1. As a manager in an organization, how do you choose the right communication channel?

What are
the factors or things that you need to consider? State and explain.

- Choosing the right communication channel is one of the Key Elements in becoming a good manager.
There are factors we have to consider as well.

A. Welfare of the Organization and its Members. - this should be given the utmost consideration, before
we choose communication channel, let us always see to it that no member of the organization is at stake
or no angle or area of the organization is being put to danger, especially now we are experiencing what
we call pandemic.

B. Consistency to Clients - Our service to our clients is a reflection of how communication is done inside
the organization. When there is good and effective communication internally it reflects externally :) .

C. Efficiency with Reference to the Members of the Organization- In choosing an effective channel ,it
should undergo analysis. As a leader or secrets , you should see to it that the communication channel
being utilized is one the makes a tasks or job easily and quickly done. You don't need to introduce be
channel of communication if you are assured that the ones you are using provide positive result.

2. As a communicator, how do you tailor your message to your audience (constituents, people you
are speaking with) in the most effective manner?

We have discussed tips in tailoring message to our audience but personally , here are the tips I could
suggest to transfer information in the most effective way.

1. Be subtle - Everything, almost everything works perfectly when done in a subtle way. Even arguments
and and many other understanding could be fixed.

2. Be diplomatic - Diplomacy is almost equivalent to justice. No matter how big and great the chaos
occuring in our organization if we are professionally inclined in communicating with them, we won't
receive negative returns.
3. Be broadminded - When tailoring information, we have to consider multiple perspective. We
communicate wrongly and inefficiently most of the time because we only know one side of the story.

3. In an organization, if a school head or manager or head of office or agency has 50 constituents or

members of the organization, do you agree that a manager should have also 50 communication styles?
Yes or No, why? or why not?

For me ,I stand for a NO as an answer.

Being a school head, you have a lot of burdens to bear.. I remember a very emphatic statement from a
supernatural movie that is superman when he said, "Great Power Comes with a Great Responsibility"
You, standing as a leader of a certain organization have a lot of things to consider. Now, if I have 50
constituents and they have 50 communication styles - do I adjust for ALL THEM? NO . I have here 3
reasons.

1. Adjustment is a Mutual Responsibility - Inside an organization, the leader do need to make a research
or study on what are the existing communication styles of the constituents yet it is impractical to
actually use them all for their sake. if we try to look into the situation, it becomes a moral dilemma on
the part of the leader if the burden is left on him or her alone, it would be better or even best to
consider encouraging everyone to make adjustment.

2. Learning to Adopt in a workplace is a Must - Inside a company, an organization or any other type of
groups ,the workers or subordinates are being trained to adopt ,with how is the communication process
being done and whatever regulations on communicating styles already established, there is no need to
abolished them for as long as no one's welfare is being compromised or violated.

3. Every Adjustment should be Reasonable - As a leader, you do not actually deploy into a decision to
utilize 50 communication styles without empirical investigation and thorough analysis. Every action
should be practically reasonable, because if they aren't not , it will just be considered a poor investment.
You should duh deep into the differences before actually making a decision.