TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timel Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
INDIVIDUAL
inePERFORMANCE
per KRA QETCOMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher I-II
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Name of Employee:
2. Diversity of 4. To establish a
MARK JOVANIE M. BACOLCOL
24.00% Quality Utilized effective teaching Utilized effective teaching Utilized an effective
Name of Rater:
Utilized a teaching strategy No acceptable evidence was

Position: Learners & learner centered TEACHER I strategies that are

appropriate in responding
strategies that are
appropriate in responding to
teaching strategy that is
appropriate in responding to
or strategies that partially shown
Position:
respond to learners’
Assessment and culture by using to learners’ linguistic, learners’ linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural, linguistic, cultural,
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Reporting teaching DIVISION OF SAMAR cultural, socioeconomic, or socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious Date of orReview:
socioeconomic, religious
strategies that religious backgrounds at an backgrounds at a group backgrounds as shown in the backgrounds as shown in the
Rating Period: respond to their
2021-2022 individual level* as shown level* as shown in the submitted learning material submitted learning material
linguistic, cultural, in the submitted learning submitted learning material
material
socioeconomic
and religious
backgrounds TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Efficiency Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Timeliness
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
5. To plan and deliver Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Basic 1. Content 1. To apply 24.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT
Education Knowledge and deliver teachingof
knowledge Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
strategies rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
Services Pedagogy contentthat are and
within agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms
agreement forms or No
agreement forms or No
responsive to the
across curriculum acceptable evidence
acceptable was was
evidence
special
teaching areas. shown shown
educational needs
of learners in
difficult Efficiency
Efficiency
circumstances Timeliness
Timeliness
6. To2.use strategies
To ensure the Quality Ensured
Quality Provided that with
learners the ICT usedProvided
Ensured thatwith
learners the ICT usedProvided
Ensured thatwith
learners the ICT usedProvided
Ensured thatwith
learners ICT are usedNo evidence
No acceptable evidence was
was shown
redefine
accurate, and and transform
specific augment
and accurate, and enrich accurate,
and specific modifyandprocesses
general and inaccurate
but doand/or
not create a new shown
positive use of ICT
for providing
directed
learning
constructive
experiences and constructive
are learning experiences
feedback asand constructive
are improvefeedback
learning as destructive
learning experience
feedback as and/or
to facilitate
timely, accurate the feedback*
documented
as shownproperly
in the and
showndocumented properly and
in the evidence shownexperiences and are
in the evidence shownare
in documented
the evidence but not
and teaching and
constructive consistently
evidence submittedusing any submitted
consistently using any submitted
documented properly and consistent with one
submitted
learning
feedback to process referencing style as shown referencing style as shown consistently using any referencing style as shown
in the submitted learning in the submitted learning referencing style as shown in the submitted learning
improve learner material material in the submitted learning material
performance Efficiency material
Timeliness MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows No evidence was shown
feedback given within 5 feedback given within 6-10 feedback given within 11-20 feedback given beyond 20
working days from working days from working days from working days from
submission** submission** submission** submission**
Efficiency
3. Curriculum and 7. To select 16.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
TimelinessObjective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT
Planning develop,
3. To apply a Quality ratingApplied teaching strategies
sheets/interobserver Applied teaching strategies
rating sheets/interobserver Applied teaching strategies
rating sheets/interobserver Applied teaching strategies
rating sheets/interobserver ratingNo acceptable evidence was
sheets/interobserver
organize and that challenge
range of teaching agreement forms learners to that require
agreement forms learners to agreement
that require
forms learners to agreement
that lead learners along agreement
forms a shown forms or No
Use appropriate draw conclusions and make connections using describe and explain ideas single path of inquiry acceptable evidence was
strategies to justify their thinking or put ideas learned as shown in learned as shown in the and/or to simple recall and
teaching and shown
develop critical parts together to promote the submitted learning submitted learning material rote memorization of
learning
and creative material concepts as shown in the
deeper understanding of
resources,
thinking, as well ideas learned as shown in submitted learning material
including ICT,higher-
as other to Efficiency the submitted learning
orderlearning
address thinking material
goalsskills Timeliness

Efficiency
8. To set achievable Quality All of the learning Majority of the learning Half of the learning
Less than half of the No acceptable evidence was
Timelinessoutcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned
learning outcomes set shown
and appropriate
with the learning with the learning with the learning are aligned with the
learning outcomes TO BE FILLED OUT DURINGcompetencies
competencies as shown in PLANNING as shown in competencies as shown in
learning competencies as TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
that are aligned the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
Performance Indicators shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted
with learning submitted
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs competencies
Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA
Efficiency
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Timeliness
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
4. Community 9. To build 24.00% Quality Sustained engagement Secured collaboration with Communicated with and Communicated with No acceptable evidence was
Linkages and relationships with with parents/ guardians and/ parents/ guardians and/ or obtained response from parents/ guardians and/or shown
 Professional parents/ guardians or wider school community to wider school community to parents/ guardians and/ or wider school community to
Engagement & and the wider facilitate involvement in the facilitate involvement in the wider school community to facilitate involvement in the
Personal Growth school community educative process as educative process as facilitate involvement in the educative process but
and Professional to facilitate evidenced by 2 or more of evidenced by one MOV no. 1 educative process as received no
Development involvement in the MOV no. 1 or 2 or 2 evidenced by MOV No. 3 response/reply as
evidenced by MOV No. 3
educative process

Efficiency Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
10. To participate Quality Participated in any
in professional professional network/ activity
that requires output* and
networks to share proof of implementation
knowledge and to **
within the school to share
enhance practice knowledge and to enhance
practice as evidenced by the
submitted MOV
Participated in any
professional network/ activity
that requires output* and
proof of implementation
**
within the
department/grade level to
share knowledge and to
enhance practice as
evidenced by the submitted
MOV
Participated in any
professional network/ activity
that requires output* to
share knowledge and to
enhance practice as
evidenced by the submitted
MOV
Participated in any No acceptable evidence was
professional network/ activity shown
that does not require
output to share knowledge
and to enhance practice as
evidenced by the submitted
MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 different Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different Submitted 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
kinds of acceptable of acceptable MOV*** kinds of acceptable acceptable MOV shown
MOV*** MOV***
Timeliness
11. To develop a Quality Updated the Development Discussed progress on Accomplished the Accomplished the No acceptable evidence was
Plan and approved by the Development Plan from Strengths and shown
personal Development Plan with
the rater during Phase II of learning objectives up to Development Needs
improvement plan the RPMS cycle the rater to check whether resources needed to portion of the Development
based on Development Needs were address Development Needs Plan after self-assessment at
addressed during the
reflection of one’s Phase I of the RPMS cycle beginning of the school year
practice and
ongoing
professional Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP No acceptable evidence was
Efficiency
learning with any 4 of the with any 3 of the with any 2 of the with any 1 of the shown
acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
5. Plus Factor 12. To perform 12.00% Quality Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related No acceptable evidence was
various related work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed shown
works/ activities to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning
that contribute to process beyond the process within the school/ process within the learning process within the class as
school/ Community Community Learning area/ department as evidenced by submitted
the teaching-
Learning Center (CLC) as Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by submitted MOV
learning process evidenced by submitted by submitted MOV MOV
MOV

Efficiency Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
 RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

MARK JOVANIE M. BACOLCOL

Ratee Rater Approving Authority