Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation Into The Effect of Tool-Chip Contact Length On
Investigation Into The Effect of Tool-Chip Contact Length On
626
Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 2 (4): 626-630 (ISSN: 2141-7016)
have not attracted as much attention in this respect was carefully polished and cleaned before each test is
(Ashok and Tanmaya, 2008; Ivana, 1998). It was also carried out while each successive test were performed
found that depth of cut does not have a significant on a new section of the cutting edge to eliminate wear
influence on the tool wear rate (Astakhov and Shvets, effects. Graphs were plotted using MATLAB.
2004).
The whole experimental procedure is carried out in
According to Coelho et al (1986), cutting at a two steps. The first step involves a testing procedure
constant cutting speed and width of cut can where at a given depth of cut, feed rate and cutting
sometimes lead to the transition from an unstable to a speed, a Kistler turning dynamometer (Type 9263)
stable condition by increasing the feed. However, the was used to measure the thrust, and cutting/feed
shape of the stable boundary obtained showed that forces. Outputs from the dynamometer were fed into
the greatest benefit from increasing feed occurs at a the Kistler charge amplifiers, generating direct
relatively low feeds. At higher feeds the curve current (DC) signals that will be transmitted to the
becomes flat making stabilization by this method, data-acquisition card installed on a personal
impractical. In addition, it should be noted that a computer. The amplifiers must be set to match the
large feed may not give stable machining and that a settings on the computer. Custom built software
small feed (reduced metal removal rate) results in installed on the computer will receive the force data
promoting chatter (Sadik and Lindström, 1993). in analog form and thereafter convert same to a
digital format, which is later transferred to
MATERIALS A!D METHODS spreadsheets for analysis. Figure 1 shows the set up
Materials Used for the Experiment for the experimental procedure.
The following materials were used for the research
work: Colcherster Mastiff 1400 lathe machine, force The second step involves a sensitivity analysis which
dynamometer- Type 9263 (force transducer), carbide is done by repeating the first step while adjusting
cutting inserts/high speed steel cutting tool, each of the three critical parameters namely: depth of
calliper/micrometer, mild steel and aluminium alloy cut between 0.10 and 0.20mm, feed rate ranging from
workpiece, each with dimensions 32mm by 290mm 0.05 to 0.50mm/rev and cutting speed between 47
in diameter and length respectively. Figure 1 shows and 71m/min.
the experimental set-up.
RESULTS A!D DISCUSSIO!
The interaction of a cutting tool with the rotating
work-piece produces cutting forces that combine with
tangential, feed and radial forces. These forces were
measured by a three-component turning
dynamometer. The tangential force produces the
greatest among the three cutting force components,
generating torque on the work-piece being rotated by
the spindle. The outputs are shown in Table 1.
627
Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 2 (4): 626-630 (ISSN: 2141-7016)
similar to 0.38 mm and 0.32 mm obtained by Iqbal et conditions. This gives an average value of 25.4%
al (2008) at cutting speeds of 200m/min and reduction in tool-contact lengths. This shows that
800m/min for high speed machining of AISI 1050 there is more stability during aluminium alloy cutting
steel. than that of mild steel. The result obtained here is
similar to that of low contact length at low speed
Though aluminum is more ductile than mild steel, obtained by Molinari et al (2002) during high speed
results clearly show that the tool-chip contact lengths machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
values obtained at cutting speeds of 41m/min and
71m/min were less than 0.08mm to 0.74mm and
0.04mm to 0.61mm for mild steel at the same cutting
Table 1: Variations in tool-chip contact length, cutting and thrust forces as feed rate changes
Aluminum
47m/min 71m/min
Feed, f Chip-tool Cutting Thrust force, Resultant force, Chip-tool Cutting Thrust Resultant
(mm/rev.) contact force, F(!) F(!) contact force, F(!) force, F(!) force,
length (mm) F (!) length (mm) F(!)
d=0.10mm
0.05 0.05 347.00 415.00 540.96 0.03 226.36 377.27 472.72
0.11 0.32 445.00 632.40 773.28 0.14 333.45 574.91 714.92
0.13 0.39 520.00 731.50 897.49 0.28 325.85 665.00 800.79
0.19 0.41 770.00 1012.60 1272.11 0.34 616.00 920.55 1185.25
0.26 0.53 1346.00 1332.00 1893.66 0.47 520.69 1210.91 1430.15
d=0.20mm
0.30 0.57 334.57 576.85 666.85 0.51 261.18 483.67 633.22
0.35 0.63 476.83 822.12 950.39 0.58 349.01 671.18 893.14
0.40 0.71 521.41 965.58 1097.37 0.61 404.63 763.45 1046.93
0.45 0.77 620.22 1265.75 1409.54 0.73 411.65 840.11 1331.01
0.50 0.81 696.34 1698.40 1835.61 0.78 612.16 1302.47 1805.35
Mild Steel
47m/min 71m/min
d=0.10mm
0.05 0.08 505.23 902.20 1034.03 0.04 344.22 688.45 965.64
0.11 0.40 613.21 1157.00 1309.46 0.36 503.24 882.88 1261.71
0.13 0.47 784.16 1352.00 1562.95 0.43 526.16 1031.68 1450.77
0.19 0.59 1081.08 2002.00 2275.24 0.52 748.56 1527.68 2137.37
0.26 0.74 1187.17 2826.60 3065.79 0.61 1068.19 2670.46 3021.70
d=0.20mm
0.30 0.76 1213.29 703.71 1402.59 0.73 484.34 835.06 854.27
0.35 0.81 1648.15 890.00 1873.10 0.78 612.56 1134.36 1080.43
0.40 0.86 2020.20 1212.12 2355.94 0.82 834.26 1390.43 1471.47
0.45 0.91 2498.06 1274.01 2804.17 0.85 876.86 1719.33 1546.60
0.50 0.94 3642.03 1893.86 4105.01 0.90 1105.07 2762.69 2192.69
628
Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 2 (4): 626-630 (ISSN: 2141-7016)
629
Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 2 (4): 626-630 (ISSN: 2141-7016)
630