(Comparing different percentages of durian)

Test for Normality

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Durian .205 9 .200* .912 9 .327

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

For the Shapiro-Wilk tests, the computed significance level is 0.327 > 0.05. Therefore, normality
can be assumed.

ANOVA
Durian

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups .500 2 .250 .429 .670

Within Groups 3.500 6 .583
Total 4.000 8

The results from the analysis indicate that the amount of concentration of durian has no significant effect
on the time the repellant can repel the mosquito, 𝐹(2,6) = .429, 𝑝 > .05.

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Durian
Scheffe

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) Concentration (J) Concentration (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Durian 50% Durian 75% -.50000 .62361 .737 -2.5001 1.5001

Durian 95% .00000 .62361 1.000 -2.0001 2.0001

Durian 75% Durian 50% .50000 .62361 .737 -1.5001 2.5001
Durian 95% .50000 .62361 .737 -1.5001 2.5001
Durian 95% Durian 50% .00000 .62361 1.000 -2.0001 2.0001

Durian 75% -.50000 .62361 .737 -2.5001 1.5001

In the Multiple Comparisons table, in the column labeled Mean Difference (I – J), the mean difference
values indicate that all the concentration level are significantly no difference from each other at the 0.05
level of significance.

Comparing Different means of repelling mosquito

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Residual for Time .181 18 .121 .909 18 .083

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

For the Shapiro-Wilk tests, the computed significance level is 0.083 > 0.05. Therefore, normality
can be assumed.

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Time

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

5.551 5 12 .072

For Levene Statistic, the significance value is 0.072 > 0.05 which indicates that the requirement
of homogeneity of variance has been met and the ANOVA test can be considered to be robust.

ANOVA
Time

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 54.778 5 10.956 5.716 .006

Within Groups 23.000 12 1.917
Total 77.778 17

The results from the analysis indicate that there is a significant difference between groups as
demonstrated by one-way ANOVA, 𝐹(5,12) = 5.716, 𝑝 = 0.006 < 0.05.
 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Time
Scheffe

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) Treatment (J) Treatment (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Commercialize Mosquito Spray -.83333 1.05785 .890 -4.1838 2.5172

Insect Repellant Durian 2.83333* .86373 .041 .0977 5.5690

Water 4.00000* 1.05785 .017 .6495 7.3505

Mosquito Spray Commercialize
.83333 1.05785 .890 -2.5172 4.1838
Insect Repellant
Durian 3.66667* .86373 .008 .9310 6.4023
Water 4.83333* 1.05785 .004 1.4828 8.1838
Durian Commercialize
-2.83333* .86373 .041 -5.5690 -.0977
Insect Repellant
Mosquito Spray -3.66667* .86373 .008 -6.4023 -.9310
Water 1.16667 .86373 .621 -1.5690 3.9023
Water Commercialize
-4.00000* 1.05785 .017 -7.3505 -.6495
Insect Repellant

Mosquito Spray -4.83333* 1.05785 .004 -8.1838 -1.4828

Durian -1.16667 .86373 .621 -3.9023 1.5690

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

In the Multiple Comparisons table, in the column labeled Mean Difference (I – J), the mean difference
values accompanied by asterisks indicate which treatments differ significantly from each other at the 0.05
level of significance. The results indicate that the Durian is significantly different from both Commercialize Insect
Repellant and Mosquito Spray. These results show that both Commercialize Insect Repellant and Mosquito Spray
have a statistically significantly higher time of effectiveness than the Durian. There was no statistically significant
difference between Water and Durian groups (p=0.621)