Asian financial crisis -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia https://www.britannica.

com/print/article/1326106

Asian financial crisis

Asian financial crisis, major global financial crisis that destabilized the Asian economy
and then the world economy at the end of the 1990s.

The 1997–98 Asian financial crisis began in Thailand and then quickly spread to
neighbouring economies. It began as a currency crisis when Bangkok unpegged the Thai
baht from the U.S. dollar, setting off a series of currency devaluations and massive flights
of capital. In the first six months, the value of the Indonesian rupiah was down by 80
percent, the Thai baht by more than 50 percent, the South Korean won by nearly 50
percent, and the Malaysian ringgit by 45 percent. Collectively, the economies most
affected saw a drop in capital inflows of more than $100 billion in the first year of the crisis.
Significant in terms of both its magnitude and its scope, the Asian financial crisis became
a global crisis when it spread to the Russian and Brazilian economies.

The significance of the Asian financial crisis is multifaceted. Though the crisis is generally
characterized as a financial crisis or economic crisis, what happened in 1997 and 1998 can
also be seen as a crisis of governance at all major levels of politics: national, global, and
regional. In particular, the Asian financial crisis revealed the state to be most inadequate at
performing its historical regulatory functions and unable to regulate the forces of
globalization or the pressures from international actors. Although Malaysia’s controls on
short-term capital were relatively effective at stemming the crisis in Malaysia and attracted
much attention for Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad’s ability to resist International
Monetary Fund (IMF)-style reforms, most states’ inability to resist IMF pressures and
reforms drew attention to the loss of government control and general erosion of state
authority. Most illustrative was the case of Indonesia, where the failures of the state helped
to transform an economic crisis into a political one, resulting in the downfall of Suharto,
who had dominated Indonesian politics for more than 30 years.

Debates about the causes of the financial crisis involved competing and often polarized
interpretations between those who saw the roots of the crisis as domestic and those who
saw the crisis as an international affair. The economic crisis focused much attention on the
role of the developmental state in East Asian development. Proponents of neoliberalism,
who saw the crisis as homegrown, were quick to blame interventionist state practices,
national governance arrangements, and crony capitalism for the crisis. Assistance from
the IMF all came with conditions aimed at eliminating the close government-business
relationships that had defined East Asian development and replacing Asian capitalism

1 of 3 12/14/2019, 2:13 PM
Asian financial crisis -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1326106

with what neoliberalists saw to be an apolitical and thus more efficient neoliberal model
of development.

The early neoliberal triumphalist rhetoric, however, also gave way to a more profound
reflection about neoliberal models of development. Perhaps most of all, the 1997–98
financial crisis revealed the dangers of premature financial liberalization in the absence of
established regulatory regimes, the inadequacy of exchange rate regimes, the problems
with IMF prescriptions, and the general absence of social safety nets in East Asia.

Echoing these concerns were those who saw the crisis as a function of systemic factors. In
contrast with neoliberal theorists who focused on technical questions, however, critics of
neoliberalism focused on political and power structures underlying the international
political economy. Mahathir’s characterization of the financial crisis as a global conspiracy
designed to bring down Asian economies represented the far extreme of these views,
though his views did have some popular appeal in East Asia.

Mostly, the widely held perception that IMF prescriptions did more harm than good
focused particular attention on the IMF and other global governance arrangements. The
IMF was criticized for a “one size fits all” approach that uncritically reapplied prescriptions
designed for Latin America to East Asia, as well as its intrusive and uncompromising
conditionality. Fiscal austerity measures were criticized as especially inappropriate for the
East Asian case and for prolonging and intensifying both economic and political crises. In
addition to the criticism leveled at the technical merits of IMF policies, the politics of the
IMF and the general lack of transparency of its decision making were also challenged.
Limited East Asian representation in the IMF and World Bank underscored the
powerlessness of affected economies, as well as their lack of recourse within existing
global governance arrangements. Combined, the criticisms of the IMF diminished the
prestige, if not the authority, of the IMF, resulting in heightened calls for a new
international architecture to regulate the global economy.

The Asian financial crisis also revealed the inadequacies of regional organizations,
especially the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN), generating much debate about the future of both organizations.
Criticism focused especially on the informal, nonlegalistic institutionalism of both
organizations. However, though ASEAN displayed greater receptiveness to institutional
reform, informal institutionalism remains the norm with respect to regional forums in East
Asia.

Alice D. Ba

2 of 3 12/14/2019, 2:13 PM
Asian financial crisis -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1326106

CITATION INFORMATION
ARTICLE TITLE: Asian financial crisis
WEBSITE NAME: Encyclopaedia Britannica
PUBLISHER: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
DATE PUBLISHED: 25 April 2019
URL: https://www.britannica.com/event/Asian-financial-crisis
ACCESS DATE: December 14, 2019

3 of 3 12/14/2019, 2:13 PM