Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Elicitation Methods
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Elicitation Methods
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Elicitation Methods
To cite this article: Rosaleen Croghan , Christine Griffin , Janine Hunter & Ann Phoenix (2008)
Young People's Constructions of Self: Notes on the Use and Analysis of the Photo‐Elicitation
Methods, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11:4, 345-356, DOI:
10.1080/13645570701605707
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or
arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Int. J. Social Research Methodology
Vol. 11, No. 4, October 2008, 345–356
International
10.1080/13645570701605707
TSRM_A_260423.sgm
1364-5579
Original
Taylor
02007
00
rosaleencroghan@hotmail.com
RosaleenCroghan
000002007
and
& Article
Francis
(print)/1464-5300
Francis
Journal of Social(online)
Research Methodology
Introduction
In recent years photo-elicitation methods or methods in which the oral and the visual
are used in tandem have become increasingly popular as methods of collecting data in
Dr Rosaleen Croghan is a Research Officer at the Psychology Discipline, Faculty of Social Science, The Open
University. Correspondence to: Rosaleen Croghan, Psychology Discipline, Faculty of Social Science, The Open
University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK. Tel.: 01865718316; Email: rosaleencroghan@
hotmail.com. Christine Griffin is Professor of Social Psychology at the university of Bath, UK. She has a long-
standing interest in representations of youth, femininity, and young women’s lives, and a more recent interest in
the relationship between identities and consumption for children and young people. Janine Hunter was a
Research Fellow on the project reported here. Her research interests include ethnographic studies of consump-
tion and youth subcultural styles. Ann Phoenix is Professor and co-director of the Thomas Coram Research unit,
Institute of Education, University of London. Her research interests include social identities, gender (femininities
and masculinities), racialisation, young people and consumption, motherhood, transnational families and narra-
tive constructions of experience and memory.
other’s perspective by asking the photographer for their interpretations of the visual
and in the process gaining greater access to their constructions of self. For this reason
there is now more emphasis on methods that involve using the participants’ own
photographs. These, it is argued, are more likely to bridge the culturally distinct worlds
of the researcher and the researched (Berger & Mohr, 1982; Harper, 2002).
However, while visual and linguistic data appear to enrich one another and to elicit
more elaborate verbal accounts, the specific ways in which these accounts might differ
from purely verbal interviews have not been examined. There is frequently an assump-
tion that the visual will act as a trigger to an oral response or that the visual and the
verbal will somehow strengthen one another, without examining the ways in which
they differ as modes of representation, or the problems that arise for researchers
attempting to interpret them.
In this article we use data from a study of young people and consumption in which
photo-elicitation methods were employed, in order to examine the kinds of accounts
that photo-elicited interviews trigger. We argue that visual data need to be understood
as products of particular contexts, genres and sites of elicitation that are quite as
complex as those in which verbal accounts are produced. We consider the different
contributions of visual and verbal accounts and how they work together in the
construction of identities.
The Study
The photographs to which we refer here were part of a larger study funded by the
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).1 The aim of the study was to investi-
gate the intersection between patterns of consumption of goods and the construction
of youth identity. The study employed a range of research methods, including ques-
tionnaires, informal interviews with young people both individually and in groups in
schools and interviews with, and observations of, young people involved in cultural
activities related to consumption.
Here we consider the part of the study in which 28 participants recruited from the
schools in which group and individual discussions had taken place were given 35 mm
single-use disposable cameras with 24 frames and asked to take photographs of
consumer goods that were of significance to them. The aim of this strategy was to use
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 347
photo-elicited accounts to enrich our understanding of the young people’s perspec-
tives. Because we relied on photographs taken by the young people themselves, we
hoped to gain insight into the young people’s perspectives, rather than imposing our
preconceptions on them (Holland, 1997).
This strategy resulted in 28 participants taking cameras and agreeing to take photo-
graphs. Eight participants were from Year 12 (aged 16–17), and 20 were from Years 8
and 9 (aged 12–14). Eleven participants described themselves as white, eight as Asian,
four as black and five came from a variety of other ethnic backgrounds. Twenty-six sets
of photos were returned because in two cases participants took the photos together.
Twelve of the photos were taken by participants in the Oxford/Milton Keynes sample
and 14 from the Birmingham sample. The disposable cameras were returned to the
Downloaded by [El Colegio de la Frontera Sur] at 11:09 20 August 2013
research team who then printed two sets of photographs on the understanding that they
would keep one set and return one set to the participants at a subsequent interview.
Interviews were carried out separately by two members of the research team, one based
in Oxford/Milton Keynes (RC) and one based in Birmingham (JH).
Each participant was interviewed at a venue of their choice (most often in their own
home). On three occasions groups of two or three friends were interviewed together.
Participants were asked to comment on each photograph in turn. The images were
sequenced in time on the film and were (generally) discussed in this sequence, that is,
in the order they were taken. However, in the course of interviews, informants chose
which photographs they wanted to prioritise and placed more emphasis on some than
on others.
Each interview was informally structured and lasted between 30 and 45 minutes.
Participants were invited to tell the researcher about each photograph, what it repre-
sented and why they had taken it. These initial prompts produced focused and detailed
descriptions with little guidance from the researcher. At times we asked for clarification
about objects and settings, asking, for example, where the photograph was taken and
asking also about the relationship of the photographer to the people in the photograph.
This often led to a more general discussion of family life, relationships and consumer
preferences.
this means noting what the camera can, and cannot, do in terms of representing the
visual and in terms of the options it gives to photographers. For example, the cameras
we provided had inbuilt flash, which made shots inside buildings possible. However,
they had automatic focus and so did not give the young people artistic choices about
aperture and shutter speed. The use of single-use disposable cameras also severely
limited participants’ editing options. Furthermore, because we developed the films, the
young people did not choose which images were printed, though they could choose to
withdraw their consent for particular images to be used in the research process.
Most of the research fieldwork was carried out between 2002 and 2003 at a time
when digital cameras were beginning to replace film and to increase the options for
editing the image both within and outside the camera. Our study, therefore, provided
limited editing options at a time when other modes of photographic production were
increasing editing possibilities.
Genre is also likely to have influenced the images produced. Photography is a genre
which has particular expectations attached to it about proper subject matter, framing
and presentation (Evans, 1999). It also has its own sub-genres, ranging from the
formally posed to photo-documentary and personal fun photography (Berger & Mohr,
1982). In giving young people disposable cameras, we invited them to participate in
a genre of personal snapshot photography that has a particular history and set of
expectations associated with it.
As Holland (1997) notes, snapshot photography is an intimate, often domestic genre.
It celebrates the everyday life of participants portraying them as they would wish to be
seen, in moments that reflect the best rather than the worst of their experience. In addi-
tion, everyday amateur photography typically covers a limited variety of composition,
subject matter and styles that reflect the fantasies and desires of their time (Watney,
1986). Not surprisingly then, the images produced by the young people were likely to
conform to the general expectations of fun photography. This is particularly so for teen-
agers, since adolescence is constructed as a time of fun and freedom from responsibility
(Griffin, 1993), both of which are likely to stylise photographic representations as upbeat
and positive.
While given the constrictions of context equipment and cultural expectations, we
have noted, it is important not to overstate the representative significance of these
images, the young people did have a number of choices open to them in terms of what
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 349
to photograph and how to frame and group these elements. Thus it seems reasonable
to infer that to some degree, the photographs they produced reflected the participants’
preferences. In common with verbal interviews, these photographs could be read as
exercises in self-presentation in which participants emphasised particular positively
sanctioned aspects of self, often along predictable, gender-related lines. Thus boys
tended to present photographs of themselves engaged in typically ‘male’ activities,
emphasising masculine preferences and pursuits (football, collecting model cars, etc.),
while girls emphasised stereotypically feminine preferences and pursuits, such as
clothes, make-up or sleepovers.
The photographs also tended to mark the spatial boundaries and arenas in which the
young people constituted their individuality, supporting recent studies in cultural
Downloaded by [El Colegio de la Frontera Sur] at 11:09 20 August 2013
geography and discourse analysis that emphasise the importance of place for identity
(Dixon & Durrheim, 2000). Bearing in mind that these may be photographs of oppor-
tunity, the setting of the photographs was likely to reflect the young people’s typical
and/or meaningful orbit. Hence the majority of photographs were taken in school play-
grounds, homes and back-gardens and a number in localities where significant events
took place. The emphasis in these photographs was not so much on how often places
are visited but on their significance for the photographer.
We needed to interpret the intentions behind the photographs with caution, since,
as we have noted, many of these photographs were likely to be photographs of oppor-
tunity. There were, for example, a large number of very similar photographs of school
playgrounds in our collection.
Here we drew on Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (1996) analysis of the ways that choice
of shot in images brings about relations between the viewer and the persons or items
represented. They note that the direct gaze in photographs invites an imagined social
response. On the other hand, an indirect or averted gaze invites a sense of objectifica-
tion of the subject presented. Kress and Van Leeuwen also note that aspects of framing
direct the visual reading so that, for example, a long shot skews the reading towards
distance and close-ups suggest intimacy.
As visual cultural anthropologists note, all forms of visual representation are likely
to be culturally specific (Turner, 1991). Though it is impossible to infer what forms
of cultural mediation were present, what we found in this group of ethnically diverse
British-born teenagers was that the photographs were remarkably similar in the choice
of shot over all participating ethnic groups. The most common shot by far was of a group
of friends posed together, facing the camera in mid-shot or at portrait distance. With
only one or two exceptions, all the photos were posed in a similar way. Participants
favoured groups of friends or family members, taken at low- or mid-angle, which in
western culture denotes equality and familiarity between photographer and subject. The
photographs were of groups of same-aged friends, often matched in gender and ethnic-
ity, posed with arms around each other, facing the camera, smiling and having fun. The
majority of these photographs were not only self-consciously posed but include subjects
who were actively performing for the camera in ironic or humorous ways. In these
photographs all participants seemed to be constructing a particular view of teenage
identity as a fun time in which friendships are paramount.
350 R. Croghan et al.
Race and cultural background appeared not so much in the choice of shot as in the
choice of subject matter, that is, the preference for showing friends from a similar
ethnic background or for showing culturally specific artefacts. The vast majority of
friendship shots showed friends who were from the same racialised groups as the
photographer. One Year 8 black girl, for example, presented 26 photographs of her
mainly black female friends at school, one of her brother, one of posters of black singers
on her bedroom wall and one of an African mask. Her priority was, therefore, the pres-
entation of a black identity, as opposed to a presentation of herself as a de-racialised
teenage consumer. This was in marked contrast to the group discussions in which she
participated, in which race was hardly mentioned. Thus the participants in our study
appeared to be prioritising both a strong youth identity and a strong ethnic identity
Downloaded by [El Colegio de la Frontera Sur] at 11:09 20 August 2013
placing himself with the band (and being allowed to do so by them), creates an asso-
ciation that no amount of verbal claiming to have been there can do. He is demon-
strably, and through the fixed image permanently, associated with the band, and with
the identities that his association invokes.
Uri: People remember the whole Jewish thing. Yes this is like the main Synagogue this
is like where the Torah is kept and all that.
Int.: OK.
Uri: And these are the Ten Commandments in Hebrew, and that’s the everlasting light
which is like on 24/7 type of thing.
(Year 12 Israeli male, Oxford)
Uri’s verbal account was attentive to the contradictions inherent in being devoutly
Jewish while also engaging in laddish behaviour. The topic of his religion is introduced
casually ‘the whole Jewish thing’ as if anticipating criticism. The everlasting light is
reintegrated into teenage culture by being referred to as ‘on 24/7’. His account both
maintains a credible teenage identity and introduces an important aspect of himself, his
culture and religion.
Similarly, a Year 8 Vietnamese girl living in Milton Keynes introduced a picture of
her grandfather’s grave into photos of a shopping trip to Leeds. Embedding the photo-
graph of her grandfather’s grave into a set of shopping photos enabled her to introduce
the significant and unexpected topic of death, religion, culture and family ties.
Nina: It’s like a shopping centre and I’m obsessed with shopping so that’s why I took it.
Int.: Right, OK, how come you went to—were you visiting someone particularly in
Leeds or was it some…
Nina: No erm every Easter we go to my Granddad’s grave innit which is the visit and
that’s why I got a photo in here. Like there’s fruit and cigarettes there coz like we
erm we believe that we’d have an afterlife so we sort of like—so that’s why we put
out fruit and then like we just pray and stuff.
(Year 8 Vietnamese girl, Milton Keynes)
Because of its ability to show aspects of identity that might have been difficult to
introduce verbally, the photo interview proved particularly useful for introducing
issues of race and culture. This was a topic that, despite the ethnically mixed nature
of the sample and the inclusion of race and ethnicity in the research design, arose
very little in the non-photo interviews. When it did was often dealt with in formulaic
and dismissive terms. However, it blossomed as an issue in the photographic inter-
views. For many young people from minority ethnic groups this was the first time
that their ethnicity was discussed in the research (see Hunter, Griffin, Croghan, &
Phoenix, 2006).
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 355
Discussion
Note
[1] This project was funded by an ESRC award (ref. R000239287), and entitled Consuming Identities:
1
Young People, Cultural Forms and Negotiations in Households. The study ran from 2001 to 2005,
based at the University of Bath, the University of Birmingham and the Open University. In all,
1350 young people completed questionnaires, 335 took part in 60 group discussions in 18
secondary schools in Birmingham, Oxford and Milton Keynes, and 20 parents and 16 of their
teenage children participated in the family interviews. We also distributed disposable cameras
to young people to take photographs of their favourite possessions, and these formed to focus
for interviews with 28 young people.
Downloaded by [El Colegio de la Frontera Sur] at 11:09 20 August 2013
References
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. London: Fontana.
Berger, J., & Mohr, J. (1982). Another way of telling. New York: Pantheon.
Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place identity: A discursive approach to locating self
and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 27–44.
Evans, J. (1999). Regulating photographic meanings: Introduction. In J. Evans & S. Hall (Eds.),
Visual culture: The reader (pp. 11–21). London: Sage.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Griffin, C. (1993). Representations of youth: The study of youth and adolescence in Britain and America.
Oxford: Polity Press.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Holland, P. (1997). Sweet it is to scan: Personal photographs and popular photography. In L. Wells
(Ed.), Photography: A critical introduction (pp. 105–132). London: Routledge.
Hunter, J., Griffin, C., Croghan, R., & Phoenix, A. (2006, April). Gotta buy: Femininity, compulsory
purchase and the consumer/retailer contract. Paper presented at International Conference on
Child and Teen Consumption, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Lury, C. (2004). Brands: The logos of the global economy. London: Routledge.
Miles, S. (2000). Youth lifestyles in a changing world. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Price, D., & Wells, L. (1997). Thinking about photography: Debates historically and now. In L. Wells
(Ed.), Photography: A critical introduction (pp. 9–54). London: Routledge.
Prosser, J., & Schwarz, D. (1998). Photographs within the sociological research process. In J. Prosser
(Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 115–130). London:
Falmer Press.
Samuels, J. (2004). Breaking the ethnographer’s frames. Reflections on the use of photo elicitation in
understanding Sri Lankan monastic culture. American Behavioural Scientist, 47(12), 1528–1550.
Schlegloff, E. (1997). Who’s text? Who’s context. Discourse and Society, 8(2), 165–187.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
Turner, T. (1991). The social dynamics of video media in an indigenous society: The cultural mean-
ing and the personal politics of video-making in Kayapo communities. Visual Anthropology
Review, 7(2), 68–76.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Reading the visual. London: Macmillan.
Watney, S. (1986). On the institutions of photography. In P. Holland, J. Spence, & S. Watney
(Eds.), Photography/politics. London: Photography Workshop/Comedia. Reprinted in J.
Evans & S. Hall (Eds.), Visual culture: The reader (pp. 141–162). London: Sage.