The participants had a discussion about machine learning models and overfitting. When accuracy reaches 100%, it likely indicates overfitting. Random forests were suggested to avoid overfitting. Later the discussion moved to decision tree visualization, specifically about a tree with 50 rows and 3 columns for features like age, number, and start. Participants also discussed entropy vs gini impurity and the effect of maximum tree depth. Finally, the concepts of 2D and 3D were explained.
The participants had a discussion about machine learning models and overfitting. When accuracy reaches 100%, it likely indicates overfitting. Random forests were suggested to avoid overfitting. Later the discussion moved to decision tree visualization, specifically about a tree with 50 rows and 3 columns for features like age, number, and start. Participants also discussed entropy vs gini impurity and the effect of maximum tree depth. Finally, the concepts of 2D and 3D were explained.
The participants had a discussion about machine learning models and overfitting. When accuracy reaches 100%, it likely indicates overfitting. Random forests were suggested to avoid overfitting. Later the discussion moved to decision tree visualization, specifically about a tree with 50 rows and 3 columns for features like age, number, and start. Participants also discussed entropy vs gini impurity and the effect of maximum tree depth. Finally, the concepts of 2D and 3D were explained.
The participants had a discussion about machine learning models and overfitting. When accuracy reaches 100%, it likely indicates overfitting. Random forests were suggested to avoid overfitting. Later the discussion moved to decision tree visualization, specifically about a tree with 50 rows and 3 columns for features like age, number, and start. Participants also discussed entropy vs gini impurity and the effect of maximum tree depth. Finally, the concepts of 2D and 3D were explained.