Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module Sed Prof 222
Module Sed Prof 222
MODULE 2
PREPARED BY:
DOMINGO MAY ROSE P.
GARCIA ABEGAIL D.
GUYA REYMOND G.
Module 2 Process-oriented Performance Based
Assessment
Objectives:
Learning entails not only what students know but what they can do
with what they know.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Provides opportunity for formative assessment Inconsistent students’ performance across time
may result in accurate conclusions
More , engaging active involvement of students Difficult to plan for amount of time needed
LEARNING COMPETENCIES
Competencies are defined as groups or clusters of skills and abilities
needed for a particular task.
Example
Specifically:
3. Maintain eye contact with the audience while reciting the poem;
REFERENCES
https://www.slideshare.net/Dianopesidas/process-and-product-
performancebased-assessment
https://www.slideshare.net/renarch/process-oriented-
performancebased-assessment-17091526
2.2 TASK DESIGNING
Objectives
TASK DESIGN
It is manner of how a task plan and its workflow are organized. In other words,
the meaning actually stands for how profoundly a task’s plan is projected. The
better task design, the less administrative questions and problems may appear
during the work.
FOR EXAMPLE:
Bring the students to a pond or creek, ask them to find all living organism they
can find living near the pond. Also, bring them to the school playground to find as
many living organisms they can. Observe how the students will develop a system
for finding such organism, classifying the organism and concluding the
differences in biological diversity of the two sites.
The design of the task depends on what the teacher desires to observe as outputs of
the students.
1. COMPLEXITY- It should be within the range of the ability of the students.
2. APPEAL- the project should be appealing to students and should lead to self-
discovery of information by the students.
3. CREATIVITY- it needs to encourage students to exercise creativity and
divergent thinking.
4. GOAL-BASED- the project is produced to attain a learning objective. Thus,
reinforcing learning.
Example;
Paper folding is a traditional Japanese art. However, it can be used as an activity to teach the
concept of plane and solid figures in geometry. Provide the students with a given number of
colored papers and ask them to construct as many plane and solid figures from these papers
without cutting them ( by paper folding only.)
REFERENCES
https://prezi.com/w1a7ijlrvao6/process-oriented-performance-based-assessment
Scoring rubrics • - are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by the teachers or
other evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or process of students’ efforts. • - are
typically employed when a judgment of quality is required and maybe used to evaluate a
broad range of projects activities. 3.3 scoring rubrics
Criteria Setting • The criteria for a scoring rubrics are statements which identify “what
really counts” in the final output.
Major criteria for product assessment” • Quality • Creativity • Comprehensiveness •
Accuracy • Aesthetics
Sub statements
Topic: Three hundred years of Spanish rule in the Philippines • Interrelates the
chronological events in an interesting manner. • Identifies the key players in each period of
the Spanish rule and the roles that they played. • Succeeds in relating the history of Philippine
Spanish rule.
3.3 scoring rubrics
When are the scoring rubrics an appropriate evaluation technique? • - Grading essays is
just one example of performances that may be evaluated using scoring rubrics.
Scoring rubrics may be used: • Evaluate group activities • Extend projects and oral
presentations
Authentic assessment • Checklist may be used rather than scoring rubrics in the evaluation of
essays.
Checklist • Enumerate a set of desirable characteristics which are actually observed.
Scoring rubrics • Based on descriptive scales and support the evaluation of the extent to
which criteria have met. • “purpose of assessment”
Benefits of scoring rubrics in the evaluation process
Support the examination of the extent to which the specified criteria have been reached. • 2.
Provide feedback to students concerning how to improve their performances. 3.3 scoring
rubrics
2/2
1. The identification of the qualities and attributes that the teacher wishes to
observe in the students’ outputs that would demonstrate their level of
proficiency.
2. Determined whether holistic or an analytical rubric would be more
appropriate
3. The identification and definition of the criteria for lowest level of
performance. Process of development scoring rubrics
A note of caution: • It is suggested that each score category should be defined using
descriptors of the work rather than value-judgment about the work (Brookhart, 1999) • For
example,” student’s sentences contain no errors in subject-verb agreements,” is preferable
over, “student’s sentences are good”.
References:
https://www.net/denisevalino/assessment-of-student-learning-2-rubrics