General Systematic review (SR) quality criteria

Can’t
Yes No
Tell
Does the SR explicitly report and perform a comprehensive and
reproducible literature search?
Does the SR formulate a clearly focused question?
Does the SR's methods section explicitly state the basis forinclusion or
exclusion of primary RCTS?
Does the SR report data from primary RCTs (e.g., size, interventions
used, results from individual RCTs)
Does the SR assess the methodological quality of primary studies, and
take these into account where necessary?
Meta-analysis: does the SR combine primary studies appropriately?
Meta-analysis: does the SR state how results are combined statistically?
Meta-analysis: does the SR report absolute numbers as well as
appropriate summary statistics?
Does the SR discuss the reasons for any variations/heterogeneity
between individua RCTs/overall results?
Does the SR report on the clinical relevance/importance of the results?

Sumber : Appraising systematic reviews | BMJ Best Practice

Bahasa indonesia

General Systematic review (SR) quality criteria

Can’t
Yes No
Tell
Apakah SR secara eksplisit melaporkan dan melakukan pencarian      
literatur yang komprehensif dan dapat direproduksi?
Apakah SR merumuskan pertanyaan yang terfokus dengan jelas?      
Apakah bagian metode SR secara eksplisit menyatakan      
dasar penyertaan atau pengecualian RCTS primer?
Apakah SR melaporkan data dari RCT primer (misalnya, ukuran,      
intervensi yang digunakan, hasil dari RCT individu)
Apakah SR menilai kualitas metodologis studi primer, dan      
mempertimbangkannya jika perlu?
Meta-analisis: apakah SR menggabungkan studi primer dengan tepat?      
Meta-analisis: apakah SR menyatakan bagaimana hasil digabungkan      
secara statistik?
Meta-analisis: apakah SR melaporkan angka absolut serta statistik      
ringkasan yang sesuai?
Apakah SR membahas alasan untuk setiap variasi/heterogenitas antara      
masing-masing RCT/hasil keseluruhan?
Apakah SR melaporkan relevansi/pentingnya hasil klinis?      
 Yes No
Purpose of the Study
Clarity Purpose of study is easy to understand √
Practical significance The study yields results that will affect practice. √
Statement of Problem
Clarity Problem(s) are easy to understand. √
Conceptual definitions A word picture or mental image of problem. √
Operational definitions A description of how people/things will be measured √
Literature Review
Inclusion of current citations Works publised within the past 5 years. √
Inclusion of classic studies Important older works √
Citation of primary sources Works by original investigators. √
Relevance Works pertain to subject being investigated √
Methodology
Population identified Subjects or objects studied are defined. √
Adequacy of sample Enough subjects or objects to represent population. √
Representativeness Sampling method is identified. √
Clarity of procedures Research design is identified. √
Data collection Data are recorded carefully; tools are reliable and valid √

Data analysis Appropriate tests or statistics are used √

Results and Conclusions

Accuracy Data interpretation is consistent with study results. √

Addressed study purpose Conclusions address research questions. √
Significance to nursing Implications for nursing practice are addressed. √
Clarity results are understood easily and presented clearly. √
Limitations Shortcomings of study are identified √
Overall Concern Biases are recognized and stated in report. √
Objectivity
Ethical considerations Informed consent was obtained; study was confidential √
and safe.
Readability Study makes sense/could be valuable in your practice √

Tujuan Studi
Kejelasan
Signifikansi praktis
Pernyataan Masalah
Kejelasan
Definisi konseptual
Definisi operasional
Literatur Review
Penyertaan kutipan saat ini
Penyertaan studi klasik
Kutipan sumber utama
Relevansi
Metodologi
Populasi diidentifikasi
Kecukupan sampel
keterwakilan
Kejelasan prosedur
Pengumpulan data
 
Analisis data
Hasil dan Kesimpulan
Ketepatan
Tujuan studi yang dituju
Pentingnya keperawatan
Kejelasan
Li mi tasi
Kekhawatiran Keseluruhan
Objektivitas
Pertimbangan etis
Keterbacaan
Yes No
Tujuan pembelajaran mudah dipahami  
Studi menghasilkan hasil yang akan mempengaruhi  
praktek.
Masalah (s) mudah dimengerti.  
Gambar kata atau gambaran mental dari suatu masalah.  
Deskripsi tentang bagaimana orang/benda akan diukur  
Karya yang diterbitkan dalam 5 tahun terakhir.
Karya-karya tua yang penting
Bekerja oleh peneliti asli.
Karya berkaitan dengan subjek yang diselidiki
 
Subyek atau objek yang dipelajari didefinisikan.
Subjek atau objek yang cukup untuk mewakili populasi.
Metode pengambilan sampel diidentifikasi.
Desain penelitian diidentifikasi.
Data dicatat dengan hati-hati; alat dapat diandalkan dan
valid
Tes atau statistik yang sesuai digunakan
Interpretasi data konsisten dengan hasil penelitian.
Kesimpulan menjawab pertanyaan penelitian.
Implikasi untuk praktik keperawatan dibahas.
hasilnya mudah dipahami dan disajikan dengan jelas.
Kekurangan studi diidentifikasi
Bias diakui dan dinyatakan dalam laporan.
Informed consent diperoleh; penelitian adalah rahasia
dan aman.
Belajar masuk akal / bisa berharga dalam latihan Anda