THE URGENCY

THE HISTORY Only half of the world’s The proportion of the Spatial urbanization
GLOBAL
SCALE ISSUES
urban population have urban population occurred at a much

OF SDGS convenient access to

public transportation
living in slums
worldwide increased
faster rate than
population growth

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable

The exerting pressure on fresh water
Development is a shared blueprint
for peace and prosperity for people
and the planet, now and into the
GOAL 11 : MAKE CITIES AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS
INCLUSIVE, SAFE, RESILIENT AND SUSTAINABLE
supplies, sewage, the
environment, and public health.
living

The expansion of urban land that is

TARGETS
1 Housing and Slums 5 Disaster Reduction 8 Public Spaces
future. Sustainable Development outpacing urban population growth
2 Sustainable Transport 6 Sustainable Transport A Rural-Urbal Regional Planning
Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent The increasing of annual waste
call for action by all countries - 3 Sustainable Urbanization B Mitigation of Climate Change Output
7
Air Quality and generation by 70% from 2016 levels to
4 Waste Management C LDCs Support-Buildings
developed and developing - in a Cultural Heritage Process 3.40 billion tonnes in 2050. over 90%
global partnership. The Sustainable of waste is often disposed in
Development Goals were set up in unregulated dumps or burned.
The increasing of exposure to natural
11.3.1
Ratio of land Proportion of cities with a direct participation structure
2015, by the United Nations General
Assembly. In the 2030, Agenda or
consumption rate to
population growth rate 11.3.2 of civil society in urban planning and management that
operate regularly and democratically hazards, especially in coastal zones
what is known as Agenda 2030. The current trend on incorporating
citizens into the decision - making
process of urban planning, or usually
called as “participatory planning”
11.3 SUSTAINABLE Sustainable Urbanization (Urbanism) is a practice
URBANIZATION that focuses on promoting their long term viability
by reducing consumption, waste and harmful
By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable
urbanization and capacity for participatory, impacts on people and place while enhancing the
integrated and sustainable human settlement
planning and management in all countries
overall well-being of both people and place.
NATIONAL
Priorities of residents of slums or informal communities regarding sustainable urbanization value: SCALE ISSUES
ECONOMIC VALUE ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SOCIAL VALUE
Security of land tenure and other assets Protection from natural disaster Access to amenities
Representation in decision-making Almost half of Indonesia's population
Recognition of informal economy Participate in proactive planning
for land tenure and upgrading lives in cities.
Population growth in cities from
urbanization is a future challenge for

Sustainable
Sustainable Development
Development Goals
Goals 11.3
11.3
Indonesia.
Livable, smart and sustainable cities

SUSTAINABLE
The SDGs are a continuation and are the 3 pillars from KSPPN
expansion of the Millennium Indonesia's informal urban
Development Goals (MDGs) that settlements are mostly concentrated
have been carried out by countries around rivers.

URBANIZATION
since 2001 until the end of 2015. Urbanization contributes to an
economic increase of 74% for cities,
but also has negative impacts.
From the various programs aiming to
enhance participatory planning,
there is still lack of effectiveness

A
AGGO
ORRA
ANNIIA
A G
GRRO
OUUP
P
 AGORANIA GROUP

STUDY CASE
on Participatory Planning in Informal Settlement
of Lebak Siliwangi, Bandung, Indonesia and Sucat, Muntinlupa City, Philippines

W h y P a rticip a tor y P l a n n i n g ? Reasons on Focusing on

Participatory planning is directly related to SDGs 11.3.2 Indicator. Informal Settlement

Cities are able to combine sustainability and shared prosperity
through effective urban governance and a strong participation of Although commonly perceived as a burden
civil society in it's affairs. Applying people participation in urban on society, a source of problems and
planning is possible when the system allows to use public opinion endless needs, informal areas house a big
and be organized in such a way that enables people's involvement portion of the urban population worldwide
in the planning process as the centre of decision-making. That

"
can be done in many ways, but the end result should be the same:
Living in informal settlements leads to the
the community feels ownership over the process and the results. exposure and vulnerability to
It is designed to harness the deep knowledge and commitment of environmental hazards to people and the
it's residents to positively and productively improve their land which they occupy. Informal
communities. settlements are characterized by a lack of
basic services, pollution, overcrowding and
poor waste management. (Msimang, Z.,
The population’s involvement and participation is
2017)
a decisive factor for the success of the
Sustainable Urban Planning Process.

Why Lebak Siliwangi?
Sucat, Muntinlupa
One of the most populous sub district (kelurahan), in Bandung,
situated in the central district of West Java Province.
Has the majority of its community living in informal settlements
yet the local government doesn't include them as one of the
slum areas in the slum area decree, resulting in them not being
able to receive the KOTAKU Program, participatory planning that
helps communities in slum areas achieving a better quality of life.
Due to its closeness to ITB, one of the universities in Bandung,
Lebak Siliwangi is exposed to many information and assistance
that are helping them to be conscious of upgrading their quality
of life because many of its students do their research and hold
programs there.
Has a lot of active community organization
"
Sucat has one of the highest proportions of Informal settlement
City, Philippines families (ISFs) of all the Barangays in Muntinlupa City.
One of the pilot neighborhoods for the World Bank-supported
Citywide Community Upgrading Strategy (CCUS), formerly known as
the Citywide Development Approach program (CDA). CCUS is an
inclusive process that tries to improve informal settlements and make
them more proactive in future disaster risk reduction.
Almost 600 ISFs living in danger zones with approximately half
clustered around the Laguna de Bay lakeshore; there is an urgent
need for sustainable solutions.
Lebak Siliwangi, Sucat shares multiple characteristics with Lebak Silliwangi such as
Bandung, Indonesia
being an urban area with a high population density and a high
number of informal settlers. Furthermore, both areas are flood-prone
due to their proximity to waterways and, in the case of Sucat, a
lakeshore.

 Economic Characteristic Environmental Characteristic

Participatory Planning in No local market and grocery store in the community can reduce Most of the residents live on the banks of the Cikapundung River

Lebak Siliwangi,
local economic income
Most people's income in Lebak Siliwangi is in the range below the
average, which is below 4 million rupiah / below the minimum wage
1 out of 4 house in Lebak Siliwangi don't have Land Certificate.
Public space is too small, causing a limited social environment and
street access become alternative public space
Low Resilience regarding natural hazards ; The zig-zag route and lack
of open spaces existing are considered hazardous for evacuation.

Bandung City.
Social Characteristic
direct, regular, and democratic structure for civil society participation in :

URBAN DESIGNING AND PLANNING URBAN BUDGET DECISION MAKING URBAN MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
Reflection on no structure that facilitate civil
the 11.3.2 Indicator : there's a governement
development planning disucssion society to participate in
system involving stakeholders
Participatory from the community called :

MUSRENBANG
but there's a
PIPPK Program
that gives every RW 100 million
no structure that facilitate civil
society to participate in

Planning rupiah annually for them

making innovation

STRUCTURE PROMOTE the structure existing in Lebak Siliwangi already promote

PARTICIPATION OF participation of marginalized group such as women in PKK and
MARGINALIZED GROUPS? also younger generation in Karang Taruna.

COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS GOVERNMENT'S PARTICIPATORY PROGRAMS

Really adaptive with innovation
Exist a lot of community organization PIPPK Kang-Pisman

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS The Regional Development and Empowerment

Kang Pisman is a socializing
Innovation Program, or PIPPK, is the Regional
Empowerment Program which includes movement for efforts to reduce,
activities for empowering the RW,PKK, Youth sort, and make waste have
Population : 3.977 | Area : 100 Ha Organizations, and LPM scope by giving 100 economic value that involving
Million rupiah for each organization every year communities in training and
to develop their area. seminar

Reflection on the 11.3.1 Indicator : COMMUNITY PROGRAMS

LEVEL OF
Sustainable The community of Lebak Siliwangi through
many community organization has a lot of
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS EVALUATION

Urbanization Ratio program and activites to upgrading their

quality of life. A lot of these organization
Manipulation Placation
Focus too much on developing only
the infrastructure
activity is actually funded by the

Program doesn't solve the land
The population of government such as Karang Taruna, RW, etc. Therapy Partnership tenure security issues most of the
Lebak Siliwangi has Lebak Siliwangi community face

been decreasing The Organization came up with the

since the last three Informing Delegation design solution/ spending without
years following the

any asisstance from the government
decreasing of the PIPPK only involving the same
urbanization ratio Consultation Citizen Control
organization in every village
itself.

source : twitter.com/karangtarunalbs
Institutions related to community empowerment in Lebak
Siliwangi Village, namely, PKK Family Empowerment and
AGORANIA GROUP
Welfare, LPM Community Empowerment Institution,
Water User Farmers Association P3A MITRA CAI,
 AGORANIA GROUP

Environmental Economic Characteristic

Characteristic
High potential for natural disasters from Laguna
de Bay, and the problem of environmental damage
due to poor socio-economic relations in the
Sucat has the potential for both informal and formal economic growth that needs to be better Participatory Planning in
Sucat, Muntinlupa,
integrated to support the economic activities of the people in Muntinlupa, by creating a business
community and improving economic infrastructure.
UNS
KI
L RMAL
E FO

LE
C
10%

Philippines.

VI
30%

DL
SER
community.

ABOR
It is necessary to provide ecological education 30% SOURCE OF
EMPLOYMENT
related to economic and social in order to INCOME
encourage community anticipation of flood hazard
34%
mitigation, preservation of hydrological conditions, RE 80%
and improvement of new life.
AGR
IC ULT
U AL
IN F O R M
Small Open space that does not have a disaster
safe zone and infrastructure are prone to natural
disasters
Social Characteristic

“With climate change, this place

“IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD, PEOPLE ARE OPEN, KNOW EACH OTHER, AND

is going to be like waterworld.” INTERACT ON A DAILY BASIS. WE ARE NOT DIVIDED BY WALLS LIKE IN
- Jason, IT engineer living in Sucat -
THE GATED SUBDIVISIONS.”
- VIC, THE BARANGAY ADMINSTRATOR IN SUCAT

Sucat's Participatory Planning Program:

Citywide Community Upgrading Strategy The Benefits?

Stronger trust and better communication
between communities and local government.

What? The mapping process can be changed to

account for the dissimilarities between different
informal settlements.
A participative neighborhood planning initiative that brings multiple Stakeholders share and validate information or
stakeholders together to gather data and create maps about informal
settlements and slum areas.
reflect on experiences encountered and lessons Population : 63,354 | Area : 262.3 Ha
learned, gradually developing trust among
themselves that may lead, better plans for the

Why? Help communities identify their priorities around development options.

city.
The mapping can help enhance the city's DRRM
plan since the collectively gathered information
Reflection on the 11.3.1 Indicator :
No person or group knows or understands the situation of low-income
households better than the communities themselves.
can lead to developing more proactive ways to
deal with disasters Sustainable
The local government and development agencies involved recognize
that the participation of local actors, especially communities, means Urbanization Ratio
having an internally driven mapping process that is more likely to yield
concrete data and assessments. Issues? The population of
Sucat has been
slightly decreasing
Who is Facilitating CUSS? Some of the ISFs were sceptical and hesitant to
participate as they feared that the process
since the last five
Civil society groups (both membership-based years following the
would lead to eviction or thought that it would
organizations and support NGOs) decreasing of the
not bring any improvements to the area urbanization ratio
Muntinlupa Development Foundation (MDF), Urban The community does not possess direct political itself.
Poor Alliance Muntinlupa and Bukluran power
HPFPI, TAMPEI
 AGORANIA GROUP

Our Views on Design Initiatives/ Solutions

SDG 11.3 Indicators on Participatory Planning Issues

ISSUES ON EACH CASE STUDY

From both study cases, it can be determined
High risk of flooding Low land tenure security and upgrading
that both indicators are already in stages of Low planning participation Low planning participation
implementation such as participatory planning Low trust in government Needs of assistance in PIPPK design planning

Sucat Lebak Siliwangi

from 11.3.2 and 11.3.1 in terms of rate of land Uncoordinated communities Lack of Green Public Space
efficiency, however, the effectiveness of both
indicators especially in urban slum areas still
needs to be evaluated and considered for a
more comprehensive planning process. Our design solution is focused on optimizing the current programs
conducted in each of the case study by adhering these four points.
We advocate for the creation of an indicator
that monitors the power-geometry in
current program : CCUS current program : PIPPK
participatory planning initiatives in informal
settlements and slum areas using Arnstein's
ladder of citizen participation to assess the gap A wide variety of ENSURE THE The only
stakeholders are stakeholders we all Build and assess new long-term
between the desired level and the actual level planning team including every
Build and assess new long-term
planning team including every
involved: researchers, INVOLVEMENT sure are involved is
PKK, RW, Karang stakeholder representatives
of participation. We also advocate for the stakeholder representatives
local government,ISFs,
OF THE WHOLE Taruna, and LPM.
NGOs, and civil society
creation of indicator that assess the groups All of them are
COMMUNITY organization
inclusiveness of the planning process, not only created by the Introduce tactical urbanism as
government. one of the solution
assess whether the structure is promoting
Provide and ensure there are
inclusiveness but whether the actual Assure that those that are Validation assistants who facilitate the
process provide input
implementation is actually involved by majority participating in the process are
representative of the whole
workshops and

of the community. community and its problems

planning activities
are held for the
PREPARE THE Community do all
the discussion, Making a handbook or even
communities and problem searching training for the community to
they are asked to COMMUNITY and solution make sure they are capable on
diagnosing and solving problem
help with drawing designing
Manipulation
Introduce tactical urbanism as
maps during TO BE ABLE TO themself without a
one of the solution
general DESIGN PLANS planned system/ Introduce focus group discussion
assemblies method method to help them creating a
Therapy as the basis of potential and
issue of the area, to enhance
inclusive and representative
environment
inclusive and the use of space
online is considered a viable
Informing Muntinlupa option due to the pandemic
Improve communication Development
Foundation (MDF),
COLLABORATE situation with the request
between different institutions Even though theres
Consultation involved to share know-how and Urban Poor Alliance WITH EXPERTS numorous program Collaborating with NGOs,
delegate tasks more efficiently Muntinlupa and held by ITB in Lebak Institutions, and government to
Bukluran are some ALSO INSTITUTIONS Siliwangi, PIPPK have extra technical and financial
Placation of the different Program never support, and also professional/
institutions involved. TO FACILITATE involve any other expert's perspective on the solution
Government should try to institution.
Partnership mitigate the distrust there is Government should provide the
towards it as a result of traditional infrasturcture upgrading program
top-down approaches in informal Barangay so that PIPPK (or any other
Delegation settlements to improve government participatory planning program) can
communication and cooperation (neighborhood level) SET UP A The government
focus on developing its men power
and city government and optimizing its potential.
Citizen Control Government should make the are involved and SUPPORTING program's
outcome isn't
power-geometry in future have come into
really impactful Government shouldn't really focus
participatory planning contact with
mapped
GOVERNMENT and there's on the amount of spending but
programs more balanced by rather focus on the outcome of
giving more power to the
communities in the decision-
communities
because of CCUS SYSTEM every spending. Big spending
doesn't necessarily mean big impact
making process and changes.
 Bibliography
Ayson, D. et al. 2017. COMMUNITY-LED, CITYWIDE SETTLEMENT PROFILING AND UPGRADING AS Afzalan, N. and Muller, B., 2018. Online Participatory Technologies: Opportunities and
EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO LAND GOVERNANCE: THE CASE OF MUNTINLUPA CITY, Challenges for Enriching Participatory Planning. Journal of the American Planning
PHILIPPINES. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319090544_COMMUNITY- Association, 84(2), pp.162-177.
LED_CITYWIDE_SETTLEMENT_PROFILING_AND_UPGRADING_AS_EVIDENCE- Aspen, D. and Amundsen, A., 2021. Developing a Participatory Planning Support System for
BASED_APPROACH_TO_LAND_GOVERNANCE_THE_CASE_OF_MUNTINLUPA_CITY_PHILIPPINES Sustainable Regional Planning—A Problem Structuring Case Study. Sustainability, 13(10),
accessed on 27/08/2021 p.5723.
BAPPENAS RI. 2013. Proyeksi penduduk indonesia. Szetey, K., Moallemi, E., Ashton, E., Butcher, M., Sprunt, B. and Bryan, B., 2021. Participatory
https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/5413/9148/4109/Proyeksi_Penduduk_Indonesia_2010-2035.pdf planning for local sustainability guided by the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecology and

accessed on 26/08/2021 Society, 26(3).

Kementrian PUPR. 2017. Buku pengantar agenda baru perkotaan. UN Habitat 2020. World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization
https://bpiw.pu.go.id/uploads/publication/attachment/Panduan%20Praktis%20Implementasi%20 https://issuu.com/dennismaranga/docs/wcr_2020_report
Agenda%20Baru%20Perkotaan%20New%20Urban%20Agenda%20- Boston.gov. 2021. Tactical Public Realm. [online] Available at:
%20Pengantar%20Agenda%20Baru%20Perkotaan.pdf accessed on 25/08/2021 <https://www.boston.gov/transportation/tactical-public-realm> [Accessed 11 September
BI. 2017. Publikasi Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia. 2021].
https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/Documents/4_LPI2017_BAB2.pdf. Accessed on Steuteville, R., 2021. Tactical Urbanism comes of age. [online] CNU. Available at:
26/08/2021 <https://www.cnu.org/publicsquare/2021/06/23/tactical-urbanism-comes-age> [Accessed 11
Hamidah N., dkk. 2017. Analisis Kampung Pahandut Sebagai Permukiman Tepian Sungai September 2021].
Berkelanjutan. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/1214/pdf. Accessed on Roux, Jan-Hendrik & Cilliers, Elizelle., 2014. The participatory planning paradigm shift:
25/08/2021 Comparing disciplines and methods.
Harahap F.R., 2013. DAMPAK URBANISASI BAGI PERKEMBANGAN KOTA DI INDONESIA. Gwaleba, Method & Masum, Fahria., 2018. Participation of Informal Settlers in Participatory
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/130628-ID-dampak-urbanisasi-bagi-perkembangan- Land Use Planning Project in Pursuit of Tenure Security. Urban Forum. 29. 10.1007/s12132-
kota.pdf. Accessed on 25/08/2021 018-9330-y.
Un Habitat. March 2019. SDG Metadata Indicator. Mauludy, M., 2021. Dana Rp 100 Juta per Kelurahan Tak Sesuai Kebutuhan - Pikiran-
Msimang, Z. 2017. A Study of the Negative Impacts of Informal Settlements on the Environment. A Rakyat.com. [online] Pikiran-Rakyat.com. Available at: <https://www.pikiran-
Case Study of Jika Joe, Pietermaritzburg. rakyat.com/bandung-raya/pr-01308090/dana-rp-100-juta-per-kelurahan-tak-sesuai-
https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10413/16293/Msimang_Ziningi_2017.pdf? kebutuhan> [Accessed 11 September 2021].
sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Dikayuana, D., Sulastri, S. and Fedryansyah, M., 2020. Community Practice Melalui Program
MIT DUSP. 2015. Muntinlupa Matters: Addressing Informality in Metro Manila. Inovasi Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Kewilayahaan (PIPPK) di Kota Bandung. Share :
https://issuu.com/mit-dusp/docs/2017-06-11_book_muntinlupa_matters_ accessed on 27/08/2021 Social Work Journal, 9(2), p.142.
Philatlas.com. 2021. Sucat, Muntinlupa Profile – PhilAtlas. [online] Available at: UN (United Nations) Habitat (undated) Participatory Slum Upgrading Programme.
<https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/ncr/muntinlupa/sucat.html> [Accessed 11 September 2021]. http://unhabitat.org/urban-initiatives/initiatives-programmes/ participatory-slum-
Zanudin, K., et al. 2019. Limitations on Community Participation in Planning Decision-making in upgrading/.
Peninsular Malaysia: A Review of Recent Studies. Septiadi, M. and Alia, S., 2020. Analisis Perbedaan Penyerapan Anggaran Program
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/irspsd/7/4/7_131/_pdf/-char/en accessed on 27/08/2021 Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Kewilayahan di Kota Bandung. Inovasi, 17(2), pp.203-217.

AGORANIA GROUP
CONTRIBUTION
PAGE 1 : SUSTAINABLE URBANIZATION NAURADINKA ASTRID ALIFIA
Designing and Layouting the whole page
TASK 2 SAPPD SUMMERCAMP
Researching and Adding the Global Scale Issues Section
Researching and Adding the Middle Part (Urgency, Target, Indicator, AGORANIA GROUP
Definition, and Value of Sustainable Urbanization)
Adding the MDG to SDG Section
PAGE 2 : Study Case Justification
Designing and Layouting the whole page
Researching and Adding the Why Participatory Planning Section
Researching and Adding the Why Focus on Informal Settlement Section
Researching and Adding the Why Lebak Siliwangi Section
PAGE 3 : Case Study 1 ; Lebak Siliwangi
Designing and Layouting the whole page
Researching and Adding the Whole Page except the environment value
section
PAGE 4 :
Designing and Layouting the whole page
Researching and Adding the Reflection on SDG 11.3.1 and map
PAGE 5 :
Designing and Layouting the whole page
Researching and Adding The 4 main point of solutions and also the
breakdown of solution on Lebak Siliwangi Part (Right Side)
Researching and Adding the sum up of Lebak Siliwangi's Issue
Adding indicator recommendation regarding : indicator that assess the
inclusiveness of the planning process,
PAGE 6 :
Adding all the references on the right side
AGORANIA GROUP