Table 1.

Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Year Level

Year Level Frequency Percentage

Gender Frequency Percentage
1st year 107 36.39%
S-Male
2nd year 9237 31.29% 12.59
S-Female
3rd year 95232 32.31% 78.91
Gay4th year 02 0.68
LesbianTotal n=294 1 100% 0.34
Queer 6 2.04
Bisexual 15 5.10
Transgender 1 0.34
Total n=294 100

Table 2. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Block

Block Frequency Percentage

Elgen A 66 22.45%
Elgen B 76 25.85%
Elgen C 72 24.49%
Elgen D 80 27.21%
Total n=294 100%
Table 3. Frequency and
Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Gender
Table 4. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Ethnicity

Ethnicity Frequency Percentage

Ilonggo 54 18.37%
Tagalog 3 1.02%
Ilocano 13 4.42%
Cebuano 115 39.12%
B'laan 27 9.18%
T'boli 11 3.74%
Maguindanaon 46 15.65%
Maranao 11 3.74%
Tausog 5 1.70%
Tagakaulo 6 2.04%
Boholano 1 0.34%
Bagobo 1 0.34%
Manobo 1 0.34%
Total n=294 100%
Table 5. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Province of Residency

Province Frequency Percentage

General Santos City 129 43.88%
South Cotabato 88 29.93%
Sultan Kudarat 20 6.80%
Sarangani 46 15.65%
Maguindanao 5 1.70%
Jose Abad Santos 1 0.34%
Davao del Sur 2 0.68%
Lanao del Sur 1 0.34%
North Cotabato 1 0.34%
Davao Occidental 1 0.34%
Total n=294 100%
Table 6. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Remembering

Frequenc
Indicators Indicators y MeanFrequency Mean
InterpretationInterpretation
a. Explains ideas, concepts, and
a. Recalls content and details. 971 3.30
principles 1117 3.80
b. Identifies classification, principles,
b. Contextualizes ideas, concepts and
methodologies, and theories. 957 3.26
principles 1095 3.72
c. Demonstrates awareness. 1142 3.88
c. Restates main ideas, concepts and principles. 1091 3.71
d. Anticipates consequences 1083 3.68
Grand Mean 3.77
Grand Mean 3.42

Table 7. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Understanding

Table 8. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Applying

Indicators
Indicators Frequency Mean
Frequency Interpretation
Mean Interpretation
a.a.Draws conclusion.
Applies knowledge. 1142 3.88
1135 3.86
b.b.Distinguishes information.
Seeks alternative solutions. 1201 4.09
1177 4.00
c.c. Applies
Breaksprocedures.
down theories, 1131 3.85
formulas, or arguments.
Grand Mean 1068 3.63 3.90
d. Demonstrates awareness. 1161 3.95
Grand Mean 3.89

Table 9. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Analyzing

Table 10. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Evaluating

Indicators
Indicators Frequency
Total Mean
Mean Interpretation
Interpretation
a.a.Draws
Assessing reliability and
generalizations. 1144 3.89
b.comprehensive.
Generates new ideas 1134
1132 3.86
3.85
c.b.Integrates relevant
Determines knowledge
effectiveness 1118 3.80
Grand Mean 3.85
and appropriateness. 1109 3.77
c. Demonstrates ability to
assess. 1118 3.80
Grand Mean 3.81

Table 11. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of ……?
Table 12. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Self-Assessment

Rating Description Frequency Percentage

1 Not Applicable 0 0.00%
2 Not Evident 3 1.02%
Identify major weaknesses and
3 strengths with assistance 60 20.41%
I synthesize feedback form
instruction and integrate with self-
4 assessment 129 43.88%
I utilize self-assessment and other
5 feedback 102 34.69%
Total 294 100%
Suggestions ko ding for interpretation sa table 6 to 11..

Rating Scale Range Description Interpretation

1 1.00-1.80
2 1.81-2.60
3 2.61-3.40
4 3.41-4.20
5 4.21-5.00