PAS 1192-2:2013

Figure 19 – Design review of models in SHARED

Reference architectural, structural and HVAC models

SHARED 1. Check composite model for stage WORK IN PROGRESS

LEAD DESIGNER Check Review and Approval

completeness
2. Change composite model suitability 1. Produce composite model
to S3 (Suitable for internal review and 2. Combine information exchange
comment) and set major revision (COBie) into a single file
3. Share composite model rendition
4. Check information exchange
(COBie) and documentation for stage
completeness
5. Change information exchange and
documentation suitability to S3
1. Native model and clas h rendition (Suitable for internal review and
2. Information exchange (C OBie) comment) and set major revision
6. Approve all items to be shared for
3. Documentation selected suitability
SUITABILITY S0 REVISION Pnn.n
SUITABILITY Sn REVISION Pnn
Design Lead

NOTE Copyright is claimed in this illustration. Reproduction of this illustration and making products from it might
infringe that copyright. Details of the copyright owners can be found in the Foreword.

9.5 Publication of information 9.6 Design for bespoke manufacture

9.5.1 The employer or the employer’s representative 9.6.1 When the design requires manufacturing of
(who may be the lead designer or the supplier) shall bespoke products, a placeholder shall be used in the
sign-off the information and request publication. model such that the volume allocation is adequate
NOTE It is recognized that some contract forms make for final installation, including necessary connections
this process difficult. In these cases it must be made (interfaces) and access for installation, maintenance
clear to the employer who within the delivery team and replacement.
is responsible for undertaking these processes. This NOTE 1 This follows a “process engineering” workflow
should be documented in the EIR and BEP. and procedure.
NOTE 2 Use of placeholders for bespoke products
9.5.2 Each task team manager shall change the status within the allocated volume allows the design team
of their team’s signed-off information, update the and the manufacturer to work in parallel and avoid
revision and issue the information and model(s) to unnecessary updates to the spatially co-ordinated
the PUBLISHED part of the CDE. model.
NOTE 3 It is not necessary for the virtual construction
9.5.3 Information shall be issued according to the
model to contain the level of detail required in the
process above in a digital format. This will be defined
manufacturing process of a bespoke product where
in the EIR (5.3).
each and every component making up that product
NOTE The issue should normally take the form of four may need to be modelled for manufacturing purposes.
data sets, including: native BIM files, clash rendition (for
an agreed model viewer), documents and 2D drawings
as PDFs, and COBie data.
9.7 Using assemblies and library
9.5.4 The clash renditions, drawings and COBie information
data shall be created from the native files to ensure 9.7.1 General
consistency.
NOTE 1 The use of Library systems to store, manage and
NOTE The information should be checked for share pre-defined assemblies or sub-assemblies is a key
completion and issued to recipients using a productivity enhancing feature of most BIM tools. They
collaboration system to ensure security and integrity. are also a useful location to store lessons learnt for
Tools to help automate the checking process are future projects
continually being added to the Task Group website
Libraries may be managed by the employer or their
http://www.bimtaskgroup.org.
agent with specific controls which will be documented
or referenced by the EIR.
If assemblies are used from Public Libraries, due
attention should be made to quality and commercial

32 © The British Standards Institution 2013