Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lit Review Chapter Kab
Lit Review Chapter Kab
Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
In this literature review, I will review the theoretical and empirical aspects of the literature on the
Eat Out to Help Out (EOTHO) programme. I will include some background detail, then illustrate
some praise of the EOTHO, including the increasing in demand for food services and impacts on
employment. I will then explore some criticisms of the literature, including the scheme resulting
in some COVID-19 cases that resulted in some economic damage. Before summarising the
literature review, I will explore an interesting point made by the literature; that rainfall had a
significant impact in where the EOTHO scheme was successful in helping out small businesses.
The COVID -19 outbreak, which was first recorded in China (Lau et al., 2020), spread swiftly to
the entire globe, resulting in unpreparedness to many states. Moreover, it sternly obstructed
economic activities, particularly the hospitality area was the most hit as attempts were
formulated to curb the spread. Almost all governments and relevant urgencies sort solutions to
mitigate its spread by adopting containment measures. For instance, the government of the UK
formulated a scheme that could see its citizens cope favorably with the new normal. The 'Eat Out
to Help Out' project was intended to motivate citizens to eat out in cafes in the wake of the first
2020 COVID 19 outbreak in the UK (Francis-Devine, Powell and Foley, 2021), among other
countries (McGowan, 2020). However, there were no restrictions on how it could be described
for each distinct. The latest finding confirmed that nearly a hundred million covers (individual
meal claims) were demanded within the four weeks the plan was rolled (Fetzer, 2020), reflecting
19 containment measures such as lockdowns (Unsworth et al., 2020). This program seemed to
have worked from the onset; restaurants recorded a substantial increase in the number of visits of
between 10 and 200 % compared to the succeeding years (Fetzer, 2020). The two indicators, job
posts, and footfalls impacted demand for food services. The data used in Hearne’s study (2020),
which uses data from the public domain, as well as data from the databases of businesses that
took part in the study. The data provided for the number of partakers who participated in the
forum against the number of days in August can be interpreted as Figure 1 below.
(in thousands)
3-August 56
14-August 60
23- August 63
31- August 64
Series1
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
Days in the month of August
Figure 1: Showing the progress of the total number of food creations registered in EOTHO (Hearne, 2020).
From Figure 1, it can be deduced that there were fifty-six thousand participants by the third day
of August in this study alone, the time when the discount was first available to customers, which
consistently increased to sixty-four thousand by the end of the first week (Figure 1).
The impact of EOTHO on job creation in the foodservice section and food business was
commented on. Fetzer (2020) confirms that some companies started enlisting as they looked
forward to an increased demand due to the program even when the impact seemed insignificant.
The plan gradually corresponded suggestively from the available statistics, indicating that
EOTHO continued to have a positive slope on the recruitment for weeks before the program
ended in late September. However, after that, the program becomes insignificant in terms of
Furthermore, using the quasi-experimental method and timely pointers, the assessment of the
EOTHO scheme on its economic impact and the relation on the works on labor market
influences the financial inducements which in turn impacts consumption (Iacobucci, 2020).
Essentially, because the restaurant servers are receiving pay for longer hours due to the scheme,
the workforce will be motivated to spend money due to the longer hours of pay. Jobs positions in
the service and food preparation trade increased by half, increasing from 7% to 14% as per
2.3 Criticisms
The scheme was criticized in the literature due to inadequate preparedness, rainfall, COVID
cases, and changes in customer behaviour. Places with significant take-up recorded a rise in new
COVID 19 cases within the initial stages of the programme. This is a point much of the literature
focuses on. As stated in Fetzer (2020, p. ??), “The empirical estimates suggest that the EOHO
scheme may be responsible for around 8 to 17% of all new detected COVID19 clusters emerging
during August and into early September in the UK”. It was observed that a later rise in cases
would potentially deter customers and minimize the effectiveness of the scheme. Moreover,
Fetzer raises the question that if the scheme itself caused a spike of cases, which would cause a
shift in consumer behaviour that would lead to economic damage. He emphasizes that “ensuing
economic damage this generates suggests that the EOHO scheme may have indirect economic-
and public health costs that vastly outstrip its short-term economic benefits” (Fetzer, 2020).
Essentially, the economic benefit would not even be a clear benefit of the scheme as it may cause
It is repeatedly pointed out in the literature that there was a connection between rainfall, and how
many customers were recorded, as well as COVID-19 cases (Sil and Kumar, 2020). In times of
heavy rainfall, there would be fewer covers (meals ordered) in lunch and dinner. There would
also be fewer COVID-19 cases subsequently (Sil and Kumar, 2020; Fetzer, 2020; Blakely,
2020).
To validate the underlying assembly between 'Eat Out to Help Out' and the impact on the general
contaminations in places of increased uptake, Fetzer considered some crucial and practical
variables like rough flexibility data and rainfall data from Google's Community Mobility Reports
(Handscomb, 2020). His findings reveal that sophisticated rainfall around and within lunch and
dinners hours during the scheme’s initial stages recorded a substantive drop and lowers the new
fatality rate associated with other areas with favorable climatic conditions. However, the rainfall
had a relatively insignificant effect on the lunch and dinner hours in certain locations.
In discussing the outcome of the program on recreation and footfall in retail, the examination
focuses on the extent to which the plan has amplified the number of visiting different formations
in this group. For instance, when examining the footfall, which includes the fixed effects and
allows the understanding of the general impact of the EOTHO plan on the results variable within
a given period. There is proof of a 95% confidence level in this correlation. This ratio confirms
that even before the available data was not significantly viable, implying no convincing evidence
of divergent trends before the scheme's commencement. Therefore, the details provided are
dependent and justifiable (Avari et al., 2020) claim that footfall increased from the program's
start. As the scheme approached the end, the footfall was at its climax. As the month ended, the
and improving the livelihood of low-income families through intensifying free foodstuffs, proved
to be far more cost-effective than the EOTHO demand-motivating events that inspire monetary
Investigators in qualitative research should ensure the integrity of the study (Fetzer, 2020). The
protocols for the interview will provide trustworthiness for the survey. For validity and
using a variety of methods that provides thorough explanations for the reader (Fetzer, 2020).
Another method that has been used previously is thematic analysis. Gonzalez et al. (2021)
illustrates how the thematic examination was used to analyze qualitative data. After the
participant of the study completes the interviews, the researcher identifies the common themes.
This approach will be through familiarizing with the data collected. The researcher transcribes
the data collected during the discussion. Transcription by wide margins will occur within 24
hours of the interview. Themes and patterns will be identified using NVivo. The articles and
practices will be determined by content analysis and sentence structure. NVivo uses a process
references about specific themes and relationships. Using the nodes is a way for the researcher to
engage in denoting and connoting. Denoting can be described as singling out relevant and
irrelevant information, whereas connoting links the indicated text with an analytical concept
(LaRossa, 2012b).
The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome broke out in South Korea in May 2015. This had
significant detrimental effects on the economy which included the closure of schools and
hospitals. The outbreak was the largest of MERS to spread outside the Middle East.
Consequently, the South Korean government settled on an economic forecast cut in that year
from 3.8% to 3.1%.The tourism sector was affected by more than 10,000 visit cancelations. In
addition to this, sales decreased by 3.4% and 16.5% for retail and departmental stores
respectively. For this reason, the South Korean Government responded with an economic
strategy of passing a stimulus package of more than $13.5 billion. This was coupled by a
decrease in interest rates by 0.25% which was provided for by the Central bank to help boost the
economy amidst the MERS outbreak (Jung et. al, 2016).The stimulus package served as an
injection of finances into the economy which increased government spending to boost
businesses. The interest rate cut increased the finances available for businesses to run in the
middle of a pandemic. This economic approach is similar to EOTHO since both served as
opportunities for adding back more finances into the economic to heighten economic stability of
business operations. The decrease in sales for these traditional stores stemmed from different
sources such as a decrease in consumer expenditure and decreased visits to the physical stores
for repeated purchases. An indication that traditional stores ought to move to an electronic
commerce platform as one of the ways of staying afloat economically even in the event of such a
pandemic. Relatively, in the global COVID-19 condition, most businesses invested in online
shops and remote hires to continue their operations and maximize on performance for
productivity
Relative to this, is the Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak that was experienced in the
United Kingdom in 2001.As a result, the FMD outbreak incurred losses for the UK agricultural
and general economy which approximated to £3.1 billion. The tourism economy in the United
Kingdom suffered losses that were approximately £2.7 to £3.2 billion. This resulted from a
significant decrease in the number of tourists. The UK government increased its expenditure into
the affected sectors to boost the economy. Inclusive of this was the compensation for slaughter,
disposal and clean-up costs that were incurred by the government to boost the agricultural sector
hence reducing the weight of incurred loses. However, this decreased government expenditure
in the productive sector. Revenue that was collected from the tourism sector operation at that
time was injected into other sectors of the economy to augment the general economy of the
country. This approach also uplifted the economy to ease the general consequences of the Foot
and Mouth Disease which approximated a 0.2% decrease in the country’s Gross Domestic
increased agricultural sector savings hence more to invest. With this, the government help meet
the costs of the FMD that would have been an economic burden to the agricultural industry. This
intervention harbored an expected estimated loss of £ 355 million, a significant 20% estimated
2.7 Summary
Deductively, the economic impact of the COVID-19 contagion and the successive containment
measures acted unevenly across and around sections. The standard directly and severely
influenced firms that depend largely on social interactions and footfall. For instance, the
foodservice industry was partly affected but plans to restore and ensure food security, and the
food industry benefited from the EOTHO. The EOTHO plan was good on paper to protect and
regain customer assurance for visiting sites by supporting the cost of getting food for the first
three days of August. The plan increased the regeneration and retail class from the analysis,
where the concentration was on the discounted days. However, the program failed to inspire
people to seek other alternative and basic services even after the discount.
Moreover, the scheme increased the number of jobs dispatched on the food preparation and
outside catering services. However, the challenge in the job formation provides limited data, thus
made it difficult to assess the level of growth in terms of job creation and persistence even after
the program.
References
Blakely, R., (2020). Eat Out to Help Out increased coronavirus infection rates, study finds.
Brinkerhoff, R., 2003. The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not.
Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Clarke, E., Ellis, D. and Brennan, A. (2020). Everything you need to know about the Eat Out to
Help Out scheme. [online] www.standard.co.uk. Available at:
https://www.standard.co.uk/reveller/restaurants/eat-out-to-help-out-scheme-date-about-
a4514816.html [Accessed 18 Aug. 2021].
Dawsey, J. (2020). The inside story of how Trump’s denial, mismanagement and magical
thinking led to the pandemic’s dark winter. [online] Washington Post. Available at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/trump-covid-pandemic-dark-winter/
drove new COVID-19 infections up by between 8 and 17%, new research finds. [online]
Available at:https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/news/30-10-20-
eat_out_to_help_out_scheme_drove_new_covid_19_infections_up_by_between_8_and_17_new
Fetzer, T., 2020. Subsidizing the Spread of Covid19: Evidence from the UK's Eat-out To-help-
Francis-Devine, B., Powell, A. and Foley, N., 2021. House of Commons Library briefing paper:
Gonzalez Pampillon, N., Nunez Chaim, G. and Ziegler, K., 2021. Eat Out to Help Out only had a
Gourinchas, P.O., 2020. Flattening the pandemic and recession curves. Mitigating the COVID
GOV.UK (2020). Eat Out to Help Out statistics commentary. [online] GOV.UK. Available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/eat-out-to-help-out-statistics/eat-out-to-help-out-
statistics-commentary [Accessed 18 Aug. 2021].
Handscomb, K., 2020. The impacts of the government’s coronavirus income support schemes
Holdsworth, M. and Haslam, C., 1998. A review of point‐of‐choice nutrition labeling schemes in
the workplace, public eating places, and universities. Journal of Human Nutrition and
Dietetics, 11(5), pp.423-445.
Hughes, O. (2021). Eat Out to Help Out had “limited effect” on hospitality sector says London
School of Economics report. [online] Business Live. Available at: https://www.business-
live.co.uk/retail-consumer/eat-out-help-out-limited-19815434 [Accessed 18 Aug. 2021].
Hutton, Georgina (26 August 2020). Eat Out to Help Out Scheme (PDF). House of Commons
Library (Report). UK Parliament. CBP 8978. Retrieved 25 September 2020.
Jung, H., Park, M., Hong, K., & Hyun, E. (2016). The impact of an epidemic outbreak on consumer
expenditures: An empirical assessment for MERS Korea. Sustainability, 8(5), 454.
Iacobucci, G., 2020. Covid-19: UK lockdown is "crucial" to saving lives, say, doctors and
scientists.
Lau, H., Khosrawipour, V., Kocbach, P., Mikolajczyk, A., Schubert, J., Bania, J. and
Khosrawipour, T., 2020. The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-
McGowan, M., 2020. NSW government considers restaurant and cafe vouchers to boost Covid-
Phillips, A. (2020). Coronavirus: Revealed - the impact Eat Out to Help Out had on infection
Sil, A. and Kumar, V.N. (2020). Does weather affect the growth rate of COVID-19, a study to
comprehend transmission dynamics on human health. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience,
1(1), pp.3–11.
Tsioulakis, I., 2020. How Greek musicians weathered an economic crisis could help UK
Unsworth, S., Andres, P., Cecchinato, G., Mealy, P., Taylor, C., and Valero, A., 2020. Jobs for a
strong and sustainable recovery from Covid-19. Centre for Economic Performance, London