, Anekal Taluk, Anekal. At the time of
marriage the respondent also received the dowry by
way of cash and jewels and Gold Ornaments. The
petitioner parents also performed the marriage
expenses by spending amount. In order to prove the
same the petitioner are herewith producing the Xerox
copy of the Memorandum of Marriage and Xerox copy
of the Photographs for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble
Court and marked as Document No.1 to 3. The
Original documents No.1 to 3 has been produced in
O.S.No.123/2010 on the file of Addl.Civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Anekal.
4. The petitioner submit that after the marriage

between the petitioner and respondent were lived
happily for 10 years at Thirupalya Village, Anekal
Taluk in a house belong to the father-in-law of the
petitioner.
5. The petitioner submits that subsequent to the 10

years, the respondent always picked a quarrel with
petitioner for nothing and demanded to bring the
dowry amount from her parental house. When the
petitioner refused to demands of respondent and
sometimes the respondent threatened he is going to
marry another lady and also refused to live happily
with the petitioner. During the wedlock between the
petitioner and respondent one male child was born,
but unfortunately the said male child was expired.
6. The petitioner further submits that since from 5-6
years back the respondent neglected the petitioners
without providing food, cloth, shelter, medical
expenses, Education expenses and other legal
amenities to the petitioners. The Respondent is being
the Agriculturist at Gorantla Village and he is earning
Rs.10,000/- and the respondent is also having house
and landed properties at Gorantla Village, Anekal
Taluk. From the landed properties he is earning
capable person to maintain the petitioners by
providing food, cloth, shelter and other legal amenities.

income for her own and she are depending upon
purely on her parents and the petitioner is not in a
position to look after themselves. The petitioner are
required Rs.4,000/- per month for her maintenance
legal amenities.
to the petitioner.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner pray

and equity.
VERIFICATION
Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SUREKHA,
W/o Ramesh,
2) KUM.RACHANA,
D/o Ramesh,
3) KUM.SINCHANA,
D/o Ramesh,

her mother SMT.SUREKHA,
All are Residing at

“Akshaya Nivas”,
No.8/274, Gokul Layout,
Behind Court Building,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. …… PETITIONERS
(ANEKAL POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.RAMESH,
S/o A.C.Basanna,
residing at
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District.
-2-
Presently residing at
No.74, Vandana Nilayam,
“E” Block, 17th Main Road,
2nd Cross, Fort Mahal,
MYSORE. ……… RESPONDENT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE

The petitioners above named beg to state as

follows:-

The petitioner may also be served through her
counsel SRI.H.SRINIVASA, First Floor, Yellappa
Building, Near Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road,
2. The addresses of the respondent for the

purpose of services of court notices and summons
from this Hon’ble court is as given in the cause
title above.
3. The petitioners submit that the petitioner No.1

is the legally wedded wife of respondent. The
marriage between the petitioner No.1 and
respondent was solemnized on 1/5/1992 at Guru
Raghavendra Kalyana Mantapa, Kumarapark,
Guttahalli, Bangalore. Out of the wedlock between
-3-
the petitioner No.1 and respondent, daughters are
born namely Kum.Rachana and Kum.Sinchana
respondent is solemnized and performed as per
the Hindu Rights and customs.
4. The petitioners submit that now the petitioners

No.2 and 3 are residing with petitioner No.1. The
petitioner No.2 being the daughter of the petitioner
No.1 and respondent and now she has completed
her 2nd PUC at JSS College, Mysore. While at the
time of admission to the 1st PUC, the petitioner
No.2 joined to Hostel at Mysore and the
respondent provided the fees, Hostel bill and other
expenses to the petitioner No.2. While at the time
of joining to 2nd PUC, the petitioner No.2 was living
with her father-the respondent for few months and
at the advise of the respondent again the
petitioner No.2 joined to Paying Guest at Mysore.
The Respondent undertake to provide all the
facilities to the petitioner No.2 for her studies and
the respondent is also undertake to take pay the
fees and also undertake to pay the Paying guest
fees and other legal amenities to the petitioner
No.2. Now the Respondent No.2 completed her 2 nd
PUC and she is intend to continue her education
and as such it is the duty of the
father/respondent to provide all the facilities and
to maintain the petitioner No.2 also.
-4-
5. The Petitioners submit that the petitioner No.3
has completed SSLC at St.Joseph School, Anekal
and she is also intend to continue her education
in future and she is also intend to join for 1 st PUC
at Mysore. The respondent is also undertake to
provide all the facilities to the petitioner No.3 for
her studies. Further it is the duty of the
Respondent/father to provide all the facilities and
6. The Petitioners submit that now the respondent

picked quarrel with Petitioner No.1 and deserted
the petitioner No.1 along with her daughters who
are the petitioners No.2 and 3 by neglecting to
maintain all the petitioners. The petitioner No.1
has no income for her own and as such the
petitioner No.1 not in a position to pay
maintenance to petitioners No.2 and 3 and she is
also not in a position to maintain herself. It is the
duty of the respondent to maintain the wife and
children by providing food, cloth, shelter, medical
expenses, Education and other legal amenities to
the petitioners No.1 to 3. When such being the
facts and circumstances without seeing the minor
interest and without providing all the legal
amenities, the respondent ran away from the
house.
-5-
7. The petitioners further submit that earlier the
respondent working as a Children Organizer at
Myrada/Plan at Hosur. Earlier the respondent was
drawing Rs.12,000/- per month. Now the
respondent working at Ujjivan, Finance Company
at Mysore as a Manager and he is drawing salary
amount more than Rs.20,000/- . The respondent
has got sufficient income to pay maintenance to
the petitioners towards the legal amenities.
8. The petitioners further submit that after

School/College Holidays, now the admissions to
the 1st PUC and as well as Degree course has been
started. As such the petitioners No.2 and 3 are
urgently need money to join college for their
further studies. When the petitioners No.2 and 3
requested the respondent to pay the college fees
and also requested to provide required books and
other materials for their further studies and
further the requested to pay maintenance amount.
But the respondent blindly refused to provide the
above said legal amenities. Since the petitioner
No.1 being the lady and she is not in a position to
provide the above said facilities to the petitioners
No.2 and 3, the respondent is a capable person to
provide the above said facilities. Hence the
petitioners have no other alternative remedy
except approaching this Hon’ble Court by this
petition.
-6-
9. The petitioners further submit that recently the
petitioner No.1 has undergone for eye operation at
K.R.Hospital, Mysore with the help of her relatives.
Now she is taking treatment at Hospital, for which
also the money is required.

capable to give a monthly maintenance of
Rs.6,000/- to the petitioners.
WHEREFORE, the above named petitioners

pray that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to
award the monthly maintenance amount of
Rs.6,000/- per month from the date of deserted by
the respondent and to grant such other relief or
reliefs as deems fit in the circumstance of the case
in the interest of justice and equity.
1.
2.
3.
VERIFICATION
We, the above named petitioners do hereby

declare that what is stated above is true and
correct to the best of our knowledge, information
and beliefs.
1.
2.
3.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SUREKHA,
W/o Ramesh,
2) KUM.RACHANA,
D/o Ramesh,
3) KUM.SINCHANA,
D/o Ramesh,

her mother SMT.SUREKHA,
All are Residing at

“Akshaya Nivas”,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. …… PETITIONERS
(ANEKAL POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.RAMESH,
S/o A.C.Basanna,
residing at
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District.
-2-
Presently residing at
No.74, Vandana Nilayam,
“E” Block, 17th Main Road,
2nd Cross, Fort Mahal,
MYSORE. ……… RESPONDENT
INTERIM APPLICATION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125(2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE.

follows:-

the petitioner No.1 and respondent, daughters are
born namely Kum.Rachana and Kum.Sinchana
respondent is solemnized and performed as per
the Hindu Rights and customs.
2. The petitioners submit that now the petitioners

No.2 and 3 are residing with petitioner No.1. The
petitioner No.2 being the daughter of the petitioner
No.1 and respondent and now she has completed
her 2nd PUC at JSS College, Mysore. While at the
time of admission to the 1st PUC, the petitioner
No.2 joined to Hostel at Mysore and the
respondent provided the fees, Hostel bill and other
expenses to the petitioner No.2. While at the time
of joining to 2nd PUC, the petitioner No.2 was living
-3-
with her father-the respondent for few months and
at the advise of the respondent again the
petitioner No.2 joined to Paying Guest at Mysore.
The Respondent undertake to provide all the
facilities to the petitioner No.2 for her studies and
the respondent is also undertake to take pay the
fees and also undertake to pay the Paying guest
fees and other legal amenities to the petitioner
No.2. Now the Respondent No.2 completed her 2 nd
PUC and she is intend to continue her education
and as such it is the duty of the
father/respondent to provide all the facilities and
3. The Petitioners submit that the petitioner No.3

has completed SSLC at St.Joseph School, Anekal
and she is also intend to continue her education
in future and she is also intend to join for 1 st PUC
at Mysore. The respondent is also undertake to
provide all the facilities to the petitioner No.3 for
her studies. Further it is the duty of the
Respondent/father to provide all the facilities and
4. The Petitioners submit that now the respondent

picked quarrel with Petitioner No.1 and deserted
the petitioner No.1 along with her daughters who
are the petitioners No.2 and 3 by neglecting to
maintain all the petitioners. The petitioner No.1
has no income for her own and as such the
petitioner No.1 not in a position to pay
maintenance to petitioners No.2 and 3 and she is
also not in a position to maintain herself. It is the
duty of the respondent to maintain the wife and
the petitioners No.1 to 3. When such being the
facts and circumstances without seeing the minor
interest and without providing all the legal
amenities, the respondent ran away from the
house.
5. The petitioners further submit that earlier the

respondent working as a Children Organizer at
Myrada/Plan at Hosur. Earlier the respondent was
drawing Rs.12,000/- per month. Now the
respondent working at Ujjivan, Finance Company
at Mysore as a Manager and he is drawing salary
amount more than Rs.20,000/- . The respondent
has got sufficient income to pay maintenance to
the petitioners towards the legal amenities.
6. The petitioners further submit that after

School/College Holidays, now the admissions to
the 1st PUC and as well as Degree course has been
started. Upon enquiry in the college the petitioners
came to know that the petitioners No.2 and 3 are
required amount of Rs.24,000/- for hostel charges
and Mess Bill Rs.2,000/- per month for both the
petitioners No.2 and 3. Examination fee is
separate as noticed by the college. The petitioners
No.2 and 3 are also required books for their
studies and other materials, for which the
petitioners No.2 and 3 are required amount. Since
there is no sufficient time, hence the petitioners
are required interim maintenance. Hence this
application.
-5-
grant interim maintenance amount as stated in
the above list in the interest of justice and equity.
1.
2.
3.

Petitioners.
VERIFICATION
and beliefs.
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No.82/2010.
BETWEEN
Smt.A.Lalitha. ……. PETITIONER
AND
Sri.S.Thyagaraj. ……… RESPONDENT
OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO

THE MAIN PETITION FILED BY THE
PETITIONER.

be dismissed in lamine.

in para 2 of the petition that the petitioner is the
legally wedded wife of the respondent. The marriage
on 17/2/2008 as per Hindu rites and customs at
Sri.Ranganatha Kalyana Mantapa, Bannerghatta,
Bangalore.

in para 4 of the petition that at the time of marriage
negotiations, the respondent and his family members
and relatives had demanded from the petitioner’s
parents a cash dowry of Rs.1,00,000/- and also
various jewels for both the petitioner and respondent
to be given at the time of marriage. The petitioner’s
father with the fond hope that the petitioner would be
placed well and comfortably in the matrimonial home,
was obliged to pay a cash dowry of Rs.50,000/- and
also spent Rs.5,00,000/- towards marriage expenses
and performed the marriage in a grand scale as
desired by the respondent and his family members
and relatives.

in para 5 of the petition that the petitioner joined the
respondent and lived with him as his duty bound and
obedient wife in the matrimonial home and discharged
her marital obligations towards the respondent and
also matrimonial duties. The marriage is
consummated, but the couple has no child born out of
the wedlock.
in para 6 of the petition that after marriage the
respondent looked after the petitioner well only for
about 3 months and thereafter the respondent and the
his family members viz., the respondent’s parents and
sister started harassing the petitioner to bring the
balance of dowry amount of Rs.50,000/- from the
petitioner’s parents.

in para 7 of the petition that the petitioner appraised
the fact that her father had given sufficient dowry and
also gold jewels to the respondent and the petitioner
as per the demand made at the time of marriage
alliance and it was not fair on his part to demand
further dowry. But the respondent did not heed to the
humble request of the petitioner and started ill
treating and harassing the petitioner. The
Respondent’s mother and sister used to add excess of
salt while the petitioner was cooking and preparing
food and blame the petitioner for no fault of her.
Further the respondent and his family members never
allowed the petitioner to have square meals peacefully.
Whenever the petitioner sat for lunch the respondent
and his family members used to pick up quarrels with
the petitioner unnecessarily and condemn the
petitioner and her parents for not giving sufficient
dowry and they used to snatch away the meals plate
from her.

in para 8 of the petition that at the instance of the
parents and sister, was assaulting the petitioner and
causing mental and physical torture to her. The
respondent neglected the welfare and maintenance of
the petitioner, without any valid reason or rhyme and
also failed refused to provide food, clothing to the
petitioner. The respondent and his family members
treated the petitioner as a slave compelling her to do
all the house hold works and finding fault with her on
petty matters and thereby caused mental agony only
for the sake of dowry.

in para 9 of the petition that as days gone by the
harassment and ill treatment by the respondent and
his family members was growing more for the sake of
additional dowry. She protested for the illegal demand
for dowry made by the respondent and refused to
bring any money from her parents. The petitioner had
reported to her parents regarding the ill-treatment
meted out by the respondent to her. The petitioner’s
parents had convened panchayathdars. The
panchayathdars had advised both the respondent and
the petitioner to adjust to each other and to lead,
married life harmoniously. Though the respondent
nodded his head in compliance with the advice of the
panchayathdars, he repeated the same ill-treatment
and harassment to the petitioner in the matrimonial
home.

in para 10 of the petition that the petitioner tolerated
the ill-treatment and harassment, only to keep up the
family prestige. The respondent and his family
members have taken undue advantage of the tolerance
of the petitioner and one fine day in the month of May-
2008, they have driven out the petitioner from the
matrimonial home directing her to bring additional
dowry of Rs.50,000/- and also to get registered a site
in the name of the respondent, otherwise she has no
place in the matrimonial home.

in para 11 of the petition that the petitioner joined her
parents. She patiently awaited for the respondent to
take her to the matrimonial home. But even though
days and weeks passed by the respondent did not turn
up to take her back to the matrimonial home. In fact
the petitioner voluntarily went to the matrimonial
home to join the respondent, but the respondent and
his family members did not allow the petitioner in the
matrimonial home and turned her away, without any
valid reason. Thereafter the petitioner’s parents and
her relatives also took her to the matrimonial home,
but the respondent did not allow her. Panchayaths
convened in this regard and good advice of the
panchayathdars was of no avail. Hence the petitioner
was constrained to lodge complaint of dowry
harassment against the respondent, his parents and
sister, but the local police did not take the complaint.
On 24/12/2009 the petitioner gave a complaint to the
Superintendent of Police, Ramanagaram District. But
unfortunately the higher police authorities have also
taken any action against the respondent and his
family members.

in para 12 of the petition that ever since the
respondent and his family members have thrown out
the petitioner from the matrimonial home, the
respondent has failed to enquire the health and
welfare of the petitioner. The respondent has also not
provided any maintenance to the petitioner. The
petitioner is unemployed and she has no source of
income. She is facing great hardship for want of money
for livelihood. The petitioner cannot be a burden after
marriage on her back to the matrimonial home or
alternatively to provide maintenance to her for living.
But all her efforts went in vain and the respondent is
adamant and deliberately failed and neglected in the
his obligations to maintain the petitioner. All the
petitioner’s jewels given by her father are in the
respondent’s house.

in para 13 of the petition that the petitioner has no
avocation or any source of income for livelihood. The
petitioner is entirely depending on the respondent. The
petitioner requires at least Rs.10,000/- per month to
make a living and meet the expenses, house rent etc.,
The respondent has utterly failed and neglected to
maintain the petitioner without any valid reason. The
Respondent being the legally wedded husband of the
petitioner, he has legal and moral obligation to
maintain his wife. The petitioner is entitled to share
the matrimonial home and also protection against
domestic violence on her by the respondent and also
family members.

in para 14 of the petition that the respondent is an
agriculture owning vast extends of land, both ancestral
and joint family properties and he has share in the
properties. He has income of more than Rs.25,000/-
per month. The respondent has sufficient source and
means and also legal obligation to maintain the
petitioner.

in para 15 of the petition that the petitioner is entitled
for necessary reliefs under the provisions of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,
2005. The petitioner is entitled to share the house with
the respondent and live in his company. She is also
entitled for protection against the domestic violence
inflicted on her by the respondent. The respondent is
liable to pay cost of this obligation to the petitioner.

in para 16 of the petition that the cause of action for
this petition arose on 17/2/2008 when the marriage of
the petitioner and respondent was solemnized and
both the petitioner and respondent lived together as
wife and husband, after 3 months of marriage i.e., in
the month of May-2008 since the respondent and his
family members started demanding additional dowry
and driven out the petitioner from the matrimonial
home following dowry harassment and the respondent
failed to maintain the petitioner and subsequently,
within the Jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
16. The Respondent respectfully submits that

C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RAMAMANI,
W/o Krishnamurthy,
2) KUM.MAMATHA,
D/o Krishnamurthy,
S/o Krishnamurthy,

Mother Smt.Ramamani
All are residing at

Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
-2-
562106.


for a month from the date of filing the petitioner, by its
4. The petitioners submit that the time of awarding the

maintenance amount, this Hon’ble court awarded
Rs.700/- per month to petitioner No.1. Now a days the
cost of living increasing day by day and the petitioner
No.1 could not able to maintain amount which is
awarded by this Hon’ble Court and the said amount is
lowest amount. Hence the petitioners have filed to
enhance the maintenance amount from Rs.700/- to
Rs.1500/-.
5. The petitioners submit that at the time of awarding

the maintenance to petitioners, by that time the
petitioner No.2 was going to Vidthata School. Now the
petitioner No.2 joined to 2nd PUC at BTL College,
Chandapura. The admissions charges studying books
and note books and other equipments to 2 nd petitioner
is very much importance to study the 2nd PUC. The
petitioner No.1 being the lady and she is not in a
position to look after the petitioner No.2 by obtaining
the little maintenance from the respondent and as
such she has obtained the loan from the different
persons and joined her daughter to BTL college.
Looking into the maintain the college going children
and looking into the present day cost of living and
other materials and traveling charges from Village to
College and for further studies in the college, the 2 nd
petitioner is required Rs.1500/- per month. Hence the
petitioners have filed to enhance the maintenance
amount from Rs.500/- to Rs.1500/-.
6. The petitioners submit that at the time of

awarding the maintenance to petitioners, by that time
the petitioner No.3 was going to Vidthata School. Now
the petitioner No.3 joined to ASB PU College, Anekal to
1st PUC. The admissions charges studying books and
note books and other equipments to 3 rd petitioner is
very much importance to study the 1 st PUC. The
petitioner No.1 being the lady and she is not in a
position to look after the petitioner No.3 by obtaining
the little maintenance from the respondent and as
such she has obtained the loan from the different
persons and joined her son to ASB college. Looking
into the maintain the college going children and
looking into the present day cost of living and other
materials and traveling charges from Village to college
and further studies, the 3rd petitioner is required
Rs.1500/- per month. Hence the petitioners have filed
to enhance the maintenance amount from Rs.500/- to
Rs.1500/-.
7. The petitioners submit that the petitioners are

herewith producing the School and college records for
the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. The petitioners
are herewith producing the Certified copy of the Order
passed in Crl.Mis.78/2002, dated: 16/9/2004 for the
kind perusal of this Hon’ble court.

WHEREFORE, the above named petitioners prays

that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to enhance the
monthly maintenance amount from Rs.700/- to
1500/- to petitioner No.1, from Rs.500/- to Rs.1500/-
each to petitioners No.2 and 3 by directing the
respondent to pay the above said amount from the
date of this petition and to grant such other relief or
1.
2.
3.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No.126/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.SUREKHA and others. ……

PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.RAMESH. ………
RESPONDENT
MEMO
The Petitioners submit that in view of the
Settlement arrived in M.C.No.1/10 on the file of
Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC, Anekal. This
Petition may be dismissed as settled in the above
case.
1.
2.
3.

Anekal
Date: 17/7/2010
C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.L.AMBIKA,
W/o P.Gopalareddy,
Residing at
Nagappa Building,
Near Sai Nagar,
Neralur Village and Post,
Anekal Taluk,
PETITIONER
(ATTIBELE POLICE STATION LIMITS)
AND
SRI.T.GOPALAREDDY,
S/o Thimmaraya Reddy,
Residing at
Dasarahalli Village,
Doddabelagandapalli Post,
Hosur Taluk,
Krishnagiri District,
Tamilnadu. ………
RESPONDENT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE


follows:-

counsel SRI.H.SRINIVASA, First Floor, Yellappa

title above.

between the petitioner and respondent was
solemnized on 28/10/2009 at Arya Vysya Kalyana
Mantapa, Chikkathirupathi. The marriage of the
petitioner and respondent has been solemnized by
the mother of the petitioner by spending more
than Rs.2,50,000/-. After marriage the petitioner
and respondent living together at respondent’s
house for a period of 6 months. During the said
period and the respondent mother, respondent
brother have been given all sorts of harassment
like physically and mental torture to the
petitioner. The respondent and his family
members also abused the petitioner with filthy
language. So many times the respondent also
assaulted the petitioner and thrown out the
petitioner from the house of the respondent to
petitioner’s parental house. Even though the
petitioner tolerated all the physical and mental
torture given by the respondent and his family
members.
-3-
4. The petitioner further submits that the
respondent and his family members picked a
quarrel with the petitioner and finally on last week
of April-2010, the respondent beaten the petitioner
and thrown out from the matrimonial home and
even picked up Manglaya Chain and Jewelers
belong to the petitioner. Finally the petitioner
joined to her parental house at Neralur. Now the
petitioner is staying at Neralur Village with her
mother. On several times the petitioner and her
mother requested the respondent to take back the
petitioner and to live happily, but the respondent
abused the petitioner and her mother with filthy
language and directly demanded for divorce. The
said behaviour of the respondent is nothing but a
cruel manner and the respondent treated this
petitioner in a cruel manner.
5. The petitioner further submits that it is the

duty of the respondent to provide food, cloth and
shelter and other legal amenities to the petitioner,
but the respondent utterly failed to provide legal
amenities to the petitioner and kicked out the
petitioner from the matrimonial home. Now the
petitioner suffering without food, cloth, shelter
and other legal amenities, since she has no any
income to maintain herself. The mother of the
petitioner is also very poor and helpless lady
having no income.
-4-
6. The petitioner further submits that in fact the
petitioner also got issued legal notice on
11/5/2010 to the respondent. The notice so sent
by way of RPAD to the respondent is duly served
on the respondent and respondent given
untenable reply to the notice. Subsequently there
was a settlement arise between the petitioner and
respondent at Mathigere Police Station, Hosur.
Accordingly the petitioner joined with her mother.
Now she is staying with her mother at Neralur
Village. The petitioner is herewith producing the
Wedding Invitation Card, One Photo, Copy of the
legal notice dated:11/5/2010 for the kind perusal
of this Hon’ble court.

respondent is a agriculturist having 9 acres of
land at Dasarapalli Village, Hosur Taluk,
Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu. The petitioner has
got income of Rs.3,00,000/- per year in the
agriculture operation. The respondent is also
having income from the Milk product, since the
respondent has got 4 cows. In the above said milk
and other product the respondent has got
Rs.10,000/- income per month. The Respondent
has got shops/houses at Hosur. One shop has
been given to Clinic for rent and another shop of
Hardware and Paints, in which the respondent is
getting Rs.10,000/- per month. The Respondent
has got own house at Dasarapalli, Hosur Taluk,
Krishnagiri District.
-5-
capable to give a monthly maintenance of
Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner.

that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to award
the monthly maintenance amount of Rs.5,000/-
per month from the date of deserted by the
respondent and to grant such other relief or reliefs
as deems fit in the circumstance of the case in the
Advocate for Petitioner.

Petitioner.
VERIFICATION
I, the above named petitioner do hereby declare
Anekal.
Petitioner.
Date:
C.Mis.No.47/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.MANJULA & another …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.SOMASHEKAR. ……… RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Manjula, W/o Somashekar, aged about 28

years, residing at Vinayakanagar, Dommasandra
Village and Post, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District, do hereby state on oath as follows:-

case, the petitioner No.2 is my daughter. I know the
facts and circumstances of the case, Hence I am
swearing this affidavit.

Prasanna Venkateshwara Swamy Temple,
Chikkathirupathi, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, as per
the Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage
the respondent also received the dowry by way of
jewels and cash. My parents also performed the
marriage expenses by spending huge amount.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
3. I submit that after the marriage between myself and
respondent were lived happily for 1 year at
Rachamanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk. Subsequently
myself and respondent were shifted our house to my
parental house at Dommasandra Village and we were
lived happily for a period of 4 years. Out of the
wedlock one female child was born namely
Kum.S.Shreya-who is the petitioners No.2 herein.
Subsequently the respondent was habit of giving
torture to me physically and mentally and so many
times the respondent never joined to the parental
house. When I have questioned the same, the
respondent again picked up quarrel with me and
assaulted me. I have tolerated all the harassment
given by the respondent. Finally one day I came to
know that the respondent married second time with
one Smt.Vanitha and subsequently the respondent
brought Smt.Vanitha to my parental house and
demanded to stay at my parental house along with
second wife. When I have refused to same again that
on 7/4/2006 the respondent and some others have
assaulted me and ran away from my parental house
along with second wife. So many panchayath were also
held, but no settlement arrived between myself and
respondent. Now I am taking care and custody of the
minor child who is the petitioner No.2 herein. For the
harassment given by the respondent, I have also
lodged the Police complaint before the Sarjapura
Police, Anekal Taluk and the Sarjapura Police also
registered a case in Cr.No.37/06 (C.C.No.1278/06)
and the said case is pending.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
4. I further submit that since from 5-6 years back the
respondent neglected myself and my daughter without
providing food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses,
Education expenses and other legal amenities to the
petitioners. The Respondent is being the Employee
under a Garment Factory at Belandur Gate and he is
getting salary of amount Rs.6,000/- and the
respondent is also having house and landed properties
at Rachamanahali Village, Anekal Taluk. From the
landed properties he is earning Rs.2,000/- per month.
maintain myself and my daughter by providing food,
cloth, shelter and other legal amenities.
5. I further submit that myself have no income for my

own and I am depending upon purely on my parents
and I am not in a position to look after myself and my
minor children. I require Rs.4000/- per month for my
maintenance amount of Rs.4000/- to myself and my
children.

daughter in the above case in the interest of justice
and equity.
Advocate. Sworn to before me.

Anekal.
Date:
No.of.Corrections.
C.Mis.No.126/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.SUREKHA & others …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.RAMESH. ……… RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Surekha, W/o Ramesh, aged about 49 years,

residing at “Akshaya Nivas”, No.8/274, Gokul Layout,
Behind Court Building, Anekal Town, Bangalore
District, do hereby state on oath as follows:-

case, the petitioners No.2 and 3 are my daughters. I
know the facts and circumstances of the case, Hence I
am swearing this affidavit.

respondent. The marriage between myself and the
myself and respondent, daughters are born namely
Kum.Rachana and Kum.Sinchana who are the
petitioners No.2 and 3 herein. The marriage between
myself and respondent is solemnized and performed as
per the Hindu Rights and customs.
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
3. I submit that now the petitioners No.2 and 3 are
residing with me. The petitioner No.2 being the my
daughter and respondent and now she has completed
her 2nd PUC at JSS College, Mysore. While at the time
of admission to the 1st PUC, the petitioner No.2 joined
to Hostel at Mysore and the respondent provided the
fees, Hostel bill and other expenses to the petitioner
No.2. While at the time of joining to 2 nd PUC, the
petitioner No.2 was living with her father-the
respondent for few months and at the advise of the
respondent again the petitioner No.2 joined to Paying
Guest at Mysore. The Respondent undertake to
provide all the facilities to the petitioner No.2 for her
studies and the respondent is also undertake to take
pay the fees and also undertake to pay the Paying
guest fees and other legal amenities to the petitioner
No.2. Now the Respondent No.2 completed her 2 nd PUC
and she is intend to continue her education and as
such it is the duty of the father/respondent to provide
all the facilities and to maintain the petitioner No.2
also.
4. I submit that the petitioner No.3 has completed

SSLC at St.Joseph School, Anekal and she is also
intend to continue her education in future and she is
also intend to join for 1st PUC at Mysore. The
respondent is also undertake to provide all the
facilities to the petitioner No.3 for her studies. Further
it is the duty of the Respondent/father to provide all
the facilities and to maintain the petitioner No.3 also.
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
5. I submit that now the respondent picked quarrel
with me and deserted me along with my daughters
who are the petitioners No.2 and 3 by neglecting to
maintain myself and my daughters. I have no income
for myself and as such I not in a position to pay
maintenance to petitioners No.2 and 3 and I am not in
a position to maintain myself and my daughters. It is
the duty of the respondent to maintain myself and my
myself and my daughters. When such being the facts
and circumstances without seeing the minor interest
and without providing all the legal amenities, the
respondent ran away from the house.
6. I further submit that earlier the respondent working

as a Children Organizer at Myrada/Plan at Hosur.
Earlier the respondent was drawing Rs.12,000/- per
month. Now the respondent working at Ujjivan,
Finance Company at Mysore as a Manager and he is
drawing salary amount more than Rs.20,000/- . The
respondent has got sufficient income to pay
maintenance to myself and my children towards the
legal amenities.
7. I further submit that after School/College Holidays,

now the admissions to the 1st PUC and as well as
Degree course has been started. As such the
petitioners No.2 and 3 are urgently need money to join
college for their further studies. When the petitioners
No.2 and 3 requested the respondent to pay the college
No.of.Corrections.
-4-
fees and also requested to provide required books and
other materials for their further studies and further
the requested to pay maintenance amount. But the
respondent blindly refused to provide the above said
legal amenities. Since myself being the lady and I am
not in a position to provide the above said facilities to
the petitioners No.2 and 3, the respondent is a capable
person to provide the above said facilities.
8. I further submit that recently I have undergone for

eye operation at K.R.Hospital, Mysore with the help of
my relatives. Now I am taking treatment at Hospital,
for which also the money is required.

daughters in the above case in the interest of justice
and equity.

Anekal.
Date:4/9/2010
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No.126/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.SUREKHA & others …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.RAMESH. ……… RESPONDENT
1. Receipt dated:15/5/2004.
2. Receipt dated: 25/7/2004.
12. School fee Receipt dated: 18/5/05.
13. School fee Receipt dated: 31/8/05.
14. School fee Receipt dated:5/6/06.
15. Salary Slip of Respondent for the month of

May-08.
-2-
16. Salary Slip of Respondent for the month of

August-08.
17. Copy of Statement of Account of Respondent from

1/4/2009 to 23/6/2010.
18. Medical Certificate of Petitioner No.1 issued by

Assistant Professor, Department of Opthalmology,
Mysore.
19. Medical Fitness Certificate of Petitioner No.1.
Anekal. Advocate for petitioners.
Date:

C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SHANTHAMMA,
W/o Thimmarayappa,
residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. …….. PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Thimmarayappa,
S/o Muniyappa,
Residing at
Karpur Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. ……… RESPONDENT
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.
-2-

customs Act. Thereafter the respondent started to ill-
treat and acted upon inhumanly and given all sorts of
pinprick trouble to the petitioner and also demanded
the petitioner No.1 to bring the dowry from her
parental house. There after the respondent thrown out
the petitioners from the matrimonial house and then
the petitioners lived separately at the address
furnished in the cause title. The petitioners are not in
a position to eak out their livelihood and bread, and as
such the petitioners have filed Criminal Mis.No.93/93,
on the file of Hon’ble Prl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC,
at Anekal for maintenance and in the said case, the
respondent appeared before the Court through his
counsel and filed the detailed objections for the said
petition. After contesting the proceedings, the Hon’ble
Prl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Anekal, passed an
order by granting the maintenance for a sum of
Rs.300/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.250/- to the 2nd
petitioner and the said order is in force.

liable to pay a sum of Rs.6050/- (Rupees Six
Thousand Fifty Only) as per the orders passed by this
-3-
Hon’ble Court. When the respondent failed to pay the
said maintenance amount to the petitioners, as such
the petitioners filed the present petition before this
Hon’ble Court for the recovery of the maintenance
pay the maintenance amount of Rs.6050/- (Rupees Six
Thousand Fifty Only) from 4/6/2008 to 3/5/2009, to
the petitioners with future maintenance to the
petitioners. Hence this petition.

from 4/6/2008 to 3/5/2009 a sum of Rs.6050/-
(Rupees Six Thousand Fifty Only) and in the case the
1.
2.
-4-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:
C.Mis.No._______/2010.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.SHANTHAMMA,
W/o Thimmarayappa,
2) KUM.ASHA,
D/o Thimmarayappa,

Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District. ……..PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.THIMMARAYAPPA,
S/o Muniyappa,
Residing at
Karpur Village,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.
-2-

customs Act, and thereby petitioner No.2 was born to
the 1st petitioner and respondent. Thereafter the
respondent started to ill-treat and acted upon
inhumanly and given all sorts of pinprick trouble to
the petitioner and also demanded the petitioner No.1
to bring the dowry from her parental house. There
after the respondent thrown out the petitioners from
the matrimonial house and then the petitioners lived
separately at the address furnished in the cause title.
The petitioners are not in a position to eak out their
livelihood and bread, and as such the petitioners have
filed Criminal Mis.No.93/93, on the file of Hon’ble
Prl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, at Anekal for
maintenance and in the said case, the respondent
appeared before the Court through his counsel and
filed the detailed objections for the said petition. After
contesting the proceedings, the Hon’ble Prl.Civil Judge
(Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Anekal, passed an order by
granting the maintenance for a sum of Rs.300/- to the
1st petitioner and Rs.250/- to the 2nd petitioner and the
said order is in force.
-3-
liable to pay a sum of Rs.5300/- (Rupees Five
Thousand Three Hundred Only) as per the orders
passed by this Hon’ble Court. The 2 nd petitioner is now
got married and she is entitle from 4/5/2009 to
3/11/2009 Rs.250 x 6 months= Rs.1500-00 and the
1st petitioner is entitle from 4/5/2009 to 3/5/2010
Rs.300 x 12 = Rs.3800-00. When the respondent failed
to pay the said maintenance amount to the petitioners,
as such the petitioners filed the present petition before
this Hon’ble Court for the recovery of the maintenance
pay the maintenance amount of Rs.5300/- (Rupees
Five Thousand Three Hundred Only) from 4/5/2009 to
3/5/2010, to the petitioners with future maintenance
to the petitioners. Hence this petition.

from 4/5/2009 to 3/5/2010 a sum of Rs.5300/-
(Rupees Five Thousand Three Hundred Only) and in
the case the respondent failed to pay the said
maintenance amount, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to
detain the respondent in Civil Prison and to award the
costs of the case, and for such other relief or reliefs as
this Hon’ble Court be pleased to deems fit to be grant
-4-
1.
2.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2011.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RAMAMANI,
W/o Krishnamurthy,
2) KUM.MAMATHA,
D/o Krishnamurthy,
S/o Krishnamurthy,

Mother Smt.Ramamani
All are residing at

Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

562106.

-3-

awarded of the orders passed by this Hon’’ble Court
above.


-4-

and equity.
1.
2.
3.
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

C.Mis.No.14/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.RAMAMANI. ……..PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY ……… RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 83 and 84 OF CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
The petitioner above named begs to state as
follows:-
The Petitioner submits that the respondent being

the husband of the petitioner No.1 and father of
the Petitioners No.2 and 3. The petitioners have
filed a case for maintenance vide Crl.Mis.78/2008.
The Hon’ble Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal
awarded the maintenance amount by directing the
Respondent to pay a maintenance amount @700/-
per month to the 1st petitioner and Rs.500/- each
to the petitioners No.2 and 3 from the date of
petition. The Respondent is due in paying the
maintenance amount from 25/1/2009 to
24/1/2010 and as such the petitioners filed the
present petition under the provision U/s.125(3) of
Cr.Pc. for failed to comply with the orders and as
such the Respondent committed the breach of
order. In fact after filing the present petition, the
Respondent has paid only Rs.2000/- to the
-2-
petitioners and remaining amount has not been
paid by the Respondent to the petitioners.
The petitioners submit that the respondent
has got movable properties, as such it is
necessitated to attach the movable property for the
balance maintenance amount. Hence this
application to attach the movable property as
detailed as below.
LIST PROPERTY TO BE ATTACHED FROM

RESPONDENT
1. TVS Excel bearing Reg.No.KA-51-L-8227.

2. Television Colour
3. Almirah
4. Gold ornaments of Respondent.
5. House hold utensils.
Anekal. Advocate for Petitioner.
Date:15/4/2011

C.Mis.No.84/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.N.LAKSHMI & another. …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.D.RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR. ……… RESPONDENT

EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER No.1-BY WAY OF
AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.N.Lakshmi, W/o D.Ravi @ RaviKumar,

aged about 22 years, residing at
Mahanthalingapura Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby state on oath
as follows:-

case, the petitioner No.2 is my son. I know the
facts and circumstances of the case, Hence I am
swearing this affidavit.

respondent. The marriage between myself and and
Sri.Champakadama Swamy Temple, Bannerghatta
Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, as per
the Hindu rites and customs. At the time of
No.of.Corrections.
-2-
marriage my father has given a dowry amount of
Rs.10,000/- and One Watch and one Ring as per
the demand made by the respondent and his
family members. My father has given One pair ear
rings, one pair hangings and sarees to myself and
as per the demands made by the respondent and
his family members.
3. I submit that subsequent to the marriage
myself and respondent lived happily for a period of
1 year at Mahanthalingapura Village.
Subsequently he has demanded to bring the dowry
amount and jewels from my parents and when I
have refused to bring the same the respondent
treated her as cruelty. When I was pregnant, by
that time the respondent given torture to myself
and subsequently the respondent sent myself to
my parental house for delivery and that on
21/2/2005 I gave birth to male child at
Y.K.Hospital at Jigani. After few months the
respondent never taken back myself and my child
to his matrimonial house. Several Panchayath and
request made by myself and my parents become
vain. Since from above said period I am living at
my parental house. I further submit that I also
came to know that again the respondent married
No.of.Corrections.
-3-
with Lavanya without my consent and knowledge.
Now the respondent and Lavanya have got one
female child who gave birth on 1/3/2009.
4. I further submit that for mental and physical

torture committed by the respondent, I have also
lodged complaint before the Bannerghatta Police
on 31/8/2008. In fact the Bannerghatta Police
have also registered the case in Cr.No.218/2008
for the offence punishable U.s,498(A) and 506 IPC.
Several times myself and my parents demanded
the respondent to take myself and my child to his
house and even though he refused to take back
myself and my child to his matrimonial house.
Now the petitioner No.2 is joined to Anganawadi
School.
5. I submit that the respondent is Owner and

Driver of T.T. Vehicle and the said vehicle is hire
to company, for which the respondent has got
income of Rs.20,000/- and the respondent is
running Provision Store at Mahanthalingapura
Village and the respondent also got landed
property at Mahanthalingapura Village. The
Respondent has got house and site at
Mahanthalingapura Village. The respondent has
got Rs.10,000/- per month from the above said
No.of.Corrections.
-4-
properties. In all the respondent is earning more
than Rs.30,000/- per month. As such the
respondent is a capable person to maintain myself
and my child by providing food, cloth, shelter,
6. I further submit that I have no income for my

own and nobody taking care about myself and my
child. Myself and my male child required
Rs.5000/- per month for our maintenance like
food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses and other
legal amenities.
7. I submit that the respondent is capable to give
a monthly maintenance of Rs.5000/- to myself
and my male child.
Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble

court may be pleased to award the maintenance
male child in the above case in the interest of
justice and equity.

Anekal.
Date: 26/4/2011
No.of.Corrections.

C.Mis.No.84/2009.
BETWEEN
AND
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE

PETITIONERS.
1. Certified copy of the RTC Extracts in 3 Nos.
2. Certified copy of the Entire Charge Sheet in

C.C.No.1765/08.
3. Certified copy of the Form No.9.
Date:
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, AT
ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2011.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.T.GEETHA,
D/o Late Thyagarajachari,
W/o R.Rajesh,
2) KUM.R.YASHASWINI,
D/o R.Rajesh,
Aged about 2 years,
Since Minor represented by

Her mother SMT.T.GEETHA,
1st petitioner as legal and natural
Guardian,

Bidaragere Road,
Hospet,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. ……… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.RAJESH,
S/o Ramakrishnachar,
Residing at
House No.2/55,
Berike Town,
Masti Road,
Hosur Taluk,
Dharmapuri District. ……… RESPONDENT
UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
The petitioners above named begs to state as

follows:-

counsel SRI.H.SRINIVAS, First Floor, Yellappa

title above.
3. The petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of

Respondent. The marriage was solemnized on
28/7/2003 before the Office of the Sub-Registrar,
Anekal according to the Hindu Rites and Customs
in the presence of the elders, well wishers, friends
and relatives of both the parties. Subsequently the
petitioner No.1 started to live at the house of the
petitioner No.1 parent in one portion, by
discharging her duties as the dutiful wife and the
Respondent also look after the petitioner No.1,
well and discharged his duties, as the dutiful
husband. The petitioner No.1 is nothing but the
blood relative of the Respondent and the father of
the petitioner No.1 out of love and affection on the
parents of the petitioner No.1 given a sum of
Rs.10,000/- cash, one soverign gold chain, costly
clothes and one Titan Watch to the Respondent
and also doing the separate shelter at Anekal
Town, out of love affection on the respondent and
as well as the petitioner No.1. When such being
the real facts, under all-advise of the enemical
persons of the petitioner No.1 and the Respondent
started to give trouble and harassment to the
petitioner No.1 and also the respondent learnt bad
habits, such as drinking alcohol, playing card and
other bad habits, to meet out the expenses of his
bad habits, started to demand the money from the
petitioner No.1 and when the petitioner No.1
refused to give the money, the respondent by
selling all the house hold things gold articles
which is in the house, and used the amount for
his bad habits, and also by drinking alcohol,
threatened the petitioner No.1 with filthy
language, and also assaulted the petitioner No.1
brutally. On several occasions, the parents of the
petitioner No.1, given some money and the
Respondent started to demand the money from
the parental house again and again. Further the
respondent started give unnecessary trouble and
harassment, when the petitioner No.1 refused to
bring the money as a dowry from parental house,
the Respondent without informing the petitioner
ran away to his native from the house. Several
panchayathi also conveyed in this regard, but all
in vain.
-4-
4. The petitioner No.1 submits that when such
being the facts and circumstances for the above
attitude of the Respondent and his parents, the
petitioner No.1 filed a Private complaint before this
Hon’ble Court for the offence punishable
U/s.498(A), 506 of IPC and the same has been
referred to the Anekal Police by this Hon’ble Court
and the Police authorities also submitted charge
sheet and the case has been registered in criminal
case Register No.C.C.No.672/2004. In fact this
petitioner No.1 also filed C.Mis.No.68/2004 on the
file of this Hon’ble court seeking maintenance. In
the mean while at the instance of elderly persons
in the locality a panchayathi was made between
the petitioner No.1 and her parents, Respondent
and his parents, finally the Respondent agreed to
take back the Petitioner No.1 with some suitable
conditions. Accordingly the panchayathi
Muchalike was drawn on 25/4/2008 and the
same has been Notorized before the Notary,
Anekal/Bangalore. Subsequently the petitioner
No.1 has been withdrawn the C.C.No.672/2004 by
giving hostile evidence before the court, since the
matter has been compromised and also withdrawn
the C.Mis.No.68/2004.
5. The Petitioner No.1 submits that subsequent to

the compromise as per the will and wish of the
Respondent, the petitioner No.1 joined with
Respondent and lived happily at Berike Village,
-5-
Hosur Taluk, Dharmapuri District for some
period. During the above said period, when the
petitioner No.1 become pregnant, as usually the
petitioner No.1 joined her parental house for
delivery of baby. That on 18/3/2009 a female
baby was born at Vijaya Nursing Home at Anekal.
The parents of the petitioner No.1 spent the
amount for the same. Subsequently the
Respondent neglected to maintain the petitioner
No.1 and his female baby-Petitioner No.2. After
one year again the petitioner No.1 rejoined to her
matrimonial home. Subsequently the Respondent
given mental and physical torture to the Petitioner
No.1 by neglecting and without maintaining her,
and without providing legal amenities to the
Petitioners No.1 and 2. Always the Respondent
demanding the petitioner No.1 to bring the dowry
amount from her parents house and bad habits
also continued without hearing the words of the
petitioner No.1. Some times the petitioner No.1
also brought amount and house hold articles from
her parents and the same has been handed over to
the Respondent. The Respondent also taken away
the Gold Neck chain of brother of the petitioner
No.1 and the same has not been returned to her
brother. Finally the Respondent kicked out the
petitioners No.1 and 2 from the matrimonial house
in the month of August-2010. Now the petitioners
are living at her parental house in a rented house.
Since from August-2010, the Respondent not
-6-
taken away the petitioner No.1 and 2 and
neglected to maintain the petitioners by providing
legal amenities. But again and again the
Respondent came near the parental house of the
petitioner No.1 picked up quarrel with the
petitioner No.1.

being the case the petitioner No.1 is not in the
position to earn the bread, and daily legal
requirements and the Respondent is legally
entitled to maintain the petitioners and the
respondent has got sufficient income to maintain
the petitioners. The respondent is the driver by
doing driver work, he getting monthly income of
Rs.10,000/-, the parents of the respondents are
also having sufficient income out of the rent from
the residential house and other sources they got
Rs.20,000/- income for month, and also owning
the properties at Hosur and also having the
properties and agricultural lands. Even though the
respondent has got sufficient income, failed to
maintain the petitioners. The repeated requests
and demands made by the petitioner No.1 become
vain, and as such the petitioner No.1 having no
other alternative remedy except filing the present
case against the respondent for maintenance.
Hence this petition.
-7-
7. The Petitioner No.1 submits that now a days
she required a sum of Rs.4000/- per month, for
food, clothing, shelter and other daily legal
requirements, but the respondent failed to pay the
maintenance as such the petitioner No.1 filed the
present petition seeking the maintenance of
Rs.4000/- per month. Hence this petition.

is capable to give a monthly maintenance of
Rs.4000/- to the petitioners.

prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to
award the monthly maintenance of Rs.2000/-
each petitioners per month and direct the
respondent to pay a monthly maintenance of
Rs.4000/- to the petitioners from the date of
deserted by the respondent and to grant such
other relief or reliefs as deems fit in the
circumstance of the case in the interest of justice
and equity.
1.
2.
-8-
VERIFICATION
correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and beliefs.
1.
2.
Date:

C.Mis.No.117/2006.
BETWEEN
BHAGYALAKSM & another. …… PETITIONERS

AND
SRI.RAMACHANDRAREDDY ……… RESPONDENT
MEMO
The Petitioner and Respondent prays that this
Hon’ble court may be pleased to accept the
evidence of both the sides, which is filed by way of
Affidavit and both of them adopts the cross-
examination already completed in the above case
in the interest of justice.
Petitioner. Respondent.
Anekal.
Date: 11/7/2011

C.Mis.No._______/2011.
BETWEEN:-
1) SMT.BHAGYALAKSHMAMMA,
W/o RamaChandrareddy,
2) KUM.DHRUTHI NAYANA,
D/o Ramachandrareddy,
No.2 is minor Rep.by her
Mother and natural guardian,
SMT.BHAGYALAKSHMAMMA,

C/o Venkataramaiah,
Retired Teacher,
KSRTC Colony,
1st Main, 1st Cross,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore Dist. ……..PETITIONERS
AND:-
SRI.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,
S/o Late Narayanareddy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore District ……RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

follows:-
-2-
counsel Sri.H.Srinivas, First Floor, Yellappa

title above.
3. The 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of

the respondent and the 2nd petitioner the daughter
of the respondent. The 2nd petitioner is the minor
represented by the 1st petitioner who is the mother
and legal guardian, next friend of minor care and
custody of her. The petitioners having neglected by
the respondent and failed to provide the livelihood
of the petitioners which are daily essential
requirements such as clothing shelter, food
medical expenses and other expenses and in turn
the petitioners deserted the petitioners. And as
seeking the monthly maintenance. After issue of
notice to the respondent, the respondent appeared
before the court and filed his objections and he
has led his evidence on his behalf of. After trial
and hearing on both sides the Hon’ble Court was
-3-
pleased to pass an order on merits by allowing the
petition partly directing the respondent to pay the
monthly maintenance a sum of Rs.2500/- to the
petitioner No.1 and Rs.1500/- to the 2 nd petitioner.
As per the orders passed by the Court and
petitioners are entitled to get a sum of Rs.4000/-
for a month from the date of filing the petitioner,
by its order dated:2/8/2011.

well awarded of the orders passed by this Hon’ble
Court and even though failed to pay the
maintenance to the petitioners. And now the
respondent is liable to pay maintenance for the
period from 2-8-2011 to 1-9-2011 intentionally
avoided to pay the monthly maintenance, and as
such the petitioner sustained irreparable loss
injury and hardship. Under the said
sum of Rs.4000/- for the period from 2-8-2011 to
above.
5. The Petitioners have paid the fixed Court fee on

the petition to allow the same and fixed well within
the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
-4-
prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order/issue leavy Warrant against the
respondent for amount of Rs.4000/- awarded for
the period from 2-8-2011 to 1-9-2011 and
directing him to pay the maintenance amount in
future dates and when fails due in the
circumstances and to award the costs of the
petition and for such other relief or reliefs as this
Hon’ble Court deems fit to be grant under the
and equity.
1.
2.
VERIFICATION
and beliefs.
1.
2.
Anekal.
Date: Petitioners.
C.Mis.No.76/2011
BETWEEN
Chi.Suman & others. ……. PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Mahadev. ……… RESPONDENT
OBJECTIONS FILED THE RESPONDENT TO

THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
The Respondent above named begs to state as

follows:-
1. At the outset the petition filed by the petitioner

is not maintainable either in law or on facts. It is
liable to be dismissed in lamine.
2. The Respondent submits that the averments

made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioners
No.1 and 2 are minors, and they are under care
and custody of their mother-guardian
Smt.Nethravathi-Third petitioner, and there is no
adversity of interest in between the minor
petitioner No.1 and 2 and their mother is hereby
denied as false and incorrect, but intentionally the
petitioner No.3 ran away from the matrimonial
home for no reason.
-2-
made in para 4 of the petition that the respondent
is the father of the petitioners No.1 and 2 and the
respondent is not looking after the welfare of
petitioners. Instead of look after the welfare of the
petitioners, the respondent is acting detrimental
interest to the petitioners, finally the respondent
neglected and deserted the petitioner, hence the
petitioner filed this petition against the respondent
is hereby denied as false and incorrect.

made in para 5 of the petition that the marriage of
the third petitioner and respondent was
solemnized at Sri.Beereshwara Temple, Near
Mallya Hospital, Sampangi Tank, Near Kanteerava
Stadium, Bangalore on 19/2/2000 as per the
Hindu rites and customs may be true and correct.
Further averments made in same para that at the
time of marriage expenses are borne by the third
petitioners parents, at the time of marriage the
respondent demanded Rs.20,000/- as dowry
amount and forcefully taken Rs.20000/- dowry
amount from the third petitioner father, the third
petitioner father given one Watch, Gold Ring and
Gold Neck Chain, Bracelet to the Respondent, and
also the petitioner father given one Gold Neck
Chain, one Gold Ring, Vale, Jumuki and other
gold and silver ornaments to the third petitioner is
-3-
made in para 6 of the petition that subsequently
after marriage the third petitioner and respondent
lived happily for some 2 years at Thimmsandra
Village, out of wedlock the petitioners No.1 and 2
are born, after the birth of petitioners No.1 and 2
the respondent addicted to bad habits and
neglected and deserted the petitioners No.1 and 2
and their mother Nethravathi-third petitioner, the
respondent harassed the petitioners without
reason and cause is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

addicted to bad habits such as gambling, woman
folk and intentionally, willfully harassed the
petitioners, and the respondent demanded more
money and jewels and gave dowry harassment to
the third petitioner, for which on several occasions
the panchayaths was held and in the said
panchayaths the respondent undertaken before
the panchayath that he will look after the
petitioners in a good manner and also the
Respondent undertaken that he will provide all the
necessities for the petitioners, but the respondent
not took any care of the petitioners is hereby
-4-
having illegal relationship with strange lady, for
which the third petitioner questioned the illegal
activities and lodged the complaint before the
Attibele Police against the Respondent for his legal
activities, before the Police authorities the
respondent undertaken to look after the
petitioners in proper manner, and the respondent
further agreed that, the petitioners are at liberty to
file case against the respondent to seek the
remedy of maintenance is hereby denied as false
and incorrect.

is guilty of willfully neglecting the petitioners
without any lawful and suitable cause, the first
petitioner is studying in 2nd Standard, and the
second petition is studying UKG, both petitioners
No.2 and 3 are studying at SVRHPS High School
at Chandapura, Since the petitioners No.1 and 2
are studying the petitioners No.1 and 2 are
required Rs.1,00,000/- per year for the purpose of
their education, and the petitioners No.1 to 3
required Rs.3000/- per month to each of the
petitioners to meet their basic necessities, food,
shelter, clothing, and for their medical necessities,
since the petitioners No.1 and 2 being minors, the
third petitioner is unable to maintain herself and
-5-
the petitioners have no source or no income to
meet their basic necessities, the respondent being
the father of the minor petitioners, it is the
bounded duty of the respondent to look after the
welfare of the petitioners, but the Respondent
failed to provide the basic necessities to life of the
petitioners is hereby denied as false and incorrect.

made in para 10 of the petition that the
respondent is having income of Rs.2,40,000/- per
year from the agricultural, the respondent is
having six high breed cows and the respondent is
doing milk business and also the respondent
doing cow business i.e, the respondent purchasing
the cows from the villagers for an amount and
same was sold in the Sandy days, from the above
said business the respondent is earning
Rs.15,000/- per month, as such the respondent is
earning totally Rs.35,000/- per month, and the
respondent is capable to pay the monthly
maintenance of Rs.3000/- per month to each of
the petitioners, the respondent being the father of
the petitioners No.1 and 2 and husband of the
petitioner No.3, is liable to maintain to the
petitioners, the petitioners are required monthly
maintenance of Rs.3000/- each per month to meet
their daily basic necessities is hereby denied as
-6-
made in para 11 of the petition that the
respondent is having landed properties such as
agricultural land bearing Sy.No.244/2 measuring
7 acres 30 guntas, including 10 guntas kharab
and agricultural land bearing Sy.No.430,
measuring 18 guntas situated at Samandur
Village, Kasaba Hobli, Anekal Taluk, as such the
respondent is having sufficient income to pay the
maintenance to the petitioners, on the other hand
the petitioners have no source of income to meet
their basic necessities of life is hereby denied as
11. The Respondent submits that the marriage

between the petitioner No.3 and respondent has
been solemnized on 19/2/2001 at Beereshwara
Swamy Temple, Bangalore as per the Hindu rites
and customs. In fact the marriage has been
solemnized in the temple in the simple manner.
The entire expenses of the marriage has been
spent by the respondent and father and mother of
the respondent. As such the say of the petiitoner
No.3 in the petition are all false and incorrect.

being uneducated person and in fact the petitioner
No.3 being the educated and she has been
completed her 7th standard.
-7-
13. The Respondent submits that subsequent to
the marriage the respondent and petitioner No.3
have lived happily for a period of 9-10 years at
S.Thimmasandra Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District. In fact the Respondent
doing coolie in some other gardens in the village,
but the respondent have no any other incomes
except above stated. With great difficulty the
respondent earning the money in order to live
happily along with the petitioner No.3. During the
wed lock the two children were born, who are the
petitioners No.1 and 2.

spending school expenses to the petitioner No.1
and 2, till the desert made by the Petitioner No.3.
In fact the petitioner No.1 was admitted to JET
School, Anekal during the academic year 2006-
2007 for Pre-KG and studied for 4 years upto 1 st
standard and he has been promoted to Class-2
and the Respondent paid all the fees for the
academic above said years and including the year
2009-2010. But without intimating to the
Respondent, the petitioner No.3 taken away the
Transfer Certificate from the above said School
during the June-2010. Like wise the Petitioner
No.2 namely Kum.Supriya was admitted to JET
2008-2009 for Pre-KG and studied for 2 years
upto LKG and she has been promoted to UKG and
-8-
the Respondent paid all the fees for the academic
above said years and including the year 2008-
2009, 2009-2010. But without intimating to the
during the June-2010. But the say of the
Petitioner No.3 in the petition that the petitioner
No.3 admitted the petitioners No.1 and 2 to the
school are all false and incorrect.
15. The Respondent submits that upto 2010 the
respondent taken care of all the petitioners and
also provided legal amenities to the petitioners,
the respondent also provided school fees,
education expenses and also provided food, cloth,
shelter and medical expenses to all the petitioners.
But without reason and without intimating to the
petitioners No.1 and 2 from the custody of the
Respondent.
16. The Respondent submits that the Respondent

and the petitioners are living separately since from
6-7 years, even though the petitioner No.3 is habit
of giving unnecessary trouble and mental torture
to the respondent. The petitioner No.3 is a habit of
picking quarrel for nothing, and she is also having
habit of kicked out the husband and joined to
parental house for no reason.
-9-
is a poor and helpless person and having no any
large income, the respondent is not in a position
to fulfill the demands made by the petitioner No.3
and in fact the petitioner No.3 wanted to live
luxurious life at Anekal Town or Bangalore or at
Bommasandra Industrial area. When the
Respondent refused to fulfill the demands made
by the petitioner No.3, the petitioner No.3
unnecessary always picking quarrel with the
Respondent. Finally in the month of June-2010,
the petitioner No.3 quarrel with the respondent
and ran away from the matrimonial home by
taking the petitioner No.1 and 2. When the
Respondent came to know that she ran away from
the Matrimonial home and joined to parental
house, immediately the respondent rushed to the
parental of petitioner No.3 at Bommasandra and
requested to come and join the matrimonial home,
in fact the panchayath also arranged in the
Bommasandra and even though with the
instigation of her parents, the petitioner No.3
refused to join the matrimonial home.
18. The Respondent submits that even afterwards

the Respondent arranged the several panchayath
with regard to the same, but the petitioner No.3
refused to join the matrimonial home to live
happily.
-10-
19. The Respondent submits that till today the
Respondent is ready to provide all the legal
amenities to all the petitioners and further the
Respondent is also undertake to take care about
all the petitioners in good manner and further
respondent also undertake to fulfill the demands
made by the petitioner No.3 as much as.
20. The Respondent submits that at the time of

marriage the respondent and his parents given
one Manglya Chain and four silk sarees to the
Petitioner No.3 and conducted the marriage with
the cost of the parents of the respondent.
21. The Respondent submits that since the
respondent has no any income and other hand the
respondent is doing coolie and he is suffering from
knee joint pain. As such it is not possible to the
respondent to pay the monthly maintenance
amount to the petitioners as prayed in the
petition, on the other hand the respondent is
ready to take the petitioners to his matrimonial
house and undertake to provide all the legal
amenities. Hence the petition is liable to be
-11-
22. The Respondent submits that the parents of
the petitioner No.3 are well to do persons and
having rented house at Bommasandra and the
brothers of the petitioner No.3 also got rented
house and having sufficient income. As such in
order to live luxurious life the petitioner No.3 ran
away from the matrimonial home along with the
children.
23. The Respondent submits that the petitioner

No.3 doing work in a factory at Bommasandra
Industrial area and she is earning sufficient
income. Further the Petitioner No.3 is capable to
maintain herself and the petitioners No.1 and 2,
on the other hand the respondent is not in a
position to pay monthly maintenance amount to
the petitioners.
Wherefore, the respondent humbly prays that

this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dismiss the
petition filed by the petitioners with exemplary
cost in the interest of justice and equity.
Advocate for Respondent. Respondent.
-12-
VERIFICATION
I, the above named respondent do hereby
and belief.
Anekal. Respondent.
Date:
C.Mis.No.76/2011
BETWEEN
AND
MEMO
The Respondent submits that the Objections filed
by this Respondent to the main petition may be
treated as objections to the Interim application in
the above case in the interest of justice and equity.

Anekal. Advocate for Respondent.
Date:

C.Mis.No.76/2011
BETWEEN
AND

THE INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE
PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 125(1) OF THE
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

follows:-
1. At the outset the application filed by the

petitioner is not maintainable either in law or on
facts. It is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
2. The Respondent submits that the

allegations/averments made in para 1 to 7 are all
hereby denied as false and incorrect, except
admitting the relationship between the petitioners
and respondent.
3. The Respondent submits that the application

filed by the petitioner is not according with law
and on careful perusal of the application shows
that and it is mention and used the words and
sentence as “I submit that” me, us, and it shows
that the application is the way of affidavit, but the
petitioner not sweared the affidavit, but filed by
-2-
way of application. As such the application is not
filed according with law. On this ground itself the
very application is liable to be dismissed in
lamine.
4. The Respondent submits that on perusal of the

application it is not clear that whether the
application is in the way of affidavit or in the way
of petition. As such the application is liable to be
5. The Respondent submits that the main

objections filed by this respondent may be read as
a part and parcel of this objection statement in
order to avoid the repetition of facts.
6. The Respondent submits that the respondent is

ready to take back the petitioners to home, but the
petitioners are not ready to join the respondent to
live at matrimonial home. As such the question of
paying the interim maintenance does not arise at
all. On this ground itself the very application is
liable to be dismissed in lamine.
7. The Respondent submits that there is no

document produced by the petitioners to show
that the respondent has got sufficient income. As
such the application is not at all maintainable in
law and the same is liable to be dismissed in
lamine.
-3-
8. The Respondent submits that there is no proper
prayer sought in the application in order to grant
the interim maintenance. As such the application
is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
9. The Respondent submits that subsequent to the

marriage the respondent and petitioner No.3 have
lived happily for a period of 9-10 years at
S.Thimmasandra Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District. In fact the Respondent
doing coolie in some other gardens in the village,
but the respondent have no any other incomes
except above stated. With great difficulty the
respondent earning the money in order to live
happily along with the petitioner No.3. During the
wed lock the two children were born, who are the
petitioners No.1 and 2.

spending school expenses to the petitioner No.1
and 2, till the desert made by the Petitioner No.3.
In fact the petitioner No.1 was admitted to JET
2007 for Pre-KG and studied for 4 years upto 1 st
standard and he has been promoted to Class-2
and the Respondent paid all the fees for the
academic above said years and including the year
2009-2010. But without intimating to the
-4-
during the June-2010. Like wise the Petitioner
No.2 namely Kum.Supriya was admitted to JET
2008-2009 for Pre-KG and studied for 2 years
upto LKG and she has been promoted to UKG and
the Respondent paid all the fees for the academic
above said years and including the year 2008-
2009, 2009-2010. But without intimating to the
during the June-2010.
11. The Respondent submits that upto 2010 the

respondent taken care of all the petitioners and
also provided legal amenities to the petitioners,
the respondent also provided school fees,
education expenses and also provided food, cloth,
shelter and medical expenses to all the petitioners.
But without reason and without intimating to the
petitioners No.1 and 2 from the custody of the
Respondent.
12. The Respondent submits that the Respondent

and the petitioners are living separately since from
6-7 years, even though the petitioner No.3 is habit
of giving unnecessary trouble and mental torture
to the respondent. The petitioner No.3 is a habit of
picking quarrel for nothing, and she is also having
-5-
habit of kicked out the husband and joined to
parental house for no reason.

is a poor and helpless person and having no any
large income, the respondent is not in a position
to fulfill the demands made by the petitioner No.3
and in fact the petitioner No.3 wanted to live
luxurious life at Anekal Town or Bangalore or at
Bommasandra Industrial area. When the
Respondent refused to fulfill the demands made
by the petitioner No.3, the petitioner No.3
unnecessary always picking quarrel with the
Respondent. Finally in the month of June-2010,
the petitioner No.3 quarrel with the respondent
and ran away from the matrimonial home by
taking the petitioner No.1 and 2. When the
Respondent came to know that she ran away from
the Matrimonial home and joined to parental
house, immediately the respondent rushed to the
parental of petitioner No.3 at Bommasandra and
requested to come and join the matrimonial home,
in fact the panchayath also arranged in the
Bommasandra and even though with the
instigation of her parents, the petitioner No.3
refused to join the matrimonial home.
14. The Respondent submits that even afterwards
the Respondent arranged the several panchayath
with regard to the same, but the petitioner No.3
refused to join the matrimonial home to live
happily.
15. The Respondent submits that till today the

Respondent is ready to provide all the legal
amenities to all the petitioners and further the
Respondent is also undertake to take care about
all the petitioners in good manner and further
respondent also undertake to fulfill the demands
made by the petitioner No.3 as much as.
16. The Respondent submits that at the time of

marriage the respondent and his parents given
one Manglya Chain and four silk sarees to the
Petitioner No.3 and conducted the marriage with
the cost of the parents of the respondent.
17. The Respondent submits that since the

respondent has no any income and other hand the
respondent is doing coolie and he is suffering from
knee joint pain. As such it is not possible to the
respondent to pay the monthly maintenance
amount to the petitioners as prayed in the
petition, on the other hand the respondent is
ready to take the petitioners to his matrimonial
house and undertake to provide all the legal
amenities.
18. The Respondent submits that the parents of

the petitioner No.3 are well to do persons and
having rented house at Bommasandra and the
brothers of the petitioner No.3 also got rented
house and having sufficient income. As such in
order to live luxurious life the petitioner No.3 ran
away from the matrimonial home along with the
children.
19. The Respondent submits that the petitioner

No.3 doing work in a factory at Bommasandra
Industrial area and she is earning sufficient
income. Further the Petitioner No.3 is capable to
maintain herself and the petitioners No.1 and 2,
on the other hand the respondent is not in a
position to pay interim maintenance amount to
the petitioners.

Interim application filed by the petitioners with
exemplary cost in the interest of justice and
equity.
VERIFICATION
and belief.
Anekal. Respondent.
Date: 30/11/2011

C.Mis.No.84/2009.
BETWEEN
AND
INTERIM MAINTENANCE APPLICATION FILED

BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER SECTION 125(1)
OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

follows:-
Sri.Champakadama Swamy Temple, Bannerghatta
Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, as per
the Hindu rites and customs. At the time of
marriage the petitioner No.1 father has given a
dowry amount of Rs.10,000/- and One Watch and
one Ring as per the demand made by the
respondent and his family members. The father of
the petitioner No.1 given One pair ear rings, one
pair hangings and sarees to petitioner as per the
demands made by the respondent and his family
members.
-2-
happily for a period of 1 year at
Mahanthalingapura Village. Subsequently he has
demanded to bring the dowry amount and jewels
from the parents of the petitioner No.1 and when
the petitioner No.1 refused to bring the same the
respondent treated her as cruely. When she was
pregnant, by that time the respondent given
torture to the petitioner No.1 and subsequently
the respondent sent her to parental house for
delivery and that on 21/2/2005 the petitioner
No.1 gave birth to male child at Y.K.Hospital at
Jigani. After few months the respondent never
taken back the petitioner No.1 and her child to his
matrimonial house. Several Panchayath and
request made by the petitioner No.1 and her
parents become vain. Since from above said period
the petitioner is living at her parental house. The
petitioner No.1 submits that the petitioner No.1
also came to know that again the respondent
married with Lavanya without consent and
knowledge of this petitioner No.1. Now the
respondent and Lavanya have got one female child
who gave birth on 1/3/2009.
-3-
3. The petitioner No.1 submits that for mental and
physical torture committed by the respondent, the
petitioner No.1 also lodged complaint before the
Bannerghatta Police on 31/8/2008. In fact the
Bannerghatta Police have also registered the case
in Cr.No.218/2008 for the offence punishable
U.s,498(A) and 506 IPC. Several times the
petitioner No.1 and her parents demanded the
respondent to take the petitioner No.1 to his
house and even though he refused to take back
the petitioner No.1 and his child to his
matrimonial house. Now the petitioner No.2 is
joined to Anganawadi School.
4. The petitioners further submit that the

respondent is Owner and Driver of T.T. Vehicle
and the said vehicle is hire to company, for which
the respondent has got income of Rs.20,000/- and
the respondent is running Provision Store at
Mahanthalingapura Village and the respondent
also got landed property at Mahanthalingapura
Village. The Respondent has got house and site at
Mahanthalingapura Village. The respondent has
got Rs.10,000/- per month from the above said
properties. In all the respondent is earning more
than Rs.30,000/- per month. As such the
petitioners by providing food, cloth, shelter,
-4-
have no income for their own and nobody taking
care about the petitioners. The petitioners are
required interim maintenance amount Rs.2000/-
each per month for their maintenance like food,
amenities.

that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to award
the interim monthly maintenance amount of
Rs.2000/- each per month in the above case in

Date: 30/11/2011
C.Mis.No.84/2009.
BETWEEN
AND
ADVANCE APPLICATION
The above named Petitioner begs to state as follows:-
1. That the Petitioner has filed the present case

against the respondent for the relief of
maintenance.
2. The Petitioner submits that to consider the

Interim maintenance application in the above case
it is just and necessary to put up the records
today. Hence this advance application.
Wherefore, the Petitioner humbly pray that this
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to put up the
records from 3/12/2011 to 30/11/2011 to
consider the Interim maintenance application in
the above case in the interest of justice and equity.

Date: 30/11/2011
C.Mis.No.163/2010.
BETWEEN
SMT.L.AMBIKA. …….... PETITIONER
AND
SRI.T.GOPALAREDDY. ……… RESPONDENT
COMMON OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE

PETITIONER TO ALL THE APPLICATIONS
FILED BY THE RESPONDENT

follows:-
1. The petitioner submits that the averments made

in application that “the petitioner has given wrong
address to this Hon’ble Court, hence it is most
appropriate for this Hon’ble Court to dismiss this
petition with exemplary costs are” all hereby

in the application that “the petitioner has not
given her residential address to the court or to me
a legal husband, which shows her illegal way of
living, to the Sr.Dn case No.MC.33/10 and to
Jr.Dvn C.Mis.163/2010” are all hereby denied as
-2-
in the application that “the advocate is also
refused to give residential address to the court and
to me, this bring to a strong reason to suspect
that her mother is using her as a prostitution so
FIR shall be made in Police station for enquiry and
the instructions shall be given by the court to sort
out” are all hereby denied as false and incorrect.

in the application that “I request to court to say
that I am unable to come to the court from state to
State, it is a waste of time and my agriculture
practice also, so when the court deems fit please
intimate me or please send her to come and lead
the life in Dasarapalli Village” are all baseless
allegations.

in the application that “the address given by
petitioner in her petition is wrong address to avoid
service of summons/notice from this Hon’ble court
or any other court, the petitioner giving wrong
residential address to this court amounts to
criminal contempt of court” are all hereby denied
as false and incorrect.
-3-
in the application that “the advocate and the
petitioner misused the Section 125 of Cr.Pc., I the
respondent has not deserted the petitioner but the
fact is the petitioner has deserted the respondent
and has filed a false case” are all hereby denied as

averments made in the application that “the
petitioner is living a illegal life, she is roming in
vehicles of unknown persons and harassing me a
lot, she is willfully neglecting me and she is say
me in phone that I don’t know who are you, from
that day she has switched off her all mobile
phones she has 5 to 6 mobile numbers which are
known to me this brings to a strong reason to
suspect her way of living” are all hereby denied as

in the application that “the court to order the
petitioner and the Advocate to present the address
at an earliest, identity proof, or to order the Police
station to enquiry her where abouts” does not
arise at all and all the allegations are baseless
allegations.
-4-
in the application that “I state that the petitioner
do not know the meaning of maintenance and the
objectio of Section” is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.
10. The petitioner submits that the averments

made in the application that “the petitioner is
wilfully neglects me totally in all means, she has
committed a fraud without giving address to the
legal husband when request orally and in court
also, the advocate has also refused to give the
address even after a letter was sent to him
through RPAD on 1/6/2011, that was intimated
his client or not I do not know” are all hereby
denied as false and incorrect, but given suitable
reply to the letter dated:1/6/2011.

made in the application that “the petitioner is
wantedly to harass me she has made this case, as
I have replied that I am ready to given all the
facilities reasonably to my ability” are all hereby

made in the application that “the petitioner and
the advocate has abused the law so the action
may be taken, if the petitioner refuses to join the
matrimonial house, requesting the facilities
-5-
needed for her” are all hereby denied as false and
incorrect.
13. The petitioner submits that this petition filed

by the petitioner U/s.125 of Cr.Pc. seeking
maintenance from the Respondent. As such the
present application filed by the respondent in this
case is not at all maintainable in law. The
Respondent has alternative remedy to file the
separate case, if the Respondent is aggreived
person, but not filing the present form of
applications.
14. The petitioner submits that the petitioner

herein also filed Divorce petition before the Senior
Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal vide M.C.No.33/10.
In fact the respondent is also appeared and also
filed similar type of applications before the court
in M.C.No.33/10. This petitioner also filed the
objections to the application and finally the
Hon’ble Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal
court dismissed all the applications with costs on
3/12/2011. As such the present applications are
also liable to be dismissed in lamine.
15. The application filed by the respondent

without mentioning the provision and without
supporting of affidavit, the application is not at all
maintainable in law. On this ground itself the very
applications are liable to be dismissed in lamine.
-6-
16. The petitioner submits that in order to drag
the proceedings, intentionally the Respondent filed
these form of applications. On this ground itself
the very applications are liable to be dismissed in
lamine.
17. The petitioner submits that on perusal of the

application, the subject in the application and the
matter in the application are entirely different and
no proper prayer sought in the application. Hence
application is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
18. The petitioner submits that on perusal of the

application the respondent is blaming the court,
stating that this court is delaying the case of the
respondent, this shows the attitude of the
respondent. Hence the application filed by the
Respondent is liable to be dismissed in lamine.
Wherefore, the Petitioner humbly prays that

application filed by the Respondent with
exemplary cost in the above case in the interest of
justice and equity.
Advocate for petitioner. Petitioner.

-7-
VERIFICATION
I, the petitioner do hereby declare that what is

stated above is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief.
Anekal. Petitioner
Date: 19/1/2012

JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.142/2011.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.T.GEETHA,
W/o R.Rajesh,
D/o R.Rajesh,
Aged about 2 years,

Guardian,

Bidaragere Road,
Hospet,
Anekal Town,
AND
SRI.RAJESH,
Residing at
House No.2/55,
Berike Town,
Masti Road,
Hosur Taluk,

PROCEDURE.

follows:-
-2-
28/7/2003 before the Office of the Sub-Registrar,
Anekal according to the Hindu Rites and Customs
in the presence of the elders, well wishers, friends
and relatives of both the parties. Subsequently the
petitioner No.1 started to live at the house of the
petitioner No.1 parent in one portion, by
discharging her duties as the dutiful wife and the
Respondent also look after the petitioner No.1,
well and discharged his duties, as the dutiful
husband. The petitioner No.1 is nothing but the
blood relative of the Respondent and the father of
the petitioner No.1 out of love and affection on the
parents of the petitioner No.1 given a sum of
Rs.10,000/- cash, one soverign gold chain, costly
clothes and one Titan Watch to the Respondent
and also doing the separate shelter at Anekal
Town, out of love affection on the respondent and
as well as the petitioner No.1. When such being
the real facts, under all-advise of the enemical
persons of the petitioner No.1 and the Respondent
started to give trouble and harassment to the
petitioner No.1 and also the respondent learnt bad
habits, such as drinking alcohol, playing card and
other bad habits, to meet out the expenses of his
bad habits, started to demand the money from the
petitioner No.1 and when the petitioner No.1
refused to give the money, the respondent by
selling all the house hold things gold articles
-3-
which is in the house, and used the amount for
his bad habits, and also by drinking alcohol,
threatened the petitioner No.1 with filthy
language, and also assaulted the petitioner No.1
brutally. On several occasions, the parents of the
petitioner No.1, given some money and the
Respondent started to demand the money from
the parental house again and again. Further the
respondent started give unnecessary trouble and
harassment, when the petitioner No.1 refused to
bring the money as a dowry from parental house,
the Respondent without informing the petitioner
ran away to his native from the house. Several
panchayathi also conveyed in this regard, but all
in vain.

being the facts and circumstances for the above
attitude of the Respondent and his parents, the
petitioner No.1 filed a Private complaint before this
Hon’ble Court for the offence punishable
U/s.498(A), 506 of IPC and the same has been
referred to the Anekal Police by this Hon’ble Court
and the Police authorities also submitted charge
sheet and the case has been registered in criminal
case Register No.C.C.No.672/2004. In fact this
petitioner No.1 also filed C.Mis.No.68/2004 on the
file of this Hon’ble court seeking maintenance. In
the mean while at the instance of elderly persons
in the locality a panchayathi was made between
-4-
the petitioner No.1 and her parents, Respondent
and his parents, finally the Respondent agreed to
take back the Petitioner No.1 with some suitable
conditions. Accordingly the panchayathi
Muchalike was drawn on 25/4/2008 and the
same has been Notorized before the Notary,
Anekal/Bangalore. Subsequently the petitioner
No.1 has been withdrawn the C.C.No.672/2004 by
giving hostile evidence before the court, since the
matter has been compromised and also withdrawn
the C.Mis.No.68/2004.
4. The Petitioner No.1 submits that subsequent to

the compromise as per the will and wish of the
Respondent, the petitioner No.1 joined with
Respondent and lived happily at Berike Village,
Hosur Taluk, Dharmapuri District for some
period. During the above said period, when the
petitioner No.1 become pregnant, as usually the
petitioner No.1 joined her parental house for
delivery of baby. That on 18/3/2009 a female
baby was born at Vijaya Nursing Home at Anekal.
The parents of the petitioner No.1 spent the
amount for the same. Subsequently the
Respondent neglected to maintain the petitioner
No.1 and his female baby-Petitioner No.2. After
one year again the petitioner No.1 rejoined to her
matrimonial home. Subsequently the Respondent
given mental and physical torture to the Petitioner
No.1 by neglecting and without maintaining her,
-5-
and without providing legal amenities to the
Petitioners No.1 and 2. Always the Respondent
demanding the petitioner No.1 to bring the dowry
amount from her parents house and bad habits
also continued without hearing the words of the
petitioner No.1. Some times the petitioner No.1
also brought amount and house hold articles from
her parents and the same has been handed over to
the Respondent. The Respondent also taken away
the Gold Neck chain of brother of the petitioner
No.1 and the same has not been returned to her
brother. Finally the Respondent kicked out the
petitioners No.1 and 2 from the matrimonial house
in the month of August-2010. Now the petitioners
are living at her parental house in a rented house.
Since from August-2010, the Respondent not
taken away the petitioner No.1 and 2 and
neglected to maintain the petitioners by providing
legal amenities. But again and again the
Respondent came near the parental house of the
petitioner No.1 picked up quarrel with the
petitioner No.1.

the petitioners. The respondent is the driver by
-6-
doing driver work, he getting monthly income of

Rs.10,000/-, the parents of the respondents are
also having sufficient income out of the rent from
the residential house and other sources they got
Rs.20,000/- income for month, and also owning
the properties at Hosur and also having the
properties and agricultural lands. Even though the
respondent has got sufficient income, failed to
maintain the petitioners.
requirements.

have no income for their own and nobody taking
care about the petitioners. The petitioners are
required interim maintenance amount Rs.2000/-
each per month for their maintenance like food,
amenities.
-7-

grant interim maintenance amount of Rs.2000/-
each to the petitioners in the interest of justice
and equity.
1.
2.
VERIFICATION
and beliefs.
1.
2.
Date:23/12/2011
IN THE COURT OF PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND

JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.25/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.DEVIKA,
W/o Venkatesh @ Yellappa,
D/o Late Nagarappa,
Now residing at
C/o Smt.Chandramma,
Near Vidhatha School,
Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. ………..PETITIONER
AND
SRI.VENKATESH @ YELLAPPA,
S/o Krishnappa,
Residing at
Dyavappana Gudi Village and post,
Jagamakote Hobli,
Sidhlaghatta Taluk,
Chikkaballapura District. ………… RESPONDENT

PROCEDURE.

follows:-

on 8/10/2004 at Dyavappa Swamy Temple, Dyavappa
Gudi Village, Sidhalaghatta Taluk, as per the Hindu
rites and customs. At the time of marriage the
petitioners mother and brother have given a dowry
amount of Rs.20,000/- to the respondent, Neck chain,
One Watch and costliest clothes as per the demand
made by the respondent and his family members. The
mother and brother of the petitioner given two paid ear
rings, one pair hangings and sarees to petitioner as
per the demands made by the respondent and his
family members.

for a period of 2 years at Dyavappana Gudi Village,
Sidlaghatta Taluk. Out of the wedlock one male child
was born namely Master.Karthik @ Murali to the
petitioner and respondent and subsequently the
petitioner. Along with respondent, the respondent
mother, father and two sisters were living together at
Dyavappana Gudi Village, Sidlaghatta Taluk. As per
the ill-advice of respondent’s father, mother and
sisters, the respondent demanding dowry to petitioner
and also giving physical and mental torture to the
petitioner. So many times the petitioner refused to
bring the dowry amount, since the parents of the
petitioner are poor. The petitioner tolerated all types of
torture, physical and mental agony from the
respondent and his family members. Finally in the
month of May-2008, the respondent and his family
members picked quarrel with petitioner and demanded
to bring dowry, by that time the petitioner refused to
bring dowry. As such the respondent and his family
members have kicked out the petitioner from the
matrimonial house by taking her child namely
Master.Karthik @ Murali forcibily. The boy is aged
-3-
about 3-4 years and the child is required mother’s love
and care of the mother and even though without
showing the mercy towards the petitioner and as well
her child, the respondent and his family members
kicked out the petitioner from the matrimonial house.
Now the child namely Master.Karthik @ Murali is in
the custody of respondent.

panchayathi was held between the petitioner and
the respondent not listen the advise of the
panchayathdars and not taken back the petitioner to
the matrimonial house and the respondent is also
allowed to see her child. The petitioner acted as a
dutiful wife and on the other hand respondent failed
to act as a dutiful husband. The petitioner parents are
very poor persons and they are not in a position to
working as a Driver in a private vehicle for which the
respondent is getting Rs.6,000/- per month. The
respondent is also doing land development business,
for which the respondent is earning Rs.10,000/- per
month. The Respondent is also having Cows, sheeps in
the house for which the respondent is having income
of Rs.5000/-. The respondent is having landed
properties in which the respondent raising ragi and
other crops in the land, for which the respondent is
earning Rs.7,500/- per year and further the
respondent is also having own house at above said
village. In all the respondent is earning more than
-4-
capable person to maintain the petitioner by providing
food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses and other legal
amenities.
5. The Petitioner submits that now a days she required

a sum of Rs.5000/- per month, for food, clothing,
shelter and other daily legal requirements.

income for her own and nobody taking care about the
petitioner. The petitioner is required interim
maintenance amount Rs.5000/- per month for their
maintenance like food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses
and other legal amenities.

that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to grant interim
maintenance amount of Rs.5000/- to the petitioner in
VERIFICATION
Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:27/12/2011
C.Mis.No.93/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.RADHAMMA & others. …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.C.GOPAL ……… RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE OF PETITIONER No.1-BY WAY OF

AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt.Radhamma, W/o C.Gopala, aged about

38 years, residing at Sakalavara Village, Jigani
Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, do hereby

respondent was solemnized on 4/3/1993 before
the Registrar of Marriage, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore
District. At the time of marriage my father has
given a dowry amount of Rs.50,000/- cash as per
the demand made by the respondent and his
family members and also given some Jewels to
myself and respondent.
2. I submit that subsequent to the marriage

myself and respondent lived happily for a period of
3 years at Sakalavara Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District. Out of the wed lock the
petitioner No.2 and 3 were born.
3. I submit that subsequent to the born of
petitioner No.2 and 3, the respondent, his father,
his brother, sister-in-law were given mental and
physical torture to myself and also demanded for
further dowry amount from me. The Respondent
and his father and mother also threatened me,
that if myself not bring the amount from the
parental house, the respondent is going to marry
second time with another girl. Even though I have
tolerated all the tortures given by the respondent
and his family members. Finally about 1 year
back, the respondent not turned up to see myself
and my children and neglected myself and my
children by providing legal amenities like food,
cloth, shelter and medical expenses and
educational expenses to petitioner No.2 and 3. The
Respondent abscond without intimating to me.
After thorough search I came to know that he was
residing at Madiwala, Bangalore with another lady
and after due enquiry, I came to know that the
respondent married for second time with a lady
called namely Ammu. I have also questioned with
regard to the same, but the respondent and his
family members threatened to my life. That on
20/10/2008 I have escaped from the clutches
from the hands of the respondent and his family
members, since they are going to finish me by
pouring kerosene. Subsequently I have also lodged
complaint before the Bannerghatta Police, Anekal
Taluk and in fact the Bannerghatta Police
registered FIR vide Cr.No.297/2008 for the offence
punishable U/s.498(A), 506, 120(B) r/w 149 of
IPC.
4. I submit that the petitioner No.2 is studying in

9th Standard at Government School, Gottigere and
Petitioner No.3 is studying in 3rd Standard at
Government School, Sakalavara Village, Anekal
Taluk, Bangalore District.
5. I submit that on several times myself and my

parents demanded the respondent to take myself
to his house and even though he refused to take
back myself and my children to his matrimonial
house.
6. I further submit that the respondent is working

in a Factory at Jigani Industrial Area, for which
the respondent has got income of Rs.10,000/- and
the respondent and the respondent also got
landed property at Sakalavara. The Respondent
has got house and site at Sakalavara Village. The
respondent has got Rs.10,000/- per month from
the above said properties. In all the respondent is
earning more than Rs.20,000/- per month. As
such the respondent is a capable person to
maintain myself and my children by providing
food, cloth, shelter, medical expenses and other
legal amenities.
7. I further submit that myself and my children

have no income for our own and nobody taking
care myself and my children. Myself and my
children required Rs.9000/- per month for
8. I submit that the respondent is capable to give

a monthly maintenance of Rs.9000/- to myself
and my children.
Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble

Court may be pleased to award the monthly
maintenance amount of Rs.9000/- per month to
myself and my children in the above case in the

Anekal.
Date:16/2/2011.
No.of.Corrections.
C.Mis.No._______/2012.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.RAMAMANI,
W/o Krishnamurthy,
2) KUM.MAMATHA,
D/o Krishnamurthy,
S/o Krishnamurthy,

Mother Smt.Ramamani
All are residing at

Vanakanahalli Post,
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,
AND
SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/o Late Muniswamy,
Residing at
Kasaba Hobli,
Anekal Taluk,

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
-2-
562106.

-3-

awarded of the orders passed by this Hon’’ble Court
above.


-4-

and equity.
1.
2.
3.

VERIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
Date:

JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.111/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.S.R.JAYANTHI & others. …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.NAGARAJ. ……… RESPONDENT
OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONERS TO

THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT

follows:-
1. It is submitted that the petitioners have filed
the present petition seeking maintenance from the
Respondent. After service of summons/notice, the
respondent appeared through counsel and filed
detail objections.
2. The petitioners submit that on going through

the objections filed by the Respondent, the
respondent not stated anything about the
document which is relied by the respondent. But
now all of a sudden without averments in the
objections statement and without showing the
document which is going to be relied by the
respondent, now this respondent filed documents
along with List. Such document cannot be marked
in the present case, and more over this case is
filed U/s.125 of Cr.Pc. and as such the documents
-2-
which is produced by the Respondent cannot be
looked into and not to mark in the respondent
evidence. The document which is relied by the
Respondent is not the subject matter of this case.
Hence this objections for marking of the
documents. Hence the application is liable to be
Wherefore, the petitoner humbly prays that

application filed by the Respondent in the above
VERIFICATION
Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:14/2/2012

JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.371/2011
BETWEEN
YASHWANTH & others ……....PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.BABU. ……… RESPONDENT

THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

follows:-
1. At the outset the petition filed by the petitioner
is not maintainable either in law or on facts. It is
liable to be dismissed in limine.

made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioner
and the Respondent’s marriage was solemnized on
3/8/2003 at ANR Kalyana Mantapa, Chandapura
Town, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, as per the
customs rituals under Hindu law is true and
correct.

made in para 4 of the petition that after the
solemnizatin of said marriage, the petitioner and
the respondent started their marital life at Anekal,
there was no trouble in the family for five or six
-2-
years, during that tenure out of the wedlock
petitioner and respondent were begot two children
who are the petitioners No.1 and 2 herein is true
and correct.

made in para 5 of the petition that at the time of
marriage third petitioner’s parents have spent
huge amount on the occasion of the marriage of
petitioner No.3 at the time of marriage following
ornaments were given to the respondent at the
time of marriage gold necklace weighing about 40
grams, 40 grams gold chain, 4 bangles weighing
60 grams, 12 grams two finger rings and silk
sarees and silver pendants and respondent also
received a gold chain, watch worth of Rs.50,000/-
and Rs.1,00,000/- cash as dowry are all hereby

made in para 6 of the petition that after begetting
the second child the respondent, started giving all
sorts of physical and mental harassment to the
third petitioner to bring dowry from her parents, it
was the usual habit of the respondent to give all
sorts of physical torture to the petitioner No.3
demanding dowry and very frequently the
petitioners No.1 and 2 who are the sons of
respondent were also subjected to physical and
-3-
mental harassment are all hereby denied as false
and incorrect.

was very cruel and failed to discharge any of his
duties as a dutiful husbnd and father to his
children. In fact the petitioner was brought to a
situation that a scene was created in the mind of
the petitioner that she cannot live a happy
married life with the respondent for any more, it is
submitted that the respondent is a coward, herein
brained and a poppet in the hands of his parents,
especially in the hands of his mother and father
and his friends are all hereby denied as false and
incorrect.
made in para 8 of the petition that at one juncture
the respondent created a situation and lured the
petitioner and her parents to give one and half
lakhs as additional dowry, the parents of the
petitiioner in a view of achieve a prospective and
lucrative life of their daughter have paid
Rs.1,50,000/- through cheque at panchayath
conveyed by panchayathdars between the spouses
have demanded and made the respondent to shell
down the money and advised to live happily in
future are all hereby denied as false and incorrect.
-4-
made in para 9 of the petition that after some
lapst of time the respondent began to repeat his
good old habit of demanding petitioner to bring
money from her parents house and sent out the
petitioner from the house and warned her not to
turn back from her parents house without money
of Rs.50,000/-, as no other way the parents have
arranged some of Rs.50,000/- by raising some
hand loans are all hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

made in para 10 of the petition that on one fine
day for no reasons the petitioners, the respondent
left the house and started to leave at
Narayanaghatta village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal
Taluk, the third petitioner along with petitioner
No.1 and 2 and with her parents approached the
respondent and requested him to return from
Narayanaghatta and to take responsibility the
family, for this respondent has given a evasive
answer try to flew from his responsibility are all

made in para 11 of the petition that after this
event without any other go and option petitioner
began live with her parents along with her
children (petitioner No.1 and 2). After some time
-5-
the petitioner’s felt that it is not possible live with
the third petitioner’s parents for the reason of
poverty and opprobrium the petitioner No.3 left
the house of her parents and began to leave in
Anekal are all hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

made in para 12 of the petition that after some
months when the petitioner began to leave
separately at Anekal the respondent used to visit
the house of the petitioner and to pick up a
quarrel in street and used to physically assault
the petitioner and also threatened the owner of the
house where the petitioners resided to threw the
petitioners out of the houses, aggrieved by the acts
of respondent the petitioner gave a complaint to
the Anekal Police, thought the Anekal Police have
intervened and settled the matter provisionally
and situation continued and though the petitioner
No.3 has been always ready to lead happy marital
life with the respondent, the respondent filed a
false and frivolus case for restitution of conjugal
rights, without any fault of the petitioners are all
-6-
made in para 13 of the petition that she is unable
to maintain herself and her children as she has no
any source, the petitioner No.3 without any
sources of income is thriving hard to eek out her
livelihood, besides the petitioner No.1 and 2 are
school going children studying in 2 nd Standard
and UKG respectively whose expenses goes upto
more than Rs.1000/- towards educational
expense. The petitioner is now living in a rented
house by paying a monthly rent of Rs.1500/- and
she needs 1500/- for the maintenance of
petitioner No.1 and 2 to meet the needs of
clothing, education, third petitioner needs another
Rs.3000/- as charges of ration to the family, in
total the petitioner needs Rs.6000/- per month are
all hereby denied as false and incorrect.

made in para 14 of the petition that the petitioners
have no permanent source of income and she is
placed in that situation and plight as, is the result
of unlawful acts of respondent the respondent
willfully neglected the petitioners, the respondent
is a well placed person in money and he is
running a stationary shop at Anekal Bus stand
from that business he is having monthly income of
Rs.1,00,000/- per month and the respondent and
his parents are owning huge properties movable
-7-
and immovable’s in their name are all hereby

made in para 15 of the petition that the parents of
the petitioner being poor are unable to maintain
the petitioner and the petitioner being not well
educated, innocent lady having no source of
income, hence the petitioner requires minimum
maintenance of Rs.6000/- per month, the
respondent is having sufficient source of income
and also capable of providing the said sum are all
16. The Respondent submits that the Petitioner is

the legally wedded wife of the Respondent. The
marriage between the Respondent and Petitioner
was solemnized on 3/8/2003 at ANR Kalyana
Mantapa, Chandapura, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore
District as per the Hindu rites and customs.
Subsequent to the marriage of Respondent and
petitioner, the petitioner and Respondent have
lived happily some times at Anekal by taking
rented house. Out of the wedlock between the
petitioner and respondent, two children were born
namely 1) Yashwanth and 2) Harshavardhan. The
daughter of the Respondent Yashwanth is now
studying at Vidhatha English Higher Primary
School at Anekal.
-8-
17. The Respondent further submits that after
born of second son the petitioner No.3 have picked
up quarrel with the respondent for unnecessary
things and no for reason. However the respondent
tolerated all the torture made by the petitioner,
because of children. Earlier the Respondent was
doing business in the name as Yashswini Book
stall at Anekal by investing huge amount and also
by taking loan amount. When such being the facts
and circumstances the Petitioner No.3 not acted
as a dutiful wife and always the petitioner No.3
picking quarrel with respondent with no reason.
Further the Petitioner No.3 not understanding the
Respondent, on the other hand the respondent
understand the Petitioner No.3 entality and as
such the respondent himself adjusted to the life.
However with the instigation of somebody in order
thrown out the respondent from the family, the
Petitioner No.3 turned mind and giving mental
torture to the respondent by abusing with filthy
language.
18. The Respondent submits that several

panchayaths held with regard to the above said
attitude. Even in the panchayathi also as per the
advise of panchayathdars, the respondent take
care about the petitioner No.3 and the respondent
children and the panchayathdars are also advice
the petitioner No.3 to act as a dutiful wife.
However in the panchayath also a written
-9-
muchalike also held with regard to the above said
aspect. Like wise 2 or 3 times panchayath were
also held and the same has been reduced in the
writing. But however the petitioner No.3 not
turned her mind towards the respondent to live
happily in the life.
19. The Respondent submits that recently the

respondent came to know that the petitioner No.3
has friendship with another person called as
Sri.K.Dhananjaya of Bangalore. Upon the
interference of above said Sri.K.Dhananjaya, the
family life between the respondent and petitioner
No.3 was broken. However the respondent has
tolerated all the things and the attitude of the
petitioner No.3 by thinking that today or tomorrow
the petitioner No.3 is going to change your
attitude. After some times again the petitioner has
picked quarrel with the respondent and even some
times the petitioner No.3 is not providing the food
to the respondent and even though he was doing
hard work in a book store and even though the
petitioner No.3 neglected the respondent and not
giving respect to the respondent as a Husband,
and even some times the petitioner No.3 has left
the house without intimating to the respondent.
After arrival by the petitioner No.3, the respondent
also questioned with regard to the non-intimation
for the same, but the petitioner No.3 has given
evasive reply. Finally the respondent arranged the
-10-
panchayath on 31/1/2011 and in the panchayath
the petitioner No.3 and the father of the petitioner
No.3 demanded to return the loan amount of
Rs.1,50,000/- which is borrowed by the
respondent at the time of running business. And
as per the final decision of petitioner No.3 and the
parents of Petitioner No.3 and panchayathdars,
the respondent returned the above said amount.
Finally the Petitioner No.3 has come to conclusion
that petitioner No.3 is intending to live separately.
As per the advice of panchayathdars the petitioner
No.3 has agreed to return the key of the house
and things and house hold articles and other
valuable materials to the custody of respondent,
for which the petitioner No.3 has took some time
and time being the respondent left the rented
house and joined to his parental house at
Narayanaghatta Village. After some times the
respondent appraoched the petitioner No.3 and
demanded to return the above said things, but the
petitioner No.3 has not returned the things. The
respondent once again requested the petitioner
No.3 to come and join along with children with the
respondent to live happily by forgetting all the
things, but the petitioner No.3 has refused to
come and join. The respondent provided all the
legal amenities to petitioner No.3 and children,
but even though the petitioner No.3 has refused to
come and join with the respondent.
-11-
20. The Respondent submits that recently the
respondent came to know that the petitioner No.3
has got friendship with Sri.K.R.Raju of
Kuthaganahalli Village and as per the ill-advice of
the above said Sri.K.R.Raju the petitioner No.3
doing all these attitudes by neglecting the
respondent. The petitioner No.3 also threatening
the respondent to lodge a Dowry harassment
complaint against the respondent. However the
respondent also once again requested the
petitioner No.3 to come and join with the
respondent to live happily by issuing the legal
notice on 30/6/2011 to both the residential
address and as well shop address. In fact the
notice is also served on the petitioner No.3. But
the petitioner No.3 failed to come and join with the
respondent. However the petitioner No.3 given
reply to the notice through her counsel with
untenable grounds and however in the reply notice
the petitioner No.3 intimated the respondent that
she is ready to come and join with the respondent.
Accordingly the respondent also issued rejoinder
notice on 15/7/2011 by fixing the date in order to
take back the petitioner No.3 and children to his
residential house at Narayanaghatta Village,
Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk. In fact the
rejoinder notice is also served on the counsel of
the respondent.
-12-
21. The Respondent submits that as per the
rejoinder notice the respondent went on
18/7/2011 near the shop of the petitioner No.3
order to take back the petitioner No.3 and his
children to his matrimonial home. But the
petitioner No.3 refused to come and join with the
respondent for the reason best known to her. In
fact the respondent and elder persons are also
went to the shop of the petitioner No.3, in order to
take back the petitioner No.3 and her children.
The respondent also took the photographs for
having the respondent met the petitioner No.3 and
requested her to come and join with the
respondent and also recorded the talks of incident
which took place between the petitioner No.3 and
respondent. However the petitioner No.3 refused to
come and join.
22. The Respondent further submits that the

respondent acted as a dutiful husband by
providing all the legal amenities to the petitioner
No.3, on the other hand the petitioner No.3 failed
to act as a dutiful wife. The respondent is always
ready and willing to provide all the legal amenities
to the petitioner No.3 and as well as to his
children.
-13-
23. The Respondent further submits that since the
petitioner No.3 has without reasonable excuse,
withdrawn from the Society, as such the
respondent being the aggrieved party. Hence the
respondent filed petition Under Sec.9 of Hindu
Marriage Act 1955 against the petitioner herein
before the Hon’ble Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC,
Anekal vide M.C.No.30/11 for restoration of
conjugal rights. In fact the notice is also served on
the petitioner herein and subsequently the
petitioner No.3 herein engaged counsel and filed
objections before the court.
24. The Respondent submits that subsequent to

the filing of M.C.No.30/11 intentionally in order to
harass the respondent lodged a false complaint
before the Anekal Police on 6/9/2011 against the
respondent and his parents. The Respondent got
released on bail. In the said case charge sheet is
also filed and registered criminal case vide
C.C.No.1381/11. In fact where the I.O. recorded
the further statement of petitioner No.3 herein, in
which the very cause title shows her job is
business. In fact the petitioner is running a shop
called as “Student Book Stall and Xerox Centre”
near by the Raghavendra Bhavan Hotel, Anekal. In
fact the Respondent also taken photos with regard
to the above said aspect and with regard to that
she is running the above said book stall and xerox
centre. In fact the petitioner No.3 have got
-14-
sufficient income for her own and she is getting
income/profit of Rs.500 to 1000/- per day. As
such she is a capable person to maintain herself
and her children. When she is capable of
maintaining herself the question of granting the
maintenance or interim maintenance to the
petitioners does not arise at all. On this ground
itself the very petition filed by the petitioner is
liable to be dismissed in limine.
25. The Respondent further submits that in fact

the petitioner No.3 is not ready to join with the
respondent to live happily in the house of the
respondent with bad intention. It is well settled
law that “when the wife not ready to live with
husband and refused to keep in the house-proviso
U/s.125(4) of Cr.Pc. attracted-wife disentitled to
seek maintenance.
26. The Respondent further submits that it is well

settled law that “husband filed suit for restitution
of conjugal rights-wife refused to come back to
husband without any sufficient reason..........”
case for maintenance filed by wife as a counter
blast of the said refusal-rejection of prayer for
maintenance justified. The same has been
reported in a reported decision 2011(2)-All India
-Criminal-LR(Cal) Page-233. As such the above
said principle of law, the petition itself is not at all
-15-
maintainable in law and the petition is liable to be
dismissed in limine.
27. The Respondent further submits that it is well

settled law that “if the husband neglected or
refuse to maintain wife and children, then only the
wife and children are entitled to get maintenance
as per the provision U/s.125 of Cr.Pc. But in this
case the Respondent is always ready and willing to
live happily with wife and children and he is ready
to provide all the facilities, legal amenities to the
petitioners and he is never refused or neglect the
maintain wife and children, and as such as per
the reported decision which is reported in 2006(2)-
All India Criminal-LR(Cal)A.282. As per the above
said principle of law, the very petition filed by the
petition is not at all maintainable in law and the
same is liable to be dismissed in limine.
28. The respondent submits that the respondent

has no sufficient income as alleged in the petition
and more over the respondent has got old age
father and mother and he is only the bread
earning member of the family to look after old age
parents by providing food, cloth and medical
expenses and other legal amenities and hence the
income of the respondent is not sufficient even to
look after the old age parents. Hence the
-16-
respondent is not capable to pay the maintenance
amount, as claimed by the petitioners, on the
other hand the respondent is always ready and
willing to provide the food, cloth, shelter and
medical expenses, school expenses to the
petitioners, if they are come and join the
respondent to live happily in the matrimonial
home.
petition filed by the petitioners with exemplary
cost in the interest of justice and equity.
VERIFICATION
and belief.
Anekal. Respondent.
Date: 10/4/2012
ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2012.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.INDRANI,
D/o Late S.K.Narayanaswamy,
W/o Krishna @ Soni,
2) MASTER.HARSHAVARDHAN,
D/o Krishna @ Soni,
Aged about 7 years,
3) MASTER.SANTHOSH KUMAR,
S/o Krishna @ Soni,
aged about 4 years,
Since Minors represented by

Her mother SMT.INDRANI,
Guardian,
All are residing at

Thimmarayaswamy Arch,
Hosur Road,
Anekal Town,
AND
SRI.KRISHNA @ SONI,
S/o Munivenkatappa,
Residing at
Near Venkateshwara Theatre,
Bannerghatta-Anekal Road,
Narayanamurthy Badavane,
Anekal Town,
-2-
UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

follows:-

counsel SRI.H.SRINIVAS, Advocate, First Floor,
Yellappa Building, Near Mohan Clinic, Attibele
Road, Anekal, Bangalore-562106.

title above.
18/4/2005 at Mico Layout, 1st Cross, Vinayaka
Temple, Bangalore according to the Hindu Rites
and Customs in the presence of the elders, well
wishers, friends and relatives of both the parties.
Subsequent to the marriage the petitioner No.1
and Respondent lived happily for a period of 1
year and subsequently the respondent given
harassment to the petitioner No.1. However the
wed lock between the petitioner No.1 and
respondent, two children were born namely
-3-
Master.Harshavardhan and Master.Santhosh
Kumar who are the petitioners No.2 and 3 herein.
The petitioners are herewith producing the
Wedding Invitation Card and photo for the kind
perusal of this Hon’ble court and marked as
4. The petitioner No.1 submits that after born of

petitioner No.3, the Respondent started to give
mental and physical torture to the petitioner No.1
and in fact the Respondent addicted to alcohol, for
which the respondent picked quarrel with the
petitioner No.1 and so many times taken away the
jewels and Thali and valuable sarees, and house
hold articles and sold the same in order to take
the alcohol. Finally the Respondent demanded the
petitioner No.1 to bring amount from her parents
and also given physical and mental torture to the
petitioner No.1. When such being the facts and
circumstances that on 14/4/2012 at about 7.30
p.m. the respondent came to the house by taking
alcohol and abused the Petitioner No.1 with filthy
language and assaulted the petitioners No.1 to 3
and kicked away from the house by directing the
petitioner No.1 to bring the amount from her
parents and also threatened to the life of the
petitioner No.1. As such the petitioner No.1 also
lodged Police complaint before the Anekal Police
on 15/4/2012 and the Anekal Police have
registered the case in Cr.No.64/2012 against the
-4-
Respondent for the offence punishable U/s.498(A),
506 of IPC. The petitioners are herewith producing
the Copy of the FIR and Wound Certificate for the
kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court and marked as
5. The petitioner No.1 submits that now the

petitioners No.1 to 3 are residing at her brother
Sri.Ramappa House at Hosur Road, Anekal Town.
Now the petitioner No.2 is studying in 1 st Standard
at Doddanagamangala, Huskur Gate, Anekal
Taluk. Now the petitioner No.3 is aged about 4
years, and the petitioner No.3 need admission to
School at present, for which the Petitioners are
required amount. The petitioners are herewith
producing the Birth Certificate of petitioners No.2
and 3 and School fee paid receipts for the kind
Document No.5 to _______.
6. The petitioner No.1 submits that the

Respondent neglected the petitioners No.1 to 3,
and the Respondent not providing food, cloth,
shelter and medical expenses and other legal
amenities to the petitioners. It is the duty of the
Respondent to maintain the petitioners by
providing the legal amenities.
-5-
the petitioners. The respondent is the Weaver and
he is running Powerlooms at Anekal Town, he
getting monthly income of Rs.8,000/-. Even
though the respondent has got sufficient income,
failed to maintain the petitioners. The repeated
requests and demands made by the petitioner
No.1 become vain, and as such the petitioner No.1
having no other alternative remedy except filing
the present case against the respondent for
maintenance. Hence this petition.

Rs.6000/- per month. Hence this petition.
is capable to give a monthly maintenance of
Rs.6000/- to the petitioners.
-6-
prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to
award the monthly maintenance of Rs.2000/-
each petitioners per month and direct the
respondent to pay a monthly maintenance of
Rs.6000/- to the petitioners from the date of
deserted by the respondent and to grant such
other relief or reliefs as deems fit in the
circumstance of the case in the interest of justice
and equity.
1.
2.
3.
VERIFICATION
and beliefs.
1.
2.
3.
Date:
ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2012.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.INDRANI,
D/o Late S.K.Narayanaswamy,
W/o Krishna @ Soni,
2) MASTER.HARSHAVARDHAN,
D/o Krishna @ Soni,
Aged about 7 years,
3) MASTER.SANTHOSH KUMAR,
S/o Krishna @ Soni,
aged about 4 years,
Since Minors represented by

Her mother SMT.INDRANI,
Guardian,
All are residing at

Thimmarayaswamy Arch,
Hosur Road,
Anekal Town,
AND
SRI.KRISHNA @ SONI,
S/o Munivenkatappa,
Residing at
Near Venkateshwara Theatre,
Bannerghatta-Anekal Road,
Narayanamurthy Badavane,
Anekal Town,
PROCEDURE.
-2-
follows:-

18/4/2005 at Mico Layout, 1st Cross, Vinayaka
Temple, Bangalore according to the Hindu Rites
and Customs in the presence of the elders, well
wishers, friends and relatives of both the parties.
Subsequent to the marriage the petitioner No.1
and Respondent lived happily for a period of 1
year and subsequently the respondent given
harassment to the petitioner No.1. However the
wed lock between the petitioner No.1 and
respondent, two children were born namely
Master.Harshavardhan and Master.Santhosh
Kumar who are the petitioners No.2 and 3 herein.
2. The petitioner No.1 submits that after born of

petitioner No.3, the Respondent started to give
mental and physical torture to the petitioner No.1
and in fact the Respondent addicted to alcohol, for
which the respondent picked quarrel with the
petitioner No.1 and so many times taken away the
jewels and Thali and valuable sarees, and house
hold articles and sold the same in order to take
the alcohol. Finally the Respondent demanded the
petitioner No.1 to bring amount from her parents
and also given physical and mental torture to the
petitioner No.1. When such being the facts and
-3-
circumstances that on 14/4/2012 at about 7.30
p.m. the respondent came to the house by taking
alcohol and abused the Petitioner No.1 with filthy
language and assaulted the petitioners No.1 to 3
and kicked away from the house by directing the
petitioner No.1 to bring the amount from her
parents and also threatened to the life of the
petitioner No.1. As such the petitioner No.1 also
lodged Police complaint before the Anekal Police
on 15/4/2012 and the Anekal Police have
registered the case in Cr.No.64/2012 against the
Respondent for the offence punishable U/s.498(A),
506 of IPC.
3. The petitioner No.1 submits that now the

petitioners No.1 to 3 are residing at her brother
Sri.Ramappa House at Hosur Road, Anekal Town.
Now the petitioner No.2 is studying in 1 st Standard
at Doddanagamangala, Huskur Gate, Anekal
Taluk. Now the petitioner No.3 is aged about 4
years, and the petitioner No.3 need admission to
School at present, for which the Petitioners are
required amount.
4. The petitioner No.1 submits that the

Respondent neglected the petitioners No.1 to 3,
and the Respondent not providing food, cloth,
shelter and medical expenses and other legal
amenities to the petitioners. It is the duty of the
-4-
Respondent to maintain the petitioners by
providing the legal amenities.

the petitioners. The respondent is the Weaver and
he is running Powerlooms at Anekal Town, he
getting monthly income of Rs.8,000/-. Even
though the respondent has got sufficient income,
failed to maintain the petitioners. The repeated
requests and demands made by the petitioner
No.1 become vain, and as such the petitioner No.1
having no other alternative remedy except filing
the present case against the respondent for
maintenance.

Rs.6000/- per month. Hence it is necesstiated to
grant the interim maintenance to the petitioners
till the disposal of the main petition.
-5-
is capable to give a Interim monthly maintenance
of Rs.6000/- to the petitioners.

grant interim maintenance amount of Rs.6000/-
to the petitioners in the interest of justice and
equity.
1.
2.
3.
VERIFICATION
and beliefs.
1.
2.
3.
Date:
C.Mis.No.93/2009.
BETWEEN
SMT.RADHAMMA & others. …… PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.C.GOPAL ……… RESPONDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE

PETITIONERS.
1. Certified copy of the RTC Extracts in 2 Nos.
2. Certified copy of the Mutation register extract.
Date: 20/7/2012
JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.111/2009.
BETWEEN
AND

THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 91(2) OF THE
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

follows:-
1. The petitioner submit that the provision

invoked by the Respondent is not attract to
present case and the provision U/s.91(2) of Cr.Pc.
is nothing but to summons to produce the
documents and other things, but in this case
already trial is commenced and hence the
question of summoning the document by the
Respondent or the question of producing the
documents by the Respondent is not at all
maintainable in law.
2. The petitioner submit that there is no provision

to produce the additional documents at the later
stage and the same is liable to be dismissed in
limine.
-2-
respondent, now this respondent filed documents
along with List. Such document cannot be marked
in the present case, and more over this case is
filed U/s.125 of Cr.Pc. and as such the documents
which is produced by the Respondent cannot be
looked into and not to mark in the respondent
evidence. The document which is relied by the
Respondent is not the subject matter of this case.
Hence this objections for marking of the
documents. Hence the application is liable to be
-3-
VERIFICATION

Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:31/7/2012

C.Mis.No._______/2012.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.T.GEETHA,
W/o R.Rajesh,
2) KUM.R. YASHASWINT,
D/o R.Rajesh,
Aged about 4 years,

her mother Smt.T.Geetha,
1st Petitioner as legal and natural guardian.

Bidaragere Road,
Hospet, Anekal Town,
Bangalore District. …. PETITIONERS
AND
SRI.R.Rajesh,
Residing at: House No.2/55,
Berike Town and post,
Masti Road, Hosur Taluk,

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Sri.H.Srinivas BA.,LLB Advocate, First Floor, Yellappa
Building, Near Mohan Clinic, Attibele Road, Anekal,
Bangalore-562106.
-2-

respondent and the 2nd petitioner is the daughter of
the respondent. The 2nd is the minors represented by
the 1st petitioner who is the mother and legal guardian,
his counsel and filed the objections to the main
petition. The petitioner No.1 and 2 also filed interim
maintanance application u/s 125(2) of Cr.P.C. and
respondant also file objections to the said application,
after hearing on interim maintenance application, this
Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass an order on merits
by allowing the interim maintenance application
directing the respondent to pay the monthly interim
maintenance a sum of Rs.1000/- each (Total of
Rs.2000/-) to the 1st and 2nd petitioners. As per the
orders passed by the Court and petitioners are entitled
to get a sum of Rs.1000/- each (Total of Rs.2000/-).

petitioners No1 and 2. And now the respondent is
-3-
liable to pay interim maintenance for the period from
27-07-2012 to 26-08-2012 intentionally avoided to pay
the monthly interim maintenance, and as such the
petitioners sustained irreparable loss injury and
hardship. Under the said circumstances, the
petitioners humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court may
be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent to
pay the interim maintenance a sum of Rs.1000/- each
(Total of Rs.2000/-) to the Petitioner No.1 and 2 for the
period from 27-07-2012 to 26-08-2012 with costs in
the circumstances stated above.


respondent for amount of Rs.1000/- each (Total of
Rs.2000/-) to the petitioner No.1 and 2 for the period
from 27-07-2012 to 26-08-2012 and directing him to
pay the interim maintenance amount in future dates
and when fails due in the circumstances and to award
the costs of the petition and for such other relief or
reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to be grant
justice and equity.
1.
2.
-4-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:27-08-2012.

C.Mis.No.40/2007.
BETWEEN
Smt.Nanjamma and others. ……. PETITIONERS
AND
Sri.Venkataswamy. ..…… RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
1. The petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed

this present petition against the respondent for
maintenance.
2. The petitioner submits that the respondent has

appeared before this Hon’ble court and filed vakalath
and failed to file the objections to this petition. The
petitioner No.1 has lead her side evidence as PW1, but
the respondent has failed to cross-examine the PW1.
While at the time of adducing of evidence of PW1, the
PW1 has not produced some relevant documents on
her side. But today the PW1 is going to produce some
documents to show the property is standing in the
name of the respondent. Hence this application to
recall the PW1 to lead further chief in the above case.
Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this

Hon’ble court may be pleased to recall the PW1 to lead
further chief in the above case in the interest of justice
and equity.

Date: 15/10/2008.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL
JUDGE JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No._______/2013.
BETWEEN
1) SMT.T.GEETHA,
W/o R.Rajesh,
D/o R.Rajesh,
Aged about 2 years,

Guardian,

Bidaragere Road,
Hospet,
Anekal Town,
AND
SRI.RAJESH,
Residing at
House No.2/55,
Berike Town,
Masti Road,
Hosur Taluk,

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

-2-
562106.

respondent and the 2nd peititoner is the daughter of
the resdpondent. The 2nd petitioner is the minors
respresented by the 1st petitioner who is the mother
and legal guardian, next friend of minors care and
custody of their. The petitioners having neglected by
the respondent and failed to provide the livelihood of
the petitioners which are daily essential requirements
such as clothing shelter, food, medical expenses and
other expenses and in turn the petitioners deserted
the petitioners. And as such the petitioners
approached thei Hon'ble court seeking the monthly
maintenance. After issue of notice to the rerspondent,
the respondent appeared through his counsel and filed
the objections to the main petition. The petitioner No.1
and 2 also filed interim maintance application U/s
125(2) of Cr.P.C. and respondant also file objections to
the said application, this Hon'ble court was pleased to
pass an order on merits by allowing the interim
maintenance application directing the respondent to
pay the monthly interim maintenance a sum of
Rs.1000/- each (Total of RS.2000/-) to the 1st and 2nd
peritioners. As per the orders passed by the court and
petitioners are entitiled to get a sum of Rs.1000/- each
(Total of Rs.2000/-) per month.
-3-
4. The Petitoners submit that the respondent is well
awaed of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court and
even though failed to pay the interim maintenance to
the petitioners No.1 and 2. And now the respondent is
liable to pay interim maintenance for the period from
31-05-2011 to 26-07-2012 intentionally avoided to pay
the montly interim maintenance, and as such the
petitioners sustained irreparable loss, injury and
hardship. Under the said circumstances, the
petitioners humbly prayed that this Hon'ble court may
be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent to
pay the interim maintenance a sum of Rs.29,716-00
(Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Seven Hundreden
Sixteen only) from period of 31-05-2011 to
26-07-2012 to the petitioner No.1 and 2 with costs in
the circumstances stated above.

order directing the respondent to pay the interim
maintenance from 31-05-2011 to 26-07-2012 a sum
of Rs.29,716-00 (Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand
Seven Hundreden Sixteen only) and in case of the
respondent failed to pay the said interim maintenance
amount, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to detain
the respondent in Civil Prison and to award the costs
of the case, and for such other relief or reliefs as this
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to deems fit to be grant
1.
2.

-4-
VERIFICATION
1.
2.
Date:08-02-2013.

C.Mis.No.291/2011
BETWEEN
Smt.Rathnam & another. ……. PETITIONER
AND
Sri.Nagappa ……… RESPONDENT

SECTION 125 OF CODE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

be dismissed in lamine. The litigation which is created
by the petitioner under this petition is a third round
litigation. The petitioner is in the habit of creating a
litigation against the Respondent and to spoil the life
of the Respondent again and again.

that the 1st petitioner is legally wedded wife of the
respondent and 2nd petitioner is the daughter of the 1st
petitioner and the respondent is ture and correct.
3. The allegations contained in para 4 of the marriage

of the 1st petitioner was solomnized on 11-05-1995
according into customs and pracitices of them is true
and correct.
4. The allegations contained in para 5 of the out of the

said wed lock the 1st petitioner and respondant have
got a minor daughter by name N.Jayamala, 2 nd
petitioner herein is ture and correct.
5. The allegations contained in para 6 that the
respondent after the birth of the second petitioner
herein for a few years there from looked after the
petitioners that too in ave casual manner is hereby
denied as false and incrrect, strictly proof same.

respondent as developed lots of vices since a couple of
years and he has become addicted to the same and the
vices of the respondent being that he is:
a. Womanizer
b. Drug Addict &
c. Alcoholic.
is hereby denied as false and incrrect, strictly proof
same.

respondent has developed the said vices in such a
ways they have become his daily life style and he is
unable to get rid of the same is hereby denied as false
and incrrect, strictly proof same.

respondent has got at his disposal plenty of amount to
meet the cost of the said vices, is hereby denied as
false and incrrect, strictly proof same.
9. The allegations contained in para 10 that since the

last 3 years the respondent has been leading a
carefree, licentious and vice ridden life at the cost of
the petitioners, is hereby denied as false and incrrect,
strictly proof same.
10. The allegations contained in para 11 that the 1 st

petitioner since the last 3 years has been staying in
her parents house with the 2 nd petitioner, is hereby

petitioner not qualified and further she cannot accept
any employment to earn and as such she and her said
minor daughter have become an unbearable burden
on the parents of the 1st petitioner, is hereby denied as

petitioner’s parents are also ridden with poverty and
they find very difficult to lead their lives, is hereby

petitioner in view of the above cannot continue to stay
with her parents with the 2nd petitioner anymore, is
hereby denied as false and incrrect, strictly proof
same.
14. The allegations contained in para 7 that it is

submitted the the 1st petitioner is concerned with the
upbringing and welfare of the 2nd petitioner and as
such the 1st petitioner wants to give proper and good
educatin to the 2nd petitioner who is studying in (New
Baldwin English School at Attible), is hereby denied as

petitioner is feeling uncomfortable to stay in her
parent’s house with here said minor daughter, is
hereby denied as false and incrrect, strictly proof
same.
16. The allegations contained in para 17 that in view of
the above it is just and absolutely necessary for the 1 st
petitioner to set-up an independent family by moving
to rented premises, is hereby denied as false and
incrrect, strictly proof same.

petitioner submits that in order to take premises on
rent she requires an advance amount of Rs.50,000/-
to Rs.60,000/- and the minimum monthly rent for
such premises in Konappana Agrahara and its
surroundings is not less than Rs.1,500/- Per month,
is hereby denied as false and incrrect, strictly proof
same.

petitioner requires a sum of Rs.3,500/- Per month to
maintain herself and the 2nd petitioner, is hereby

petitioner is without any means and further she is
absolutely in need of the monthly maintainance of
Rs.2,500/- monthly rent of Rs.1,500/- and for 2nd
petitioner’s education Rs.1,000/- Per month which the
respondent can easily afford and in the event of the
said amont being not granted the petitioners will have
to lead a destitute life, is hereby denied as false and
incrrect, strictly proof same.
are the husband and wife, the marriage between the

petitioner and respondent was performed on 11-05-at
Champakadama Swamy Modaliar Chowltry, at
Bannerghatta village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore as per the Hindu rites and customs is true
and correct. At the time of marriage the petitioner
parents has given cash of Rs.50,000-00, one Gold
chain, one Gold Bracelet, one Gold ring to the
respondent is hereby denied as false and incorrect.
The petitioner submits that after the marriage the
petitioner and respondent lived together at Anekal for
some time is true and correct. After that the
respondent started ill-treating the petitioner without
providing food, and other daily requirements to the
petitioner and assaulted the petitioner on so many
occasions and demanded more dowry from her parents
is hereby denied as false and incorrect. The petitioner
submits that since the parents of the petitioner are
very poor they could not afford to meet the demands of
the respondent, therefore the respondent and his
family members on 27/8/2003 assaulted the
petitioner and thrown away the petitioner out of the
matrimonial house and threatened the petitioner if she
returns without more dowry they will kill her, hence
the petitioner without any other way returned to her
parental house is hereby denied as false and incorrect.

that she has filed a complaint before the Jurisdictional
Police against the respondent in Cr.No.116/2003 is
true and correct. Now she is residing with her parents,
the petitioner has no any income to meet her daily
needs such as food, clothing and shelter is hereby
denied as false and incorrect. The petitioner required
Rs.2000/- per month to meet her food, clothing,
shelter and medical expenses, but she has no
independent income to afford, hence she is filing this
petition for maintenance is hereby denied as false and
incorrect.

that the respondent is running twisting factory and 10
power looms at Anekal and earning Rs.20,000/- per
month, but the respondent is not providing food,
clothing, shelter and other daily requirements to the
petitioner is hereby denied as false and incorrect. The
respondent being her husband is legally bounded to
provide the daily requirements of the petitioner, but
the respondent is not providing the petitioner daily
requirements of the petitioner is hereby denied as false
and incorrect. The Respondent is having sufficient
income to provide the daily needs of the petitioner is

that, she requires Rs.2000/- per month for her food,
clothing, shelter, and other daily requirements and the
respondent is having sufficient income to pay to the
petitioner is hereby denied as false and incorrect.
6. The Respondent submits that he is suffering from

ill-health due to snake bite. The respondent is unable
to work and he is mentally unable work. The entire his
family members are depending upon the respondent
brother’s income. His father and mother are old aged
persons, they have no sufficient income to lead their
livelihood. The Respondent submit that the father of
the respondent and respondent has no any income.
7. The respondent further submit without consent and

knowledge of the respondent she ran away from the
respondent’s house. As such she is living at her
parents house. The respondent submits that the
petitioner parents have good sufficient income,
sufficient agricultural lands to lead their livelihood.
The respondent submits that the petitioner is working
at Garments factory and she is earning Rs.3000/- per
month. The petitioner can live herself and lead her
livelihood without depending upon anybody. On the
other hand the respondent has no income.
8. The respondent further submit that he is ready to

take to his matrimonial house. Under the above
circumstances, there is no obligation to the
respondent to maintain the petitioner and the
petitioner is not entitled for any sort of maintenance.
Further, the respondent has not having the capacity of
paying a separate maintenance to the petitioner and
further the petitioner is an earning member.
-4-
9. Under the above circumstances, the petitioner is not
entitled for any maintenance form this respondent and
the above petition filed by her is liable to dismissed
with cost.

Respondent.
VERIFICATION
I, the above named Respondent do hereby declare
Anekal. Respondent.
Date: 28/3/2006.
JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
C.Mis.No.111/2009.
BETWEEN
AND

THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT

follows:-
1. It is submitted that the petitioners have filed

the present petition seeking maintenance from the
Respondent. After service of summons/notice, the
respondent appeared through counsel and filed
detail objections.
respondent, now this respondent filed application
U/s 243 of Cr.P.C for marking of documents along
with List. Such document cannot be marked in
the present case, the petitioner submit that the
respondent filed the application U/s 243 of Cr.P.C
-2-
seeking permission for production of document to
the respondent side. There is no such provision in
the Cr.P.C as stated in the application U/s 243 of
Cr.P.C for production of documents for respondent
in maintenance case. The provision U/s 243 of
Cr.P.C its only accused may be produced the
documents in his case, at his defence side
evidence only, here in this case the respondent not
the accused in the above case and this is not a
C.C case and this is only petition U/s 125 of
Cr.P.C and the respondent filed the application
U/s 243 of Cr.P.C is not applicable to this case.
The provision Under section 243 of Cr.P.C

Read as follows:-
Sec “243.Evidence for defence”- (1) The accused
shall then be called upon to enter upon his
defence and produce his evidence: and if the
accused puts in any written statement, the
Magistrate shall file it with the record.
(2) If the accused, after he has entered upon
his defence, applies to the Magistrate to issue any
process for compelling the attendance of any
witness for the purpose of examination or cross-
examination, or the production of any document
or other thing, the Magistrate shall issue such
process unless he considers that such application
should be refused on the ground that it is made
for the purpose of vexation or delay or for
defeating the ends of justsice and such ground
shall be recorded by him in writing.
-3-
Provided that, when the accused has cross-
examined or had the opportunity of cross-
examining any witness before entering on his
defence, the attendance of such witness shall not
be compelled under this section, unless the
Magistrate is satisfied that it is necessary for the
ends of justice.
(3) The Magistrate may, before summoning
any witness on an application under
sub-section(2), require that the reasonable
expenses incurred by the witness in attending for
the purpses of the trial be deposited in Court.
Its clearly stated in the Cr.P.C that only the

accused may be permitted to adduce his evidence
Under section 243 of Cr.P.C. And more over this
case is filed U/s.125 of Cr.Pc. and as such the
documents which is produced by the Respondent
cannot be looked into at this stage and not to
mark in the respondent evidence. The document
which is relied by the Respondent is not the
subject matter of this case. Hence this objections
for marking of the documents. Further the
respondent recently created the above said
documents. And same may be cannot the looked
into at this state and not mark in the respondent
evidence. Hence the application is liable to be
dismissed in limine.
-4-
VERIFICATION
Anekal. Petitioner.
Date:26-03-2013.

C.Mis.125 New

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C.Mis.125 New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JR.DN) AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.

Both are residing at

UNDER SECTION 125 (3) OF THE CODE OF

The petitioner above named begs to state as follows:-

1. The address of the petitioner for the purpose of

3. The 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the

4. The petitioners submit that the respondent is well

5. The Petitioners paid the fixed Court fee on the

Wherefore, the petitioners above named humbly

Advocate for Petitioners.

UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL

The petitioner above named begs to state as follows:-

1. The address of the petitioner for the purpose of

3. The petitioner is the legally Wedded wife of

4. The petitioner respectfully submits that after the

5. The petitioner submits that on 29/1/88 the

6. The petitioner submits that as such in Law the

7. The petitioner submits that the respondent doing

8. The petitioner submits that the petitioner requires a

9. The petitioner submits that the petitioner already

10. The petitioner submits that the respondent is

WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner prays

Advocate for Petitioner. Petitioner.

UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL

The petitioner above named begs to state as follows:-

1. The address of the petitioner for the purpose of

2. The addresses of the respondent for the purpose of

3. The petitioner is the legally Wedded wife of

4. The petitioner submits that on 7/1/1988 the

5. The petitioner submits that to the utter surprise of

6. The petitioner submits that under the

7. The petitioner submits that the respondent has got

8. The petitioner submits that she requires a minimum

9. The petitioner submits that this petition filed the

10. The petitioner further submits that the respondent

11. The petitioner submits that the petitioner

WHEREFORE, the above named petitioner prays that

Advocate for Petitioner. Petitioner.

I, the above named petitioner do hereby declare that

Smt.Nanjamma and others. ……. PETITIONERS

Sri.Venkataswamy. ..…… RESPONDENT

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 125 OF CODE OF

The petitioner above named begs to state as follows:-

1. The petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed

2. The petitioner submits that the respondent has

Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

Smt.Bharathi & another. …….

PW2-EVIDENCE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT

I, Sri.Ramakrishnappa, S/o Muniyappa, aged about

1. I submit that I am the know the petitioner and 2 nd

2. I submit that the petitioner is the legally wedded

4. I further submit that panchayathi also held and I

5. I further submit that the 1 st petitioner had lodged

6. I further submit that the respondent where he has

Wherefore, I humbly prays that this Hon’ble court

Advocate. Sworn to before

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

Since 2 to 4 are minors represented by

All are residing at

UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL