Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Questionnaire: Validation of Competency - Based Curriculum (CBC) On
Questionnaire: Validation of Competency - Based Curriculum (CBC) On
VALIDATION OF
COMPETENCY –BASED CURRICULUM (CBC) ON:
___________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
The Curriculum and Training Aids Development Division (CTADD) under the National Institute for
Technical Education and Skills Development(NITESD) one of the executive offices of the Technical
Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) is undertaking this process to ensure that the
Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) meet the requirements specified in the Training
Regulations/Competency Standards for various trades/ occupations of different industry sectors.
With your knowledge and experience on this trade, you have been selected as one of the
respondents in this validation. Your comments and recommendations shall be considered in the
finalization of this material.
Thank you.
NAME:
Last First M.I
COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NOTE:
Study the content of the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) you are about to evaluate. Each
CBC has two main components; namely
Component 1 Course Design
Component 2 Module of Instructions
Component 3 Attached Documents of CBC
Component 4 Overall impression/comments on CBC
Should you have comments on any of the entries on components in the CBC, please
indicate them on the spaces provided in this instrument.
Please use additional sheets when necessary.
[Note: As an alternative of accomplishing this validation questionnaire, the expert may choose to make
marginal notes or comments on the CBC itself, or formally state his/her comments on the CBC during
the deliberations. These should be noted in the minutes of the validation workshop/meetings]
START HERE
COMPONENT 1- COURSE DESIGN
2. Are all the unit of competencies listed in the TR/ CS have corresponding
modules?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate the competency/ies that should have
included.
YES NO
6. Is the Training Duration for Supervised Industry Learning (SIL) of the Course
sufficient to cover the critical competencies of this qualification?
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
1. Are the Module Title/s stated in an action statements and related to the unit of
Competency/ies specified in the TR/CS?
YES NO
2. Does the Module description clearly define the knowledge and skills requirements
and the coverage of the module?
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
5. Are the Assessment Criteria on each Learning Outcome sufficient to ensure the
achievement of knowledge, skills an attitude of the learner?
YES NO
YES NO
9. Does the Contents address the required knowledge of the unit of competency?
YES NO
10. Are the resources (condition) consistent/sufficient to support the activities in each
Learning Outcome?
YES NO
13. Are the Teaching strategies (methodologies) sufficient to support mastery of three
domains (knowledge, skills and attitude)?
YES NO
14. Are the Assessment strategies (methodologies) appropriate for the activities?
YES NO
2. Is the Contextual Learning Matrix (CLM) complete for all modules of core
competencies of the course?
YES NO
3. Is the Curriculum Plan pertaining to STEM approach available for the course?
YES NO
After having gone over the draft Competency-Based Curriculum of this course
carefully, what is your overall rating as to its acceptability and validity based on the
scale below: Please check one number only.
(5 – Acceptable 0 – Unacceptable)
5 4 3 2 1 0