Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R102 Task 3.1 Manuscript
R102 Task 3.1 Manuscript
MAY 2021
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
Learning’’, prepared and submitted by D/C Andoy, Jhudiel Carlo A., D/C Albelda,
Kim Karlo, E/C Catubig, Jervin, D/C Delima, Dexler D., E/C Labiaga, Hector, D/C
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
ABSTRACT
The study focused in level of satisfaction on Google Meet and Zoom applications of video
conferencing application to remote learning as basis for recommendations. The following sub-
problems were answered: the video conference application used, level of satisfaction, and significant
difference between the level of satisfaction by video conference applications
This study used descriptive-correlational method conducted to 1st to 3rd year BSMT students
studying at UC- METC. A sample size of 90 respondents was used which is 3.82 percent of the
population size of 2353. Quota sampling was utilized in disseminating the researcher-made
questionnaire to gather data. The tool’s reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Alpha with a result
of 0.97 respectively, and validated by the adviser. The data gathered were treated using weighted
mean and T-test.
The research revealed that 67 BS marine transportation students or a 74.4% uses Google Meet
application while 23 BS marine transportation student or 25.6% percentage uses Zoom application.
Most marine transportation students are highly satisfied on the usage of Google Meet application. It
was also found out that some students are moderately satisfied on the usage of Zoom application. It
was concluded that there is a no significant among the level of satisfaction on both video conferencing
application. It is therefore recommended to conduct a similar study with greater number of sample
size for a better result.
iv
DEDICATION
To my five co-researchers:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To Ma. Theresa C. Martinez, MAEd, our adviser and mentor, who patiently
To Michelle M. Pable, Dev. Ed. D., our instructor, who imparts us with
evaluated and criticize our study to offer advice or suggestion to make our study a
better version.
To the Respondents,
And to those who has unselfishly helped us through finish this study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Content Page
Title Page i
Approval Sheet ii
Abstract iii
Acknowledgement iv
Dedication v
Table of Contents vi
List of Figures viii
CHAPTER
DEFINITION OF TERMS 16
CHAPTER
2 PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND 19
INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Video conference application used by the respondents 19
Level of satisfaction on the Google Meet application 22
CHAPTER
3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Findings 29
Conclusion 31
Recommendation 32
REFERENCES 33
Electronic Sources 33
APPENDICES 36
B- Research Instrument 39
C- Location Map 42
D- Informed Consent 43
G- ERB Clearance 50
CURRICULUM VITAE 51
A1- Mrs. Martinez 51
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES Page
1 Research Flow 10
1
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
our temporary solution to cope up with our studies as the world emerges in
the covid-19 pandemic. It is still essential for students to take online learning
as it not only exposes them to a new type of learning, but it also helps students
to utilize the wasted time and catch up with education through remote
learning.
opportunity for students and teachers to remain connected and engaged with
the content while working from their homes. Options for remote learning
2
they return to physical school environments, they will not need to complete
learning are technical errors of the online learning platform used, poor internet
In line with this, the researchers studied further the remote learning
Education and Training. Researchers are affirmative that this study is not a
resume education in case a pandemic like covid-19 may happen in the future.
3
Theoretical Background
session will allow them to improve their learning capability as they see more
education.
4
(2008), which states that the internet provides learners with an enormous
According to Pramod Kumar (2020), said that Google Meet has always
attracted many users, owing to its qualities of comfort and accuracy. Google
Meet gives excellent quality video calling, which can be used for corporate
meetings, online tuitions, as well as for casual discussions. The usage of this
application has boomed in the past few months due to the worldwide
pandemic of Covid-19.
Google meet. The study found out that the cost was the primary reason for the
Daniel Hughes and Liam Barker (2021) stated that Google Meet offers
that, unlike lots of other videos conferencing software, you don’t need to
available to use even with a free, personal Google account, making it very
accessible.
Chad Brooks (2020) said that the Google Meet is an upgraded version
applications like webinars and video conferencing. With Google Meet, you
can host video calls with many students in one server platform. The service
includes valuable features like screen sharing, recording options, and the
they used Google Meet with the integration of peer tutor mechanism for
Meet.
Susan Blum (2020) said that Zoom works well for faculty members
who lecture or for groups with formal meetings with rules for who speaks and
authority figure, the order can be kept. The trumpets come in on cue. It is
Anthony Lee (2020) said that Zoom is very easy to optimize and has a
reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing across mobile
6
devices, desktops, phones, and room systems which allow to meet and
local drives, which can then be shared securely for collaboration (Zoom Video
Rebekah Carter (2021) said that Zoom allows you to organize your
with staff through a session. You can also reduce the need for excessive video
THE PROBLEM
Education and Training Center, Mambaling, Cebu City for the academic year
respondents?
2.2 Zoom?
conference applications?
Students. They have a partial overview of the online class and convince
guide for further research to those future researchers who plans to undergo a
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
to remote learning.
10
• Internet
• Recommendation
1. Video conference
Researches
application used by the
• Transmittal letter
respondents
• Data-gathering
• Data presentation
2. Level of satisfaction
• Data analysis
on the video
• Data interpretation
conference application
• Treatment of the
of the respondent
Data
s
• Report of Findings
and Conclusion
3. A significant
level of satisfaction by
video conference
application
Research Environment
Stewarding (CS).
Research Respondent
The research respondents of this study were all the Bachelor of Science
in Marine Transportation students from 1st year to 3rd year at the University of
respondents from 2nd year, and 30 respondents from 3rd year, with a total
Research Instrument
the level of satisfaction with ten statements. These statements were taken from
and gather reliable information in this study. The respondents have to put a
checkmark in the corresponding box if they (4) Strongly Agree, (3) Agree, (2)
Disagree, (1) Strongly Disagree with the statements specified under the level
responded to and used as the primary data gathering instrument for this study.
Research Procedure
Gathering of Data. After the approval of the study from the panel of
examiners, a technical expert examined the research tool to test its reliability,
and the researchers commenced a pilot testing to the research tool to test the
Furthermore, the study was sent to the Ethics Review Board to check
the research protocol and approval for conduction. Upon the issuance of the
certificate from ERB, a transmittal letter notified by the adviser was sent to
the study among the respondents with the recommending approval of the
the university registrar asking for the official population of the mentioned
Before doing the research survey, the researchers sent consent to the
target respondents to ask for their permission to be part of our study. Once the
target respondent agrees to participate, the researchers sent them the research
the public. No names or any information would be called out for the protection
of the respondents.
indicated below.
Equivalent
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The terms stated below were used in this study and defined
operationally.
Academic Performance
BSMT Students
Science in Marine Transport which is composed of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-year levels.
Level of Satisfaction
Remote Learning
and interact collaboratively through the internet such as Google Meet and
Zoom.
18
The data gathering was done with one set of survey questionnaire. The
researchers made tool was checked and validated by an expert/s to check the
content and sentence construction. Pilot testing made improve the quality of
the tool to 15 BSMT students who were not respondents of the study.
The result of the pilot test was analyzed to ensure clarity and to
determine the consistency of the result. The result showed a Cronbach’s alpha
CHAPTER 2
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the gathered data from the online survey
The data acquired are presented in a tabular form to ensure a clear view of the
TABLE 1
N= 90
Video Conference
Frequency Percentage
Application
Zoom 23 25.6%
TOTAL 90 100%
percentage. It clearly reveals that the usage of Google Meet has the highest
that Google Meet has always attracted many users, owing to its qualities of
comfort and accuracy. It also gives excellent quality video calling, which can
optimize the application with low data consumption and gives free services to
everyone.
21
TABLE 2
N= 67
Weighted
STATEMENTS Description
Mean
1. Video conferencing application give
excellent quality video calling, which can be Highly
3.34
used for corporate meetings, online tuitions, Satisfied
as well as for casual discussions
2.Video conferencing application is viewed
Moderately
as a very effective tool for enhancing student 3.21
Satisfied
engagement.
3.Video conference application offers some Highly
3.28
useful, good-quality features. Satisfied
4. Video conference application includes
valuable features like screen sharing, Highly
3.36
recording options and the ability to dial in to Satisfied
a video conference by phone.
5. Video conferencing application integrates
Moderately
of peer tutor mechanism thus students held a 3.07
Satisfied
positive perception.
6. Video conferencing application works
well for faculty members who lecture, or for
Highly
groups that have formal meetings, with rules 3.31
Satisfied
for who speaks and how to signal an interest
in speaking.
7. Video conference application is very easy
to optimize and has reliable cloud platform
for video and audio conferencing across
Highly
mobile devices, desktops, phones, and room 3.28
Satisfied
systems which allows to meet and
communicate face-to-face with anyone
anywhere in the world.
8.Video conferencing application has the
Moderately
ability to securely record and store sessions 3.19
Satisfied
without recourse to third-party software.
9. Video conferencing application allows
you to organize your meetings and send links Highly
3.34
or additional information when you’re Satisfied
connecting with staff through a meeting.
22
Highly
AGGREGATED MEAN 3.27
Satisfied
its corresponding weighted mean and aggregated mean. It clearly reveals that
conference by phone has the highest weighted mean of 3.36 with the
application has the ability to securely record and store sessions without
recourse to third-party software has the lowest weighted mean of 3.19 with
provides greater services and features. As stated by Daniel Hughes and Liam
Barker (2021) that Google Meet offers some practical, good-quality features.
One of Google Meet’s big appeals is that, unlike lots of other videos
devices to get started. What’s more, it is available to use even with a free,
TABLE 3
ZOOM APPLICATION
N= 23
Weighted
STATEMENTS Description
Mean
1. Video conferencing application give
excellent quality video calling, which can be Moderately
3.22
used for corporate meetings, online tuitions, Satisfied
as well as for casual discussions
2.Video conferencing application is viewed
Moderately
as a very effective tool for enhancing student 3.04
Satisfied
engagement.
3.Video conference application offers some Moderately
3.09
useful, good-quality features. Satisfied
4. Video conference application includes
valuable features like screen sharing, Moderately
3.17
recording options and the ability to dial in to Satisfied
a video conference by phone.
5. Video conferencing application integrates
Moderately
of peer tutor mechanism thus students held a 3.04
Satisfied
positive perception.
6. Video conferencing application works
well for faculty members who lecture, or for
Moderately
groups that have formal meetings, with rules 3.13
Satisfied
for who speaks and how to signal an interest
in speaking.
7. Video conference application is very easy
to optimize and has reliable cloud platform
for video and audio conferencing across
Moderately
mobile devices, desktops, phones, and room 3.13
Satisfied
systems which allows to meet and
communicate face-to-face with anyone
anywhere in the world.
8.Video conferencing application has the
Moderately
ability to securely record and store sessions 3.22
Satisfied
without recourse to third-party software.
9. Video conferencing application allows
you to organize your meetings and send links Moderately
3.22
or additional information when you’re Satisfied
connecting with staff through a meeting.
25
LEGEND:
WEIGHTED MEAN RANGE INTERPRETATION
3.26-4.00 Highly Satisfied
2.51-3.25 Moderately Satisfied
1.76-2.50 Slightly Satisfied
1.00-1.75 Not Satisfied
corresponding weighted mean and aggregated mean. It clearly reveals that the
with many students in one server platform has the highest weighted mean of
3.35 with the interpretation of Highly Satisfied while the statement, Video
student engagement has the lowest weighted mean of 3.19 with the
services and features. As stated by Anthony Lee (2020), that Zoom is very
easy to optimize and has a reliable cloud platform for video and audio
the world.
27
TABLE 4
CONFERENCE APPLICATIONS
N= 90
Level of
Satisfaction
32.73 5.626
on Google
Meet
There is no
Do not
88 0.846 1.99 significant
Reject H0
difference
Level of
Satisfaction 31.61 5.1
on Zoom
Table four shows the difference between the level of satisfaction on the
the Google Meet Application has a highest mean of 32.73 and highest standard
deviation of 5.626 while the Zoom Application has a lowest mean of 31.61
and lowest standard deviation of 5.1. Both variables managed to attain the
no significant difference.
29
CHAPTER 3
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Findings
students of BSMT prefer to use google meet platform than zoom. This
accounts for smaller bandwidth for google meet and data consumption is not
that much heavy compared to zoom. Students can afford to use the google
are Highly Satisfied with an aggregated mean of 3.27. The students can
manipulate the google meet easily with much hassle in terms of its user
interface. The application itself is free to use and the usage time is unlimited.
30
no significant difference.
31
Conclusion
during online synchronous learning. Since the findings revealed that there is
Recommendation
Based on the findings of the study and conclusion generated, the following
so students can save more data for long term usage; and
online classes through the use of Google Meet application since most
students are more in favor on it due to its great services, easy manipulation
and affordability.
33
REFERENCES
Electronic sources
Kumar, P. (2020). Google Meet vs. Zoom: Which One Is Best for
You.
Retrieved from https://www.pcmobitech.com/google-meet-vs-zoom/
on March 6, 2021.
Daniel Hughes and Liam Barker (2021). Google Hangouts Meet. Retrieved
from https://www.techradar.com/reviews/google-hangouts-
meet on dddddApril 29, 2021.
34
Susan Blum (2020). Zoom Class Depletes Energy Opinion. Retrieved from
https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/04/22/professor-
explores-why-zoom-classes-deplete-her-energy-opinion on April 29,
2021.
Liu & Chuang (2016), The Use of Google Meet during Pandemic.
Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345962298_The_Use
_of_G oogle_Classroom_during_Pandemic on February 20,
2021.
from
35
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/16094069198745
96
dd
https://www.uctoday.com/reviews/collaboration_reviews/collab
oratddddddion- reviews/zoom-chat-review-more-than-just-messages/
APPENDIX A1
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE DEAN
Dear Sir:
Greetings!
The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team has finished on the research
study “Video Conferencing Application to Remote Learning.”
In line with this, I would like to ask for your approval in allowing the team to
disseminate the research instruments using Google forms to our respondents who are the
BSMT students enrolled in University of Cebu-Maritime Education and Training Center
for the academic year 2020-2021.
I am hoping for a positive response on this request. Your approval will greatly
contribute to the success of this study. Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,
Noted by;
APPENDIX A2
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE REGISTRAR
Dear Madame:
Greetings!
The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team has finished the research study
“Video Conferencing Application to Remote Learning. “
The data requested above are needed for the computation of our sample size and
dissemination of our research tool. This study would not be possible without your help.
I am hoping for a positive response on this request. Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,
Noted by:
APPENDIX A3
Dear Respondents,
Greetings!
The undersigned is the lead researcher of ANDOY TEAM who
finished the research study “Video Conferencing Application to Remote
Learning. “
My teammates and I are enrolled in Research 101 under the class of Dr.
Michelle M. Pable and the advisory of Mrs. Ma. Theresa Martinez.
Furthermore, the team had already asked for an approval from the dean to
conduct and disseminate research instruments. The transmittal letter from the
dean with his approval is attached as evidence.
In line with this, I would like to ask a little of your time as well as your
cooperation to be our research respondents/subject. Our study would not be
realized without your help.
Sincerely yours,
Noted by:
APPENDIX B
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
A. Google Meet
B. Zoom
PART II. Directions: Identify the level of the factors mentioned which
correlate the level of satisfaction and academic performance. Put a check (✔)
on the column which corresponds your answer. Please refer to the legend
below for better understanding of your chosen option.
Legend:
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
4 3 2 1
STATEMENTS
1. Video conferencing
application give excellent
quality video calling, which
can be used for corporate
meetings, online tuitions,
as well as for casual
discussions
2.Video conferencing
application was viewed as a
very effective tool for
enhancing student
engagement.
3.Video conference
application offers some
useful, good-quality
features.
4. Video conference
application includes
valuable features like
screen sharing, recording
options and the ability to
dial in to a video
conference by phone.
5. Video conferencing
application integrates of
peer tutor mechanism thus
students held a positive
perception.
6. Video conferencing
application works well for
faculty members who
lecture, or for groups that
41
8.Video conferencing
application has the ability
to securely record and store
sessions without recourse
to third-party software.
9. Video conferencing
application allows you to
organize your meetings and
send links or additional
information when you’re
connecting with staff
through a meeting.
10. Video conferencing
application enables you to
host video calls with many
students in one server
platform.
42
INFORMED CONSENT
Students and Faculty Researchers University
of Cebu System
Introduction
In line with this, I am inviting you to be a respondent of this investigation and request you
to spare few minutes of your time to answer this questionnaire honestly. However, you do
not have to decide today whether or not you will participate in the research. Before you
decide, you can talk to anyone you feel comfortable with about the research. If there are
contents in the questionnaire that you do not understand and find ambiguous then feel
free to contact the researcher. Rest assured that all the answers will be treated with
utmost confidentiality.
This research
involve will (method) use a descriptive comparative method involve
44
Participant selection
We are inviting 30 sample sizes BSMT students from each year levels at the University of
Cebu-Maritime Education and Training Center.
Voluntary Participation
To ensure that you will be able to have full grasp on the purpose of the study, the
proponent will first explain the objectives of the study and the intended benefits of the
participants himself.
Duration
The research takes place in 1 month. During that time, you will be asked by the
researchers to answer the questionnaire during your convenient time and may submit
within 2 days. If you would answer the questionnaire immediately, then it will take around
10 minutes to finish. Your engagement as a respondent will only take once.
Risks
I am asking you to share or divulge your personal information which you may feel
uncomfortable answering with. there are also questions which might affect your exhibition
of those values, and you may feel uncomfortable talking to other topics. You must know
that is you who will decide whether to give answer to all questions or you may skip on
some questions You do not have to give reasons for not responding to any question, or for
refusing to take part in the survey.
45
Benefits
There will be no immediate and direct benefits to you, but it will serve as a feedback
for the satisfaction and comfortability of BSMT students taking online
conferencing class.
Reimbursements
You will not be provided with any payment for taking part in the research.
Confidentiality
Because something out of ordinary is being done through research in the educational
institution that you are connected with, it might draw attention. If you participate, other
people in the organization and the society in general may ask questions.
I will not be sharing information about you. The information that I collect from this
research project will be kept confidential. Information about you and your perception that
will be collected from this research will be put away and no one but the researcher will be
able to see it. Any information about you will have a number on it instead of your name.
Only the researcher will know your number/contact information and I will lock that
information up with a lock and key. It will not be shared with or given to anyone except my
research adviser,
and my co-researchers.
At the end of the study, I will be sharing what I have learned with from the respondents
and with the community. I will do this by meeting first with the participants and then with
the larger community. Nothing that you answered in the questionnaire will be shared with
anybody outside the research. A written report will also be given to the participants which
that they can share with their families. I will also publish the results in order that other
interested people may learn from this research.
You may choose not to participate in this study and does not have to take part in this
research is you do not wish to do so. Choosing to participate or not will not affect your
employment at Northeastern Cebu Colleges, Inc. you will still benefit from the
implementation of the employee development plan. You may stop from participating in the
survey at any time that you wish without either you losing your rights here.
46
Who to Contact
If you have any questions, you can ask them now or later, even if the study has started. If
you wish to ask questions later, you may contact any of the following:
This thesis proposal has been reviewed and approved by my thesis panel of
UC-METC, which is a committee whose task is to make sure that researchers have
properly conducted the study. If you have any questions for may panel, please contact the
University Research Office.
I have watched the foregoing information, or it has been read to me. I have had
the opportunity to ask questions about it and any questions that I have asked
have been answered to my satisfaction. I consent voluntarily to participate as a
participant in this research.
I am willing to Participate ☐
If illiterate
A literate witness must sign (if possible, this person should be selected by the participant
and should have no connection to the research team). Participants who are illiterate should
include their thumbprint as well.
I have witnessed the accurate reading of the consent form to the potential
participant, and the individual has had the opportunity to ask questions. I
confirm that the individual has given consent freely.
47
Date ________________________
Day/month/year
I have accurately read out the information sheet to the potential participant, and to the
best of my ability made sure that the participant understands that the following will be
done:
1. The researchers will send a consent first to the target respondents before
they will become part of our study.
2. No Confidential Information of the respondent will be disseminated to the
public and will be used for research purposes only.
3. Once agreed to the terms and conditions, the respondents will be given 10
minutes to answer the questions provided in the google forms.
I confirm that the participant was given an opportunity to ask questions about
the study, and all the questions asked by the participant have been answered correctly
and to the best of my ability. I confirm that the individual has not been coerced into giving
consent, and the consent has been given freely and voluntarily.
APPENDIX D
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT VALIDATION
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the research tool constructed by D/C Jhudiel Carlo
Date: 07/01/21
UNIVERSITY OF CEBU
Maritime Education and Training
Alumnus, Mambaling, Cebu City
α ≥ 0.9 - Excellent
0.9>α>0.8 - Good
0.8 >α>0.7 - Acceptable
0.7>α>0.6 - Questionable
0.6>α>0.5 - Poor
0.5 > α - Unacceptable
Remarks: All items/questions are consistent and reliable with an overall Cronbach’s
Alpha of
0.9775 which is EXCELLENT. Each item is significant showing EXCELLENT
consistency.
VERIFIED BY:
University of
Cebu Academe
Research Ethics
Committee
This is to certify that the following protocol and related documents have
been granted EXEMPTION FROM REVIEW by the University of
Cebu Academe Research Ethics Committee (UCAREC) for
implementation.
Protocol Title:
UCAREC Chairman:
Date: May 21, 2021
DR. JUANITO N. ZUASULA. JR.
Signature Over Printed Name
51
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Name : Maria Theresa Caiñela Martinez
Age : 43 years old
Gender : Female
Civil Status : Married
Birthplace : Cebu City, Philippines 6000
Birthdate : October 6, 1978
Spouse Name : Goodwin Cuevas Martinez
Academic Background
Graduate School
Cebu Normal University
Osmeña Boulevard, 6000 Cebu City, Philippines
College
Cebu Normal University
Osmeña Boulevard, 6000 Cebu City, Philippines
Vocational Course
Abellana National School
Osmeña Boulevard, 6000 Cebu City, Philippines
52
CURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAE
Academic Background
College : Marine Transportation
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
High School : Saint Michael School
Argao, Cebu
Elementary : Montessori Learning School
Argao
54
CURRICULUM VITAE
Jervin R. Catubig
Calasa, Colase, Samboan, Cebu
jervincatubig22@gmail.com
09154443520
Personal Background
Name : Jervin R. Catubig
Age : 22 years old
Gender : Male
Civil Status : Single
Birthplace : Cainta, Rizal
Birthdate : June 19, 1998
Parents : Jaime H. Catubig and Enesita R. Catubig
Academic Background
College : Marine Engineering
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
High School : San Sebastian National High School
Bato,Samboan, Cebu
Elementary : Camburoy Elementary School
Samboan, Cebu
55
CURRICULUM VITAE
Dexler Dayuja Delima
Ylaya, Bolinawan, Carcar City, Cebu
Danny_cute73@yahoo.com
09682016366
Personal Background
Name : Dexler D. Delima
Age : 23 years old
Gender : Male
Civil Status : Single
Birthplace : Bolinawan, Carcar City, Cebu
Birthdate : February 18, 1998
Parents : Vivencio Delima and Carmelita Delima
Academic Background
College :Marine Transportation
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
High School :Asian College of Technology
Cebu City, Cebu
Elementary : Ocaña National High School
Ocaña, Carcar City
56
CURRICULUM VITAE
Hector Ralph S. Labiaga
Cantabo Gunting, Barili Cebu
ralphlabiaga@gmail.com
09615998485
Personal Background
Name : Hector Ralph S. Labiaga
Age : 21 years old
Gender : Male
Civil Status : Single
Birthplace : Cantabo Gunting, Barili Cebu
Birthdate : June 13, 1999
Parents : Antonio R. Labiaga and Melchora S. Labiaga
Academic Background
College : Marine Engineering
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
High School : Bartolome & Manuela Panares Memorial NHS
Barili, Cebu
Elementary : Barili Central School
Barili, Cebu
57
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Name : James Anthony V. Lapasa
Age : 20 years old
Gender : Male
Civil Status : Single
Birthplace : Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines 6400
Birthdate : August 3 , 2000
Parents : Florencio E. Lapasa and Emma V. Lapasa
Academic Background
College :Marine Transportation
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
High School :UC main Campus
Cebu City, Cebu
Elementary : Catarman 1 Central School
Catarman, Northern Samar