Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamics of Vortex-Antivortex Matter in Nanostructured Ferromagnet-Superconductor Bilayers
Dynamics of Vortex-Antivortex Matter in Nanostructured Ferromagnet-Superconductor Bilayers
共Received 11 July 2008; revised manuscript received 17 July 2009; published 21 August 2009兲
We investigate theoretically the dynamics of vortices and antivortices in a hybrid superconductor magnetic-
dot-array bilayer with the nanodots polarized in plane. Our model naturally accounts for creation and annihi-
lation of vortex-antivortex 共v-av兲 pairs and simulate their motion by a 共Langevin兲 molecular-dynamics algo-
rithm. We observed several phenomena resulting from the intricate vortex-antivortex dynamics in this system.
In general, as a dc-transport current is applied, the steady state corresponds to a cyclic sequence of vortex-
antivortex creation, motion and annihilation processes, giving rise to periodic fluctuations of the number of
v-av pairs and the induced electric field. Surprisingly, the v-av motion does not follow, in general, the induced
Lorentz force direction. Hence, a vortex-guidance effect and the resulting transverse electrical field were
observed at zero external magnetic field when the current was applied near certain high-symmetry directions.
E = 兺 q iq j
i,j
冋 1
2
册
Uvv共rij兲 + Ec␦i,j + 兺 q jUvm共r j兲,
j
共1兲
FIG. 2. 共Color online兲 共Top兲 Vortex共black兲-antivortex共red兲 con-
figurations for 共a兲 m = 1.00z0 共n pair = 1兲, 共b兲 m = 1.650z0
where q is the vorticity 共q = 1 for vortices, q = −1 for antivor- 共n pair = 2兲 and 共c兲 m = 2.250z0 共n pair = 3兲. 共Bottom兲 Number of v-av
tices兲. Here we assume that no external magnetic field is pairs per dipole, n pair, versus magnetic moment of the dipoles, m,
applied. In other words, the vortex-matter “neutrality” con- for different values of c.
dition, 兺 jq j = 0, must be satisfied. Uvm共r兲 is the usual inter-
action energy between a vortex located at r and the dipole
The procedure for the second part, v-av pair creation, is to
array calculated in the London limit.22 The interaction energy
freeze the vortex-matter configuration after every Langevin
Uvv共rij兲 between an arbitrary pair of vortices at positions ri
dynamics time step and create v-av pairs using a Monte
and r j is calculated following Clem’s variational approach
Carlo procedure. This assumes that the actual nucleation pro-
for the order parameter 共rij = ri − r j兲.23 In the limit Ⰷ d con-
cess takes place in a time interval so short that the motion of
sidered here, this gives Uvv共r兲 = 0d ln共兩rij兩2 + 22c 兲, where
the vortex matter during it can be neglected.16 Trial v-av
0 = 20 / 402 and c is a variational parameter 关in general,
pairs are then placed at every point of an auxiliary grid, with
c ⬃ 共T兲兴. The vortex-core energy can be calculated straight-
unit cell of dimensions ac ⫻ ac 共ac ⯝ c兲, commensurate with
forwardly by using Clem’s trial order parameter to compute
the dipole array. The vortex and antivortex are placed at a
the gain in condensation energy due to an isolated vortex,
distance c from each other at a given axis, with the pair
which results in Ec = 0.3750. −Ec acts as a chemical poten-
center of mass fixed at the grid point. At high T, this axis is
tial of the vortex system and thus plays an important role in
chosen randomly, whereas at low T it is determined by the
the nucleation of vortex-antivortex pairs.24
direction of the total current density calculated at the grid
Our numerical algorithm is based on the assumption that
point 共at that instant of time兲 as to favor pair unbinding.
the time evolution of the vortex matter can be broken into
Then, a Metropolis code is used to either accept or reject the
two distinct parts: motion of the vortices and antivortices,
pair. The energy entering this algorithm includes the energy
and creation of v-av pairs. The first is governed by the
due to the interaction with the transport current, that is
Langevin equation
ET = E − 兺 jF j · r j. Such a procedure accounts for both deter-
dr j共t兲 ministic 共induced by the local-current distribution兲 and ther-
= − ⵜ jE + F j + ⌫ j , 共2兲 mal pair nucleation.25
dt
where = 00Hc2 / n is the Bardeen-Stephen friction coef- III. EQUILIBRIUM CONFIGURATIONS
ficient 共with Hc2 = 0 / 22 and n the normal-state resis-
tance兲, j runs over all vortices and antivortices present at The simulations are carried out on a L ⫻ L section of the
time t, F j = q j0J ⫻ ẑ is the driving force, and ⌫ j is the ran- bilayer, with L = 8a p, and assuming periodic boundary condi-
dom force appropriate to temperature T. J is the applied tions in both x and y directions. The time step used in the
current density which makes an angle ␣ with the positive y numerical integration is dt = 2 ⫻ 10−4t0 关t0 = ap2 / d0兴and we
axis, as shown in Fig. 1共b兲. These equations are solved nu- chose z0 = 0.2a p. Equilibrium configurations of the vortex
merically by a finite difference method. Eventually, a vortex matter for small T and J = 0, were obtained minimizing E
and an antivortex collide and annihilate each other. This is 共Eq. 共1兲兲 by means of a simulated annealing scheme. Figure
taken into account by assuming that such a collision occurs 2 shows the equilibrium states of the superconducting film
every time the vortex and the antivortex are separated by a obtained by this method. The bottom panel presents the num-
distance ⱕc. ber of vortex-antivortex pairs per dipole 共n pair兲 as a function
054514-2
DYNAMICS OF VORTEX-ANTIVORTEX MATTER IN… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 80, 054514 共2009兲
054514-3
CLÉSSIO L. S. LIMA AND CLÉCIO C. DE SOUZA SILVA PHYSICAL REVIEW B 80, 054514 共2009兲
054514-4
DYNAMICS OF VORTEX-ANTIVORTEX MATTER IN… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 80, 054514 共2009兲
verse electric field induced by vortex-antivortex guidance. In this sense, these phenomena, when observed at zero mag-
This is a unique Hall-type effect observed at zero (macro- netic field, can be considered as fingerprints of spontaneous
scopic) magnetic field. It is worth noticing that recently simi- vortex-antivortex matter in superconductor-ferromagnetic
lar anisotropy in Jc as well as guided vortex motion has been hybrids.
observed experimentally in superconducting films interacting
with different magnetic textures for the case of nonzero mag-
netic fields, as a result of the inherently anisotropic proper- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ties of the magnetic pinning potential.9,28 The anisotropy and
guidance observed in our calculations, on the other hand, The authors are grateful to Gilson Carneiro for fruitful
occur at zero field and is only possible if the specific mag- discussions. Research supported in part by the Brazilian
netic texture is capable of inducing spontaneous v-av pairs. agencies CNPq and CAPES.
1 V. V. Moshchalkov, M. Baert, V. V. Metlushko, E. Rosseel, M. J. 14 D. J. Priour, Jr., and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 057003
Van Bael, K. Temst, R. Jonckheere, and Y. Bruynseraede, Phys. 共2004兲.
Rev. B 54, 7385 共1996兲; A. V. Silhanek, S. Raedts, M. Lange, 15 M. V. Milosevic and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 267006
Lett. 79, 1929 共1997兲. chalkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 197006 共2003兲; M. Lange, M. J.
5
Y. Jaccard, J. I. Martín, M.-C. Cyrille, M. Vélez, J. L. Vicent, Van Bael, A. V. Silhanek, and V. V. Moshchalkov Phys. Rev. B
and Ivan K., Schuller, Phys. Rev. B 58, 8232 共1998兲; A. Hoff- 72, 052507 共2005兲.
mann, P. Prieto, and I. K. Schuller, ibid. 61, 6958 共2000兲. 19
W. Gillijns, A. V. Silhanek, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Phys. Rev. B
6 D. J. Morgan and J. B. Ketterson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3614
74, 220509共R兲 共2006兲.
共1998兲. 20 C. C. de Souza Silva, A. V. Silhanek, J. Van de Vondel, W.
7 M. J. Van Bael, K. Temst, V. V. Moshchalkov, and Y. Bruynser-
Gillijns, V. Metlushko, B. Ilic, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Phys.
aede, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14674 共1999兲. Rev. Lett. 98, 117005 共2007兲.
8 21
M. J. Van Bael, J. Bekaert, K. Temst, L. Van Look, V. V. Mosh- J. S. Neal, M. V. Milosevic, S. J. Bending, A. Potenza, L. San
chalkov, Y. Bruynseraede, G. D. Howells, A. N. Grigorenko, S. Emeterio, and C. H. Marrows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127001
J. Bending, and G. Borghs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 155 共2001兲 ; M. 共2007兲.
22 G. Carneiro, Phys. Rev. B 72, 144514 共2005兲.
J. Van Bael, M. Lange, S. Raedts, V. V. Moshchalkov, A. N.
Grigorenko, and S. J. Bending, Phys. Rev. B 68, 014509 共2003兲. 23 J. R. Clem, in Low Temperature Physics, edited by K. D. Tim-
9
A. Belkin, V. Novosad, M. Iavarone, J. Pearson, and G. Kara- merhaus, W. J. O’Sullivan, and E. F. Hammel 共Plenum, New
petrov, Phys. Rev. B 77, 180506共R兲 共2008兲; V. Vlasko-Vlasov, York, 1974兲, Vol. 3, p. 102.
U. Welp, G. Karapetrov, V. Novosad, D. Rosenmann, M. Iavar- 24
P. Minnhagen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1001 共1987兲.
one, A. Belkin, and W.-K. Kwok, ibid. 77, 134518 共2008兲. 25 C. L. S. Lima, C. C. de Souza Silva, and G. Carneiro, private
10
G. Karapetrov, J. Fedor, M. Iavarone, D. Rosenmann, and W. K. communication.
Kwok, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 167002 共2005兲. 26 A. V. Silhanek, L. Van Look, S. Raedts, R. Jonckheere, and V. V.
11
J. E. Villegas, K. D. Smith, L. Huang, Y. Zhu, R. Morales, and I. Moshchalkov, Phys. Rev. B 68, 214504 共2003兲.
K. Schuller, Phys. Rev. B 77, 134510 共2008兲. 27 J. E. Villegas, E. M. Gonzalez, M. I. Montero, Ivan K. Schuller,
12
S. Erdin, A. F. Kayali, I. F. Lyuksyutov, and V. L. Pokrovsky, and J. L. Vicent, Phys. Rev. B 68, 224504 共2003兲.
Phys. Rev. B 66, 014414 共2002兲. 28 N. Verellen, A. V. Silhanek, W. Gillijns, V. V. Moshchalkov, V.
13
M. V. Milosevic, S. V. Yampolskii, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. Metlushko, F. Gozzini, and B. Ilic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 022507
B 66, 174519 共2002兲. 共2008兲.
054514-5