Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scan 31 Aug 2019
Scan 31 Aug 2019
~~--
7
• --- ◄~
·-◄ 1
sf-&
;.J
• J ....
"/.
,,.,_
'I
<. •---
_,. ◄ \<l
◄
.~
~~
.
~,,.. ~i ~~~\
~ ◄ ~
7
, S11 ;1i11 .
.. : due to force in the size or shape of a body referred to its Syz
I he un ,t change , .. ' . . tity but it is frequently
, ,n inal size or shape. Stram is a nond1mens1ona 1q~an , . Szx
. g d . . hes per 1· nch <:entimeters per centimeter, etc. (Fig. 4.2).
nprcs~e m me •
The change per unit length due
z Szz
II Linear (tensile or compressive) strain Figure 4.1 Components of force per unit area dA orien!~~ ~o~~I t~f,1.l• ~ ,,.
t P force in an original linear dimension. . . . directions ...
11 e1 t O the longitudma 1 axis \ .-
t, Axial strain LI _ -.Il~~! strain in a plane para ·
. 1 l d the net cross section
a Nominal stress The stress at a pmnt ca cu ate on
11 f the specimen. · h · . -.- ·. t the effect on the stress
St rain in a plane perpendicular to t c a>:1s by simple elastic theory without taking into accoun
c Transverse strain Linear . . .. h h grooves fillets. etc.
produced by geometric d1scontmu1t1es sue as oIes, · - ' .
" f the specimen . f h lar change. due · dicular to a piane on winch
. ) The tangent o t e angu . b 1\'ormal stre.,ss The stress component pcrpen
ti Shear strain (angular strarn - d. \· to ea•'h other throu f:,h
· · 11 erpen 1c11 a r . '~ the forces act. Normal stress"may. be either : . d , , . from the
'" !orcc . bet""een two lines ongma y p · · d forces directe a\\a\
l Tensile stress Normal stress ue to ·
'
1 "1 :1 1 in a °,°d:, • plane on which they act , or
---- - . • , E E-M last rcvi~,:.d 1965 .
, ,, • icd fr om ASTM Des1gnat1on ) .,
)
). I'
I
~ ,;.:; J;;; 3
. y PLANT ANO . '51>
. .. Al\lMAL MATERIALS
0
{, _ 8-'"' .E
~
<V
bcha, ior dnd ho" .
- ,:. t ri RJ{EOLOGY -E
. ·cEPlS OF
: g:ca-1 models.Sunhe ,. such b~hanor can be explained . ·1c CON E
SO ~lf 3.\S ·
:.-.:: rate of . . . r 1llustrat1ons of the t' a- in terms of r/J,.,...
straining for s 1 ime-e,,,.,-1 - .
~:: 1. ~ote, ,i__. . e ecr,.,i r _ •
. f susta ining w ithou; . an y
. . 1 15
. capable o -- . ,,
PLANT AND ANl~IAL ~t.\.TERJALS £ . h 1 rn:itena of the stress. / ,
· t stress " h.lC · · rnplete re tease ~✓
. d toward the The gre;1 tc~ --- n1-J upon co .
Normal stress due to forces d1recte . . t strain rern:11 _,,
2 . compressir:e stress pe(lfllanen · nl limit
plane •:>D which they act. . 1 to the plane on which /asticit . b 1 w the proportIQO
- - -- -- .... The stress component tangentia od11/ll..S O,f e -··ponding strain e 3 . . i[inear rather
c Shear stress-~, ._ .
The ratio of stress ~o c:.~:,"e the stress-strain relationsld(;i;~r:. 5) :
the forces act. e cross section resulting
The shear stress on a traosvers (Note) For materials r !lowing terms may be use
d Torsionai stress e of the four ,o . curve at the
from a twisting action. - . • test calculated than linear, on - f the stress-$tra1n
. . tension or compress1 00 ,_ . . ·/ d I· The slope o
e True stress The axial stress in a t' nal area instead of the o"ngrnal - - ,,A. In itial tangent ,no u :.s
on the basis of the instantaneous cross sec io . . . curve at any .s.pecified
ong1n . f h stress-stra1 n
I Tb! slope o t e
area .
ma[) The ma:-omu
. ro or minimum value of the
'bl b Tangen.I mod1111s j..
r Principal strefs (nor .d d w1·th respect to all poss1 e
• · · a plane cons1 ere stress or strain . drawn from the origin to any
normal stress at a point_m O ch principal planes the shear . . !· The ;\ope of the scecant .
orientations of the considered plane. n su c Secan: moctu ,,s . .
' fied point on the str!"Ss-scram cUI"'le. two speci -
stress is zero. · • .o;p:c1 f th ·hurd drawn between any
e normal stress on the minimum cross 5ectron:,1 d Chord modulus The ;!ope o e i.;
,, Fracture stress The tru
~ Et ;:be bgimliag of fractl!re.. tied points on the stress-:~rain curve.
. @: ~· ~:
-@~
Sxx
·•"
Sy.y
,. . .. ,
Szz
-~-- . ...
Syz
_,_. ..
..
Sxz
__ ,.. -r:~·
,
Sxy
VPoisson's ratio
The absolute value of th~ ratio of t~B~~-=---~;9~n. to the correspo:1 i_ng
d'
axial s_ti:;iin resulting from uniformly distributed axial stress below th~ pt o-
p'o_r.ti~nal limit of the m::.::!rial.
a Stress (Note J) For stresses '::eyond the proportional limit, the r.ange of /tress
should be stated.
(Note 2) Passion's rat fr, :viii hai·e more than one value if the materi~l: is not
isotropic.
in r exx eyy ezz eyz exz exy
b Strain ,,~rc;portional limit
>rec
=on Figure 4.2 A volume ¢lemcnt of a m:l.1¢rial ihowing the six components of The greatest stress which a mater ial is co.pable of sustaining witho~_t any
:~ ( stress and strain r•~iu ircd ior complete sr,:cification (Alfley, 1948) deviation from proport i0i'.ality of stress to strain (Hoo k~'s law).
!an~
...\eci-
;I ! ~11,ilc strength is calculated from the maximum load during a tension test
,.1r•1cd to rupture and the original cross sectional 2rea of the specimen .
~ r
o,-----.._1
i
!
:ct111g
,pro-
!' f' hc first stress in a m2reri2.L less than the maximum attainable stress, al
11 ln..-!1 an increase in strain occurs without an increJ,e in stress.
I ,'I ore) Ir should be noted that 011/y materials th,:! exhibit the unique phe-
11,,111mo11 of yielding hare a "yield point ".
I
I
I
LJ..
l.lJ
u
er
0
. " R
F ,
, 11.,111. I
is ,wr
I
I •. " " ') /1
1 1111 0
'' ' " /
is customary to determine yield strength by Offset Method (usually
0.2 per cent is specified). I DEFORM A TIQN ,
figure 4.3 A possible force-<! ft •
o
ir a11, LL . e ormatron curve: for an agr· uJ
, linear limir; J', "bioyield . .. . rc turalproduct.
j " .i OT HER ·DEFil\ITJONS RELATED
I J)(lmt , R, rupture Point
TO MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES differentiate t~is.phe ' ·•• ·
/ '11 \ \ / ll 't'
I
/
Th . nomenon from the v· Id . .
c bzoyi~ld point may occur at an ·. ie p,oint m engineering materials .
•\ •~1..:.,1 urc of the mean norrna .
, I stress on a point of a body - (/b/in2). ' ~curve.,d.evzates from the initial strai yhpt oI_inr be}~nd the point LL, '.'-'here the
/1, •" 11 //1 / / ()/1 "-J,,, g ine poruon .
~q....- re point
( r,; •,1 ·,~ d'
I ' n or istortion is the relative d' . I·
•
A point on the stress-srr .
. JI ML1rmat ion like stre-ss is , isp _~~e_:n~!]l of points with in ·1 loaded s . . ain or force-deform .
a \CCtor quant ity. In general' def . ' ---.PE.2_meo r~res under al d 1n _atzo~ curve at wbi£tuh.;. axia Jh
, ormat1on
cause punctu f .. oa . - biolo('J I - .
re o shell or skin c k ' e-'ca matenaL, rupture ID.": ._.
' rac ing. or fract .
ure planes. Ji ma_v be statec
- ~
;:;;·
-,:
n
~
~2~ ~
"'0. -0
tP
')
~
-~
"ll
c::
".)
C
0
",-..
1-J
Cf,
(/1
,,.
0
portion of the curve (Fig. 4.3). The ratio of s t r e s ~ in this more 5/ .,:i"4:~ i?. 1 i,l~---
1
oo,I ..-PLJ:":'J~:-·
,$J_ c-:J•,i·
!lc,E,I<.......
1P. ;...-
or less ela:;tic region of th e curve may ~rEfe;~~--t~--;~-t qe "~odulus of ~"I . t,'t.=: ~ .
elasticity· or ·••Young's modulus·• (lb/in 2 ). In the case of nonlinear stress-
sfrai n- oelia,ior, stiffness or "apparent modulus" can be defined ir. terms of
i1!l,I:;/ ''1
~rJ/..,., .: -13\ ~-
·-• · · ··
~LJ
~,
i
A -'
·-~~;;f~-.
.
initial tangent modulus, secant modulus, or tangent ·modulus, as illustrated in
~I .\
"Fig. 4.5. Initial tangent modulus is taken as the slope of the curve at the t/
~I I ~: - j",j. .'
vrig.in. Secant modulus is the slope of the Tine connecting the origin and a -~~::.~
I I
'selec .ed point A on the curve-; Tangent modulus is the slope of the tangent frn-e I I -~~ ·:. ~.:~.-4 -=.-_
-~o ~leered point B on the curve. _ t. I
1/
~ sricifr· 0
SJ.RAIN
~apacity of a material for takinl! elastic or recover_ablc deformation. Figure 4.5 Methods for ddi~i"n T!hc modules m non-linear stress-strain
In those portions of the curve in Fig. 4.3 before the pomt LL is reached, diagram~
recoverable, the un;ecovera b)e· ~Hrt <.. .in be~~ken as a measure_of p!astic
:i i!
& format ion (Fig. 4.4).
w
u G~ ,- r
lMi~e!,'ree n e a,11c1111
1 · · (fJ * -- • •
a: 1"-·1 ~he ratio of elast ic deformation to the sum of elast ic ard plasuc deformation
0
u. \\'hen a ma teria l is loaded to! certa in load and then unloaded to zero load n ' .
i
d
(Fig. 4.4) .
Srrengrh
,. I DEFORMATION
Dp--!+-De1 L The resistance to appl ied force (lb/in).
+oe---i . . U/timare strem!lh
Op . .. from a loading-unloadmg cllf\C. D,
Figure 4.4 Degree of elasllctl)_ . D - lastic or residual deformat ion ;
. overablc defonnat1on ,- v - P . . • (_,~stress correspond ing to the rupture point (lb/in2).
+
= clas11c or rec D,,f(D • D , ) = degree of elast 1c1ty
V (!_ ,ii&p ½ \'Y\,lY -
T ht work required to cause rupture in tbc mare rial. This can be approx i- C ~ i c stress component ~
m:1 :ed by the area under the stress--:-strain or force-d::format ion curve u,-, T~ stress which is responsible for change in volume.
3
10 the po int selected as the rupture point (in-lb/in ) . If in estimating tough -
,/4scoe/af{icity \
ti
e-J J
nc, , . a force-deformation curve is used , the size of the specimen and the
1..-iadi ng surface area should be specified. -I ~ . A prnbioed. soli<l~like and liq~~d_-j£!_(e beba,-ior in which the
~ relatio1:ship is time_ dependent.
stres►srra.in /
2
'
t
1
,,,;;,
.....
I!/
---
\, /--f<.r.silien,e
ca acity of a material for storage of strain enenr ,· i n rhe elast ic ran •c
I ~£ear m"scoe/asticity
A viscoelast ic behavior in which the ratio of stress ro strain is a funciion
j 11n-- lb/in 3) . Thus the area under the_ curve 1 'g:---4-:j~p to the po int LL is
t ., measure of res ilience of !he material. As in the case of toughness, when a of time_a~one and not of the stress magnirude.
I.
~
·,11 ce-deformat ion curve is used , the size of the specimen and the loaded /
?tress relaxation
.,re.1 should be specifie·d . v
4
Decay of s tress with time when the material is suddenly deformed ro a
G - M cchanical hysteresis gi:_e_E__jeformarion-<:01:~LS.U:ain (Fig. 4 , 15).
~~n
\~
1'11er absorbed b a m in adin12: and unloading- '-...fte/axation rime
.
n a/uared as area between loadin and unloading cur,·e (Fig. 4.4). Mee an1-
IC i c .1 hysteresis is a measure of the damping capacity or the ability of th "'
ma terial to d issipate the strain energy as heat (inch-pound per cycle).
The rate of stress decay in a material subjected to a sudden strain. Ir is rbe
time required for the stress in the M<!--\~~JLmg__dE, representin& stre<..s
relaxation bchaviolj to decay to ·1/e -c/i approxf,;;a1e'ly 3 7 ~ f --i:-;
1- ~~~ 1~
i"\ 1 ~ ·
/ J}I ,.
S tressed object / inal value~~~t [ ·- ---- L --- --
/ 1. •\ n o bject under a "ba lanced " sel of forces , tend ing to change its shape o r - \./'Greep_ - 1-
/n ,11~· . or both . ·- 1 1~ -t I O 1" fU . /
0 I
fd Deformation with time when the material is suddenly subjected tc, 2 dead I
·'
I r
- S rra 111ed object load--co_Estant stres~ (Fig .-4. J Sj:e
--- ---~ S.f- ) ------ -- - -
&i ,\n nbject subjected to a change of shape or size, or bo th as a result of ~Retardatio11 time ·$f l_,.l J_
o-51· l1M1.,__.._ ·_] -,L_
+I
1I.
1p r, li cat 1on of a "balanced'" set of forces .
~£
}
/
I
re~rc~ent ing .creep behavior, to d_efor1:} to (J - I/e) or ab~u.t 63 per c-e:-. : ~ -;
'•, l.1)c- d elastic deformat ions wh ich take place up or. load ing and recove r,
of 11_s !O la/ -~ eforma!ion, . _ ~ .,,_ '~ , ;, t
11 1!o ad 1n g (Fig. 4.24) .
I ; • l
' .. ~,,, _h!, t.h"V'<'"
e,~ '
\_'vn-!
_,JR{
!
•
~- 0
I;;. %. p,
p,
i;;- f?
"'
PL AS
. -I A :s. u·· 'l.'.'\I~IAL
. . •t-.i .-,
• -, 1:··K 1A L:>
· ..
,1 ,,, H, ,a c o ,~rE. PTS OF RHEOLOG)
·ifTect
'
I
~
t ie phys1c.d ~lm~ of th .
er·cep complt.an.:c fun rn ,Jn ande material Th . f .
! f)\
•.
?• .t:~ .s un -: e t (; fl o w in d icated by coefficient of \' .ISCOS .lt y . I . • estate o a maten a l in term s of
time h as b een gi1 en b: Sharma re axat ion mod
(1965 . I .f unct ion
~us · plotted aga inst
,. tuus 11_, coeffi cient comp~1ance function J11 l is th . ), as given in F ig. 4.6 and 4. 7. The creei;i
n...: rati o of <.hearing
: lb - st ress to shea ri. ng rate in Newtonia n flu id s (dynes - sec f
. .
given time I when the load
e ratio of she
.
or stress 1s kept
.
ar strain to shear stress at a □)'.
-
-
\i
unction G(t) is the ratio of h constant. The relaxation modulus 1\
• . s ear stress to she •
== 1"1,{)•se
r -• or I\ ft 2sec) (Fig.4. 11). . cm-, stram is kept co nstant. ar stram at any time t when l
f .
\ :on-Xe1,·tonian liquid
I II. m rr
PERFECT ELJ,S"7 tC VISCOELASTIC FINITE ELASTIC 1¥"..RFECT FLUtO
A ~ in which the relationship between shear stress and shear rate 1s I FLOWl
z (GLASSY ) l TRANSITION l l RUEaERY)
nc:m-hne~r. If the flow curve is coocaYe to the shear stress axis, the flow is 0
i=
caned dtlatant. If t he flow curve is convex to the shear stress axis-· the flow (.)
z
1s called pse11doplas1ic (Fi gs. 4.38 and 4.39). ' ::::>
I.I.. -
----
w ,,,/
(.)
z .., /
Apparent l'iscosif)'
~ / /
- '-r A ~ a p p lied t o no n- Newtonian liquids is the viscosity o f a Newtonia n liquid :J Cl'
Cl. 0
/
/
exhi b iting t he sa me resistance to flow at the chosen shearing stress or shear
rate . It is dete rmi ned from slope of a straight line connect ing the chosen
:!:
0
(.)
----
Cl.
point o n· the no n-linear cu rve t o the ,origin (Fig. 4.39). w
uJ
cc
I I
(.) TIME , loQ t
Thixorropic flu ids
GHARAGTER1571: TIME
Those fl ui ds which show a decrease in shear stress w ith time of shea r at a ◄ ,. .
Figure 4.6 Creep ro:n;-liance vs. time relations in shear. -- ·· crosslinkcd
fl \ en shea r rat e .
polyme~ - linear polymers (Sharma, 1965)
R /-. eopec ric fluids
Those fl uids which sho \\'. an in•c rease in shear stress w ith t ime of shear at a
corresponds to the beha,ior of materials exhibiting both elastic and viscous ll S
C!• tn shear rate. effects . The behavior ofthc;e materials, classified as viscoelastic, is obviously ly
- ,;
I time-dependent and is co\"ered under the theory of linear viscoelasticity tY
4.4 P HYS lC A L ST AT E S OF A MATERIAL t (Ferry, 1961). Zone 1II c0rresponds to the rubber)' or soft materials exhibi- ) I·
, 1c·r 1~il s _1s called the fin it e elas tic t heory , deal ing ,v ith la rge and fin ite / -4.5 CLASSICAL IDEAL MATERIALS
,', '' ,,r ma t, ons (Murnaghan . 1959). Zone IV shows the state of a material for
.' I ,· h ,t ress is prop~rtional to the rate of s1ra in of
a perfec t fluid . The As mentioned under defin itions , there are two types of deformation . elasuc
--: .: JI hydrodynam1cs ·c0Hrs the theor ies concerned with these materials deformat ion and no,1 . FJo,1 is also d ivided into plas'tic flow and viscous
:'1b . 1945). In real mater ials the linear respome can be ach ieved only ii' a flow. Therefore. elast icity, plast icit) and viscosity are three fundamental
properties by" h ich the rheological behavior of a material can be described .
,.t The three class ical ideal bod ies representing these properties are Hookean
I
I n lJI TI[
body, St. \'enant body, and Newton ian liqu id . Since no real material
t PERFECT ELAS11C VISCOELASTIC FINITE ELASTIC PERFECT FLUID
z (GLASSY) ITRANSITIO N l
behaves perfectly elastic or perfectly plast ic, the three ideal bodies have been
Q ( RUBBERY) ( FLOW)
) ,-
<..)
z-:,
---- ,----~
........,.._~ • - chosen to serve as standards of comparison in the analysis-of the behavior
r of any real material.
I
I
lL
!fl
:::,
'''
!,'
_J
:::, '' ~ a s t i c be~avior (H~okean body)
0
0
:::i':
z
<..?
C7'
' ---- In a Hooke body, .stress is directly proportional to strain as illustrated in
Fig. 4.8a. The relationship 1s known as the Hooke's law and the behavior
0
Q is referred to as Hookean behavior. ' Although this behavior has been
,-
c:l:
X
c:l:
_J
UJ
STEEL
a:
I iHARACTERISTIC TIME, I TIME, 109 1 (./)
(./)
LOAD ING
@
w
Figure 4.7 Relaxation modulus t's. time relations in shear.---- crosslinked c:::
1- St.OPE 1 E or G or t<
polymers, - linear polymers (Sharma, 1965) (./)
UNLOAD I NG
(kmo r.stra td fo r small strains (l ess than 0. 1 per cent) in certain sol ids. a, \\'hen the Ho cil-.can solid 1s under hydros ta tic pre ssure : he bulk modulus
stated by Re mer (1960). imporvements in experimental techniques ma) or incompre ssibility 1s given by
p rove that perfect elast icity may-not exist·m any real mater ial. Furthermore,
the dtrfin it ion of elast icity req·uires only a complete recovery of strain upon
( K_,_) =_ hydros ta ti c pressure p
, where c,.
J1
(4.3)
volume stra in Ev r
I
removal o f stress. Therefore, we may differentiate between the Hookean or
Ir linear ela~ticity shov,:n for steel and the non-linear elasticity shown for rubber The relationship between the above elastic constants and , Poisson ·s ratio
(Fig. 4.8b). _ µ is given by
Compression tests of a variety of food and feed materials such as fruit's
and vegetables, forage, cereal grains, and egg shell have ind icated that
Hookean elasticity, even for very small strains, apparently does not exist
(f+Il (4.4)
(4.:i)
E = 3K(I - 2,u~-~
in these biological materials. Figure 4.8c shows the first cycle of loading
and unloading for the horny endosperm of dry corn kernel. This type of E = 2G(1 + µ) (4 .6)
curve which shows some residual deformation upon unloading is typical (3K- £)
µ= (4 . 7)
fo r most of the food and feed materials. . 6K )J.. f. R
Based on Hooke's Jaw and together with .Poisson 's ratio, the f~llow1~g
relationships have been established for elastic, homogeneous and 1sotrop1c 1 (£- 2G) (4.8)
µ=
2G
materials (See Fig. 4..9~-
Table 4 . J shows the range of values for Poisson ·s rat w. E;G ratio, and
KJE ratio calculated from the above equations.
T
P.
A
·T;.f;-,
~/0
/
·,--
Tablt> 4.J Elast ic constants for ri~d to liquid-l,i-e
materials
KE
1
Poisson's ratio E/G
J, :
u r": --~ 0
0.10
2.0
2.20
0.333
0.417
0.556
.J.. _ _ __ NO SHEAR
SHEAR 0.20 2.40
0.667
0.25 2.50
Figure 4 .9 Hooke's elasticity in tension and shear 2.60 0.833 . ,\
0.30
modulus 0.35 2.70 I.I l l '--Idt,.\ ,,..' "'
2.80 J.667
\\' hen the Hooke sol id is und~r t~nsile or compressive stress, 0.40
0.45 2.90 3.333 111.
of ela sticity or Young's modulus is g_1ven by LJ/ 0.50 3.00 $_tr,
tensile or compressive ress er where e = --
st (4.1) ma
/ . , . . be ween O 2~d..Q5. As seen from stn,;n
E = tensile or compressive s~t ain e_ For most materials Poisson s ratio is Ot5 - --th-~ character of a material
' th Hooke. sol id , j~ ;~bj;~;~d- to distortion by shear stresses, the • , t' approaches . as
Ta bk 4. 1 the Po isson s ra to . . h. '-o mes evideO! when we recall
on\il
\ \ hen e . . . • · by bbe
approaches tbat,o f ru r or
1tqu1ds. T 1s =co - .. .
sses resultinll in a ng1d1ty
~!.\n
lus or modulus of rig1d1ty is given t any shear stre , -
, hea r mo d u D ,t.., that a :iqu id cannot suppor t'j
(4.2) })
"' shea r stress -r where 'Y = _ = ta~ · y
G = shear stram · 'Y I
V\
) I
SOME BASIC CONCEPTS OF RITTOLOG)
n, . ,1, 11, ~if G equals_z_ero. This will yield a zero value for£ in E .J 6 10·
..., .. ,. 1 he rncompress1bility Kofa liquid :
. , " · '--'-- f;. .,,
fi . . . . __ q. ( ·
' 5 a nite \alue, 1f E 1n Ee . (4.5) 1s
!- In a "simple" liquid with laminar flow the velocit~ gradient may be
, l1l kr~1 (I - 2p) must a'.so be zero . which yie.lds ,; value of for P. 0.5 expressed as follows :
I f
,l' c typical values for Poisson's rat io and bul1-
. . . "' mo u us or se Iecte d
d
-
dr
= <j,T = - T
! ·
r. : r, :11 s are given 111 the Appendix . (4.91
dy T/
where dv is the velocity inc;ement of one layer of the liquid passing over
!. • !tit- al plastic behavior (St. Yenant body) another layer a distance dy apart (Fig. 4.11). The mo1·ement is due to a
uw
ti f the block. When the pull slightly exceeds the static friction . the block u
0:
PLASTIC FLOW
,t .irh to move. 6nce the movement beg{n~~~iCmust· overcome only 0
t ht: isinetic friction to keep th.e..block mo,ing. ln this model the displacement
IJ...
p ., d 1cnt (in/in) ·stands for shearing strain ;., in an ideal p_lastic material..The
mater ial does not flow until a limiting \'alue of sheanng stress r,. called
DEFORMATION ( L11)
1
he ·' vield stress," is reached. The material can. sustain no str~ss ~eat~r
h;in ; his value and flows indefinitely under thi1s stress unless d1storuon JS
1
rcstr! cted by some other factor. ·..£.-6+
_ -v+dv
F dy
.
medium filled with the
(n · ·
SOME BAS IC COl\(E
PTS Of RHEOLOQy
<7\~.
--.,v.u-Q-
J.(\
,ro l\w,S}N"
. .\\
r ,.:,,~ 'P
,u-·
109
~
it\•,~~-
;,, -~\\'1
area of either of two horizontal l ~ angential force and a unit 0,alinearv1scoelasticmate ··I h ~ ex" )g:i..· "'))..'\x
na t e ra ti o of '•
I panes at umt dist o f time alone and not of the stress . . Sires~ to strain is " func ti on '
move one pl~pe with unit veloci\y with refi ance apart , requ ired to . I . - magn nudc.1Fo ,,
matena 5 linear ,·1scoelastic rcspo ~ r a number of viscoelastic ,n •
I , .. . . erence to the other plane. When r • nse can be achieved · tc ·1
d e,onnrng stresses are kept suffic ' experimen tally if the i
ient 1Y small If th · 1e ~
~uch that the result in" strain is mo ti . ·- ·-· ~__!ll_agnJtude of m:ess_is_ t.
Vl · .,, ==--::..s ' nonrecoverabl is_ ~
Vl ~raTio of stress to stra in is a functio • f t _ e upon un Ioading. th_e ,
l.&J . ~ ·---.,~--=--no s rcss as well as 1• d h . :1e (
a: elasi1~ behavior is non-linear Th ' -- : · - ._ ime an t e v1s~o-
1-
Vl · ~ _____ _ : is t) pe of non-lmear-vrscne1astic behavior 0•
1
'
1s normaliy considered under viscoplasticity A h . or \,
er • I •· • • not er type of non-linear '
c:i: \'1~,0e astica_y JS _the type observed in rubber and rubber-like materials ar .
l.&J
:r
V>
where non-lmeanty results due to large or fin i'te 1 ·
. . . .
•
s rams, m contrast to
' Is
'
t
111finnes1mal strains considered in the theory of elasticity. to if
Based on ex~r~mental evidence, agricult!:!~~l.P.!QQ!,!C!~ are viscoelastic. J·
RATE OF SHEAR , 1=dvldy Fro~ the ve? !muted data available in this area it appears; ~;,;r, that - ic. I
Fizure 4.12 Newtonian liquid and the model t~-e ~l~s°'c_beha,•ior is m:m-Jinear. Since no general theory for non-linear :: ,.f
;,,,coo cay 1s yet available, in an attempt ro explain the rheological
beha,ior of agricultural products, we are fo~d ro =Jee simplifying :al JJ
lile force is one dyne over one square centimeter, the distance between assumptions and apply the theories of linear ,·iscoelasticity as fo the case ng '
pl:1nes is one centimeter, and the velocity one centimeter per sec~nd , the of some engineering materials. se }
absolute viscosity is by definition one "poise." A centipoise, which is one
I 'JOO of one poise, is usually taken as the unit of measurement. The kine-
tJ
~EOLOGICAl;. MODELS ~
matic viscosity or " stokes," used in engineering practice, is YJ/(! . where (! ~
is the mass density of the liquid , The units .o f viscosity in the Engl ish system {
T~ch::.nical models consisting Qf ~~(~.!?_~nd da~hpots are used to cxplai!I
are lb - sec . ft 2 for absolute viscosity and ft 2 /sec for k inematic viscos ity. _and interp~t \~e_rhe<:>logi9~l behavior of linear viscoelastic materi_als.7The
in
he f
/ \'iscosity values for various materials are given in t•he Appendix. model is supposed to behave qualitatively, to some degree ofapprox_!!PaAon, 'l
/ n,
in a m:rnner similar to that of ~tual material. If the mechan ical behavi~r
✓TIME
or
can ~ expressed in terms of force-d~[ o_!!!E!!ion or stress-stra in and 1irne, IC,
EFFECTS (VISCOELASTICITY) the res ults can lead to a rheological equation. This equation can be used
'f- to e.\pla in and in certain cases pred ict the behavior of the material under
:d
er
. I aterial shows deviation from the ideal materials discussed _i~ th: various loading conditions. . .
Am rea m
Dre~·ious article. According to Ferry (1961), these devia!lons ca~
. .
tb dl\'ldea
I'd
The use of .rheological models in studying the mecha~1_cal behavior of
.
cnmne-enng • ma tcna• 1s h as bee n questioned by some authorities,
. even though
of ~
)
· to two tvpes. First, the relationship between stress and s~rain or so 1hs th; model is to represent only the m~croscop_ic behavwr and not any
~h '!
in • . 1· ' d ma be more comphcated than t e ~)'
·• d stress and rate of.strain for iqui s Y . r 'd . . . h l Jar bas'is of the visco<!lastJC phenomena. In the case
111s12ht 11110 t e mo ecu · J t f se
~n •. . . .
si mple relauonsh1ps ~1ven .
for Hookean solids or Newtonian iqui s.
. d nd on the rate of strain a_s.
- . r 'd ·mulating the .viscous eemen so
of biological materials, where iqu1 s'. s1 . h ' bably a better just~
I
,pf
- h s-stram· re)at1onsh1p may epe l · · he material v.e a,e pro tfi-
s~cond , t ,;._E!'CS . . . Th 1's time dependency resu ts the model. actually exiS t 111 t ' h s been shown that despite the
. · dp ..,. ,...,t:,,es of-the-stra10. - • • h I gical mode 1s. 11 a . ~e
well as h1_g_h_$.L.ll.m.e- .' , •h · h combines Ji uid-like an d sohd-hk fic~tion for the use o f r eo O b d~ r r applying the theories
. h' h have een ma ' ,,0 .e ~
in :i behavior called v1scoe 1ast1c, ,, ic simplifying assumptwns w ic
~,fia"~istics. ,
' \l I PLANT A};D A"<IMAL MATERIALS
SOME BASIC CONCEPTS OF RHEOLOGY
~\i I
I
I
l \\
+
\
V> w
T
t./)
w a:
t-
a:
I-
t./)
t./)
\ I
STRAIN STRAIN
MAXWELL
t SPRING
,,......
CAPAC1TA"5Y OASHPOT RESIST.:.•,-::£
'-
'-...... I
I
Figure 4 . 13
;r'-"
Effect of strain rate i: on stress-strain curves of four basic
models i: 2 = 2i: 1 (Nielson, I 962)
-- .T--- 1
f
:1
r. 1tl:,
r
and i2 , It is shown that for the spring t~'=--~:e~•~".'.i? r_1s_ ~nd_e ~~ndent
i
\
i For· the dashpot andtne other models contarn ing a dashpot , stre~s--
)' '' l ti me . - -- - ~-:-----;- .. .
! . ·,, I 11 n r·; cationship is time-depen dent.
e
'. . ; n the Kel vin model , both the spring and dashpo1 a re forced to _move
,f
!:~ -~ \1,, ~et h . tant r ate Therefore , the force due to t. he dash p ot Jumps MAXWELL KELVIN s-':' _
i-
.
e r ,\ta cons · _
' LL)n s, tant value instantaneously and -rema 1m, consta nt v.
·h·I the force
11,e , pr ing sta rts at zero and grad ually build~ up . When thee ect s o
f the
-
1; Figure 4 .14 Electrical analogs of mechanical
/ ,-~"t
rno<lef .. _~-
' . ' (\ \ ~ \ )'r.
~~ ,- '
PLA1''T A~l) ANI MAL MATER IA LS I SOlfE BASIC CO~CEPTS CJ! KHE:ULOGY ..,
IU
I
In th is a n.dogy, the spring, rep;csenting el . . . . .
,, _ . d ast1c1 t:. 1s replaced by a capaci- where
,ance an the dashpot, representing viscos 1·t . l . .
-
r lie tensio n and compression of the spring
Y, is rep aced by a resistance f = J/3 (er + E, + E,)
d · . ·
. . . correspon s to chargrng and
J i~charging l1f the capacitor. The work done on the d· h t . .d.. . d Jt may be said that while the mean normal stress is a measure of pressure
. _ clS po JS ISSlpate as
and the mean normal strain a measure :o f volumetric d~formation,Jhe devia-
heat JU~t as the work done on the electrical resi·st · d
. ance 1s converte to heat. toric stresses isolate the· shear stresses and strains. For example, the state
Figure 4.14 s~ows !he electrical analog of the basic mechanical element and
of stress and strain in an is~\ropic elastic material would lead to the simple
the models. Note that when elements are coupled in parallel in the me~hani-
stress-strain relationships
c~_I 1~odeJ, its ~qui_valent in the el_ectrical network is a series cotlling. Similarly,
a series coupling in the mechanical system has a parallel equ'i'valence in the iJ/c =Kanis leX ·=-=
X. G (4.11)
electr!cal syste_m. In the electrical network, the stress is represented by the where K is the bulk modulus and G the :Shear modulus. (Compare Eqs. 4.2
elecmc potential (voltage) and the st~ain by electric cµrrent. and 4.3). Since in an isotropic elastic material K is much greater than G
There are other mechanical-dectrical analogies, proposed by various in- (the incompressible case), it ·is often justifie•d ·10 neglect volume changes in
vrnigators (Stambaugh, 1952 ; Shoefield and Scott-Blair, 1933). The principle eng'ineering materials and consider only the shear strain relationship.
ad\ antage of !he electrical models is the ~implicity and directness by which Jn the above discussion only one of the six components of stress at a
rhe model can be built and put into operation against the more complic~ted volume eiement of a material is given. However, the type of test and the
anJ elaborate mechanical system. frame of reference can be chosen such that 11:r and the corresponding Ez
become the principal stress and strain. The other components wiJI either
be smaDer than the principal tensile or compressive stress, or become zero.
An example for th is situation is tensile test of a cylindrical specimen where
'·-z(g RHEOLOGICAL EQl' ATJONS
the principal tensile stress in the direction parallel to the long axis is F;A.
the principal shear stress is 1 / 2 F/A, and the other components of stress are
\ _ ~ e s s and total strain c/ zero. Therefore, the principal tensile stress. being twice that of the principal
shear stress, should be the one to consider.
\\'hen a material is subjected to tensile or compressive stresses resulting Since simple shear deformation can be easily produced on both solids
in both change in shape and change in volume, the deformation may be and liquids and viscoelastic materials are intermediate between solids and
II • C
shown to be a combination oT both shear and bulk deformation. onse- ii quids, it is customary to show the rheological equations in t~rms of s?ear
I .. qu~nrly. stress components at any point of this material can be decomposed stress and shear strain. Jn the following, however, the rheological equations
I •J
)I
int o a deviatoric stress component, which is responsible for the change have been developed for total ax ial stress 11 and total axial strain tin tension
rn shape. and an isotropic stress component which is responsible for the or compression. The equations are equally val id for shear parameters as
cha nge in \'olume. Therefore, the total stress in rhe x direct ion , Cfx, can be well as bulk compression. Except ions are ind_icated.
,1-rirren as follows: (l_ //
, <lx = Sx + iJ \)Maxwell model
It
where s,, is the <leviatoric stress and iJ is the mean normal stress defined as To derive the rheological equations for the basic Maxwell and Kelvin mod~~• b'.
we assume the Newtonian I. ..· of viscosity for'the dashpots and the Hoo s i
a = 1/3 (<lx + <J>. + o':) I law for the springs. With n:; : rence to Fig. 4.15, if
{ _,,. Sim ilarly, rhe total strain in the x direction: c,,, can be resolved into a
l u = stress
de, 1,ttoric strain ex and a mean norma l strain l as follows: = strain
I
t
p, . , . .,.. '
~---. . , • AND ANIMA.L MATERIALS
where a(r) d~~otes stres~ at any time " r •·. G, is the decay stress, and <J, isl'•!
w h e re dot on any symbol represents the time~e .
Fo r th e dashpot ....-- stress at c~u1!1 brium . In terms of time depend~n\ modulus, E(r ), Eq. (4 . ! ;
can be ¼Titten as o ~:.Xcu:-10~~ . .U
(4 . 13) ~ _,,,...-::'J • "l'f\.-0 CJ-, ~1J)Y\-(V' I C) ""-
/£( t) = £ e-r ' r,., + E ' (·' -,;
· t h \.'. ~tra in s be i ng add i t ive in the MaxweJI model, the total strain I : ' ~ V ""'·-·
N?te that after t = oo there is still som~ stress Jefr io tbe spring E of c·,!
A (4.14) Maxwell model in F,g. 4.15. This can physically be visualized either :- .
dilk renti atin_g _(4 . 14) and substituting i.s and i , from (4.12) and (-U3) yields assuming the dashpot being limited and reach ing the bottom wh ile the spr. :- ~
is still strained , or by considering the dashpot being unlimited bu, add1:-_r
i. =Es + i ,. ilnother spring with modulus £ , in parallel with the Maxwell eleme;:~
Th is latter s ituation can be seen in Fig. -U6 where; generalized Max"=·
(4 . 15)
model is illustrated . Sometimes the equa tion for a simple Maxwell m,,j:
\ 1\1lT in a Maxwell model the s_a me force is carried through tht spring and 1s shown as
1\i l· d;1 ~h pot , subst itution for a, = a r '7" a in Eq. (4 . 15) yield s <T(r) = Oo e.-; T«l (4.: :
and
- --------
\ i. = a/E + ah (4 . 16)
E(t) =' Eo e- = Tul (4.::
t).I
l li e ,<1 lu t1 o n o f the above d ifferential equation is of the fo r m icall y.
Exam ination of Eq . (4.19) and (4.20) shows that the Maxwell mode: -
_.....\ ~ - \ a=Ae- ,tr.. ,+C (4 . 18) not sufficiently general to describe the behavior of a linear viscoeh:: •
,',. ·1 m,1tcrial. For example, if a cons~nt stress is applied to a, ~faxv.e~I r:c;_:_
,, hri c ,. 1s the ba se of Naperi an lo gar ithm (e
I• 1111 ,l.,r~ cond it ions of
<J ao = ~ o-"o at I = 0
= 2.72) . Sub, rn ut ing th c
,' ~
\ ;}\i\'H I °' the model exh 1b1ts only New'to!]ian fl_~- ~nd not a reta rd ed elast
<){)~,,n ,' ,
f•'inal ion which is experimentally observed tn a ere~ or fO nstc_n_t sir --_-;·..
·1 o avoid this problem. an infinite number of Ma~well models are ~se~
;~,:e.':,
,J • '\-Q. l parallel and the resulting model is called a e:enerahzed M3 xwell mod :
(J = <J,
'
£,r. 0 a t t = oo ~ ').{) l)CJ\), -,
r w '-l \\ ')\ ' ~•
'- """"'IJ..,..J,.'y.. i
, '.i µ, ' ~ " l';',
~~ ~~
~ ~; · 9i ~; ~-f;r- ~
;;; q f!!_. o ·o i " \ ~ .?-~ % ~- i. "'q' %~ ~ '§:
p. t'1.
t
L cc~CE PT S O F R H"EOL OGY
I
E
er
I• ·ICELVlN MODE!. REPRESENTATION MAXWELL MODEL REPRESEN i ATION
Generalized Maxwell model representation
t· Figure 4.16
:, 1 ~p fUNCTIOtl STRESS HISTORY STEP FUNCTION STRA I N H I STORY stress in the model
Time , t
0'----------.:..00_
·-·-
-- - --·- · -·-
O'----- - - ---=:=.._.__
Ti me I
0()
\':trious. elements in the model. The physical sign ifica nce of T,c1 can beS"t
be appreciated if we consider that the relaxation t ime, accord ing t o th e
simplified case given by Eq . (4 .21) , is the .time required for the st ress to
:st
he
decay to \fe times its original valu~ or to 36.8 per cent of itc:; o rigi nal valu e . to
STRA ltl VS. TI ME RELATIONSH I P STRESS VS . TI ME RELAT I ONSHIP
CORRESPOND ING TO STEP FUNCTION CORRESPOND I NG TO STEP FUNCT I ON I ~ ,vords,· at
constan t strfil{l , a Maxwell element rel ax es its stress
STRESS H l ~TORY STRA I N HISTORY )
,~xponent1allv~ ~( _!~~~ determi~ed by T ,'"; 1•
~ Fiiur, 4.15 . ::chin and Maxwell models showing creep and stress rclaxa-
~ ~ tion characteristi cs (Sharma, 1964)
1 v,\t~~ ,
-~ l~elrin model
~~~~~ ~Wm- ~ .xY'f- In the Kel\' in model of F ig. 4 . 15 , wh1·1e t l1e total
-
·
stress 1s d i\i d ed b etwee n
\ i l ~ ~~ ·~·\~ ~ v ~ __,
the spring and the dashpot
~ryyj/__ a = a, + a.,
u> \}j.. c~{~NW
,., ~'I'- t 11\ ~ -· (4.24)
i.,.i,.n ~ • ,. ~ 'u ·-=.
~~<Wtil#W
P L AN T AND A1'IMAL MATE RI ALS SOME BASIC CONCEPTS OF RHEOLOGY
,· 1 ~ cLi\ hpot is forced to take up the same deformat io ,. as the spring such lf the
•
constant
•
load is removed from the strained body , 1·1 w1·11 not r::·. :rt
!) , 1- _to the unstrained state unt!l after infinite time. This can be-seen froc; ;be
following equation which is derived rom 4 .30 b letting
(4 .25)
,.
~
'-t t) , 1nu t i ngfor G , and a ,, form- -c4·: r25 -and ( 4 . 13) and. considering ( 4.25) , <:10=0 4 '30)
1
( a = Ee + 11 i (4.26)
Equat ions (4.31) and (4.32) represent respecti vely th~ loading and unlo;: ~ ,g
t
t 11 t he ratio 1j ,' E = T.w called the time o f retardatioc. . Eq . (4 .26) can be sections of the straj~ riroe cmve of a Kelvin model (See F ig . 4.24).
r f ,I
rcJ:.,ced t o As in the case of Maxwell model, Eq. (4.31) is not sufficiently gen~~ to
r,, a/£ = t: + T,c , i (4 .27) _2redict the behavior of a viscoelastic material under alJ conditiol15 -;f
l 1\ t ter d ifferention loading. For example, ifuthe model is subjected to a c~n~~~~~~-;;e
t a/E = i + T••, ii (4 .28) observed stre~~ relax:g/01J __cannot.....be ...predicted fro,; tbe Keiviq ....L::o.:d,
l
l \tic
a ~u bject in g the model to a c~_n_s~a_n_t stress a 0 , as in Fig. 4 . I 5, reduces Eq . (4 .28)
lll
because <10 remains a constant stress and not a decreasing stress. To coma
this situation, a more gener.11 model called a 4-element model -has ~r.
proposed.
\
T .. , ii + i ~ 0 (4.29)
pa L // .
B) nte gration we ob~ta:i: _:n:_._-~--- - - - - ---, .J'/41eme~t model (Burgers model)
r'"'' \
1
to , ~ o. £ = £0 = 0 0 ... - ~dditive while the stress is the same in all three units A. B,..and C. -
Thr ~e three r qu:1t1o n, c:111 b r co mh111cd 0 o ne equ a tt on relating str-: \'> a rid
---- - - T tot:il ,tr :i1 n ( for ,kr1 , ., t1on ,cc M o rr o w . 96 5)
I
---t
A
c + i /T,.. = I / £ [o0 + /\~ +
£, T,, ,
t., /17 + I /T,. ,) a + ( ~ )
T,. , 1J,
a]
(4 . 33)
q--+ C
Th is different ial equati on is suffi cient ly g
a linear viscoel ast ic mate rial t hrough th
B~;;; -;;n~ta~; s~ress -~r~e~~ c; nstan t
neral to describe the be havior _o f
behavior of a 4-eleIT!ent mode l.
stra in (stress relaxation) behavi o r_
'
T
'I,
•
...
;
______ _j_ can be pred icted from th is equat ion . H veve r, it 1s much easier to use a
i;.
general ized Ma.... wel(modelfor stress rel , ·at ion . Th e eq ua t ion is a ls o val id ,
for a material exh ibiti ng instantaneous la st icity. ret.arded elasticity , and 1;
(
flow .
For exam pie. if a coQ_n!}_s~tjlaffil.lOcilll...UJD&Sl!.U~~ll!.:UiP-pll.c!l and held con-
st ant, for the in:tial cond itions of
'..·,
::,
)
a = <Jo = -~ onstan at 1 0
0 ; . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T i me , t
0 00 Equation (4 .33) reduces to
Slroin, e 1
E + i/T,. , ( 4.34) ,,
~,~-----------=-~-~-~-=------
The solu ti on of the above equat ion (as gi n by Morrow, 1965) is
D , = 1/ E, = retarded compliance
- -- - - - - -- - - -
;,,
PLANT A~D .
. ' A!'\IMAL MATER i ALS
)lr'
.
\'
\
~ ~ ANT A ND AKlMAL MATERIALS
~O \ ll BAS IC l'U '- <. t:J' f ~ Ul:- l{H l:OLOu \ ·
125
·--.:. tr, behavio r dn d h o \\ such beha \'1 or can be expla ined i n te r ms of rhco -
: g:c.al m odel s. Furthe r 'ill ustrations of the t ime-effect , man ifested through that at large del'orma t1 om. th e fo rce (s tress) levels off to a Jim iiine value
.:-.:: r 2t e o f s tra ining for selected food m a terials are g iven in Fig. 4.20 and The grea 1er t he speed of test ing. the grea ter is the lim iting value of the fore ~ i:q. (:: .;1
or stress . ~,~
.:. : 1. ~ote that in the case of fresh fruits the initial slope of the curve is
Because of th is time-effoct phenomenon, in evaluating qualities of pro-
: r, dependent of the speed of testing ·(Fig. 4.20). This phenomenon was also
duc ts such as tenderness of meat, hardness of gra ins, and firmness of f;u its ~ .1 thi s cc,
a nd vegetables. the compression apparatus must provide a constant rate . ,, ·For this ·
FRESH FRUIT
of loa d ing for the duration of the test. Otherwise, for any fixed displacement ,, oweve i.
13 i pm
of the crosshead, the force readings may vary as the rate of loading varies. large s:r;
To illustrate. suppose the compression force exerted on samples of fruits at incrca~t'
l 00 units of d isplacement of the crosshead is to be taken as the firmness of rntes of s
t he fru it (Fig. 4.20). lf due to the change in oil temperature, in a hydraulic relax,J! ioi
ty pe of machine, or other factors , the speed of the crosshead increases from the beh:1~.
t5 "
CZ: G,,ecia r J
J inch per m inute to 13 inches per m inute, the firmness reading may vary
~ E from 4 pounds to more than 6 pounds just because of the variation in the
vis,:ocl;, , t
'/
suggest :i :t
rate of load ing. ·
marenaJ i
Th e effect of rate of loading on stress-stra in behavior can be predicted
Taerc ;
from the stress-stra in equat ion of the Maxwell model which can be derived
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 stra i , ,: \ )1
fr o m the d ifferential equation
DEFORMATION ( in. x 10-'} m::i c },i nc
Figure 4.20 Firmness reading of a fruit can be influenced by the ra te of i = a/E + a/;;
load ing c a0 is
given previously. For a constant rate of strain i = R, the abo ve equation ·1r inil!
5
6 .0 x _l0- cm/sec
ca n be rearranged to g ive Si(11> j
15 , 1. 4 • ,o- cm /se:::
5 a+ Ea/7} = RE (-..39)
I · F ' 13 After a Jn
sho\\' n ih the stress-stra in curve of the .Max\\'. ell mode_ ~~- ~ ~faxwell
:n Co nstant A can be evaluated by considering the initial · .Jndition of a = 0 der. c r Fi/
. E 1. F' 4 ?O) the reaction as g1, en ) e cxp- t ;c
gi'- en fo r ce (poin t ~ ig. ·- . ' • / behavior. This results in at I = 0. This results in
model. c o mbines elasti c and dv'. sco~~ tli:::t~s of loa ding. It is' a lso seen
A = -R17 'r l