Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Van Bockstaele 2021 - Impact of Temporary Frozen Storage On The Safety and Quality
Van Bockstaele 2021 - Impact of Temporary Frozen Storage On The Safety and Quality
Van Bockstaele 2021 - Impact of Temporary Frozen Storage On The Safety and Quality
LWT
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt
Impact of temporary frozen storage on the safety and quality of four typical
Belgian bakery products
Filip Van Bockstaele a, Els Debonne a, b, *, Ingrid De Leyn a, Kathou Wagemans c, Mia Eeckhout a, b
a
Research Unit of Cereal and Feed Technology, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin
Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
b
Laboratory of Applied Mycology (MYCOLAB), Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin
Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
c
FGBB Vzw – Asbl – Federatie van Grote Bakkerijen Vzw, Fédération des Grandes Boulangeries Belges GBB Asbl (Integrated Member of FEVIA), Belgium
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: EU regulation No. 1169/2011 states that foods that have been frozen and thawed before being sold, the name
Bakery products shall be accompanied by the designation ‘defrosted’. This requirement does not apply when defrosting has no
Frozen storage negative impact on their safety and quality. Producers should be able to show that defrosting has no negative
Microbial safety
impact during the shelf-life. Therefore, the impact of temporary frozen storage on the quality and safety of
Quality
industrially produced bakery products, including wholemeal bread, sandwich rolls, sponge cake and pie, was
Sensory properties
studied in comparison with non-frozen products. Total plate count, aw, texture analysis and sensory analysis were
applied to assess microbial, physico-chemical quality and consumer acceptability of the products. All tests were
performed before and after the defrosted shelf-life period. Freezing and defrosting of bakery products did not
enhance microbial spoilage. All values remained under the maximal limit of microbial contamination, respec
tively 5 log CFU/g for bread products and 4 log CFU/g for sponge cake and pie. Texture analysis and aw showed
only limited differences between fresh and defrosted products. Although a slight difference in texture was
observed for sandwich rolls, sponge cake and pie through sensory trials, all products were found acceptable for
consumption.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110454
Received 3 August 2020; Received in revised form 14 October 2020; Accepted 23 October 2020
Available online 26 October 2020
0023-6438/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
F. Van Bockstaele et al. LWT 137 (2021) 110454
2
F. Van Bockstaele et al. LWT 137 (2021) 110454
Fig. 2. Total aerobic plate count (log CFU/g, n = 3) of non-frozen (black) and frozen/thawed (white) bakery products at the begin and end of the shelf life period:
[A] wholemeal bread (3 days); [B] sandwich rolls (4 days); [C] sponge cake with whipped cream and fruit filling (2 days) and [D] cherry pie (4 days) (- –: upper limit
of acceptability; ….: lower limit of acceptability). Bread products stored at 22 ◦ C and sponge cake/pie products at 5 ◦ C. Values indicated with different letters are
significantly different.
strain at a test speed of 1.7 mm/s, with of pause of 5 s. The compression distinguishable, the proportion of correct answers will be larger than
probe differed in diameter depending on the product type: 35 mm for 1/3. The minimal number of correct judgements to establish significance
wholemeal bread and 25 mm for sandwich rolls. Sandwich rolls were at a probability level of 5% (one tailed, p = 1/3) was taken from Lawless
sliced in the lab before texture analysis. For wholemeal bread, 3 breads and Heymann (2010). Further, participants were asked to indicate
were analyzed 5 times (new slices) per analysis (n = 15). For sandwich whether all three products were still acceptable for consumption
rolls, 6 products were analyzed 2 times (new slices) due to smaller (regardless of the product being frozen or not).
product size (n = 12). Because of the complex composition of the sponge
cake and pie, no texture measurements could be performed on these 2.7. Statistical analysis
products.
To assess significant differences among samples, a multiple com
2.6. Triangle test parison analysis of samples was performed using SPSS Statistics version
24. In case the results were normally distributed, either a Tukey test
A triangle test (ISO 4120:2004) was used to evaluate if the samples (homoscedasticity) or a Dunnett T3 (no equal variances) test was used as
were perceived to be different in their sensorial properties (Klotz, post-hoc test to group the means with 95% confidence (p = 0.05).
Winkler, & Lachenmeier, 2020). In this study, the triangle test was
applied to detect the difference between non-frozen and frozen/thawed 3. Results & discussion
bakery products both at the start and end of their shelf-life period. For
the test, three representative samples with randomized three-number 3.1. Total aerobic plate count
codes were offered: two identical and one odd sample in six random
ized serving orders. The participants needed to detect the odd sample. Microbial analyses showed that there was no enhanced microbial
The participants were employees working at or in close proximity to the proliferation due to the frozen storage and subsequent thawing. On the
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering (Campus Schoonmeersen, Ghent). contrary, wholemeal bread and sandwich rolls showed a significantly
They had no previous experience in sensory evaluation. Demographic lower amount of CFU/g, respectively at the start and the end of the shelf-
data of the subjects (n = 18–26; 70–75% females and 25–30% males, life. Fig. 2 summarizes the results for the total aerobic plate count of
aged 25–58 years, mean 42 years). When no differences are discerned, non-frozen (fresh) and frozen/thawed bakery products at the start and
the probability of selecting the correct sample is 1/3. If the samples are end of the shelf-life period. For wholemeal bread, frozen storage led to a
3
F. Van Bockstaele et al. LWT 137 (2021) 110454
Table 1 Table 2
Water activity (aw, n = 3) of non-frozen and frozen/thawed bakery products at Texture profile analysis parameters of crumb of non-frozen and frozen/thawed
the start and end of the defrosted shelf-life period: wholemeal bread (3 days); bread products at the begin and end of the shelf life period: wholemeal bread (3
sandwich rolls (4 days); sponge cake (2 days) and cherry pie (4 days). Bread days; n = 15); sandwich rolls (4 days; n = 12). Values indicated with different
products stored at 22 ◦ C and sponge cake/pie at 5 ◦ C. Values indicated with letters within the same row are significantly different.
different letters within the same row are significantly different. Product TPA Start of shelf-life (d0) End of shelf-life
Product Start of shelf-life (d0) End of shelf-life parameter
Non- Frozen/ Non- Frozen/
Non- Frozen/ Non- Frozen/ frozen thawed frozen thawed
frozen thawed frozen thawed
Wholemeal Hardness (g) 487 ± 480 ± 40a 541 ± 538 ± 40a
Wholemeal Crust 0.950 ± 0.947 ± 0.952 ± 0.960 ± bread 63a 48a
bread 0.012a 0.019a 0.006a 0.002a Adhesion (g. 1.1 ± 0.8 ± 0.4a 0.4 ± 1.4 ± 1.3a
Crumb 0.971 ± 0.977 ± 0.971 ± 0.977 ± s) 0.3a 0.1a
(¼section) 0.007a 0.002a 0.005a 0.008a Cohesion (− ) 0.75 ± 0.71 ± 0.73 ± 0.69 ±
Crumb 0.975 ± 0.976 ± 0.975 ± 0.980 ± 0.01a 0.01b,c 0.01a,b 0.01c
(½section) 0.003a 0.002a 0.005a 0.005a Springiness 0.93 ± 0.90 ± 0.92 ± 0.90 ±
Sandwich Crust 0.921 ± 0.878 ± 0.922 ± 0.921 ± (− ) 0.01a 0.01b 0.01a 0.01b
rolls (upper) 0.008a 0.022b 0.010a 0.007a Chewiness 341 ± 308 ± 19a 363 ± 334 ± 17a
Crumb 0.930 ± 0.939 ± 0.923 ± 0.925 ± (− ) 45a 33a
0.005a,b 0.002b 0.007a 0.005a Resilience 0.38 ± 0.34 ± 0.36 ± 0.31 ±
Crust 0.918 ± 0.898 ± 0.921 ± 0.920 ± (− ) 0.02a 0.02b,c 0.01b 0.01c
(bottom) 0.003a 0.015b 0.005a 0.009a Sandwich Hardness (g) 240 ± 236 ± 33a 419 ± 428 ± 18b
Sponge cake Top layer 0.924 ± 0.955 ± 0.911 ± 0.909 ± rolls 31a 21b
0.010a 0.025a 0.003a 0.010a Adhesion (g. 3.3 ± 4.3 ± 0.5b 1.3 ± 2.28 ±
Bottom 0.911 ± 0.922 ± 0.909 ± 0.907 ± s) 0.6a 0.5c 0.13d
layer 0.072a 0.007a 0.007a 0.017a Cohesion (− ) 0.63 ± 0.55 ± 0.5 ± 0.43 ±
Cherry pie Crust 0.883 ± 0.888 ± 0.897 ± 0.907 ± 0.01a 0.04a,b 0.01b 0.01c
(upper) 0.003a 0.006a.b 0.000b.c 0.006c Springiness 0.81 ± 0.81 ± 0.82 ± 0.79 ±
Fruit filling 0.979 ± 1.000 ± 0.977 ± 1.000 ± (− ) 0.01a 0.02a 0.02a 0.01a
0.041a 0.005a 0.036a 0.005a Chewiness 123 ± 105 ± 11a 171 ± 6c 143 ± 3b
Crust 0.861 ± 0.877 ± 0.911 ± 0.912 ± (− ) 16a,b
(bottom) 0.008a 0.017a.b 0.013b 0.023b Resilience 0.23 ± 0.18 ± 0.16 ± 0.13 ±
(− ) 0.01a 0.02b 0.01b 0.01c
4
F. Van Bockstaele et al. LWT 137 (2021) 110454
Table 3
Triangle test results comparing non-frozen and frozen/thawed bakery products at the start and end of their shelf-life period (time, day x (dx) of the shelf-life); n =
number of participants; # correct answers = number of participants which could distinguish the odd sample (showing differences between the frozen non-frozen
bakery products); threshold = number of correct judgements needed for significant difference detection); product acceptability = number/percentage of partici
pants that found both frozen and non-frozen samples acceptable for consumption.
Product Time n # correct answers Threshold Significant difference Product Acceptability
during the shelf-life. For the cherry pie, a large difference in aw was product acceptability scores were quite high, even at the end of the shelf-
found between the pie crust and the fruit filling. The aw of the pie crust life. Excluding wholemeal bread at the end of the shelf-life (57%
increased significantly during storage whereas the fruit filling showed a acceptability rate), the product acceptability rates of the sandwich rolls,
constant aw. A water activity of 1 was measured for the fruit filling of the sponge cake and cherry pie were higher than 83%.
frozen/thawed samples, indicating that the water was less bound in the
fruit filling matrix due to freezing and thawing. 4. Conclusion
3.3. Texture profile analysis This study showed that temporary frozen storage of bakery products,
including wholemeal bread, sandwich rolls, sponge cake and cherry pie,
The crumb texture of the bread products was tested by texture profile does not reduce their microbial quality compared to fresh non-frozen
analysis (TPA). Texture of the sponge cake and cherry pie was not products during the defrosted shelf-life period. Even at the end of the
measured as these are very heterogeneous products, not suitable for shelf-life, consumer acceptability remained high indicating that tem
reproducible TPA. TPA results in several texture parameters which are porary frozen storage does also not reduce perceived quality to the
listed in Table 2. For wholemeal bread it was found that hardness, extent of products being rejected by consumers.
adhesion and chewiness were not significantly different between non-
frozen and frozen/thawed samples. However, cohesion, springiness CRediT authorship contribution statement
and resilience were significantly lower for frozen/thawed samples both
at the start and end of the shelf-life. None of the texture parameters Filip Van Bockstaele: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing -
significantly changed upon storage, however slightly higher values for original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. Els
crumb hardness were observed after 3 days (respective values for Debonne: Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Ingrid De Leyn:
hardness of non-frozen bread on day 0 of 487 ± 63 g and on day 3 of 541 Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investi
± 48 g (n = 15), similar trend was observed for frozen/thawed whole gation. Kathou Wagemans: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing -
meal bread). For sandwich rolls, differences were observed for adhesion, review & editing. Mia Eeckhout: Conceptualization, Resources, Fund
cohesion, chewiness and resilience between non-frozen and frozen/ ing acquisition.
thawed samples. Hardness and springiness were not significantly
affected by freezing. Storage time also strongly impacted most texture Declaration of competing interest
parameters, including hardness, adhesion, cohesion, chewiness and
resilience, which is in accordance with results of Bárcenas and Rosell None.
(2006b).
Acknowledgments
3.4. Triangle test
The authors want to acknowledge the federation of the large Belgian
To assess whether consumers could perceive a difference in sensory bakeries (FGBB) for the funding and following bakery companies for
attributes between non-frozen and frozen/thawed products, triangle providing the samples: La Lorraine Bakery Group N.V. (Ninove,
tests were performed at the start and end of the shelf-life (Table 3). No Belgium), Bakkerij Quintens (Asse, Belgium). Annemarie Vroman and
differences were noticed for wholemeal bread on day 0 and day 3 be Ann De Wulf are acknowledged for performing the microbial analyses.
tween frozen and non-frozen bread. Non-frozen and frozen/thawed
sandwich rolls were found to be different at the start of the shelf-life. References
After 4 days, no significant effect of freezing could be observed. Half
Archer, D. L. (2004). Freezing: An underutilized food safety technology? International
of the panelists which could indicate the odd samples of the sandwich Journal of Food Microbiology, 90(2), 127–138.
rolls, indicated that their choice was based on differences in texture. The Baier-Schenk, A., Handschin, S., Von Schönau, M., Bittermann, A., Bächi, T., & Conde-
different state of water activity in the crust between fresh and frozen/ Petit, B. (2005). In situ observation of the freezing process in wheat dough by
confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM): Formation of ice and changes in the
thawed sandwich rolls probably led to a difference in texture perception gluten network. Journal of Cereal Science, 42(2), 255–260.
resulting in a significant difference in the triangle test of the sandwich Baik, M. Y., & Chinachoti, P. (2000). Moisture redistribution and phase transitions during
rolls at the start of the shelf-life. However, this did not impact consumer bread staling. Cereal Chemistry, 77(4), 484–488.
Bárcenas, M. E., Haros, M., Benedito, C., & Rosell, C. M. (2003). Effect of freezing and
acceptability of the sandwich rolls. For sponge cake, a significant dif
frozen storage on the staling of part-baked bread. Food Research International, 36(8),
ference was found both at the start and end of the shelf-life. Panelists 863–869.
mentioned texture, taste, smell and moistness as basis for selecting the Bárcenas, M. E., & Rosell, C. M. (2006a). Different approaches for improving the quality
odd sample. In case of the cherry pie, the difference at the end of the and extending the shelf life of the partially baked bread: Low temperatures and
HPMC addition. Journal of Food Engineering, 72(1), 92–99.
shelf-life was mostly based on differences in texture. Although triangle Bárcenas, M. E., & Rosell, C. M. (2006b). Effect of frozen storage time on the bread crumb
tests showed differences in some cases, especially for sponge cake, and aging of par-baked bread. Food Chemistry, 95(3), 438–445.
5
F. Van Bockstaele et al. LWT 137 (2021) 110454
Cheng, X., Zhang, M., Xu, B., Adhikari, B., & Sun, J. (2015). The principles of ultrasound Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices.
and its application in freezing related processes of food materials: A review. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 27, 576–585. Marın, S., Guynot, M. E., Neira, P., Bernado, M., Sanchis, V., & Ramos, A. J. (2002). Risk
Cook, F. K., & Johnson, B. L. (2009). Microbiological spoilage of cereal products. assessment of the use of sub-optimal levels of weak-acid preservatives in the control
Compendium of the microbiological spoilage of foods and beverages. Springer. of mould growth on bakery products. International journal of food microbiology, 79(3),
Debonne, E., Van Bockstaele, F., Philips, E., De Leyn, I., & Eeckhout, M. (2017). Impact of 203–211.
par-baking and storage conditions on the quality of par-baked and fully baked bread. Primo-Martin, C., Van de Pijpekamp, A., Van Vliet, T., De Jongh, H., Plijter, J., &
LWT – Food Science and Technology, 78, 16–22. Hamer, R. (2006). The role of the gluten network in the crispness of bread crust.
Debonne, E., Van Bockstaele, F., Van Driessche, M., De Leyn, I., Eeckhout, M., & Journal of Cereal Science, 43(3), 342–352.
Devlieghere, F. (2018). Impact of par-baking and packaging on the microbial quality Rosell, C. M. (2019). Trends in science of doughs and bread quality. Flour and Breads and
of par-baked wheat and sourdough bread. Food Control, 91, 12–19. their Fortification in Health and disease prevention. Elsevier.
Deschuyffeleer, N., Audenaert, K., Samapundo, S., Ameye, S., Eeckhout, M., & Saclier, M., Peczalski, R., & Andrieu, J. (2010). Effect of ultrasonically induced
Devlieghere, F. (2011). Identification and characterization of yeasts causing chalk nucleation on ice crystals’ size and shape during freezing in vials. Chemical
mould defects on par-baked bread. Food Microbiology, 28(5), 1019–1027. Engineering Science, 65(10), 3064–3071.
Díaz Ramírez, M., Calderón-Domínguez, G., Salgado-Cruz, M.d. l. P., Chanona- Santos, M. V., Vampa, V., Califano, A., & Zaritzky, N. (2010). Numerical simulations of
Pérez, J. J., Andraca-Adame, J. A., & Ribotta, P. D. (2016). Sponge cake chilling and freezing processes applied to bakery products in irregularly 3D
microstructure, starch retrogradation and quality changes during frozen storage. geometries. Journal of Food Engineering, 100(1), 32–42.
International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(8), 1744–1753. Smith, J. P., Daifas, D. P., El-Khoury, W., Koukoutsis, J., & El-Khoury, A. (2004). Shelf
FAVV. (2013). Autocontrolegids voor de brood-en banketbakkerij - versie 2 DD 18-06-13. life and safety concerns of bakery products—a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science
Retrieved from http://www.favv.be/autocontrole-nl/gidsen/distributie/g026/ and Nutrition, 44(1), 19–55.
_documents/G-026_V2_NL_18-06-2013.pdf. Speck, M., & Ray, B. (1977). Effects of freezing and storage on microorganisms in frozen
Giannou, V., Kessoglou, V., & Tzia, C. (2003). Quality and safety characteristics of bread foods: A review. Journal of Food Protection, 40(5), 333–336.
made from frozen dough. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 14(3), 99–108. Stinco, C. M., Fernández-Vázquez, R., Heredia, F. J., Meléndez-Martínez, A. J., &
Kennedy, C. (2000). Freezing processed foods. Managing Frozen Foods, 137–158. Vicario, I. M. (2013). Bioaccessibility, antioxidant activity and colour of carotenoids
Klotz, J. A., Winkler, G., & Lachenmeier, D. W. (2020). Influence of the brewing in ultrafrozen orange juices: Influence of thawing conditions. LWT-Food Science and
temperature on the taste of espresso. Foods, 9(1), 36. Technology, 53(2), 458–463.