PROPOSAL PENELITIAN

CRITICAL APPRAISAL JBI

OLEH :

KOMANG MANIASIH

NIM.18089014033

SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN BULELENG PRODI S1 ILMU KEPERAWATAN

2021
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

Jurnal 1 : Peningkatan Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial Pada Anak Autis Melalui

Terapi Bermain Assosiatif

Auther : siska Iskandar, Indaryani

Year : 2021

Date : 24 September 2021

Yes No Unclear Not

applicable
1. Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and
what is the ‘effect’ (i.e. there is no confusion  □ □ □
about which variable comes first)?
2. Were the participants included in any
 □ □ □
comparisons similar?
3. Were the participants included in any
comparisons receiving similar treatment/care,
 □ □ □
other than the exposure or intervention of
interest?
4. Was there a control group?  □ □ □
5. Were there multiple measurements of the
outcome both pre and post the  □ □ □
intervention/exposure?
6. Was follow up complete and if not, were
differences between groups in terms of their  □ □ □
follow up adequately described and analyzed?
7. Were the outcomes of participants included in
 □ □ □
any comparisons measured in the same way?

8. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?  □ □ □

9. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?  □ □ □

 Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info

□

Comments (Including reason for exclusion)

Desain penelitian ini sudah baik

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Judul Jurnal : Efetivitas Terapi Bermain assosiatif Terhadap Kemampuan Motorik Pada Anak
Autis

Auther : siska Iskandar,Indaryani

Year : 2019

Date : 24 September 2021

Yes No Unclear Not

applicable
10. Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and
what is the ‘effect’ (i.e. there is no confusion  □ □ □
about which variable comes first)?
11. Were the participants included in any
 □ □ □
comparisons similar?
12. Were the participants included in any
comparisons receiving similar treatment/care,
 □ □ □
other than the exposure or intervention of
interest?
13. Was there a control group?  □ □ □
14. Were there multiple measurements of the
outcome both pre and post the  □ □ □
intervention/exposure?
15. Was follow up complete and if not, were
differences between groups in terms of their  □ □ □
follow up adequately described and analyzed?
16. Were the outcomes of participants included in
 □ □ □
any comparisons measured in the same way?

17. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?  □ □ □

18. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?  □ □ □

Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □

Comments (Including reason for exclusion)

Desain Jurnal sudah Bagus
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Judul Jurnal : Peningkatan Interaksi Sosial Melalui Puppet Show Theater Pada Anak Autism
Spectrum Disorders di Kota Batam

Auther : Utari Christya Wardhani, Sri Muharni, Rizki Sari Utami Muchtar

Year : 2018

Date : 24 September 2021

Yes No Unclear Not

applicable
19. Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and
what is the ‘effect’ (i.e. there is no confusion  □ □ □
about which variable comes first)?
20. Were the participants included in any
 □ □ □
comparisons similar?
21. Were the participants included in any
comparisons receiving similar treatment/care,
 □ □ □
other than the exposure or intervention of
interest?
22. Was there a control group?  □ □
23. Were there multiple measurements of the 

outcome both pre and post the  □ □ □

intervention/exposure?
24. Was follow up complete and if not, were
differences between groups in terms of their  □ □ □
follow up adequately described and analyzed?
25. Were the outcomes of participants included in
 □ □ □
any comparisons measured in the same way?

26. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?  □ □ □

27. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?  □ □ □

Overall appraisal: Include  Exclude □ Seek further info □

Comments (Including reason for exclusion)

Desain yang digunakan sudah tepat .
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________