Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Metropolis
Metropolis
HISTORY OF CINEMA
BOGNÁR ALEXANDRA
BOGNÁR
ALEXANDRA
HISTORY
OF
CINEMA
M ETROPOLIS
Writing
critiques
is
an
exciting
part
of
film
esthetics,
moreover
its
even
more
fun
if
I
get
a
bad
movie.
Well,
Metropolis
can
fit
into
my
personal
list
of
"worst
films
ever"
and
join
the
rest
of
the
movies
that
I
already
put
there.
I
always
knew
that
Hitler
and
I
have
nothing
in
common
and
Metropolis
is
just
one
more
proof
-‐
we
do
not
even
share
a
slightly
similar
taste
in
cinema.
Sci-‐fi
is
not
my
type
of
movie.
Although
I
understand
that
people
as
well
as
dealing
with
our
past
and
present
are
curious
about
future,
but
seriously
a
negative
utopian
story
with
an
imagined
world
under
100%
control?!
This
is
just
so
amateur
compared
to
Orwell's
fascinating
novels.
The
Metropolis,
directed
by
Fritz
Lang,
was
originally
released
as
a
210-‐minute
epic
in
Germany
-‐
thank
God
the
now
available
version
is
just
114-‐minutes
long
(due
to
its
restoration).
According
to
the
IMDb.com
the
film
included
more
than
37,000
extras
and
it
took
2
years
to
shoot.
The
story
is
platitudinous (starting with its title...),
the
techniques
are
elementary
as
it
is
a
silent
movie
with
sometimes
appearing
sentences
-‐
functioning
as
"help"
for
the
viewer
to
understand
what
is
going
on
the
screen.
The
small-‐minded
conflicts
fused
together
with
the
pointless
love
story
are
the
key
features
of
a
meaningless
story.
The
futuristic
'political
regime'
idea
divides
the
population
into
two
groups
-‐
workers
and
thinkers,
therefore
creates
a
significant
border
among
the
social
classes.
This
concept
was
yet
old-‐fashioned
in
the
20th
century,
why
would
it
be
a
new
invention
in
the
future?
Since
we
have
spoken
about
civilization,
we
have
discussed
differences
whose
accessory
is
obviously
a
caste
system.
The
"elite"
always
figure
out
what
is
good
for
the
community
while
the
"poor"
achieves
it.
In
other
words,
it
is
just
a
cliché:
the
influential
ones
control,
while
the
weak
ones
are
being
controlled.
This
notion
is
not
innovative,
rebellious,
unique
or,
let's
say,
futuristic.
2
BOGNÁR
ALEXANDRA
HISTORY
OF
CINEMA
The
only
thing
that
I
liked
in
this
movie
is
its
score.
Without
the
music
I
would
have
honestly
felt
the
penetrating
pain
while
trying
to
survive
the
class.
Of
course
it
was
not
added
to
the
film
originally,
only
later
in
2004
and
was
performed
by
the
New
Pollutants.
"The
score
was
conceived,
composed
and
recorded
over
a
12-‐month
period
and
had
its
world
premiere,
to
rapturous
applause,
at
the
2005
Adelaide
Film
Festival". But,
there
are
many
other
soundtracks
created
for
the
Metropolis
but
perhaps
(I
am
just
guessing
because
I
do
not
know)
that
they
were
as
bad
as
the
film
itself
so
it
was
necessary
to
replace
them
in
order
to
ensure
the
future
interest
of
the
would-‐be
audience.
A
minor
criticism
to
this
version:
it's
too
21st
century,
so
it's
easily
recognizable
that
it
was
written
decades
later.
Moreover,
since
the
score
is
way
much
better
than
the
movie
it
does
not
serve
as
an
"attachment"
which
balances
the
impressions.
This
soundtrack
deserves
a
more
demanding
movie
and
these
contemporary
electronic
sounds
do
not
correspond
with
the
black
and
white
historical-‐futuristic
setting
of
a
20s
film.
To
sum
up
in
a
short
sentence,
despite
that
I
still
do
not
understand
how
Steven
Jay
Schneider
could
include
Metropolis
in
his
'1001
Movies
You
Must
See
Before
You
Die'
list,
the
music
was
fine...
merely
inappropriate
for
the
film.
REFERENCE:
Metropolis
Rescore,
MySpace,
accessed
2011.03.27.,
http://www.myspace.com/metropolisrescore
Trivia
for
Metropolis,
The
Internet
Movie
Database,
accessed
2011.03.06.,
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/trivia
3