Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty Marked Assignment 3: CIEN 40022
Faculty Marked Assignment 3: CIEN 40022
Faculty Marked Assignment 3: CIEN 40022
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
CIEN 40022
On-The-Job Training 2
FACULTY MARKED
ASSIGNMENT 3
GROUP 2
CILOT, CLARIZE MIKA T.
EXIOMO, REANNA APRIL C.
MOPAS, LYKA S.
NOCHE, EMMANUEL R.
TAOPA, DANBERT K.
BSCE III-2
NAME OF FACULTY
ENGR. ELVIN TACTAC
DATE SUBMITTED
August 17, 2021
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
2. Lack of clear senior management and the higher-level ownership and leadership
• Clear View of Interdependencies
Make certain that the project management team have a clear view of the
interconnection between projects, the benefits, and the definition of a
successful project for them.
• Clear Governance arrangements
Establish a clear governance structure in case the project cross
organizational boundaries to ensure sustainable alignments of the different
objectives of all the organizations involved.
• Decision making and commitments
Check if the schedules will not hinder other commitments when it comes
to the execution of the project. In terms of decision making, it should be made
early and decisively, and it should be followed.
• Approvals
The project should have the necessary approval to proceed from its
Senior Project Manager and high-level authorities.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
4. Lack of skills and proven approach to project management and risk management
• Define roles and responsibilities
Make sure that there is a skilled and well enough experienced members
of the team with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. If there is not, provide
an access for training in order to enhance their chosen field of expertise to fill
their respective roles.
• Risk Mapping and Treatment
Identify the major risk and weigh them, and get them treated by the SRO,
the Director, and the Project Manager, and/or the project team.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
5. Lack of understanding of, and contact with, the supply industry at senior levels and
organization
• Tested project approach
It should be tested that the project approach is agreeable and achievable
in the construction industry. Check whether if it will attract sufficient
competitive interest.
• Engagement strategy
Establish a clear strategy for engaging with the industry. The decision
making should be made early and decisively and should not be made gradually or
irregularly.
• Senior management engagement
Senior management should be engaged in an adequate amount of
time with the industry in order to examine possible risk that would arises
especially regarding the supply sufficiency.
6. Too little attention to breaking development and implementation into manageable steps
• Tested project management approach
The project management approach should have been tested to ensure it
is appropriate in scope.
• Timescale
The project should have sufficient time built-in to allow for planning
applications in property and construction projects. The best should be done to
keep delivery timescales short so that change during development could be
prevented.
• Business Continuity Plan
There should be a business continuity plan in the event of late project
delivery or failing to deliver at all. Potential risk should be identified in advance
in order to create a mitigation plan for it.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
7. Evaluation of proposals driven by initial price rather than longer term value of money
(especially securing business benefits)
• Evaluation approach
Create and prepare a proposed evaluation approach that allows us to
balance financial factors against quality and security of the execution of the
project. The evaluation should be based on whole-life value for money, taking
account of capital, maintenance, and service costs.
• Business Criticality
It should be included in the evaluation approach the business criticality and
affordability.
• Business Driven
The evaluation approach should be business driven.
8. Lack of understanding of and contract with supply industry at senior levels in the
organization
• Roles and Responsibilities
Ensure that all parties have a clear understanding of their roles and
responsibilities, and a shared understanding of desired outcomes, key terms, and
deadlines.
• Supplier`s assumptions
During the initial stages, it is best to ask the suppliers to state any
assumptions they are making against their proposals.
• Dynamics of Supply Industry
Study and assess the dynamics of the supply industry for us to be able to
know whether the project is achievable considering that there could be other
potential competitors that could affects us.
9. Lack of effective project team integration between clients, the supplier, and the supply
chain.
• Market Evaluation
Initially, market evaluation should have been prepared and undertaken to
test market responsiveness with regards to our project.
• Procurement Routes
The procurement routes such as partnering should be used to allow
integration of the project team, client, and contractors.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering