Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DO - 011 - S2013 - Star Rating
DO - 011 - S2013 - Star Rating
)-H
.FEB 072013
To enhance the materials testing capability of the implementing offices and improve
quality control in project implementation, a Star Rating System for testing laboratories of the
Regional and District Offices is hereby adopted and the corresponding guidelines for its
implementation are hereto prescribed.
The System shall classify testing laboratories into One-Star, Two-Star or Three-Star
categories based on the following criteria:
All Regional Offices and all 1sl class District Offices shall exert efforts to attain One-Star
rating status within one (1) year from the effectivity of this Order, while 2nd class and 3rd class
District Offices shall be given two (2) years. Regional Offices shall upgrade their status to Two-
Star rating within two years. Thereafter, all laboratories shall work towards upgrading their star
rating.
The Bureau of Research and Standards (BRS) shall initially star rate all Regional and
District laboratories. Henceforth, upgrading of star ratings shall be made upon request of the
head of office and upon evaluation by the BRS, which shall recommend to the Secretary the
upgrading of the star rating, iffound meritorious. The Star Rating shall replace the rating criteria
"Adequacy/Reliability of Laboratory Equipment and Facilities of the Revised Guidelines for
Rating Quality of Works in Project Implementation."
ELIO L. SINGSON
Secretary
Department of Public Works and Highways
Office of the Secretary
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WIN3102071
....•
.... 0:::
«
I- E
en
o
z•.. w
c-
1/1
.•...
w co
OJ 0::: A
...
"'0
...J
J:
I-
OM
+J
1:0
•••• «
z
«
OJN
E -0
a
+J
X ••• III C>
~ ~.~ w
I: OJ ••. 0::
«c~ :c
3:
0..
C
L!-
>-
0::: E
a o c-
C/) C) 1/1
w W
I-
o
co
I-C/)
-w
...J_
«
u to
I
.•...
-0::
ma
«I-
0..«
«0::
°a
C>m f---
z«
I-...J
C/)I-
Wo
1--
wO:: 0::: E
:cl- «
I-
c-
I-~ 1/1
en o
c>C w to
zC z I
-z o o
M
~«
0::
0::
«
I-
C/)
Z
a +'
r::
ell
C/) E
W +'
c-
Z r:: '5
ell c-
...J E w
ell
W ,: ~
C « :J
c-
o
+'
~ 0::: ~
ell •..o
ro
C> w .c
I- ell
(J ro
0::: ....J
ro
C- .•..o
U (/)
>-
~ :!:
o
+' .c
•..o
ro
.!!!
.c ro
ro >
....J «
....:
"0
.=:;,
Q)
0-
Q)
c:::
"0
())
.=::J
0-
())
L-
a
z
Q)
l:
l:
o
...
l/l
l:
o
--
Q)
a.. :;::;
C1l
o (.)
l;::
l:
Q)
1::
Q)
E ()
.~
:;,
II)
o
0- o
Q) <:'!
c::: II)
N
l:
o ,...
o
.•..
+:;
C1l ()
(.)
w
~
iU (5
:;, en
CJ
Annex B
Department Order No. .{1
Series of 2013
Materials Tests
Moisture Content
Fractured Face
Laboratory Compaction
Field Density
Abrasion
CBR
Soundness
Unit Weight
Organic Impurities
Mortar Strength
Clay Lumps
Stripping
Flexural Strength
Compressive Strength
Thickness
Asphaltic Materials and Asphalt Mixes
Portland Cement
Gabion & Tie Wires (Tensile, Yield, Elongation, Dimension & Zinc Coating)
Concrete Hollow Block (CBB) ( Compressive Strength, Water Absorption, Moisture
Content and Dimension)
Pavement Studs ( Proof Load (Tension)