Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Court Fees
Court Fees
- versus –
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
V.K. JAIN, J
GT Road.
32/3,4,7/1,12/16,13/20,19,25/21/1,27/5/1,1
3/2,242,49,49/1.
18 bighas.
Puri), Delhi;
140, 138, 142M, 34M, 1M, 46, 43, 44, 930, 939,
legal heirs, including his widow Smt. Barfo Devi. Smt. Berfo
namely, her son, late Shri Anup Singh Tehlan, her other son
intestate in the year 2003, without any issues and his wife,
and mesne profit with respect to the profits earned from the
reads as under:
direct that suits of that class shall, for the purposes of the
and the Punjab Court Act, 1918 the value of the whole of
all such suits the plaintiff shall state the amount at which
was held that this averment would not mean that the
(emphasis supplied)
Lrs. and Ors. 2007 (1) SCC 674, a suit for partition of
agricultural land was filed seeking its division into two equal
property valued for the purpose of Court fee or not, only the
Kumar Seth vs. Pawan Kumar Seth & Ors. 124 (2005) DLT
305:
(V.K. JAIN)
JUDGE
MARCH 04, 2011
bg