Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conquest and Fusion. The Social Evolution of Cairo, A.D. 642-1850
Conquest and Fusion. The Social Evolution of Cairo, A.D. 642-1850
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East
Journal
This content downloaded from 137.99.31.134 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:28:19 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
BOOK REVIEWS 359
that no spokesman for the Zionist or Israeli point The book focuses chiefly on the social class
of view was present: the conferees agreed that system of Cairo from the founding of al-Fustat in
this should be remedied at any future meeting 642 to the early Muhammad 'Ali period (handled
of this kind. all too sketchily). The subtitle would have been
more accurate if the terminal date had been
A EVAN M. WILSON, former US Consul General in
Jerusalem, is the author of Jerusalem: Key to Peace given as 1800 or 1811, instead of 1850. As it
(Washington: Middle East Institute, 1970). stands, the crucial issues of economic change
under Muhammad 'All, the important influences
upon the city of IbrThim Pasha (unaccountably
never mentioned) and the long term effects
that Egypt's absorption into the European domi-
EGYPT
nated world system had upon realignments in
Cairo's class structure are essentially ignored in
CONQUEST AND FUSION: THE SOCIAL EVOLU-
this work.
TION OF CAIRO, A.D. 642-1850, by Susan
The ability of the author to tease out class
Jane Staffa. Leiden, Brill: 1977. 449 pages.
structure and social organization at various points
Illus. Maps. No price indicated.
in the city's development is obviously contingent
not only upon her own research, which is careful
Reviewed by Janet L. Abu-Lughod
and extensive. It relies as well upon her cautious
Conquest and Fusion is a fundamental and and sensible interpretations, upon the nature of
excellent addition to the growing literature on the available sources and upon the vast variation
Cairo, a city which continues to inspire sufficient in the latter which accounts for so much of the
affection and fascination to sustain authors uneven success of the narrative. Part I (Chs.
through long and challenging years of labor. 1-4) covers the pre-Ayyiubid period. Here the
No information is given on the background of classical Arabic sources have been thoroughly
the book or its author, but it appears to be a doc- mined and often used in imaginative ways. Even
toral dissertation of remarkable quality and am- so, by their nature they are not full enough to
bitious scope. The research was undertaken dur- allow much reinterpretation. The recent publica-
ing eight years of residence in Egypt. The tions of Goitein have enabled her to expand
work was apparently substantially completed in considerably coverage of the "middle" period of
the early 1970s, although a few chapters on Cairene history from Ayyiubid to late Mamluk
the Turkish period were revised (or added) to times. Nonetheless, Ms. Staffa accepts too un-
incorporate Andre Raymond's detailed scholar- critically both the general framework offered by
ship on the economy of eighteenth century Lapidus (which was based upon far less data than
Cairo, published in 1974. There is no evidence hers) and the accuracy of Goitein's interpreta-
that this reviewer's work on Cairo, written by tion of the Geniza papers.
1967 but not in print until 1971, was available By far the most innovative and valuable por-
when Ms. Staffa undertook her research. It tion of the book is Part III, Chs. 13-17,
is, therefore, quite possible that many of the which deals with the Turkish period. Ms. Staffa
parallels in format (and even in extracted quota- covers ground therein which was previously
tions) are attributable to our mutual dependence impossible for many researchers to explore.
upon common sources. Although the field can All prior histories of Cairo have treated this
easily absorb many books, each written from a period as a lacuna of stagnation and decline.
somewhat different vantage point and with a That they did so can be attributed in part to the
different goal, it is always a pity when systematic inadvertent impression that modernism burst full
aggregation is lost. I, for one, would have blown upon a moribund structure to which there
benefitted immeasurably from her careful scholar- were only tenuous links. Thanks to the incredibly
ship and regret that some of the items I detailed and methodical scholarship of Andre
struggled with and finally resolved could not have Raymond on economic life in Cairo in the
assisted her, e.g. the confusion over the term eighteenth century, it is now possible to begin
"Misr" which arises on pp. 52-53. to evaluate this period. Because of the paucity
This content downloaded from 137.99.31.134 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:28:19 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
360 THE MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL
This content downloaded from 137.99.31.134 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:28:19 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms