Schiffrin Et Al (2003) Noted That There Are Three Main Categories of Discourse

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Name : Putri Alia Reza

NIM : 41032122181056
Class : VI A
Subject : Discourse Analysis

1. What is Discourse Analysis?

 The definition of Discourse :


- Schiffrin et al (2003) noted that there are three main categories of Discourse
definition :
1. Anything beyond the sentence
The person who intrested in discourse or discourse analysis is called linguist.
2. Language in use (Empirical)
Applied linguist conversation analysis.
3. A broader range of social practice that includes nonlinguistic and nonspecific
instances of language
Critical discourse analysis is often done.

- Foucault’s sense of Discourse :


“Not just the language of an individual communication (which Foucault regards
as a “sample”), but the larger systems of thought within a particular historical
location that make certain things “thinkable” and “sayable” and regulating who
can say them.”

 The definitiom of Discourse Analysis :


- Gee breaks da, down into 2 basic approaches :
o Descriptive (largely linguistic)
 Looking at the actual language details and how language and their
grammars work together. It has a broad sense.
o Critical ( applied, political)
 more applied understanding of linguistic infromation and particularly
political bent.

 Approaches of Discourse Analysis


- According to Hodges and Colleagues (2008) there are three diffrent approaches to
Discourse Analysis :
1. Formal linguistic discourse analysis (such as sociolinguistics)
2. Empirical discourse analysis (such as conversation analysis, genre analysis)
3. Critical discouse analysis ( such as foucauldian analysis)

You might also like